Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 06/11/2017 01:16 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface.

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread John R Pierce
On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 06/10/2017 02:54 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 09/06/17 21:00, Andrew Holway wrote: I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread Robert Moskowitz
I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD card or a slow USB drive? See my

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Hughes, Had experimental my gst-test installed ~ gstreamer 1.6.4 and there seems to be a hardware video playback function. By the wild gstreamer mix of course not stable. Have only proven that the compilate for intel ok on my laptop. Sincerely Andy Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/10/2017 08:47 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hallo Hughes, > > thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. > > Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not > served in the opensource. > That's why I'm experimenting with the latest

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hallo Hughes, thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not served in the opensource. That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. My laptop has done the

Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with > new kernel. > > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch

[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)

2017-06-10 Thread Andreas Benzler
Hello Everyone, Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with new kernel. linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch Sincerely Andy

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

2017-06-10 Thread Fabian Arrotin
On 09/06/17 21:00, Andrew Holway wrote: > I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that > can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. > > OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty friend onto such a > device :) I would