On 10/05/2019 06:46, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
Good afternoon from Singapore,
When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, 2019-05-10 at 05:46 +, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming
wrote:
> Good afternoon from Singapore,
>
>
> When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> -BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
>
> The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
>
> [The New York Times] Microwave
Good afternoon from Singapore,
When will CentOS 8.0 be released?
Thank you.
-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-
The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):
[The New York Times] Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills of
U.S. Embassy Workers
Link:
it's used for running HPCs a lot
On 5/9/19 10:40 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
packages?
Regards,
Simon
No, Red Hat have not yet released any
> On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>>> The price we pay.. :)
>>
>> Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox
>> packages?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Simon
>>
>
> No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
> a priority for them.
Which
El Miércoles 08/05/2019 a las 05:42, Gary Stainburn escribió:
> I'm going to rebuild my workstation because maintaining it is now a
> nightmare after using "recommended" repo's that now conflict with each
> other. Every time I do a yum update I it fails with conflicts.
>
> I'm looking for new
use yum plugin protectbase to protect main centos repositories and then you
can use whatever other repos you want, without worrying they will overwrite
"base" centos packages - this should resolve your problem
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Gary Stainburn
wrote:
> I'm going to rebuild my
On 09/05/2019 09:09, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
Regards,
Simon
No, Red Hat have not yet released any updates for Firefox. I doubt it's
a priority for them.
On 5/9/19 11:03 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote:
>
>> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
>>
>> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 11:56, Warren Young wrote:
> On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
>
> That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far
> less work to get out than a point-zero.
>
>
On May 9, 2019, at 9:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> As an initial goal, we would love to have a release in a month ..
That’s about the average time for 7.x releases, which I assume are far less
work to get out than a point-zero.
Is this goal realistic?
I’d consider any ship date before
Once upon a time, Johnny Hughes said:
> We obviously can not yet make an educated guess on WHEN this process
> might or might not be completed .. or WHEN the new version will be
> available.
So, next Tuesday then? :)
Thanks for the update, and all the hard work!
--
Chris Adams
On 5/7/19 9:07 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> This morning Red Hat announced the general availability of Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 8.
>
> More details at
> https://www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/red-hat-enterprise-linux-8-every-enterprise-every-cloud-every-workload?sc_cid=701f201OIIOAA4
>
On 5/8/19 11:23 AM, mark wrote:
> Hi, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote:
>>>
>>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as
>>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of
>>> servers whether gssproxy keeps
On 5/8/19 8:42 AM, mark wrote:
> Hi, Johnny,
>
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 5/2/19 9:15 AM, mark wrote:
>>>
>>> Especially Johnny - could you possibly push this fix through as soon as
>>> upstream puts it out? It's a real issue for us - we've had a number of
>>> servers whether gssproxy keeps
Hi,
As everybody is probably aware now, RHEL 8.0 was released earlier this
week .
Instead of publishing multiple blog posts here and then point to updated
content, we decided this time to have a dedicated wiki page that can be
used to track our current status :
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 17:48, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
>
> On 2019-05-08 15:05, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:48, Valeri Galtsev
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2019-05-08 12:28, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 13:24, mark wrote:
> >>
>
>
No, it's the "price" we "pay" for using EL.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Simon Matter"
> To: "Nux!"
> Cc: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Thursday, 9 May, 2019 09:09:13
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox esr repackage
> The price we pay.. :)
Do you say that paying RH customers already received new firefox packages?
Regards,
Simon
>
> BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and
> will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround
> in fact until RH catches
The price we pay.. :)
BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will
self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact
until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
--
Sent from the Delta
20 matches
Mail list logo
