Am 26.07.23 um 00:52 schrieb Gordon Messmer:
On 2023-07-25 12:18, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer said:
If Red Hat were doing development in RHEL minor releases that wasn't
published elsewhere, I would probably have a different view of
thing, but they aren't. There's
On 2023-07-25 12:18, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer said:
If Red Hat were doing development in RHEL minor releases that wasn't
published elsewhere, I would probably have a different view of
thing, but they aren't. There's nothing there that isn't published
elsewhere.
Once upon a time, Gordon Messmer said:
> If Red Hat were doing development in RHEL minor releases that wasn't
> published elsewhere, I would probably have a different view of
> thing, but they aren't. There's nothing there that isn't published
> elsewhere.
This will not be the case for the
On 2023-07-25 09:19, Gordon Messmer wrote:
5. Red Hat's policy change contradicts the GPL's spirit.
As you acknowledge, that's a subjective question. I would say "no."
Seriously? You are the only person here who thinks that.
After reading an unrelated thread, I want to make an
On 2023-07-25 04:25, Phil Perry wrote:
Nonsense. For years Red Hat freely published the complete RHEL SRPMs
to their public ftp server.
No, they didn't. Take a look at the planning guide diagrams, here:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/updates/errata
A RHEL major release isn't a
I was trying to stay out of this thread, but the reply was complete and
utter nonsense...
On 25/07/2023 01:24, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 2023-07-24 13:47, frank saporito wrote:
Let me know if you disagree with any of these statements:
1. Red Hat is no longer posting source code to
On 21.07.2023 09:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote:
Because the general rule seems to be
Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service
What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely 'unaffordable'
service.
this is ok, but the worse thing is: students and teachers get
+1
I now have only two servers left on CentOS - both on 7, as 8 and 9 and
the whole stream thing just never passed my confidence tests. All my new
machines since stream was enabled have been on Ubuntu LTS. It has been a
learning curve, a little more work to deal with certain updates and the
>
>> 5. Red Hat's policy change contradicts the GPL's spirit.
>
>
> As you acknowledge, that's a subjective question. I would say "no."
>
> I think the entire history of the free-as-in-speech vs free-as-in-beer
> clarification is proof that we wanted to ensure the right to improve
> software if
9 matches
Mail list logo
