Re: [CentOS] wich filesystem to store 250E6 small files in same or hashed dire

2011-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I haven't tried it but could you possibly use a database to hold all those files instead? At less than 4K per row, performance from an indexed database might be faster. On 3/12/11, Alain Spineux aspin...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I need to store about 250.000.000 files. Files are less than 4k. On

Re: [CentOS] CentOS MD RAID 1 on Openfiler iSCSI

2011-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 3/2/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: I'm very interested to find out what happened with this project and what you ended up doing? There were delays after changes after delays for that project that was meant to run on the VM setup. Spent more time hacking temporary solutions to their

[CentOS] What iSCSI is used in Centos 5 and RHEL6?

2011-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I was looking up on iSCSI in preparation and became aware that there are different iSCSI software/drivers/whatever-is-the-correct-term available. e.g. IET http://iscsitarget.sourceforge.net/ SCST http://scst.sourceforge.net/ STGT http://stgt.berlios.de/ LIO http://linux-iscsi.org/ Based on

Re: [CentOS] What iSCSI is used in Centos 5 and RHEL6?

2011-03-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Thanks for the confirmation and the note about LIO On 3/13/11, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 02:41:07AM +0800, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: I was looking up on iSCSI in preparation and became aware that there are different iSCSI software/drivers/whatever

[CentOS] mdraid on top of mdraid

2011-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of mdraid? specifically say mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath. e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different physical network switches then use multipath to create md block devices then use mdraid on

[CentOS] mdraid on top of mdraid

2011-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Is it possible or will there be any problems with using mdraid on top of mdraid? specifically say mdraid 1/5 on top of mdraid multipath. e.g. 4 storage machines exporting iSCSI targets via two different physical network switches then use multipath to create md block devices then use mdraid on

Re: [CentOS] mdraid on top of mdraid

2011-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Since your exporting the storage as iSCSI, the host machine will see it as a raw disk, irrespective of how it's setup on the exported server. So, yes, you can do this. Sorry for my ambiguity, I meant that mdadm would be on the host machine. e.g. Using just a 2 node, raid 1 situation Storage 1

Re: [CentOS] mdraid on top of mdraid

2011-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
You'll have really poor performance if you raid over iscsi... I've spent more time thinking about this and reading over my research.The crux here seems to be that while RAID does impose additional write IOPS costs, it may be more than offset by the read advantage. According to my own notes

Re: [CentOS] mdraid on top of mdraid

2011-03-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Searching more on this, the consensus seems to be that RAID 1/10 on iSCSI is quite okay and may provide read performance increase but RAID 5's iops penalty will probably be a killer. if you can use 2 dedicated ethernet adapters to 2 iSCSI servers for this mirror, its probably a win. That

Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???

2011-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 3/29/11, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: we have several servers on same rack and servers are all inside firewall. Centos version from 4.X to 5.X. sometime the connection are very slow (compare to servers on other racks also inside firewall). we discuss with network engineer he ask

Re: [CentOS] centos server network speed check???

2011-03-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 3/29/11, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote: I don't think it is cable problem. The reason are: 1. it happen every 3 to 4 weeks once. 2. problem last 4 to 5 hours then back to normal. 3. not one server has this problem, several servers on that rack all have problem at same time. Did

Re: [CentOS] Feeding CentOS build results to twitter (was: Centos 6 Update?)

2011-04-06 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
This was done on a trailling basis for a couple side arch's builders by me and another. It turns out to be a lot of chatter and 'noise', and not much 'signal' Although it might not be of any real use in indicating when a version would be ready, I think it helps a lot psychologically when

Re: [CentOS] Feeding CentOS build results to twitter

2011-04-06 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/6/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 04/05/11 11:32 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: A lot of the anxiety seems to be about the silence about any kind of progress. there's a fair amount of traffic on centos-devel archives here, http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/8/11, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: If you do not like how your hairdresser does you hair you will go to other one. If you do not like the taste of bread you are buying, you will go and by from other bakery. I have never been insulted or belittled by my hairdresser as we

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/8/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:58 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote: and so we should tell people: We will ship it when it is done; please come back then Got it. Great idea Isn't that what you've beeb telling people this

Re: [CentOS] GUI Software Raid Monitor Software

2011-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/12/11, jvalido...@juanyjosefina.com jvalido...@juanyjosefina.com wrote: For me mdadm is fine but if I set a server for a friend, relative or client I want to be notified by email if something goes wrong, I mostly (99.5%) work on windows so I don't really know what's out there for Linux. I

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/12/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 04/11/11 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: DO NOT TOP POST. sadly, gmail/googlemail is very hostile to proper quoting practices. it hides quoted text, while leaving the whole previous message appended, without any form of quoting. The

[CentOS] Choosing network interface to send traffic through

2011-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I've got a server that initially was connected to a static WAN connection via eth0. Now I've added a second NIC eth1 connected to a local network switch with the intention of using it as a backup remote access connection via a dynamic ADSL connection. The problem now is getting the IP address of

Re: [CentOS] Vitualization and Partitioning

2011-09-11 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Hi, When I do the install, do I or should I setup a separate partition for guest That would be better from a performance point of view OS's? From the redhat docs, it looks like the guest OS's reside at /var/lib/libvirt/images/. This should be using files as disk files, which I did and found

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/15/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: I have written 20+ complete systems using these and found them to be fast and very effective. Everyone who has seen my HTML, CSS, PHP, MySQL systems has been favourably impressed (me too!). MySQL is a fast database system. Never ever used a

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/15/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: Next you'll be saying you don't use triggers and constraints either. Not consciously. Never heard of them. You should take a look at constraints, they are good for ensuring certain types of data integrity. For example, it would make the

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I've done a lot of what we used to call embedded SQL, and when I did do a join, it was *not* an explicit join. I've also used right or left once? twice? ever? But then, I carefully design and code my queries. So it's more like a series of

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: You *need* both. Take too long, and the user will go somewhere else. Of course :D I remember hearing about another division, a bunch of years ago, when I worked at the Scummy Mortgage Co. (name available upon request, offline), where the

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: Data is generally stored once. However because of legal requirements a customer's invoicing name and address and delivery address will be copied from the customer file and permanently stored in an invoice's header record. This means when

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: Before anyone can add data for customer 9865, the existing customer record is displayed on the screen. This helps the user to be sure he/she has got the correct customer. A customer not found message means the record does not exist.

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-16 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: C1 c1ref c1customer (code) c1quantity (integers only) c1price (in cents) c1discount (2 decimal places held as integers) c1catalogue (code) c1date

Re: [CentOS] Was: Re: Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7, is, programming with style

2011-09-17 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/16/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Remember, even among those who studied, a) half of them were in the bottom of their class, and b) too many are True Believers in the latest programming (not the P word!) paradigm; y'know, recursion is the answer to *everything*, or OO,

Re: [CentOS] centos product specification

2011-09-17 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/17/11, Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net wrote: and it is not black color: #464646; While the exact optimal shade is arguable (a tad too light IMO), past ergonomics studies indicate that extreme contrast such as #00 on #ff is more tiring to read so can't really fault the

Re: [CentOS] Installation of 6.0

2011-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/21/11, Al Sparks data...@yahoo.com wrote: Some observations. When I installed 6.0 (base install), the installation interface did not guide me through a network configuration. I do static IP addresses, not DHCP. IIRC, it's in this small unobstrusive rectangular box that says Setup

Re: [CentOS] Problems with Intel Ethernet and module e1000e

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/23/11, Volker Poplawski vol...@openbios.org wrote: Hi all, I'm facing a serious problem with the e100e kernel module for Intel 82574L gigabit nics on Centos 6. The device eth0 suddenly stops working i.e. no more networking. When I do ifconfig from console I get . . . Bringing down the

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: I can tell you that we are building 6.x stuff for QA now and have been for several weeks. I'm not personally unhappy with the devs over the situation since I pretty much didn't plan on any critical C6 installations until 6.1 comes out. So with

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: I don't think you understand. The process is iterative; if QA fails it's all the way back up to building it again. A package may have existed three weeks ago in terms of being built; if that package had passed binary testing and QA it would have

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Yes, I suck at communication. Just ask my 1st wife. Does that mean that the whole dev team are just going to chalk it up to poor communications, shrug and not do anything about the communication channel, despite the existence of the qaweb and

Re: [CentOS] 6.1 Release

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, TE Dukes tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: OK, So how can we help getting CentOS 6.1 released? This is a Community project. I'm not a programmer, IT person but I do ask a lot of help from this list. What do we need to do or how can the 'average person' help? Can you send us some

Re: [CentOS] kickstart: gfx vs. txt mode

2011-09-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/24/11, Eric Sisolak haldir.j...@gmail.com wrote: This is usually caused by not having enough RAM. I think for el5 you need either 512 or 768MB and for el6 it is more like 1GB (IIRC). Should be 768MB for EL6 based on my recent EL6 VM installation. It just seem rather silly that the

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

2011-09-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/27/11, Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: When booting a non-working system, it boots straight up to the boot prompt (runlevel 3) without issue, and everything works fine. When the machine sits idle for a period of time (ranging from 15 minutes or so and up) the HDD becomes

Re: [CentOS] RTL8111/8168B always 100mbps

2011-09-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/27/11, Muhammad Panji sumodi...@gmail.com wrote: Dear All, I have an onboard Realtek RTL8111/8168B NIC. from lspci -vv : 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 02) It is detected, but why the speed is

Re: [CentOS] Hard I/O lockup with EL6

2011-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 9/27/11, Benjamin Smith li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: I wish you the best of luck! Fortunately (or unfortunately depending on how one looks at it), mine appears to be just bad sectors developing on one of the newest drive I added to the machine as part of a mdadm RAID 1 array. After I

Re: [CentOS] Choosing a CentOS version

2011-10-04 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 10/4/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Note that the above is true of every single o/s: for example, I think Windows XP is approaching EoL, while Internet Exploder 6 is *past* that (and there was much rejoicing). IIRC WinXP is already EoL'd for general end users but still a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 is a bear

2011-10-08 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 10/8/11, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote: Gotta say, centos has been tough to install and get working. The anaconda installer makes large drive setups horridly tedious (especially if reinstalling a lot). I usually try to speed reinstall up by using small / and not reformating /home.

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 10/13/11, whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Eth0 is the onboard device, using an updated VIA Velocity driver (velocityget 1.42 instead of default via-velocity): 05:00.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6120/VT6121/VT6122 Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev 82) Eth1 is a

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.7 Ethernet bonding - order of enslavement matters?

2011-10-21 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 10/19/11, whitivery co55-s...@dea.spamcon.org wrote: Thank you for the reply, but I don't think that this is the issue. Otherwise bonding failover wouldn't work at all. When enslaved in order eth1 eth0, bonding and link detection work properly - with eth0 set as primary, I pull the eth0

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/12/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: But, our RAID10 is setup as a stripe of mirrors, i.e. sda1 sdb1 - md0, sdc1 + sdd1 -md1, then sde1 + sdf1 -md2, and finally md0 + md1 + md2 are stripped. The advantage of this is that we can add more disks to the whole RAID set with no downtime

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Brandon Ooi brand...@gmail.com wrote: centos 5 can expand raid 0/1/5. just not 6. 10 is just layered 0/1 so you can expand it. centos 6 will be able to expand raid6 as it was a feature in 2.6.20 or something. This is where I'm getting confused. I had been reading up on mdadm,

Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. Thanks for the confirmation. Could you please outline the general steps to expand an existing RAID 10 with another RAID 1 device? I'm trying to test this out but unfortunately being the noob that I am,

[CentOS] Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/13/11, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote: to expand the array :) I haven't had problems doing it this way yet. I finally figured out my mistake creating the raid devices and got a working RAID 0 on two RAID 1 arrays. But I wasn't able to add another RAID 1 component to the array with the

Re: [CentOS] How can a company help, officially?

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/14/11, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote on 04/13/2011 12:55 PM: CentOS is ... right now ... deployed on 29% of web servers on the Internet that use Linux. That 28.9% is down from the high of 33.5% in Oct. 2010 or a 13.8% decrease.

Re: [CentOS] Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-13 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/14/11, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: You can't expand a mdraid raid0. I believe you can expand a mdraid raid10,5,6, but not raid0. That was what I thought previously when looking into this and weighing the pros/cons of using RAID 10 vs RAID 5. But earlier this week, from the

Re: [CentOS] Expanding RAID 10 array, WAS: 40TB File System Recommendations

2011-04-14 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/14/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: since this is the centos list, I really didn't want to suggest this, but if I was building a 20 or 40TB or whatever storage server, I do believe I'd be strongly consider using Solaris, or one of its variants like OpenIndiana, with ZFS. ZFS

Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?

2011-04-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/21/11, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: The only sentiment picked up on was that of a loud, minuscule and irrelevant fraction of the user base from this and the -devel mailing lists. He went with the loudest group of whiners he could find. Perhaps only a small handful keep

[CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-25 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm having problems trying to install CentOS as a KVM guest despite following the wikis and howtos. The problem is that most of the instructions skip the part that happens after virt-install... It seems that something blindingly obvious happens if nothing goes wrong and most instructions

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote: On 26.4.2011 0.47, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: I'm having problems trying to install CentOS as a KVM guest despite following the wikis and howtos. I succeeded with this howto: http://sysadminman.net/blog/2011/kvm-virtualization-text-centos-guest-install-2098

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
is the problem, I decided to mount it to check, since it looked OK. I tried another install using the mount point and I no longer have a blank console :) So the key is to mount ISO before using as installation source. On 4/26/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for both

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Unfortunately, things still don't work. rant It's just ridiculous that the installer under KVM does not detect the cdrom drive it was booted from. Trying to do a net-install doesn't work, maybe I messed up the networking even though br0 and eth0 is working on the host. Nevermind, let's install

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-27 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote: I understand you so well, I have been so frustrated too with virt-install. Virt-manager is probably an easier way to install, but text-based virt-install is very cranky (my experience). Maybe the devs concentrate on the GUI side. Hope not.

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote: I tried it too, didn't work. Try virt-install without creating the image first. Virt-install will create the image (type raw) on the go. If you want qcow2, you can convert the image later. Qcow2 has some special features but is slower than

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Simon Grinberg si...@redhat.com wrote: What version of VMWare are you using? Currently, I'm not using VMWare yet on this new server as I really do hope to be able to use an unified solution. But so far, it's just one brickwall after another. I've given myself until this weekend to

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Jussi Hirvi listmem...@greenspot.fi wrote: For me creating the images does not take any noticeable time. Only when the installer formats the disk to ext3 (or others), it will take some time. Probably your syntax does not work. Try the syntax in my example, like --disk

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote: So why don't you use virt-manager? The original intention was to run the host without any graphical desktop or anything not necessary to host the guests. That was based on reading and such which recommends not having anything beyond the necessary

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote: Qemu is not intended to be used directly by end user. It is too complex as you already found out. VMware don't even give you access to such low parts of virt stack. You should use libvirt or virt-manager instead. Especially if you are concerned

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: You don't have to run an entire X desktop on the server to use virt-manager there. If you have a graphical linux workstation on the same network (x can be slow across a WAN, so I would only do it locally), you can just do this from the

[CentOS] How to switching terminal/console to /dev/pts/X while in SSH?

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Is there a way to switch the display/console while connected while SSH to another display e.g /dev/pts/X ? The purpose is because qemu-kvm diverts the char device output to /dev/pts/X so there's no further way to view/interact with the VM. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/28/11, Gleb Natapov g...@redhat.com wrote: of virt stack. You should use libvirt or virt-manager instead. Especially if you are concerned about security. I think libvirt can start guest on headless server. If this still fails for you you need to complain to libvirt developers (not in a

[CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

2011-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
Is it possible to assign multiple IP addresses to a bridge the same way ethernet devices can? The purpose is to accept incoming traffic for multiple public IP. 1 Physical NIC - br0 (accepts incoming traffic for x.x.x.2 to x.x.x.5) Then 3 different virtual interfaces are connected to this bridge

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

2011-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote: Something seems out of order with the above; may I ask what exactly you are trying to achieve? Unless I read it all wrong you want (i.e.) x.x.x.2 on br0 and also on eth0? This cannot work. Well, I have a physical connected to the ISP modem/router

Re: [CentOS] Install CentOS as KVM guest

2011-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/29/11, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: Only problem is... networking still isn't working although brctl show on the host shows that a vnet0 had been created and attached to the bridge. Any pointers would be appreciated! Just to close off on this issue for the benefit

Re: [CentOS] Multiple IP Addresses for a bridge

2011-04-29 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/29/11, Lucian luc...@lastdot.org wrote So .2 works as main IP and .3 does not? Is your ISP doing any MAC address filtering? You may need to use a routed bridge then.. It turns out that I was barking up the wrong tree and chasing red herrings. The virtualized guest definition was off by

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-12 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/12/11, Phil Schaffner philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote: Apparently they did admit and it does change: https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=31347forum=53 Late breaking news: http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/67 http://qaweb.dev.centos.org/qa/node/69 This is

Re: [CentOS] A Group is Its Own Worst Enemy (was: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux))

2011-05-18 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: If we *really* need a moderator, here's an option: soc.religion.paganism has a robomoderator; on topic posts get autoapproved, obviously off-topic get bounced, and if there's any question, they get randomly bounced to a configurable number

Re: [CentOS] A Group is Its Own Worst Enemy (was: EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux))

2011-05-18 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/19/11, m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: As already said, this sounds really complicated. Coming from an IRC and vBB admin background, I'll suggest moderation using the reactive approach instead of a automated process. Not really. The perl script was written, um, around 1993 or

Re: [CentOS] EL 6 rollout strategies? (Scientific Linux)

2011-05-18 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/19/11, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Can we do a better job at some things, sure. But trust me, CentOS is going nowhere. I think you might mean CentOS is not going away since going nowhere fast or slow is bad news for those waiting for the next version ;)

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition

2011-05-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/22/11, yonatan pingle yonatan.pin...@gmail.com wrote: the only way to go with SSD is RAID due to these reasons. it's unlikely that two disks will die at the same time, so it's possible to use and enjoy them , but don't forget to have a fresh backup and a raid array. ( that should be done

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition

2011-05-25 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/24/11, Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote: On 05/24/2011 08:25 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: I know you get some USB type SSD's, but people still refer to them as SSD drives, and not USB drives The correct way to describe it is 'a SSD drive *with a USB interface*' or 'a SSD drive *with a

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, Kevin K kevi...@fidnet.com wrote: Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what is used in hard drive replacement units. No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb drives are not really any slower by nature/design. This is

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote: Spinning disks seem an awful lot like victorian technology taken too far. In the long term, what's *not* to like about the idea of fully solid state storage? Personally, I'm averse to using SSD with any important long term data is the

Re: [CentOS] SSD for Centos SWAP /tmp /var/ partition

2011-05-26 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/26/11, Simon Matter simon.mat...@invoca.ch wrote: On 5/26/11, Kevin K kevi...@fidnet.com wrote: Though thumb drives are flash, they tend to use a slower flash than what is used in hard drive replacement units. No actual industry facts for this, but I think the Flash used in thumb

Re: [CentOS] OT: Why VM?

2011-05-28 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 5/28/11, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote: 4. Gain operational flexibility: Respond to market changes with dynamic resource management, faster server provisioning and improved desktop and application deployment. I have no idea how deploying VMs to a company's desktop

[CentOS] High system load but low cpu usage

2011-06-08 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm trying to figure out what's causing an average system load of 3+ to 5+ on an Intel quad core. The server has with 2 KVM guests (assigned 1 core and 2 cores) that's lightly loaded (0.1~0.4) each. Both guest/host are running 64bit CentOS 5.6 Originally I suspected maybe it's i/o but on

Re: [CentOS] Installing rather than changing

2011-06-08 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
You'll probably be able to use rsync to copy everything from your server first before the re-install. Something like rsync -avcz --partial --progress --rsh=ssh your_login@your_server.com:/home/path_to_folder/* /home/path_to_local_folder Possibly also need to copy the config files for whatever

Re: [CentOS] Paypal phishing warning

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/9/11, MR ZenWiz mrzen...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for the cross-post, and off-topic at that, but: This morning I received a very authentic looking email from info.paypal.com, claiming that Paypal wanted me to update my browser. (Really.) It had my name in it and all the right graphics

[CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm trying to resolve an I/O problem on a CentOS 5.6 server. The process basically scans through Maildirs, checking for space usage and quota. Because there are hundred odd user folders and several 10s of thousands of small files, this sends the I/O wait % way high. The server hits a very high

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/9/11, Mathias Burén mathias.bu...@gmail.com wrote: The first thing that comes to my mind: Have you tried another IO scheduler? and the first thing that came to this noob's mind was: Wait, you mean there's actually more than one? AND I get to choose? I'll probably be experimenting with

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/9/11, Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com wrote: You should look at running your process using 'ionice -c3 program'. That way it won't starve everything else for I/O cycles. Also, you may want to experiment with using the 'deadline' elevator instead of the default 'cfq' (see

Re: [CentOS] High system load but low cpu usage

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/9/11, Steven Tardy s...@its.msstate.edu wrote: top Cpu(s) line is averaged for all cpus/cores. to display individual cpus/cores press: 1 you'll likely see one cpu/core being pegged with iowait. to identify the offending process within top press: fjenter to display the P

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/10/11, Markus Falb markus.f...@fasel.at wrote: Yes, but before doing this be sure that your Software does not need atime. For a brief moment, I had that sinking Oh No... why didn't I see this earlier feeling especially since I've already remounted the filesystem with noatime. Fortunately,

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/10/11, Steven Tardy s...@its.msstate.edu wrote: did you set noatime on the host filesystem and/or the VM filesystem? i would think noatime on the VM would provide more benefit than on the host... shrug. now my brain hurts. gee thanks. (: I was trying it on the host first, thinking that

Re: [CentOS] ultrasecure sshd server

2011-06-09 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/10/11, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: This is not same case, I need publickey and normal password authentication. not password protected privatekey. How about using the ForceCommand described here https://calomel.org/openssh.html to add a second layer of authentication. In his

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-10 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/10/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: atime and mtime are updated for *every* read and write operation, not for the open() of the file. Ok. In any case, the combination of atime and ionice on the cronjob seems to have helped, no locked up in the past 24 hours. But it is a Saturday

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/16/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: I read somewhere recently that people were complaining abut LVM overhead and poor performance, but I've never seen any evidence of it. Was there something that made you think that LVM had significant overhead? Looking at some very sparse

Re: [CentOS] Odd issue with custom udev rule at boot

2011-06-15 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/14/11, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: The rules are parsed, applied and the permissions are then correct but why is it not doing so at boot? The file in questions I've called /etc/udev/rules.d/49-udev-override.rules and it contains KERNEL==tty[A-Z]*,NAME=%k,

Re: [CentOS] Possible to use multiple disk to bypass I/O wait?

2011-06-16 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/16/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: I think you were misinformed, or misled. That wouldn't be new for me as far as system administration is concerned :D LVM should not present any noticeable overhead on the host. Using raw files to back VMs presents a significant overhead to

Re: [CentOS] OT: high static in server room

2011-06-16 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/16/11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: actually, its 40-60%, I believe. and you should have a humidifier as part of your A/C, since cooling air sucks the moisture out of it. I would NOT rely on a fishtank to provide any significant humidity. Well, can't be so sure the fish

Re: [CentOS] lots of disk activity keep process from responding

2011-06-20 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/20/11, Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com wrote: I have noticed that only around the 4am-4:15 time frame when the trim is happening does my other process log connection attempts but my process (forking and opening databases) is not responding in time to give data back to the connecting

[CentOS] Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?

2011-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I was trying to do some performance testing between using iSCSI on the host as a diskfile to a guest vs the VM guest using the iSCSI device directly. However, in the process of trying to establish a baseline performance figure, I started increasing the MTU settings on the PCI-express NICs with

Re: [CentOS] Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?

2011-06-23 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/24/11, Tim Nelson tnel...@rockbochs.com wrote: Realtek NICs are known to be some of the poorest interfaces available. A quality Intel or Broadcom NIC will set you back very little in terms of cost. Just replace it and be done. :) I was afraid that might be the case (already had two Intel

Re: [CentOS] Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?

2011-06-24 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/24/11, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Friday, June 24, 2011 01:20 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: First bottleneck was discovering the max MTU allowed on these is 7K instead of 9K but googling seems to indicate that the RTL8168B is only capable of 4K frames

Re: [CentOS] Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?

2011-06-24 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/24/11, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote: Try ElRepo driver and please report if that helps. I would like to know your experience with ElRepo driver. The ElRepo driver appears to work, I don't get an error when increasing the MTU but I'll need to solve another problem before I can

[CentOS] Exporting /dev/shm as NFS share?

2011-06-24 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
I'm trying to do some network transfer test using NFS. The problem is when I try to eliminate the possibility of the hard disks being the bottleneck. I am unable to export /dev/shm as a NFS share. Initially there was an error about fsid or wrong filesystem. If I use a symbolic such as /home/test

Re: [CentOS] Exporting /dev/shm as NFS share?

2011-06-24 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/24/11, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote: /dev/shm's how I would do it. Make a file on /dev/shm and the format it, mount it, export it. dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/export bs=1M count=1000 mke2fs -j /dev/shm/export mount -o loop /dev/shm/export /mnt/foo Then export /mnt/foo

Re: [CentOS] Jumbo frames problem with Realtek NICs?

2011-06-25 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 6/26/11, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote: I don't know anything specifically about those cards, but you'll see that behavior on any card unless all of the hosts on a broadcast domain are using the same MTU. You need to set all of the devices on a LAN segment, including the router,

  1   2   3   >