Dear list,
we have a relatively new Sun Storage 7310, where we connect CentOS 5.5
Servers (IBM LS21/LS41 Blades) via Brocade Switches, 4GBit FC. The Blades
boot from SAN via qla2xxx, and have no harddisks at all. We want them to
use multipathing from the very beginning, so /boot and / are
sda 8:0 [active][ready]
\_ 1:0:0:0 sde 8:64 [active][ready]
however, the system lives happily, despite the error messages.
Jens Neu
Health Services Network Administration
Phone: +49 (0) 30 68905-2412
Mail: jens@biotronik.de
Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org
Sent by: centos-boun
Alexander,
thank you very much, you're the man!
best regards from Berlin
Jens Neu
Health Services Network Administration
Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org
Sent by: centos-boun...@centos.org
05/28/2010 04:29 PM
Please respond to
CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
To
CentOS mailing
to me.
System is very up-to-date, Centos 5.5 Version below:
[r...@dev-db3 ~]# yum list device-mapper-multipath
Installed Packages
device-mapper-multipath.x86_640.4.7-34.el5_5.1installed
[r...@dev-db3 ~]# uname -r
2.6.18-194.3.1.el5
Any suggestions?
best regards from Berlin,
Jens Neu
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/technotes/tips0738.pdf clearly states Support
for RHEL 4 as well as 5, so you should have no problem with CentOS 5.5.
regards
Jens Neu
Peter Hinse l...@d0pefish.de
Sent by: centos-boun...@centos.org
06/15/2010 01:46 PM
Please respond to
CentOS mailing list centos
Hi,
Did you try to disable the mirror selection and specify one single repo?
-Jens
- Originalnachricht -
Von: Jatin Davey [jasho...@cisco.com]
Gesendet: 14.07.2010 11:03 ZE5B
An: centos@centos.org
Betreff: [CentOS] Running yum shows errors
Hi
I am getting the following errors
Dear all,
unfortunately I observe drastic drops in read- performance when I connect
LUNs 2.2T to our Centos 5.5 Servers. I suspect issues with the GUID
Partition Table, since it happens reproducibly only on the LUNs 2.2T and
goes back to normal performance when using a LUN 2T with normal,
I think ext3 is a bit slow on so big LUNS, try xfs or similar?
there is no official support for xfs in RHEL5, so that is not an option.
Besides, I'm talking about a drop of 150mb/s to ~10mb/s read performance
when cracking the 2.2T size. This is clearly not in the ext3 (or FS for
that matter)
Do you see the slow behaviour (10 MiB/s) for all of the device or only
for the
part that is 2T?
Why use a partition table at all? run dd directly against the device. If
this
is slow then you have a controller side problem.
very true, back to Go :(
Peter Kjellstrom c...@nsc.liu.se
9 matches
Mail list logo