Re: [CentOS] Network bandwidth tools. || RPM Builder

2011-01-16 Thread JohnS
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 15:16 +, Keith Roberts wrote: > I'm willing to build it for Centos 5.5 if that helps :) > > Keith Looks like another builder here? Makes 3 now? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] Troubles for an non-IT beginner

2011-01-16 Thread JohnS
On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 10:55 -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > You can ignore md5 for now - they are just for verifying that the file > you've downloaded has not been modified. You should not tell him to ignore it but tell him how to use it and what it is for. "md5sum my.iso" Validate the ISO

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-20 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 14:18 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > Giles Coochey wrote: > > [...] > > > I can't speak for HIPPA, SOX etc... but automatic locking is part of IT > > best practice. > > I can. I did a contract job a few years ago to achieve HIPPA compliance > with some pharmacy software. I

Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?

2011-01-20 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 20:13 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > > This is on software which ran as POS stuff. Yea but the catch is it is left up to YOU being responsible for what happens on that network. Very candid HIPPA states only `data at rest` does not have to be. In my state I live in I am the

Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency

2011-01-22 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 17:07 -0700, Terry Hickey wrote: It't as simple as this Terry: This is under CentOS 5 from EPEL so they may have it for CentOS4 [ethan@midnight ~]$ yum whatprovides */libt1.so.5 --enablerepo=\*epel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror epel | 3.7 kB 00:00 epel/primary_db

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

2011-01-24 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 17:33 -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > Upgrading the kernel *can* work, but defeats the purpose of running an > enterprise OS. I find your statement to not be true at all. Upstream offers two (2) different Enterprise Level kernels to pick, choose and play with. CentOS

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

2011-01-24 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 01:06 +0200, mahmoud mansy wrote: > more explanation plz! Nothing much ado about nothing to really explain. Just have to search google :-)... This is the other one [1] the source from upstream. Of which you have to find one built for CentOS like this one [2] exclusively :

Re: [CentOS] kernel update

2011-01-24 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 18:42 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > Oracle does, I know. Does RH? Yea they sure do in "mERG". There's a difference though one is a Throughput based kernel and one is realtime based with full preemption: 2.6.33.7-rt29.47.el5rt RT based 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 Throughput

Re: [CentOS] kernel security issues

2011-01-25 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 02:24 -0800, Dave wrote: > Question: Are those alerts mostly specifically centos related or do they > also affect the vanilla sources? Yes and No. It is dependent on where you are getting the source security updates from. Some times it can come down all the way from kernel

Re: [CentOS] libsrtp package anywhere?

2011-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:07 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: It's your build environment that's the problem. They build for el5. Clean out your build root and recreate it and do a fresh .rpmmacros file. John Wrote: /home/ethan/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libsrtp-1.4.4-2.20101004cvs.el5.em2.src.rpm Wrote: /home/et

Re: [CentOS] libsrtp package anywhere?

2011-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 09:38 -0500, JohnS wrote: > On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:07 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: > > It's your build environment that's the problem. They build for el5. > > Clean out your build root and recreate it and do a fresh .rpmmacros > file. >

Re: [CentOS] libsrtp package anywhere?

2011-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:02 -0500, JohnS wrote: > The problem is RPM is trying to install into the main file system > whereas el5 rpm does not need an incantation like so. I mean el6 sorry.. John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.or

Re: [CentOS] libsrtp package anywhere?

2011-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:01 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: > DESTDIR=/home/ethan/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/libsrtp-1.4.4-2.20101004cvs.el5.em2.x86_64 Yea that probally confuses you and a lot of people. Pay that no mind. :-) > Where/how is %{buildroot} defined in your build environment? > Are you building on

Re: [CentOS] libsrtp package anywhere?

2011-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 11:35 -0500, Bob Beers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:04 AM, JohnS wrote: "+rm -rf %{buildroot}" Now I know you rebuild it more than one time instead of once. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@ce

Re: [CentOS] Cold install kernel .config file

2011-01-28 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:19 -0600, Tom G Murphy wrote: Nothing hard about doing this I do it a lot. My RT KickStart built into isolinux %post # Update the Install # We pull in our kern.repo file for updates. Magic! yum -y install -c http://192.168.2.200/kicks/kern.repo kernel-rt # Clean out

Re: [CentOS] LiveCD System recovery - Mounting LVM?

2011-02-03 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 23:21 -0600, Gregory P.. Ennis wrote: > Thanks for the response. Does this mean there is nothing I can do to > make this happen. Is there a way to change the name of "VolGroup00"? > If so I have not found it yet. I see that I can change "LogVol00", but > have not figured

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-04 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 13:13 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 02/02/2011 01:01 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > Karabhir, what are the odds of encouragng a switch to > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora-epel/6/mock-1.1.8-1.el6.src.rpm, and > > backporting it to centos/5/5/extras ? It's working ver

Re: [CentOS] LiveCD System recovery - Mounting LVM?

2011-02-05 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:06 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > [root@SeVi ~]# vgrename /dev/VolGroup00 /dev/SeViGroup00 > Volume group "VolGroup00" still has active LVs > Internal error: Volume Group SeViGroup00 was not unlocked > Device '/dev/sda2' has been left open. > Device '/dev/sda2'

Re: [CentOS] Significant speedup of package building with mock from EPEL for RHEL 6, should definitely go in CentOS 5

2011-02-05 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 17:44 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > I just found a nasty bug. Hold off on using that. Share it a bz #? John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] How and when are the sound modules loaded at system boot time on CentOS 5?

2011-02-07 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 17:38 +, James Pearson wrote: > I've been trying to work out how the various sound modules get loaded at > boot time on CentOS 5 - but I can't find anything obvious under /etc/rc.d/ and you want A call is done to "init_module" to sling it into memory then other things

Re: [CentOS] How and when are the sound modules loaded at system boot time on CentOS 5?

2011-02-07 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 19:43 +, James Pearson wrote: > I assume something does probe some how - which is what I trying to work > out. i.e. what exactly does the probe and where in the startup sequence > is this done? I told you already...the kernel calls insmod first...then "init_moule" the

Re: [CentOS] How and when are the sound modules loaded at system boot time on CentOS 5?

2011-02-07 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 20:37 +, James Pearson wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > > > I told you already...the kernel calls insmod first...then "init_moule" > > then a "another sub r gets called to an actual init_module r > > That is how the kernel loads a mod

Re: [CentOS] Is there a Centos 3 around ?

2011-02-07 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 15:27 -0800, Benjamin Smith wrote: > A) Determine just how far they got in (did they get access to other systems?) All the bad stuff only resided in Volatile Memory and you Erased it when you shut down the machine and forgot to copy the Memory. :-) John

Re: [CentOS] PAE kernel source code

2011-02-09 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 21:06 -0800, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > Hmmm...I place the following into firefox searchbox (google is my > search engine): "2.6.18-194.el5-PAE SRPM" > > I seem to have lots of hits (maybe they're no good): > > This one looks pretty good and it is the first one on the list:

Re: [CentOS] java please help

2011-02-11 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 20:03 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > If you need the latest/greatest, to play nicely, I can publish my > .spec files for the various Sun/Oracle published components. My > "jpackage-utils-compat-el5" package, in particular resolves some the > RHEL/CentOS spacific requireme

Re: [CentOS] java please help

2011-02-14 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 07:40 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > But I'm looking at http://mirrors.dotsrc.org/jpackage/6.0/, and I'm > not even seeing hooks for RHEL 4. Is it worth pursuing compatibility > with that OS? Are other people using it? Well all the source rpms are there. If they will bu

Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-31 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 17:23 -0800, Corey Chandler wrote: > William Warren wrote: > > I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system. Can i upgrade > > that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should > > i just back it up and do it from scratch? Also will the samb

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-31 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:32 -0500, fred smith wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me. > > > Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked. > > > > > > The link to it is here which

Re: [CentOS] bind & kickstart

2010-01-04 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 04:01 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Anyone know what's up w/ trying to install bind through kickstart? > I am trying all variations of group installs, individual package > installs and it just won't install, it either fails on the libs, the > chroot pkg or whatever? >

Re: [CentOS] bind & kickstart

2010-01-06 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 23:17 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >Ok, finally got on a windows wkst so I could vm this up and be able to switch > >consoles. > > I should have paid more attention, I spoke to soon. Problem is elsewhere... > > It failed again, so, from the console during install while

Re: [CentOS] bind & kickstart

2010-01-06 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 23:17 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >Ok, finally got on a windows wkst so I could vm this up and be able to switch > >consoles. > > I should have paid more attention, I spoke to soon. Problem is elsewhere... > > It failed again, so, from the console during install while

Re: [CentOS] bind & kickstart

2010-01-06 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 23:53 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >Maybe your networking somewhere. Replace the rpm or reburn the disk. A > >disk can check good and still be bad! > > I don't follow you:) > > This is a kickstart install from a cdrom with a url line pointed to a repo. > Its going acr

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.4 :: linux-2.6.32.2 compile error (via nano l2...@1600)

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 11:46 +, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 01/07/2010 11:36 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > > Depends what hardware you have. ELRepo has a fixed powernow-k8 driver > > for AMD processors that allows correct scaling on multicore processors. > > See here: > > OP has a VIA nano, the K8 st

Re: [CentOS] Serial port fun: CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) vs. CentOS 5.4 (64-bit)

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote: > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:54 -0500, Robert Heller wrote: > > I am in the process of migrating from running CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) to > > CentOS 5.4 (64-bit) on my AMD Sempron(tm) Processor LE-1300 system (it > > is running CentOS 4.8 32-bit becaus

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:36 -0800, nate wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > On 1/8/2010 11:41 AM, nate wrote: > >> Ray Van Dolson wrote: > >> > >>> Out of curiosity, any idea what a full cabinet of one of these runs? > >> > >> Over $1M pretty easily, probably close/more than $2M. > > > > I think you

Re: [CentOS] Serial port fun: CentOS 4.8 (32-bit) vs. CentOS 5.4 (64-bit)

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 14:55 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 2:44 PM, JohnS wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:13 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote: > > > Also I have a problem with your post, heres why: The same for CentOS and > > RHEL 5. > > &

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:23 -0800, nate wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > > Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they > > support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked > > into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 15:43 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > Just asking is the fiber ports BiDirectional or Directional or can they > > support a Bond that is BiDirectional of 4GB/s or can they be trunked > > into 16GB/s? Bidirectional. I need about 24 GB

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 16:08 -0800, nate wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > > Currently using the older model of this one [1] @ 4GB/s on the fiber. > > You sound pretty confused, there's no way in hell a Fujitsu DX440 > is going to sustain 4 gigabytes/second, maybe 4 Gigabit

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:53 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> Your ROI of 5 minutes doesn't make any sense to me. > >> > > > > Ok, Job submission and completion is what I am getting at. > > > > ROI generally refers to the time an expense takes to pay off.Like, > if buying $X worth of

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 17:09 -0800, nate wrote: > > Using 15K RPM drives I can tell you that a 3PAR T400(very well > versed in their products, fast easy to use) can do 25.6 Gbits/second > (3.2 gigabytes/second) sustained throughput. 640 drives, 48GB data > cache. > > If you were starting out at

Re: [CentOS] 2 CPU's problem(Centos5)

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 09:23 +0300, Anas Alnaffar wrote: > Actually During boot I get this failed message every time. > > CPU Module microcode doesn't exit /proc/modules, need to add modules > > And when I try to run TOP command, I only can see CPU1. man top; type "top" hit "1" on the keyboar

Re: [CentOS] 2 CPU's problem(Centos5)

2010-01-08 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 10:23 +0300, Anas Alnaffar wrote: > Hello John, > > Thanks a lot, it seems I don't have any problem, right? :) > > Anas Al-Naffar Please reread my prior post to you. You in fact have a Problem with it. Also it can be ignored like the other Poster told you. It is your c

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-10 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-09 at 07:14 -0800, nate wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > > Interesting link for info there. I found [1] and at the bottom of the > > page there is like tidbits of info in PDFs of the different models. Any > > idea where I could get more info than that, l

Re: [CentOS] ADSL ppp0, persist

2010-01-10 Thread JohnS
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 16:54 +0100, David Hláčik wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have two ISP's connected to my router. One via eth2, second one via > ADSL modem, with ppoe doing on my Centos 5 . > > The problem I have is, that when ADSL fails , interface ppp0 is > removed. This also removes my static

Re: [CentOS] interfaces start-up order

2010-01-10 Thread JohnS
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 17:43 +0100, David Hláčik wrote: > Hello guys, > > On my Centos5 interfaces start in this order : > > eth0,eth1,eth2,ppp0 > > I believe it goes by alpabethical order. > Is there a possibility to change this order? I want to start > interfaces which connects to internet fir

Re: [CentOS] 8-15 TB storage: any recommendations?

2010-01-12 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 16:16 -0500, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > > CentOS 5.4 x86_64 works fine on the x4540s, I've installed it myself and > didn't have to do anything special to see and use all of the disks. > > In my testing, the IO was faster and the storage easier to administer > with when us

Re: [CentOS] Rhythmbox won't play mp3 files

2010-01-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 13:23 -0700, Kevin Kempter wrote: > Hi all; > > I'm actually running RHEL 5.4 > > I installed the rpmforge centos repo (and disabled it). Then I installed the > following: > > > yum --enablerepo=rpmforge install libdvdcss libdvdread libdvdplay libdvdnav > lsdvd mplayerp

Re: [CentOS] Rhythmbox won't play mp3 files

2010-01-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 14:47 -0600, lostson wrote: > For one stop using rpmforge this repo does nothing but trash a system. Discussion on that for us? > Use the rpmfusion repo then do a > > yum install gstreamer-plugins-ugly gstreamer-plugins-bad > > And now Rhythmbox will play mp3's witho

Re: [CentOS] more kickstart - saving %pre decisions for %post

2010-01-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:42 -0500, Alan McKay wrote: > Hey again folks, > > How can I save answers to questions in %pre, for use in %post? > > I'm assuming (though have not yet tried) that variables won't live that long. > > Could I save them off to /tmp in a file, and retrieve them? > > e.g.

Re: [CentOS] IO Schedulers

2010-01-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:00 -0600, Tim Nelson wrote: > Greetings all- > > I'm on a quest to do some serious tuning to some of my production systems. > All are on CentOS 5.x ranging from 5.0 to 5.4. I've been reading up on the > various IO schedulers available in the kernel and I'm hoping some o

Re: [CentOS] High load since passing from rhas3 to centos4.8

2010-01-14 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:47 -0500, fortin.pie...@bell.ca wrote: > > We are migrating HP servers from RHAS3 to centos 4.8. Since, the load > > average is reaching really high values. Under usage we see loads of > > 15-20 instead of the 0.5-1.5 we were used to. > > > > I searched a lot for informati

Re: [CentOS] mysql Workbench

2010-01-18 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 18:59 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > Is there a centos repo with mysql workbench anywhere. > > In the same vein, is there a publicly available build system for > centos where people can submit the source tar.gz and get hotly baked > rpm and the icing w

[CentOS] USB Mounting Problem

2010-01-18 Thread JohnS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550590 This also applies to Suns VirtualBox ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] mysql Workbench

2010-01-18 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 14:27 -0500, Max Hetrick wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > > You can get directly from mysql.com for EL5. > > I don't believe you can. The only RPM they have is for fedora 11, that I > can see. > > Max --- http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/gui-too

Re: [CentOS] mysql Workbench

2010-01-18 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 23:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > JohnS wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:40:31 -0500: > > > Of which they will work on el5 with the compat gcc for older software > > compatability. > > And why would you want to use these? They are *old*. > I don&#

Re: [CentOS] mysql Workbench

2010-01-18 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 10:29 +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > Thanks for a flurry of replies. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:01 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > JohnS wrote on Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:40:31 -0500: > > > >> Of which they will work

Re: [CentOS] Gmail problem

2010-01-24 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 19:38 +0800, Majian wrote: > Hi,all : > > > There is gmail drive for windows platform where the person can access > his gmail storage space as a drive. > > Do we have something similar on Linux? > Means is there any software that will allow the person to 'mount' the > gma

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-24 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 01:09 +0800, Noob Centos Admin wrote: > e.g. the table may currently have rows with 20 fields and total > 1KB/row, but very often say only 5/20 fields are used in actual > processing. Reading x rows from this table may access x inodes which > would not fit into the cache/mem

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 09:45 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:41 AM, Noob Centos Admin > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >> 20 feilds or columns is really nothing. BUT That's dependant on the > >> type > >> of data being inserted. > > > > 20 was an arbitary number :) > > > >> Ok so br

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 18:51 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > > Instead look at the way your PHP Code is > > Encoding the BLOB Data and if your really need the speed since now > > it's > > MySQL DB, make you own custom C API for mysql to encode the BLOB. The > > DB can do this like that much faster

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-25 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:19 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > Are complicated relationships being stored in postgresql and not in > mysql? I do not know how things are now but mysql has a history of only > being good for simple selects. Selects can get very upity for mysql as in "VIEWS". They c

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-25 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 13:41 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 08:19 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: > >> Are complicated relationships being stored in postgresql and not in > >> mysql? I do not know how things are now but

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-26 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 09:48 -0500, Ross Walker wrote: > > Great things started to happen with mysql @ version 5 >. Now it's > > just > > probally going to wither away. Who really knows? > > Some really nice things are happening with postgresql as well, you > should check it out. > > -Ross

Re: [CentOS] Centos/Linux Disk Caching, might be OT in some ways

2010-01-27 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 10:10 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: > > I've seen mysql do some really stupid things, like a full 3-table join > into a (huge)disk temporary table when the select had a 'limit 10' and > was ordered by one of the fields that had an index. Very true. You can you use logic ope

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.3 - slightly OT

2010-01-30 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:11 -0800, MHR wrote: > > So, does anyone know why AR takes forever to get going? > --- No, but it takes about 5 secs to start up on a P4-1.7. That machine is 10 years old almost. How long are you talking about? John ___ Ce

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.3 - slightly OT

2010-01-30 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 15:54 -0800, MHR wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 3:20 PM, JohnS wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 10:11 -0800, MHR wrote: > > > >> > >> So, does anyone know why AR takes forever to get going? > >> > > --- > >

Re: [CentOS] Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.3 - slightly OT

2010-01-30 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 18:38 -0800, MHR wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, JohnS wrote: > > > >> This only happens during the first load in a while - probably until > >> the cache for its pages clear, or it may be going out on the web to > >> check for

Re: [CentOS] Anyone using Active Driectory auth with Centos 5.4.....?

2010-02-09 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 14:21 -0700, Craig White wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 18:08 +, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > >This looks like the way to go, I don't like the username /pass stored in > > >plain text but maybe if I create a special group that doesn't really have > > >any privileges this

Re: [CentOS] Serial Port or USB monitoring / Logging

2010-02-13 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 19:58 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I am trying to connect a automated urine analyzer to a serial report > with the hope of catching the results so that I can eventually > incorporate the data in a patient medical record. I intend to do the > same thing for a blood analy

Re: [CentOS] Serial Port or USB monitoring / Logging

2010-02-13 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 19:58 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I am trying to connect a automated urine analyzer to a serial report > with the hope of catching the results so that I can eventually > incorporate the data in a patient medical record. I intend to do the > same thing for a blood analy

Re: [CentOS] Serial Port or USB monitoring / Logging

2010-02-15 Thread JohnS
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 23:43 -0600, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I'll be happy to share it with you. Your admonitions in the previous > e-mail are appropriate. The urine analyzer does not communicate in HL7. > I do have a bunch of code that is an HL7 parser for communication with > Quest diagnostic

Re: [CentOS] MonoDevelop for CentOS

2010-02-17 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 05:58 -0500, Alberto Garcia Gomez wrote: > Did anyone know where can I find the MonoDevelop as RPM? > > I wonder if thereś any version under 2.2 > http://monodevelop.com/ yum search mono ## have fun mono-core.i386 : The Mono CIL runtime, suitable for running .NET code m

Re: [CentOS] MonoDevelop for CentOS

2010-02-17 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 05:58 -0500, Alberto Garcia Gomez wrote: > Did anyone know where can I find the MonoDevelop as RPM? > > I wonder if thereś any version under 2.2 > --- I see what now what you want and you will have to roll your on RPM or hack the Suse RPM or install from a tar fil. I do no

Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-11 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 04:52 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Rajagopal Swaminathan writes: > > > > > JohnS writes: > > > > I tried switching over to wget but inspite of having 2mbps link which gives > us a > download speed of around 200kBytes/s

Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 06:17 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > JohnS writes: > > > > Is there a method to log the filenames that are downloaded? > > > > Hmm prolly so, I believe for sure wget can do that and also > > pull files from a server based on a fil

Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 06:13 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > JohnS writes: > > > > > > > May be a server issue. You may want to try another server. If you have a > > local LAN try to wget a large file for comparing. > > > > But from the s

Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 08:04 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > JohnS writes: > > > --- > > Check out you networking stack. Like NIC Card settings with ethtool and > > your dns like namserver settings in resolve.conf. If it is getting an > > address by dhcp

Re: [CentOS] Network Install Procedure Question

2009-05-13 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 16:24 -0400, Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote: > Hi there -- > > I wanted to do a netinstall of the 5.3 release, and the source that I > had in mind was either an ftp or http site. > When going through this procedure, am I going to download the .iso > images from one of the mirror s

[CentOS] Possible deadlock: Trying to lookup SID S-1-1-0 with passdb backend SAMBA

2009-05-15 Thread JohnS
May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2635]: [2009/05/15 14:14:07, 0] nsswitch/idmap.c:idmap_init(772) May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2635]: ERROR: Initialization failed for alloc backend tdb, deferred! May 15 14:14:07 twittle winbindd[2598]: [2009/05/15 14:14:07, 0] nsswitch/winbindd_passdb.c:sid

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-19 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > I've been asked to think about setting up an installation for a recently- > widowed man. His needs are small - mail, Internet, on-line banking, > basically > - but his wife dealt with all of it on her laptop and he feels very insecure. >

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-19 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 14:37 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 11:22 AM, JohnS wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 16:11 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: > >> I've been asked to think about setting up an installation for a recently- > >> widowed man. His

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 13:20 +0200, Equinox86 wrote: > yes centos is not for desktop it's guaranteee, if you don't have much > time and want a distro updated at last release, if you have much time > to spend to recompile dependences i advice use slackware, is fast and > desktop friendly, similar to

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 09:30 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Ralph Angenendt > wrote: > > > Lanny Marcus wrote: > >> The NSA manual suggests disabling yum-updatesd and doing it with a > >> cron job. update yum and then update. > > > > a) That manual was written at the t

Re: [CentOS] Samba Question

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:16 -0400, Bo Lynch wrote: > Hopefully very easy question to answer. I am trying to migrate data of of > a samba server that is using winbind joined to a windows domain to another > box. What samba or winbind files do I need so that this will resolve to > names rather than

Re: [CentOS] Samba Question

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:16 -0400, Bo Lynch wrote: > What samba or winbind files do I need so that this will resolve to > names rather than UID and GID. For example > drwxr-x--- 1049 10926 10005 36864 May 15 11:46 Student --- Ok lets take away AD. To use regular name auth

Re: [CentOS] Samba Question

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:48 -0400, Bo Lynch wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 2:43 pm, JohnS wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 14:16 -0400, Bo Lynch wrote: > >> Hopefully very easy question to answer. I am trying to migrate data of > >> of > >> a samb

Re: [CentOS] Samba Question

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 15:39 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote: > > >>> The situation I'm in is that this box is joining to a win2000 PDC using > >>> samba+winbind for setting permissions on files and dir with domain > >>> users/groups. When I do a ls -l I just see the uid or gid instead of the > >>> do

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 3, Sun jre1.6.0_12_x86_64 and enabling a plugin

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:40 -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: > SOMEbody on this list must have this combination working by now. > > How does one enable the firefox jre plugin for Sun's x86_64 > distribution? Every site that I can find refers to making a link to > a now non-existent plugins directory

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-21 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 21:06 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:13 PM, JohnS wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 09:30 -0400, Ross Walker wrote: > >> I wonder if yum-updatesd might cache repo data separate from yum > >> cache, in which case some old

Re: [CentOS] Random server reboot after update to CentOS 5.3

2009-05-22 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 09:44 +0200, Peter Hopfgartner wrote: > > > Would it make sense to install the kernel from CentOS 5.2? Any > contraindications? > > Regards, > > Peter --- Now why in the world would you want to do that??? You running 5.3 as per your earlier post and your uname shows yo

Re: [CentOS] Samba Question

2009-05-23 Thread JohnS
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 20:37 +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > Bo Lynch wrote: > > Hopefully very easy question to answer. I am trying to migrate data of of > > a samba server that is using winbind joined to a windows domain to another > > box. What samba or winbind files do I need so that this will r

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-announce before mirrors ready?

2009-05-23 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 18:42 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > MHR wrote: > > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:00 AM, > > I've noticed this more and more over the last few months, especially > > since 5.3 came out, and I'm wondering: > > > > Are these announcements being sent before the mirrors are gett

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >-Original Message- > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf > >Of William L. Maltby > >Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 2:24 PM > >To: CentOS mailing list > >Subject: Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing sec

Re: [CentOS] resolving names it is really slow slow with CentOS5.x using named

2009-05-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:57 +0200, carlopmart wrote: > I have find a temporary solution: reduce the MTU on CentOS server (1440) ...I > need to investigate why centOS loses some packages and ubuntu doesn't --- What happens when you set the MTU for the type of Net Link you have? That goes for

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

2009-05-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:44 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > Hi, > > Can somebody recommend a photo browser. It needs to support > CR2, NEF, PEF and DNG formats. I'm looking for something like > Infranview, but for Linux. --- Well I need one that supports *.raw for a Client of mine but I'm

Re: [CentOS] Auto-installing security updates?

2009-05-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:02 -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > At Mon, 25 May 2009 12:35:02 -0400 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:02 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote: > > > >-Original Message- > > > >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Photo browser

2009-05-25 Thread JohnS
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:19 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > On Mon, 25 May 2009 13:00:21 -0400 > JohnS wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 09:44 -0700, cen...@911networks.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Can somebody recommend a p

Re: [CentOS] Random server reboot after update to CentOS 5.3

2009-05-27 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 18:03 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > I am experiencing the same issue with random reboots after a 5.3 > upgrade. Sometimes it will go for days without rebooting then today > it has rebooted 6 times at random times. I have modified grub.conf to > go back to 2.6.18-92.1.22.el

Re: [CentOS] OT: Testing and monitoring hardware RAID

2009-05-29 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 09:25 -0700, Dianne Yumul wrote: > Thanks for the help Karanbir and Rainer. > > > That sounds quite silly - also going through reboots means downtime, > > isnt that the sort of thing that raid1 was designed to protect against > > anyway. > > I guess it would be silly :). I

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >