Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-07-04 Thread Linux Advocate
enough is enough already. can some centos admin please discipline, ban and/or get rid of Radu-Cristian FOTESCU aka beranger...@yahoo.ca please? not only has he physically threatened a contributor, his language behavior are more than inappropriate for such a professional

[CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
guys, i have installed mailscanner, spamassassin, etc on my machine. This was done sometime ago. Some of these rpms i got not frm centos repos. What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. yum info packagename just says; repo :

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Frank, On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 23:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Linux Advocate wrote: What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. rpm -qi packagename # rpm -qi spamassassin Name: spamassassin Relocations: /usr

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
What command ( or yum command ) can i use to find out which repo did this installled package come from. rpm -qi packagename # rpm -qi mailscanner Name: mailscanner Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.74.13 Vendor:

[CentOS] RPMs for vispan , spamstat, phplistadmin

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, i have heard of vispan, phplistadmin, spamstat from the mailscanner manual and would like to experiment with them. 1. Any thoughts on them? ( i am trying to avoid mailwatch bcos i think vispan is better fit for reporting) 2. I have googled for their centos rpms but no luck? Any ideas

Re: [CentOS] Yum - which repo did a package come from

2009-08-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Yes, I have found this is a limitation of yum. It would be nice if the information about the source repository could be stored somewhere. If these were installed after the initial OS installation, and you haven't done a yum clean, you might be able to glean some info from the cache: #

Re: [CentOS] firewall question

2009-08-06 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 4:15:40 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] firewall question On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 17:39 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: Or IPcop? BTW,

[CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
guys, i have the yum plugin - fastest mirror . But not even once i have seen it selecting repos which are near my region such as japan or australia ( where i get the best speeds). Something is wrong. It seems stuck with these 3 sites ; Determining fastest mirrors * ftp-stud.fht-esslingen.de :

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
i have tried yum clean all , yum clean metadata - Original Message From: Linux Advocate linuxhous...@yahoo.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 8:56:37 PM Subject: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-22 Thread Linux Advocate
Hi Linux Advocate, I have found this a problem for the Australian servers I manage as well. I suggest you manually test the speed of some local mirrors then manually specify a mirror rather than relying on the fastest mirror plugin. If your ISP mirrors content locally then that'd

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
inetnum: 60.48.0.0 - 60.54.255.255 netname: XDSLSTREAMYX descr:Telekom Malaysia Berhad descr:Network Strategy descr:Wisma Telekom descr:Jalan Pantai Baru descr:50672 Kuala Lumpur country: MY . A couple different geo-ip

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
John R Pierce wrote: fwiw, it appears linux advocate is sending his email from a Malaysia IP per the email headres... $ whois 60.50.xxx.yyy [Querying whois.apnic.net] [whois.apnic.net] % [whois.apnic.net node-2] % Whois data copyright termshttp://www.apnic.net/db

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
#mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=os baseurl=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 Regards, Oliver I have done this;

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
If you take a look in /etc/yum.repos.d/ you will see a number of files. There should be example baseurl lines in the repo files which will be commented out by default. Here's an example of how I use this to manually use my local ISPs mirror for the base repo: [base]

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
my repos are configured to use mirrorlist. how do i add mirrors manually? If you take a look in /etc/yum.repos.d/ you will see a number of files. There should be example baseurl lines in the repo files which will be commented out by default. Here's an example of how I use

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
#mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releaseverarch=$basearchrepo=os baseurl=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/$releasever/os/$basearch/ gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=ftp://mirror.internode.on.net/pub/centos/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5 Regards, Oliver oliver what kind of

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-24 Thread Linux Advocate
I maintain the RPM that is used as part of CentOS Extras and that we use on the CentOS servers in question. I did some major work on the app that CentOS uses for mirrorlists and isolists over the weekend. Especially in the AP region, as we have picked up some mirrors there recently.

Re: [CentOS] fasttest mirror -doesnt seem to pick sites near my region

2009-08-26 Thread Linux Advocate
my region Linux Advocate wrote: johny, thanx for the link. i think 'my' should point to jp, cn, tw, au,sg. the setup u have there is ;) do all ISP's in .MY use the same peering/trunking or do different providers have different sorts of international backbone

Re: [CentOS] What repo did this rpm come from? rpm-VVa failures on new install

2009-09-20 Thread Linux Advocate
Vendor: Fedora Project If (Vendor == Fedora Project) then repo is epel if (Vendor == Centos) then repo is Centos if (Vendor == Dag Apt Repository) repo is rpmforge useful info. thanx. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] realtime backup

2009-02-18 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 5:40:48 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] realtime backup From: CentOS List I had a cfml application running on mysql database. Can some suggest a

Re: [CentOS] Mail from domain problem

2009-02-23 Thread Linux Advocate
in /etc/postfix/main.cf , set myorigin=$mydomain and not as $myhostname. From: Xia Guowen xi...@51poi.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 2:07:38 PM Subject: [CentOS] Mail from domain problem Hi, I installed a CentOS 4.7

[CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
from the rpmforge repo? - Original Message From: Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk Linux Advocate wrote: Guys, What repo has rpms for mailscanner, clamav and spamassasin? RPMforge has clamav and spamassassin, but not mailscanner. Mailscanner has RPMs available

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote: Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo /etc/yum.repos.d

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote: On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote: Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones? /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2 /etc

Re: [CentOS] HylaFax and Com Ports

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote: I need to setup HylaFax which leads to my first question, anyone got an opinion on whether or not to use HylaFax or HylaFax+? We use Hylafax together with Avantfax and are very pleased with the results. I cannot speak to HylaFax+ . We

Re: [CentOS] Repo order - priority plugins

2009-02-27 Thread Linux Advocate
Thanx kal, and to all who replied. i have understood the issue better. /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo you can put rpmforge at 10 and epel and atrpms

Re: [CentOS] centos 5.2 - latest rpms for mailcanner , clamav and spamassassin

2009-02-28 Thread Linux Advocate
Craig White wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:46:47 -0700: you can get clam* and newer spamassassin rpms from rpmforge I suggest rolling your own SA. It's as simple as downloading the tarball and rebuilding it with the included spec file. It's a simple one-line command and documented on

[CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms

2009-02-28 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, i have just installed ( after reading the docs on the mailscanner site and centos lists ) Mailscanner, and was wondering a.) How do i test my installation? is there some sample spam/ virus messages that can be used to test. b.) MailScanner -V shows; b.1) LibClamAV Warning:

Re: [CentOS] trying to install 5.2 on a laptop

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: Michael Klinosky m...@enter.net The X wiki suggested that I try adding this to /etc/X11/xorg.conf: Section ServerFlags Option AllowMouseOpenFail 1 EndSection Using cat xorg.conf, I seeSection InputDevice , which refers to the

Re: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge + vanderkooij rpms

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx. - Original Message From: tdu...@sc.rr.com tdu...@sc.rr.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Cc: Linux Advocate linuxhous...@yahoo.com Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 11:38:35 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] mailscanner installation - centos 5.2 - rpmforge

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban

2009-03-01 Thread Linux Advocate
Actually, it is a rather OS dependent package and the rules for CentOS are difficult to write. That really doesn't belong on the fail2ban list either. i have a basic fail2ban with tcp-wrappers /etc/hosts.deny combo working. i couldnt get the iptables thing working properly. You

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban

2009-03-03 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx john - Original Message From: John Lundin lun...@fini.net john, could u share your rules for the dovecot attempts?t Since no one else has stepped up... here's dovecot and vsftpd. These worked for me, ymmv. Centos 5 with rpmforge. Folded, failregex should be a single

Re: [CentOS] Cannot get CentOS to install

2009-03-10 Thread Linux Advocate
The hardware is P4 2.8 CPU, 512 MB RAM, 120GB 3ware IDE/PATA RAID HD, ATI Video, CDRW CD, Dual Nic, Floppy and IDE/PATA Tape drive. if you could install centos 3 on this hardware, then centos 5.x should work...any error messages from the console?

Re: [CentOS] How to add ClamAV to Postfix?

2009-03-24 Thread Linux Advocate
Is there some standard way of adding AV to Postfix? clearly the best way is to add a wrapper program like amavisd-new or MailScanner which handles spamassassin and which ever combination of anti-virus programs you use. The postfix list and primary author, Wietse will tell you

Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

2009-03-24 Thread Linux Advocate
but what I worry about is members of the core CentOS team burning out and quitting... that would be much worse for CentOS than a few weeks delay here and there. For me it is important for the core team to know that they can take the time off they need for real life events without feeling

Re: [CentOS] OT: Torrent software choice

2009-04-02 Thread Linux Advocate
For a GUI, ktorrent scratches my itch. Persists indefinitely -- across power failures, reboots, etc.; provides many stats. From rpmforge: ktorrent-2.2.1-1.el5.rf For a curses solution, I like bittorrent-curses from the bittorrent-4.4.0-1.el5.rf package -- also from rpmforge. is

Re: [CentOS] OT: Torrent software choice

2009-04-04 Thread Linux Advocate
Linux Advocate wrote: is there a cli option? Yes, there is. /usr/bin/bittorrent-console is provided as part of the bittorrent package, available from http://bittorrent.com/ thanx, i will get it frm the rpmforge repo

[CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
Guys, apache cpus usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box with just 8 users or so. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the work 'atack' under command PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
sorry typos amended Guys, apache's cpu usage is hitting 100% sometimes ( to such an extent that its very noticeable) on a box ( 2gb ram) with just 8 users or so. This newver happended before. i m getting this when i run 'top'. The worrying thing is seeing the word 'atack' under

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
some google foo shows this is a WINDOWS exploit not a linux one. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/analyzing-apache-logs-174552/ ___ yes, william, i saw those links when i googledi too did no think it related to me

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-02 Thread Linux Advocate
reply below - Original Message From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 11:43:46 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 08:23:16PM -0700, Linux

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
My replies below i m just so down in the dumps nowaaah - Original Message From: Neil Aggarwal n...@jammconsulting.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 1:38:05 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com On Wednesday 03 June 2009 06:09:37 John R. Dennison wrote: He's running an apache instance on cent5. He has processes he can not readily identify running under apache named atack; where

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
as an aside? did he say if he even looked on the net for anything related to this?? i tried googling for 'centos apache atack but did not get anything substantial. i tried locating a binary file called ' atack' but got nothing. ___

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com I stand by my previous advice - the box is compromised, can not be trusted, and as a responsible admin he should be working on re-installing it, evaluating what web-apps he had running that led to this

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-03 Thread Linux Advocate
BRUCE U ARE A F*** GENIUS MAN ! u were right brothanx for spending the time on this man more info below ! - Original Message From: bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net To: linuxhous...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2009 9:53:24 PM Subject: RE: [CentOS]

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: Anyone have any idea as to why setroubleshootd would be dominating the system: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 2371 root 25 0 1884m 1.8g 4100 R 100.2 44.7 680:06.40 setroubleshootd

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
Matt, great idea I FOUND SOMETHING... pls see below... From: Matt lm7...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 4:40:57 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell PID USER PR NI

Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message From: Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de To: centos@centos.org Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 2:46:40 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] setrubleshootd dominating Linux Advocate wrote: strace -p And see what it is doing? does

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: bruce bedoug...@earthlink.net To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 3:20:24 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell and if you don't figure out what caused the issue... working on it

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
- Original Message From: William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2009 12:56:22 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 09:33 -0700, Linux Advocate

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-13 Thread Linux Advocate
replies below... - Original Message From: Filipe Brandenburger filbran...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 9:58:51 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell I suggest you start by looking at

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....

2009-06-16 Thread Linux Advocate
cmdshell.php) ? The horde framework was installed from the centos repo.!!! I don't think the horde set on CentOS is very current. I just used the tarball from the horde website, and I keep it current. ok. its just that with centos being a redhat clone and so on. all the rpms they

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell....[SOLVED]

2009-06-18 Thread Linux Advocate
thanx guys. Lets close this thread. bye. - Original Message From: Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 2:36:27 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3 - Apache - Under Attack ? Oh hell on 6-16-2009 10:26 PM Linux Advocate spake

Re: [CentOS] ssh security

2009-06-19 Thread Linux Advocate
[Normal log stuff from dictionary attack deleted...] This is common, and, presuming you have good passwords or only accept authorized_keys, not a real problem other than large log files. Look at fail2ban for a method that will automatically add iptables blocks when this occurs. yes

Re: [CentOS] Program to ban sniffers

2009-06-20 Thread Linux Advocate
That program would then, upon receiving a 'sniff' or 'user' would then add that ip to the deny hosts lists..for either a long or short time. Using this would seem like a win as you can easily grab someone before they can get somewhere one hopes. Also, by opening up a few other ports

Re: [CentOS] server is always getting hacked

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
get ; 1. fail2ban - it blocks failed login ips etc 2. get shorewall or any iptables front end and restrict ips to the ranges u need ( or even specific ips) 3. run ssh on a nonstandard port 4. good, long password these steps will go a long way and will get u started. - Original Message

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend and is suitable fro webpages and so on. What do we need to make it as a LAMP cluster, i.e with a mysql HA backend as well. So- HA of [ LoadBalancer + Apache + MySQL} Any ideas guys? From: fmb fmb

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-28 Thread Linux Advocate
. From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux Advocate Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 11:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster taling abt piranha... i understand that its LVS + webfrontend

Re: [CentOS] 2 servers cluster

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
site! Stay fully operational even with a db server failure. Ask me about the GRed database. From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Linux Advocate Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 12:13 AM To: CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
same here. i really must thank dag wiers and gang for all the good work. But If epel and rpmforge can work together , that's great. - Original Message From: Ron Loftin relof...@twcny.rr.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 3:13:33 AM Subject:

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-29 Thread Linux Advocate
beranger...@yahoo.com... , u have a problem with dag...and now it looks like u have a problem with linus torvalds himself u talk abt the need for cooperation,etc but you apparently dont get that 'you have to give respect to get respect' 'give cooperation to get cooperation' relax

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
Niki, could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would like to learn this. - Original Message From: Niki Kovacs cont...@kikinovak.net To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:11:54 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
david, could u tell me how to build frm SRPMS. i m not good in this area and would like to improve. - Original Message From: David Hrbác( hrbac.c...@seznam.cz To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 5:52:37 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
Rather than dumping *even more work* on the core CentOS project (who are already clearly struggling to provide even the core distro at present), why doesn't everyone do as Dag suggested, and adopt a handful of packages and help maintain them at rpmforge for the benefit of everyone.

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
great. thanx. - Original Message From: Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would like to learn this. Simple form (should work with most packages): # rpmbuild --rebuild package-version-release.srpm 'man

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 14:18, Linux Advocatewrote: could u tell me howto build frm SRPM? i am not good at this area and would like to learn this. This article in the Wiki should get you going... http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM HTH, Filipe thanx.

Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag

2009-06-30 Thread Linux Advocate
can dag karanbir sort of sum up this thread as to how list members can work together on improving all the additional non-redhat-originated packages from rpmforge,etc. As for radu-cristian, relax bro. As for others (myself included), lets all chill out. this thread should not evolve into