On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:44:19PM +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Lisandro Grullon spake:
Thank u timo,
I will test this further when I get home. I have been having nightmares
getting this card working from an OS iso, it appears that the card is very
new and the drivers have not been
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:49:44PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 at 1:45pm, Robert Arkiletian wrote
I just read the rhel6 filesystem size limit.
http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/
It says 16TB limit for ext4 (same as ext3)?!?! I thought ext4 was
supposed to
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:46:49PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running Centos 5.5 with Xen 4.0.1
Would like to use a USB key (not a block device) in my domU.
Dom0 lsusb yields;
Bus 002 Device 004: ID 064f:0bd8 ABC-Systems AB CDE/FG
xm usb-add shows;
Usage: xm
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:53:15AM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:46:49PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running Centos 5.5 with Xen 4.0.1
Would like to use a USB key (not a block device
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:20:28PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:53:15AM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 18, 2011, at 5:40 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 04:46:49PM -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm running
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 12:53:45AM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/29/11 12:36 AM, Sanjay Arora wrote:
Hello
Looking to build CentOS based micro EC2 instance bootable from Amazon
EBS. Want that the image be minimal, so that I can add only the rpms I
want.
Despite looking could not
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
Hm, that is kind of the only important thing. :-)
If it is not recommended, there have to be better reasons for that
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:31:18AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Is there any (easy?) way to migrate running standalone CentOS 4 or 5
systems to xen virtual stacks?
Rebuilding those systems from scratch on the xen machine would take
plenty of work.
If you're talking about Xen PV domUs, then
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:37:08AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On 4.3.2011 10.52, Simon Matter wrote:
I don't know if it's recommended that way but at least it works fine.
Hm, that is kind of the only important thing
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:33:10PM -0500, Kwan Lowe wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:11 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
IBM Power servers since the Power4+ CPU (they are up to Power7 now) have
hardware partitioning support, commonly known as LPAR. LPAR can be
divided in units
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
The slightly longer story...
First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time
with any success; the 31st guest always failed to boot or crashed during
booting, no matter which guest I chose as the
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:59:09AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 09:41:04AM -0400, Steve Thompson wrote:
First. With Xen I was never able to start more than 30 guests at one time
with any success; the 31st guest always failed
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:36:39AM -0400, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 10:21 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Alain Péan
alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr
mailto:alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr wrote:
snipped: two recommendations for XFS
I would chime in with
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:01:53PM -0500, Scott Moseman wrote:
On 8/22/07, Scott Ehrlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having snapshot technology is great. Who else supports it?
Try EqualLogic. I'm pretty sure they do snapshots.
Yep, Equallogic supports snapshots, replication, and all
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything except / (3ware say their cards are fast, but only on
XFS) AND using
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:57:28PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:39:09AM -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Simon Banton wrote:
At 12:30 +0200 2/10/07, matthias platzer wrote:
What I did to work around them was basically switching to XFS for
everything
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 08:34:13AM -0400, Brian Mathis wrote:
You cannot use haproxy with SSL. You need to terminate the SSL
connection before reaching haproxy, such as (already mentioned) using
apache as a front end proxy.
apache.. or stunnel, or stux, or nginx, or you name any other
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:53:16AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:29 AM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
2012/1/4 An Yang an.eurof...@gmail.com
Somebody in Oracle told me, they need one year to test, I'm not sure,
it's true or not.
That's about right. The testing isn't
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:12:45PM -0400, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2008-09-16 03:38, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Has anyone seen this netfilter kernel crash?
Images from the console of the crashed firewall:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/centos5-kernel-crash/
There have been some
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 06:58:21PM +0530, partha chowdhury wrote:
i add the irqpoll option to kernel line. after the system booted i log
into X with tty1 also login as root with the command tail
-f /var/log/messages for monitoring . After 10 to 20 minutes i got the
same message again but this
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:55:22PM -0400, Jake Holmquist wrote:
Hello!
Has anyone seen this netfilter kernel crash?
Images from the console of the crashed firewall:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/centos5-kernel-crash/
Firewall is HP DL360 G4 server running CentOS 5.x 32 bit.
I've
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 11:53:36AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 03:55:22PM -0400, Jake Holmquist wrote:
Hello!
Has anyone seen this netfilter kernel crash?
Images from the console of the crashed firewall:
http://pasik.reaktio.net/centos5-kernel-crash
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 06:43:14PM +, Ned Slider wrote:
Brett Serkez wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:45 AM, Vandaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do people have wet underwear for nothing over XEN?
See http://www.redhat.com/promo/qumranet/
As far as CentOS is concerned saying Xen is
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:49:16PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote on Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:49:20 +:
Fedora10 does have DomU support for Xen, dom0
support wasent ready in time,
what exactly does that mean? That you can run Fedora as a pv guest in
other distros, but
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 03:31:19PM +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote on Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:04:16 +0200:
There are many options.
Yeah. The point behind my asking was if one would be able to run
RHEL/CentOS 6 as a dom0 - as it is derived from Fedora and reflects
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:00:39AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Brett Serkez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Tom Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Xen wont be in RHEL6 - KVM will
What insight can
Hello list!
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
-- Pasi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:40:14PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello list!
http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html
kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.3 GA Announcement:
https
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 07:40:24PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 21.08.2009 um 19:08 schrieb Peter Kjellstrom:
On Friday 21 August 2009, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
We have a few (p800). My opinion is that they're acceptable but
not fast.
Heard this a few times now, in the interest
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 02:04:58PM +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Am 22.08.2009 um 12:37 schrieb Pasi Kärkkäinen:
Uhm.. Solaris/zfs can't really light-up the failure lights on Sun's
own
hardware?
Of course it can - on SUN's own hardware.
But you can run Solaris on almost any hardware
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 06:04:06PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200
BG == Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at wrote:
BG Thanks to everyone who took the time to answer in this thread.
BG I'm just writing this message to give this thread
Hello,
It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html
And before you ask: CentOS 5.4 will be released in 2-4 weeks or so, when
it's ready :)
-- Pasi
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:16:31PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
It looks like RHEL 5.4 has been released:
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1243.html
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html
http://www.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/5.4/html
- Forwarded message from rhelv5-l...@redhat.com -
From: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com
To: rhelv5-l...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:17:35 -0500
Subject: [rhelv5-list] Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.4 GA Announcement
Red Hat is pleased to announce the availability of the
latest update to Red
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 02:45:28PM -0400, mbneto wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering what is the current status fro ext4 support in Centos. I've
noticed that is marked as dev when I try to use it from the installer.
Does anybody have a scary story to prevent using it?
RHEL 5.4 was just released,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
One of my clients use a software product that is upgrading and will
shortly utilize micro$oft SQL server 2005.
Currently the clients are XP on older machines with the database
residing on a Samba / CentOS
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 02:04:35PM -0400, Ross Walker wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinenpa...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 10:22:56AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Rob Kampen wrote:
One of my clients use a software product that is upgrading and will
shortly
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 03:10:36AM -0700, Aclhk Aclhk wrote:
do anyone know the xen version in centos 5.4 (redhat 5.4)?
if they support 3.2 or above, i will wait.
Xen hypervisor in RHEL 5.4 is 3.1.2 + a lot of patches from Redhat
(backports from newer Xen versions).
You can check the Xen
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 01:54:47PM +0300, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On Oct 8, 2009, at 7:19 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I am installing my first xen system (CentOS 5.3). The host system
seems to be ok.
I am following this tutorial:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:45:14PM -0400, Alan McKay wrote:
Hey folks,
CentOS / PostgreSQL shop over here.
I'm hitting 3 of my favorite lists with this, so here's hoping that
the BCC trick is the right way to do it :-)
We've just discovered thanks to a new Munin plugin
/i386/images/xen/vmlinuz
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 503: Service Temporarily Unavailable
...though I can start downloading that file manually in the browser
quite ok.
Anyway, I will try that path again another time, let's see.
On 8.10.2009 15:22, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Try using ftp
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:44:55PM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi List,
Does anyone here use Dell Equallogic IP SAN? If so, do you have any
immediate high points / low points you wouldn't mind discussing on- or
off-list ?
Yes, it
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:04:21PM -0500, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
Hi List,
Does anyone here use Dell Equallogic IP SAN? If so, do you have any
immediate high points / low points you wouldn't mind discussing on- or
off-list ?
Yep, I've been using Equallogic iSCSI arrays with
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:36:01AM -0700, James A. Peltier wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hmm.. what kind of problems do you have with snapshots?
Let's see
They take up 16MB of space regardless of the amount of data that changes.
A single bit changes and 16MB
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:39:54PM -0500, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM, James A. Peltier jpelt...@fas.sfu.ca
wrote:
They take up 16MB of space regardless of the amount of data that changes. A
single bit changes and 16MB is taken up. This is not tunable.
I
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 10:52:19AM -0700, nate wrote:
James A. Peltier wrote:
Mounting a snapshot requires the generation of a new UUID for the file
system in order to be able to use it. Perhaps this is a XFS limitation,
but unlike ZFS they aren't immediately available. We need to
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 08:55:16PM +0200, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
nate wrote:
if you have a SAN that supports logical volumes that have snapshot and
grow and such, I'm not sure why you'd bother with LVM on top of that, it
would just further obfuscate things.
And how do you grow
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 08:39:06AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
I have some weird behavior I can't explain... I've noticed this behavior
since CentOS 5.2 (version I started running) through 5.4...
I am running a Xen host/VM. On my guest VM, I use Alpine as my email
client and Aspell as
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 09:11:05AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
Answers inline below...
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 08:39:06AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
I have some weird behavior I can't explain... I've noticed this behavior
since CentOS 5.2 (version I started running) through 5.4...
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:28:14AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
Even more interesting - I just created a local user specific to the VM...
aspell works just fine...
I'm wondering if this is an NFS/NIS related thing... Very wierd indeed...
try strace alpine to see what it's using..
btw.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:53:49AM -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
OK, I feel like a complete idiot...
I was not running nfslock... I started it, and the problem went away.
The user (me being the user) had an NFS mounted home directory...
No idea why this worked under Fedora 9 - I may
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:01:32AM -0200, Miguel Di Ciurcio Filho wrote:
Hi there,
After updating a server from CentOS 5.3 to 5.4 my Xen pci-passthru setup
has some troubles.
The server has two NICs, one used by dom0 and the other assigned to a
domU and one SCSI controler assigned to
Hello!
I'm having problems with udev /dev/tape/by-id/ symlinks..
it seems symlinks to tape drives are sometimes (randomly) missing after reboot.
Server in question has IBM TS3200 tape library connected with 2 drives in
it.. so /proc/scsi/scsi shows 3 devices: 2 tape drives, and 1 medium
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 09:12:33PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello!
I'm having problems with udev /dev/tape/by-id/ symlinks..
it seems symlinks to tape drives are sometimes (randomly) missing after
reboot.
Server in question has IBM TS3200 tape library connected with 2 drives
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 11:27:27AM +0200, Bent Terp wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
What would you recommend as an FS for an partition greater than 16 TiB?
This is for an production server (that is, no ext4 recommendations
please
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The general consensus seems to be If you can start anew: use
XFS. This leaves one question: as the XFS is not included
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:03:32PM -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
on 5-14-2009 1:24 PM Pasi ??? spake the following:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:23:05PM +0200, Bernhard Gschaider wrote:
Thank you all for your quick answers (you guys must have started
typing BEFORE I hit the Send-button).
The
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 07:18:23PM -0400, John Jasen wrote:
On 04/12/2011 11:30 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 9:36 AM, John Jasen wrote:
snipped: two recommendations for XFS
I would chime in with a dis-commendation for XFS. At my previous
employer, two cases involving XFS
Hello,
Does someone know if there's a cacti rpm available
that works (=installs and doesn't conflict) when php53 rpm
is installed, instead of the older php rpm ?
cacti rpms from rpmforge/dag have these requirements:
php
php-mysql
php-snmp
So those cacti versions conflict with php53.
I checked
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
Does someone know if there's a cacti rpm available
that works (=installs and doesn't conflict) when php53 rpm
is installed, instead of the older php rpm ?
cacti rpms from rpmforge
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:09:36PM -0400, Denniston, Todd A CIV
NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
-Original Message-
From: On Behalf Of Pasi Kärkkäinen
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 11:13
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 04:34:53PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:18:28AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 04/27/2011 07:26 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
Is there a safe way of recovering the partition table?
I have a vague idea that copies are kept at various places on the disk?
AFAIK, there is only one
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 12:45:41AM -0400, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
Greetings all.
I am attempting to install dom-u guests on a vanilla install of Centos
5.6. I am attempting to use the Xen Manager and it 1) won't let me
choose ANYTHING but network install, which is quite odd to say
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 04:53:22PM -0400, Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
On 05/05/2011 09:09 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
It sounds like your hardware does not have HVM support,
which means you can only run PV VMs.
Thanks for the reply.
You are correct.
I have two P4 32-bit machines
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:26:00PM -0400, b.j. mcclure wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-11 at 14:35 -0700, Emmett Culley wrote:
The network configuration GUI is not to be found on any of the CentOS repos
or on EPEL. I am not interested in having NetworkManager installed on a
server. Is there an
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:32:14PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
I've been asked for ideas on building a rather large archival storage
system for inhouse use, on the order of 100-400TB. Probably using CentOS
6.The existing system this would replace is using Solaris 10 and
ZFS, but I want
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 04:53:11PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:32:14PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
I've been asked for ideas on building a rather large archival storage
system for inhouse use, on the order of 100-400TB. Probably using CentOS
6.The existing
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 09:01:04AM +0200, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote:
hi,
is there any chance to see a xen kernel + xen in centosplus probably? or
is any recommend 3rd party repo available yet which provides this?
This wiki page has some repo-links (and other related info):
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu but apparently the debuginfo packages for Centos 6 do not
exist and so I cannot get any useful information from the kernel.
Is
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 01:03:23PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 07/30/2011 06:37 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 08:07:38PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use oprofile to debug a problem with idle virtual machines
eating 10% cpu
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:29:59PM +0200, Marc Deop wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 16:40:45 Timo Neuvonen wrote:
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/xorg.conf
FATAL: Error inserting i915
(/lib/modules/2.6.32-71.29.1.el6.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko):
No such device
(EE)
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:28:12PM +0300, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen pa...@iki.fi kirjoitti viestissä
news:20110731184737.gp32...@reaktio.net...
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:29:59PM +0200, Marc Deop wrote:
On Saturday 30 July 2011 16:40:45 Timo Neuvonen wrote:
(==) Using config
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use $ git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
linux-3.0.0-xen command and it works.
Btw you don't need to get jeremy's tree anymore for Xen dom0 support,
you can
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 07:07:57AM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
On 08/08/2011 12:01 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:05:42PM +0700, LHT. Qu???c wrote:
Does anyone try Xen in Kernel 3.0? I use $ git clone
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
linux
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:19:22AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
So I'm curious how SAS JBOD arrays and linux MDraid as implemented in
CentOS6, and SES (SCSI/SAS Enclosure Services) backplane controllers
'get along' and how much configuration is needed to get the warning
lights to work
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:19:17AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/15/11 3:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Afaik the LEDs won't work out-of-the-box.
There's no daemon currently in Linux responsible for monitoring disk status
and lighting up SES LEDs accordingly..
yikes. thats pretty
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 07:03:01AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 08/16/11 12:59 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
ie. you need a daemon/tool that monitors status of disks,
and keeps the Linux disk- ses slot mapping up-to-date.
i'm amazed this doesn't exist. isn't this a really common problem
/me ducks.
- Original Message -
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights
On 08/16/11 12:59 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
ie. you need a daemon/tool that monitors
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:30:46PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/27/2011 09:12 PM, sylvan.dcu...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Dennis,
Thanks a lot for the wise reply.. really did boost my knowledge..
honestly was unware of the fact that dom0 is just like another VM ...
Anyway I had
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:44:09PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know what version of XEN works fine with CentOS 6?
I installed XEN on a CentOS 6 server, as per these instructions:
[1]http://www.crc.id.au/xen-on-rhel6-scientific-linux-6-centos-6-howto/
And the
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Diederick Stoffers wrote:
Hi,
We have a new 24-core Dell PowerEdge R905 server with 128GB's RAM. The 64
bits version of Fedora 12 lists the correct amount of 128GB, CentOS only
finds 32GB (and so does Scientific Linux). I would much prefer
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:10:59AM +0800, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:36:57PM +0200, sadas sadas wrote:
I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of web
server farm because I need to do billing - I will use CentOS with iptables
+ ipset to store a list if my clients so when client doesn't pay his
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 09:58:19AM -0800, nate wrote:
RedShift wrote:
Have you got some figures to back that up? Everybody's saying OpenBSD's pf
performance is superior, yet nobody has posted some proof.
Not sure myself, keep in mind that there are (at least) two different
ways to
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:17:48AM +0100, Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Pasi Kärkkäinen spake:
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 09:36:57PM +0200, sadas sadas wrote:
I will explain more deeply. I need to deploy a firewall(s) in front of
web
server farm because I need to do billing - I will use
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:04:32PM +0200, sadas sadas wrote:
pa...@iki.ficentos@centos.org
Some months ago there was discussions about 10 gbit performance with
Linux. Some guys were pushing over 70 Gbit/sec through a single linux
box.
/centos@centos.org/pa...@iki.fi70
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:33:39PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Karanbir Singh schrieb:
On 01/08/2010 01:58 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online high density storage.
I wonder how much that would change
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 03:00:41PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 12:33:39PM +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote:
Karanbir Singh schrieb:
On 01/08/2010 01:58 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
the thumpers make for decent backup or vtl type roles, not so much for
online
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:12:33PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
At Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:01:24 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:17:14 +0200:
and don't
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:41:19AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 12/01/10 00:02, Christopher Chan wrote:
problems mostly centered around management and performance issues. the
world is littered with stores of cciss fail
Really? Man, I have been given this spanking new HP DL370 G6 and
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/12/2010 10:39 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
...
...that said, it's not much worse than the competetion, storage simply
sucks ;-(
So you are saying people dole out
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:43:35AM +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Wednesday 13 January 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 01:05:39AM +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Tuesday 12 January 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 1/12/2010 10:39 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:32:05PM -0800, nate wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Are there good 10Gb cards/drivers for the linux side?
My NAS vendor has deployed many systems with Chelsio 10GbE cards
in the field, say they are good.
http://www.chelsio.com/products_10g_adapters.html
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need faster performance, and simple
to configure, I wrote a blog on this a couple of months ago:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:08:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need faster performance, and simple
to configure, I wrote a blog
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:30:23AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:08:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 02:31:09PM -0800, nate wrote:
10GbE is really cheap these days(cheaper than 1GbE in some cases
on a per Gb basis) if you need
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:52:01AM -0800, nate wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
10GBase-T:
- latency 2.6 us
- power per port: 4-6W/port
With the right gear this is much lower, only 1 switch on the market
that is this good though the one mentioned in my blog, I'm sure
others
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:49:07AM -0800, nate wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Have you paid attention to this? How big is the difference nowadays?
Or I wonder if it was just on some specific product..
Depends on the product, my blog mentions a new product that draws
less power
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:07:43PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/12/2010 10:43 AM, John Doe wrote:
On the other hand, here, we have around 30 HP servers.
Some DL360/380/180 G5/G6 with CentOS 4/5 and,
in 2 years, only 3 drives failed... That's it; no other problems...
Drives is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 08:14:52PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 01/12/2010 03:51 PM, nate wrote:
I've used HP/cciss on a couple hundred systems over the past 7 years,
can only recall 2 issues, both around a drive failing the controller
didn't force the drive off line, and there was no
1 - 100 of 331 matches
Mail list logo
