On Wed, 7 May 2008, James Bunnell wrote:
What are the requirements to get a Centos IRC cloak in
freenode? Thanks in advance.
As of the last discussion by the centos group of developers,
IRC cloaks were not something that was going to be generally
'purchasable' by way of a donation, as if
On Fri, 16 May 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'm not sure I've ever seen the words 'easy' and 'pine' used
in the same sentence before. Pine has to have the most
counterintuitive interface known to man.
I usually hold the shift key down while using the down-arrow
to move over the parts to
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Nicholas wrote:
Would anyone know if CentOS 4 and 5 is LSB certified?
We have been offered a pass through the process by the LSB,
but there has not been demand for it.
I have not found any info on RH being LSB certified either. Is RH also LSB
certified?
One assumes
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Let me be the first (maybe):
CentOS 5.2 is here (at least):
http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/
ummm ... PLEASE -- no unofficial announcements as there are
some last minute tweaks still in process.
as Hughesjr pointed out in one channel:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008, Clint Dilks wrote:
I have been following the instructions here
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS but trying to modify them for
jdk-6u7-linux-amd64.rpm but there doesn't see to be a compatible
java-1.6.0-sun-compat-*.rpm.Does one exist ?
What's wrong with
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Martyn Hare wrote:
Yes but Linus could be guest speaker at LinuxChix, Bill has to pay for
his women ;-)
hey now -- she worked in tech too -- a product manager for
MSFT's 'Bob' product (clippy on steroids) ... oh, hmmm, so he
_did_ indirectly pay for ...
Never mind --
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Matt wrote:
I am wanting to uninstall an rpm off my CentOS 4.6 box. Namely
caching-nameserver. Is there anywhere I can look at the uninstall
script to see what it all does on its way out?
Run as an unpriv'd user:
rpm -q --scripts caching-nameserver
will show
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
When i install CentOS, it doesn't install yum package. How i
do it? when i haven't yum, it is like that i haven't
apt-get. Please help me
you appeared in the IRC channel earlier today, and were told
that the fork you are runing -- a
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I have the following in it:
clearpart --all
which is OK if I am installing over a previous installation. But for new
machines it does not seem to recognize the clearpart or it is not enough
because I am still prompted whether I want to
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010, Warren Young wrote:
On 12/9/2010 2:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, Apple dictates style; to a lesser degree, so does M$. There's no
dictated style guide for Linux.
That's outdated thinking. Apple's acquired some infamy among its fanboy
How about this long since OT
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, A T Williams wrote:
*But* I am the primary developer of a large Python application
http://www.ohloh.net/p/coils [113K lines and growing] and it *is( an
interesting trendlines there [soft economy, or loss of
interest in FOSS oritented languages, I wonder] -- I tinkered
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have a look at Lua (www.lua.org). Imo it's quite readable and less
snip
Don't. I have literally never heard of it before, and I at least have
heard of everything else folks have mentioned. Learn something that
there's a *large* base of folks who
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
gpg --import-key yourkey.asc
Thanks for your reply Tim. It still does not work though.
[rpmbuil...@karsites qps]$ gpg --import
Fedora6-GPG-public-key.asc
[rpmbuil...@karsites qps]$ rpm -K qps-1.9.18.6-1.fc6.src.rpm
qps-1.9.18.6-1.fc6.src.rpm:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Keith Roberts wrote:
# rpm --import Fedora6-GPG-public-key.asc
and then that objection will be silenced
Thanks Russ.
That has cured the problem.
Do I need the .gpg subdirectory in my rpmbuilder homedir?
no - that was created by GnuPG for maintaining a keystore,
The question was:
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 22:53 -0800, S Mathias wrote:
http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054
# Set up SSL protection on your website.
is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip
address, when i want to use ssl on my domain?
and one reply asseted:
On Wed,
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or more) on this list who compile from current source
in order to minimize their risks and are therefore the subject
audience.
and it is on topic in this venue, just
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Cal Webster wrote:
java-1.6.0-sun
non FOSS, non-source provided, no? This is in an addon
channel in RHEL, and so far as I know we have never shipped
such
Of the others the wireshark update is a periodic update of
some edge case dissectors [these developers are quite
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, robert mena wrote:
yeah but he wants to hear from the horse's mouth
Who knows what the guy really said when a reporter quotes something
The 'pull quotes' attributed to me (the horse in question) by
the Reg are accurate and carry good context
Anyone who follows
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011, fakessh @ wrote:
I installed the packages and libp11 engine_pkcs11
to allow me to recover the rpm of bind depositing unofficial CentALT.
is the only way to properly recompile the source rpm
this in order to to safety the last holes in bind
there is a fake bind that runs a
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jason Slack-Moehrle wrote:
Would anyone have thoughts?
don't reinvent the wheel
inotify builds and works fine on CentOS 5
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Michael B Allen wrote:
True. You cannot have multiple PTR records for an IP. I did not mean
to suggest that you could.
Not saying you are wrong here, but have you an RFC reference
to this effect? We previously held this belief from our prior
practice, but cannot find a
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
There are significant components of the upstream 5.6 release which are
stuck behind the CentOS 5.6 release process, but are now incorporated
in EPEL 5 components.
Sad that -- that the dependent partial Red Hat adjunct project
is not compatible
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
http://www.usatoday.com/money/smallbusiness/columnist/abrams/2011-03-18-how-to-lose-a-client_N.htm
CentOS has no clients to whom a contractual duty of support is
owed. If SLAs, sales engineers, 800 numbers, and such are
wanted or needed, PLEASE
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Александр Кириллов wrote:
TANSTAAFL
... long overdue free lunch
I get it -- you dont (or choose not to) understand the written
word
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011, Drew wrote:
Most likely because of relative cost and/or perceived value of SLES vs RHEL?
Novell is essentially offering to help you while you switch existing
kit over to SLES. If you're already paying for a RHEL subscription,
Novell's offer may have a lower cost or offer
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
Building the kernel shouldn't be an issue - but look at the
SL notes on the srpms that don't build with the listed
dependencies as shipped - and they aren't being picky about
the library linkages matching the RH binaries like CentOS
is.
If the
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, cornel panceac wrote:
2011/3/23 R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
This comes and goes, and really there is no substitute for actually
'doing' rather than
talking in the cloister
as i see it, the problem is while the users expectation has grown, the work
became harder
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
It is just hard for an outsider to reconcile the statements about the
build process not needing any changes or more resources with the lack of
a target time. Or that binary compatibility is the critical thing with
the distribution becoming
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
OK guys. Why don't you fork the CentOS project and build your own???
Why don't ANYBODY fork CentOS project? What are you/they waiting for?
Whining is easy, build something on your own.
Too strongly stated. I am aware of at least two private
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
As an aside, does the CentOS build environment (understanding that it
needs to be built, too), able to tweet something like last build; X
packages OK, Y packages failed?
This was done on a trailling basis for a couple side arch's
builders by me and another.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Tom H wrote:
This is the kind of answer that CentOS as a project
shouldn't allow (KB's recent use-something-else email is
another example) because it makes the developers look like
rank amateurs.
It is _so_ easy to tell others what they should or should not
do.
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
day (and I mean every complainant every day) and saying SL is better,
raising blood pressure to devs (which is why they are loosing their
temper), but keeps bashers wanting CentOS over the SL? I do not get it
Actually I just finished an email to
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
rebuilding RHEL src rpms under RHEL, it should be made
public and either fixed or acknowleged as the intended
outcome.
Off topic here as to what RHEL and its vendor should or should
not do, Les.
And 'self-hosting' has NEVER been a goal of the
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
hair is best cut. My bakery has refused to sell me sliced bread because it was
too hot to slice... however, they kindly explained when I should come back if
I
wished such that the bread would suitably be ready. No drama.
and so we should tell people:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
But Johnny's postings seem pretty insistent on never releasing the
actual scripts in a form that can be used elsewhere or by anyone outside
the project, so maybe a more productive approach would be some way of
oh horse puckey, troll -- it is just
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 4/12/2011 12:51 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
off the top of my head, here is the meta-code
Would you really repeat those steps by hand if someone gave
you a new server to add to what you use? Maybe things are
worse than I'd guessed.
You did
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) i dont see /usr/src/redhat/BUILD and the other 4 directories..
namely RPMS, SOURCES, SPECS, SRPMS
so basically how do i install /src.rpm files
Building as root is not sensible, as packages can 'leak' and
pollute the host environment -- see:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
A nice catch. As you know, typos are a hallmark for some CentOS
developers and an integral part of the CentOS project because they
make this OS stand out. :-)
hey -- I resemble that
-- Russ Herrold
orc_orc on IRC
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
ATM we'll just live and let live, and there will not be any one-side
effort to rectify any compatibility issues EPEL created. It's their
mess, they'll have to clean it up.
Live and let die, you mean - at least as far as the users
are concerned. I
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I understand how a lot of it went down (saw the meetings
and am on the lists as well), I'm just wondering if that
aside (I know, hard to do :), could there feasibly be an
RPM-based solution to this that would make repo-tags
obsolete?
'could be'?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
R P Herrold wrote on Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:29:47 -0400 (EDT):
cd /etc/xen
hmmm -- As I recall, you noted in your initial post having
built the xen images at: /home/xen. Please, could you please
place in a pastebin (http://www.pastebin.ca
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
That's so short I could post it here. But here you go:
http://www.pastebin.ca/672505
test1 is the name of the VM. It's the first and only I
created so far. I made one or two edits in xend-config.sxp
*after* the problem occurred, nothing that could
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
What I don't udnerstand is how xend or xm determines where the image file
is located. I can't see that anywhere. And the same applies to how it
man xm
holds this answer -- if the path variable is not set, it seems
to look at the CWD, from some of the
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small
s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up.
What sort of access is needed?
Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet at PARI.
Best as I had roughed out plans for a builder
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Just to make sure, is the /tftpboot directory set to perms 777?
Not that that parent directory (/tftpboot) requires (or should
ever have) anything like that to work
-- why the voodoo suggestion?
-- Russ Herrold
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote:
If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable
(single-phase OK, but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least
jumperable) UPS to the effort, about a 3000VA unit or so,
that would help matters considerably!
As it turns out, I _may_ actually
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007, Craig White wrote:
I hope now that java is GPL that it is packaged/bundled to eliminate
this nonsense
The versions are using and adjunct components people want are
not GPLd
-- Russ Herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007, Les Mikesell wrote:
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
On the other hand, redistribution is permitted...
Yeah, but there's still that indemnification clause in the Distribution
License. The FAQ says that this really doesn't matter, the License says
otherwise.
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Jerry Geis wrote:
I then found a vpnc reference but did not find a 64 bit version.
yum install vpnc did nothing
What is my next step?
it builds trivially from the SRPM -- it works fine here for me
- Russ Herrold
___
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
However, you can file a bug report against the website.
What is the point in 'complaining' by filing a BUG report when it is
conspicuously evident the existing web person(s) can not cope because
they have insufficient time or have died or have
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
Can't see any new web site on the latter URL. I'm not a Flash user by
choice.
Perhaps the Centos web site should be simple, practical, helpful in
preference to emulating the very latest presentation gimmicks ? A larger
font size will be useful for
On Sat, 17 Sep 2011, Always Learning wrote:
I am unaware of ever making those comments !
Check your file copy of your email to me of 25 Aug. I won't
engage in a battle of semantics with an anonymous troll
To all:
As a matter of logistics, we are putting some new permissions
in place to
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/21/11 8:42 PM, Always Learning wrote:
5.7 has been released, obsoleting the 5.6/cr/
John or Always
I am in a low bandwidth environment, and so cannot do this
myself
Plesae file a bug at: http://bugs.centos.org/ so that the
release process
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
What state should it be in? should that file be referenced as
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/5/cr/x86_64/RPMS/centos-release-cr.el5.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
?
or should there be a new
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
ok, not my best bug report.
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5136
but I guess it will serve as a placeholder for clarifications.
you know, if there is not a report, there is not a bug ;)
I've addressed the documentation issue already facing end
On Tue, 4 Oct 2011, Johnny Tan wrote:
Like recent Ubuntus, C6 uses upstart in place of traditional Sys V init.
Likely, you will want this in /etc/init/ -- note!, not the same as
/etc/init.d/
I don't know WHAT you are looking at, if anything, but it is
not a CentOS 6 install; 'upstart' is a
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/21/2011 12:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
They have created an optional channel in several of those
groupings that is only accessible via RHN and they do not
put those RPMS
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Gary Greene wrote:
Trust me ... the Linux Foundation thinks it is OK, so we are SOL.
I'd rather get the opinion of the FSF (those whom wrote the
license) instead of LF, as they don't matter as much,
really.
Feel free to approach whoever you wish on your own account
On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
I don't care in general, but dislike hypocrisy. If you are going to
claim to be open source, it should work to rebuild.
les ... go rent a forum of your own -- this has no centos
aspect any more
-- Russ herrold
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
I just can't embrace installing an OS whose security updates have
...
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
-- Russ herrold
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote:
Oh, things have improved have they? Last I tried, you could not get d-i
Please take this elsewhere -- it has nothing to do with centos
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Craig White wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:49 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
Then please leave -- your sustained venom and bile are not
needed, wanted, nor useful here, let alone remotely on topic
what venom? what bile?
For the record, I wasn't the one who brought up
PROTECTED] .gnupg]$ gpg --clearsign import-key-howto.txt
You need a passphrase to unlock the secret key for
user: R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024-bit DSA key, ID 9B649644, created 2003-02-09
File`import-key-howto.txt.asc' exists. Overwrite? (y/N) y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .gnupg]$
10
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, R P Herrold wrote:
... Hopefully this attched writeup will transit the CentOS
mailing list manager intact. I also include it inline below,
but this may mangle the signature.
'attached' of course -- part of the 'orc_orc' spelling
authenticity test. ;)
Following up
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, William L. Maltby wrote:
PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm
seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any
three words: Processor Tech Sol
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote:
three words: Processor Tech Sol
-- Russ herrold
Ahh, I was waiting for you to show up. OK, everyone, if you are
trying to show your age, stop now -- because no one can win orc_orc
(Russ, our CentOS dev).
Actually from slightly before that era, I
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Robert wrote:
We might be entering first liar don't have a chance
territory here. Do you remember where you were when Kennedy
was shot?
sadly, yes
I was in the last Ramac 305 class ever held, on
lunch break and had watched the motorcade pass from a
lunchroom window.
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jim Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, R P Herrold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you win ;) -- I don't want to be older, and in my head, I'm still in my
twenties.
Face it. Your golden buckeye card has a registration number of 1. you
cannot escape this fact
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Paul wrote:
Hmmm, Processor Technologies used to have a voice coil actuated dual
drive that shared it between both drives IIRC. Interesting drive with a
motorized eject, thing is you had to wait for the disk to complete eject
before you grabbed it, if you grabbed it before
On Thu, 4 Sep 2008, Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
A final point I'll note is that this is a CentOS list, aimed
at helping people with CentOS. It's not a place to spam with
ads for your website unless they are CentOS specific.
* cough *nor even then --- We encounter this in
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Miark wrote:
My wife's office server was compromised today. It appears
they ssh'ed in through
ehh? exposed to the public internet? oh my ;)
account pcguest which was set up for Samba. (I don't
remember setting up that account, but maybe I did.)
ssh will of course
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
on 9-10-2008 1:02 AM Josh Donovan spake the following:
Hi folks,
Normally people ask when is CentOS 4.7 coming and they
are told when it is ready. Dag posted on his blog about
it going to testing in July while it was supposed to be
syncing to the
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, MHR wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Anne Wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had similar messages on this laptop. Acer accepted liability and replaced
the disk.
I'm pretty sure the Seagate warranty is no longer in force - most of
them are a year.
you
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, RobertH wrote:
Any 4.7 update issues or horror stories yet?
Part of the QA which I mentioned earlier in the week was
looking for problems. This late in point respins of the 4
series, however, nothing major comes to mind from the looking
we did during that testing.
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Shad L. Lords wrote:
James Pearson wrote:
I can't find the kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.EL.src.rpm and
kernel-2.6.9-78.0.1.plus.c4.src.rpm on the download sites - the binary
i386/x86_64 RPMS are there, but not the matching SRPMs
There are actually quite a few missing sources:
On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
RobertH wrote:
Marcus,
Exactly, I have often wondered upstream does it that way so that I always
have to go fix the /etc/hosts file after every CentOS install.
Since functionally, it is wrong.
indeed, having the hostname bound to the loopback
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
I'd have to suggest that the 'default' list (eg this one) should be the most
general and beginner oriented, and any new additional lists should be the
ones with the narrower focus (centos-tech, for instance, or centos-sysadmin).
in my experience with
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Scott Silva wrote:
This thread has got to have beaten the CentOS record for
most posts about nothing!
Or the longest off-topic thread about off-topic threads!
or a sad demonstation by people who know better ignoring
Godwin's Law
If people are unwilling to follow long
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote:
totalitarian republic of CentOS. I believe an announcement
All sources used by CentOS are freely available under a
distributable license, as are those for patched RPMs
consistent with its GPL obligation when _distributing_ the
product of another;
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Spike Turner wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
You know after all this time the CentOS frontpage
is still showing out of date info.
Please remind me of your bug number filed on this. I have
read all new filings to date and must have missed it.
-- Russ herrold
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
I need to create some local users but then 'disable' that user. I know i can
enable and disable the user by using usermod -L and -U but does anyone know
if there is a way for me to see the current status of the user? ie locked or
unlocked?
[EMAIL
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Tom Brown wrote:
Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout package
update repo deploy
I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out
there that can take code from a repository and build rpm's
in a continuous integration type manner? I
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 2008-12-04, 00:42 GMT, Christopher Chan wrote:
What would you pick? Learn a few new commands/configuration
files or have to prep up a new desktop rollout every six
months?
12 -- Fedora 8 is still pretty good and only now you would have
to switch to
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Amos Shapira wrote:
I found Perl's Conf::INI module but it expects comments beginning with
;, not #.
and
| sed -e 's...@^#@;@g'
cannot cure that bad habit on generated files or an input
stream?
[herr...@centos-5 ~]$ cat - END | sed -e 's...@^#@;@g'
one
two#two
On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
on 1-8-2009 1:28 PM Warren, Eucke spake the following:
Is there a process for finding status updates to open bugs
within Centos?
-- view it in a web browser, and optionally 'monitor' it so
emails of updated state are received
-- offer to buy support
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Warren, Eucke wrote:
... To suggest a shaming only makes the Centos community
look bad as it would be done so without understanding the
entire environment and situation.
Thank you for the restrained reply, Eucke
Wearing my '@centos.org' hat, let me add that I strongly
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5)
and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt
and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind,
or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs?
If more volunteers are
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
... you do NOT file bugs in the bug tracker to make formal
your concern.
I made last month about security updates missing for almost
a month.
no bug - no issue.
Members of the CentOS community should, in a free world be
able
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, nate wrote:
I would not use CentOS at all if for anything else than Oracle
won't support it. Oracle linux is a clone of RHEL and I believe
is pretty cheap, otherwise RHEL 5 Advanced.
ummm .. a recent UBL was a rebuild of CentOS SRPMs
- Rhss herrold
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
In all fairness to all the rebels, if somebody from the
Cento's team would have responded in a timely matter to the
original yes/no question of this thread,
... and an allegedly 'yes or no' question can take three and a
half 24 line screens to
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009, Bogdan Nicolescu wrote:
BUT... when someone from the Centos team makes a statement
like ...latest release has many up-to-date desktop
packages...
ummm -- it is of course true that changes happen; rebasings do
as well; and the CentOS project [and the upstream] document
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009, Scott Silva wrote:
You can loopback mount the dvd image, but I don't think you
could easily loopback mount the cd images and get a proper
directory structure.
A little massaging is needed and simple image loopback mounts
seem 'touchy' in practice as outlined in the
indicated and of record at the
customary keyservers
See:
http://orcorc.blogspot.com/2008/08/gnupg-few-minutes-on-using-detached-and.html
user: R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
1024-bit DSA key, ID 9B649644, created 2003-02-09
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Craig White wrote:
Perhaps you can just say to Lance, thanks and keep whatever money, just
turn over the domain name and then you can get your own paypal adsense
accounts.
* chuckle * I will sell you this toll bridge for a great
price -- want to know how much it is
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Monty Shinn wrote:
To those that have been able to donate money, I would like to say thank
you. The project is still alive, so the money must have been used to
some extent to support the project.
An accounting would answer that question, wouldn't it?
As the
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Timo Schoeler wrote:
BTW: cent-os.org was just being registered:
The signers of the letter have the needed domain trifecta's
locked up already.
-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Jason Pyeron wrote:
As I have said before, I have experience in this matter and we have a current
relationship with tucows. Would the team like our help? We can't and won't
unless asked.
The letter was done in the fashion it was in sorrow, and not
in anger, as my blog
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Marcus Moeller wrote:
I recently started thinking about how to make a project like CentOS
more transparent and open (especially for new contributors).
I have no idea what meaning to 'transparent' you have in mind
-- all mailing lists of public character are open; the
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
R P Herrold wrote:
The bit that causes all the confusion here is the C in the name
CentOS. It would all be so much clearer if the project would just rename
to EntOS because that's what it is.
Show merit on a sustained basis, and get offered [drafted
On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:40 AM, R P Herroldherr...@centos.org wrote:
Some people are perhaps offended that the less public CentOS
infrastructure levels do not invite them in -- I cannot help
their wounded feelings. ...
During my 'relatively short'
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
