On Friday 18 April 2008 12:23, Masry Alex wrote:
#that's what the mentioned article suggested..I'm not sure it's working!
*raw
-A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 80 -j NOTRACK
Do you have a chain called NOTRACK? What is setup under it?
COMMIT
*filter
-A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT
-A
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 01:49, gopinath wrote:
if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3 the pc is able to communicated to
everyone on the networks.
Please help me out.
How about check the configs against one another on all 3
Hello,
For some reason KMail is all but coming to a stand still when I open messages
with any kind of signature. So I goto the configuration page of KMail
Security Crypo Back ends and I see nothing is checked off. So I hit rescan
and get the error that is listed in the attachment. Anyone
On Thursday 24 April 2008 14:07, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:58:24 Anne Wilson wrote:
On Thursday 24 April 2008 18:45:40 Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello,
For some reason KMail is all but coming to a stand still when I open
messages with any kind of signature
On Saturday 26 April 2008 09:05, Anne Wilson wrote:
Bringing up interface borg2: RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Error adding address 192.168.0.40 for eth0.
but ifconfig shows the correct address for eth0.
Apr 26 11:11:52 borg2 automount[2547]:
On Saturday 26 April 2008 10:19, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Saturday 26 April 2008 14:29, Robert Spangler wrote:
This is a firewall issue. If I turn off the firewall everything
works. NFS and SMB are marked as trusted services, but it seems
that is not enough. Which ports need
On Monday 28 April 2008 10:47, Philip R. Schaffner wrote:
For relatively simple situations Firestarter may be worth a look as a
GUI front end:
http://www.fs-security.com/
There is an EL4 binary version on the above site, but it builds OK from
SRPM on CentOS-5:
Hello,
For some reason at different times Centos will freeze and not allow me to do
anything. This doesn't happen while I'm working on the system but after I
have locked my session and then return. It could goes days without a lockup
and then the next time I try to log in it'll be frozen.
I
On Thursday 15 May 2008 21:51, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Spangler wrote:
For some reason at different times Centos will freeze and not allow me
to do anything. This doesn't happen while I'm working on the system but
after I have locked my session and then return
On Saturday 17 May 2008 08:12, B.J. McClure wrote:
I had a similar situation on CentOS 4.x and on 5.0, different boxes. In
both cases it was resolved by replacing a bad stick of RAM. If the box
can be off line I would suggest a 24 hour run of memtest. On my systems
it only occurred
On Friday 23 May 2008 21:31, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
Actually I have written a small tutorial on iptables, but I haven't
translated it into english. I'll let you know when it's done. Hopefully it
will be useful for others.
Please have someone, or for that matter a few people, who have a good
On Friday 23 May 2008 11:03, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Thursday 22 May 2008 22:30:29 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a dual homed server in an install for someone who is very cost
sensitive. This server originally is being setup as an Asterisk server,
but now the simplest thing for me to
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for
Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and
I think it should be time for an upgrade.
If I'm looking in the wrong place let me know also. Thnx.
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 19:31, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:22 PM, Robert Spangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0
for Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the
repos
On Tuesday 27 May 2008 20:19, MHR wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Robert Spangler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I use one out of the Fedora's repos? If so, which repo?
You can just pull down the latest version from mozilla.org - they're
pretty good about compatibility. I'd
On Saturday 14 June 2008 09:49, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
chkconfig iptables off
That was how I disabled it originally yet it was being started by
something else. jlc
Did you install another firewall front end? Something like Firestarter?
--
Regards
Robert
Smile... it increases your
On Thursday 10 July 2008 18:08, MHR wrote:
In following up on the rsh problem I was having earlier, I decided
to try out the suggestion Felipe sent about using
system-config-securitylevel-tui to open up ports 513 and 514, but that
doesn't seem to do the job, either.
# iptables -L
On Thursday 10 July 2008 22:49, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Could you post /etc/sysconfig/iptables?
/etc/sysconfig/iptables doesn't necessarily reflect what is running
right now, and you can't include the counters with it.
I'm not interested in the counters I want to see how the rules
On Friday 03 December 2010 19:30, Michael D. Berger wrote:
In the control script of my daemon in /etc/init.d?, I have
# chkconfig: 35 97 3
The result of this is that I have links:
/etc/rc.d/rc1.d/K03...
/etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S97...
/etc/rc.d/rc5.d/S97...
As mentioned in a
On Sunday 09 January 2011 13:33, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Our intranet's WAN interface just stopped working yesterday, and I
can't figure it out.
Look in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. There you should see ifcfg-eth# If
ifcfg-eth0 isn't there copy ifcfg-eth1 to ifccfg-eth0 and then configure
On Friday 14 January 2011 04:01, Ritika Garg wrote:
When I give the command cp file1 file2 then the error comes:
cp: cannot create regular file `file2': Input/output error
This occurs sometimes and it occurs when I am giving the command inside a
external hard disk which is mounted by
On Friday 14 January 2011 05:45, Mister IT Guru wrote:
On 13/01/2011 21:45, Daniel Heitmann wrote:
On 13.01.2011, at 22:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
You should probably give RH a call with your questions, or try this
mailing list:
Or wait a few more weeks for CentOS 6, if it's a
On Thursday 20 January 2011 09:14, Ross Walker wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Bob Eastbrook baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's password when the system wakes
up from the screensaver. This can be disabled by each user, but how
can I disable this
On Monday 31 January 2011 07:46, Jobst Schmalenbach wrote:
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to
$PROXY:3128 iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth1 -p tcp --dport 443 -j
DNAT --to $PROXY:3128
browser tell me invalid request.
From the man pages:
DNAT
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 13:36, Carlos S wrote:
I am forwarding traffic on port 8080 to port 80 with following rule.
# iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j
REDIRECT --to-port 80
Shouldn't that be '--to-ports'?
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 16:43, Carlos S wrote:
Thanks for the help.
You are welcome.
Robert, you pointed out the mistakes correctly. Not sure why I used
iptables-save command at first place...
Most likely because in ever other distro and web page that is the way to do
it. It's just
On Monday 07 March 2011 15:22, the following was written:
Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:34:24AM -0600, Sean Carolan wrote:
Can anyone point out reasons why it might be a bad idea to put this
sort of line in your /etc/hosts file, eg, pointing the FQDN at the
loopback
On Tuesday 08 March 2011 12:39, the following was written:
And giving it 127.0.0.1 would tell it others to ignore it, I think.
Where did your user come up with this idea - clearly, they have *no*
clue what they're doing, and need at least a brown bag lunch about
TCP/IP, and they
On Friday 08 April 2011 14:32, the following was written:
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:27 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Johan Martinez wrote:
I have modified /etc/hosts file with IP address and hostname entries.
However, host command is returning 'Host vhost1.example.com not found:
On Thu July 5 2007 06:29, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] master]# cat example77.com.zone
$TTL86400
@ IN SOA gateway.example77.com. root.example77.com. (
2006101604 ; Serial
1800 ; Refresh
On Fri August 3 2007 23:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've a new CentOS 5 minimalist install; this will be the name server
from my prior thread. I have configured eth0 during setup with the
static IP the unit will have when in production. During this setup
phase, selinux is set to
On Fri August 17 2007 09:16, Ray Leventhal wrote:
As this remains an issue for me, I'm reposting. Please forgive the
redundancy, but I've been unable to find the answer and am hoping for some
guidance.
OK, are you running named in a chroot env?
On Tue August 28 2007 12:27, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up a centos5 router for a friend. It will direct traffic
to an internal webserver, already in place, as well as run squid proxy. It
should do nat and have a firewall with iptables. I've set up routers before
for this purpose
On Thu August 30 2007 00:08, William Warren wrote:
easier waylog in as root and type the word free to get a much
slimmer version of that information. If the numbers look odd(after
posting them here) then the more expansive option below is needed.
You don't need to log in as root to
On Fri September 21 2007 18:50, Craig White wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# kill 26598
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# service named restart
Stopping named:[FAILED]
Starting named:[ OK ]
After you have
On Mon October 15 2007 13:13, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 10/15/07, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well ... that SMP appears in uname -a even on a single-cpu system.
Oops :-P
I've only got multi-cpu systems these days and didn't test it out in a
vm. Glad to see you're keeping me
On Sat November 10 2007 09:34, Paul wrote:
Unfortunately, at least here in France there's no ing way to have a
laptop without Microsoft Windows installed. I'm 100% GNU/Linux since
2001 or so, but I must have paid for five or six licenses since.
I thought that I read that someplace
Hello everyone,
I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using
nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound.
Flashplayer is: flash-plugin-9.0.48.0-release.i386.rpm
nspluginwrappers are: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm
On Mon November 12 2007 12:28, Shibu C Varughese wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello everyone,
I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using
nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound.
Just check if the user is added to the audio
On Mon November 12 2007 13:30, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello everyone,
I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for
firefox using
nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound.
Make sure the 32-bit alsa-lib is installed.
alsa
On Mon November 12 2007 15:54, James Pearson wrote:
On 12/11/2007, Robert Spangler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon November 12 2007 13:30, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
Hello everyone,
I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins
On Wed November 14 2007 14:41, James A. Peltier wrote:
Completely off topic, but I'm sure someone out there is using scripts
that require a sudo password of some sort, so I'll ask.
What are people doing to automate tasks that required sudo passwords in
order to run? sudo without a
On Thu November 15 2007 06:04, James Pearson wrote:
If you have a 64 bit distro installed, then aplay will be 64 bit -
running:
file `which aplay`
Nope, but rpm -qa | grep alsa-util told me that I have the 64bit installed,
which by the way does work fine.
should confirm this. To run
On Fri November 16 2007 06:06, James Pearson wrote:
Might have to walk down this same path Thnx for all your help and time.
The 32 bit kernel support for playback on 64 bit machines for older 2.6
kernels (including the RHEL4/CentOS4 kernel) didn't work properly until
ALSA 1.0.15.
Hello,
I received the below SELinux message today and I am trying to figure out what
caused it. I see what it says under Allow Access but I am not sure this is
what I really want to do without know why it happened in the first place.
What should I be looking at to understand what or why this
On Thursday 08 September 2011 16:58, the following was written:
I'm not a pro or anything, but this bug report gives a bit more info.
Have you made any changes to the disk lately?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485921
find / -context *:file_t:*
The above command will
On Friday 09 September 2011 10:21, the following was written:
That's the total output?
Yep. Nothing more. I ran it again and here is the new output:
[Fri Sep 09 10:40:20] [rjs@bms] /home/rjs
~ $ sudo find / -context *:file_t:*
getfilecon(/proc/7408/task/7408/fd/4): No such file or
On Sunday 11 September 2011 14:57, the following was written:
So why is ifconfig eth0 up not connecting?
Have you tried 'ifup eth0'?
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The adventure of a lifetime.
Linux User #296285
Get Counted
http://linuxcounter.net/
On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written:
So
How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated?
or at least how to tell centos to stop messing with the
70-persistent-net.rules?
Add the hardware addresses to their ifcfg-eth# files.
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 04:10, the following was written:
On 19.09.2011 23:48, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Monday 19 September 2011 11:04, the following was written:
So
How do you specifiy the order in which NICs are enumerated?
or at least how to tell centos to stop
On Tuesday 20 September 2011 17:39, the following was written:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2011 04:44:35 PM Robert Nichols wrote:
On 09/20/2011 02:49 PM, Craig White wrote:
Guessing that you didn't look/watch the console on first boot but
rather used ssh to connect from another
On Friday 07 October 2011 06:25, the following was written:
In the named.conf, located on main.example.com, I am adding my entire 16
IP block of addresses along with my localhost
options {
allow-recursion { localhost; xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx /29;};
allow-query { localhost;
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 03:43, the following was written:
Hi,
This is a Centos 5.5 host with one xen guest.
About 2 weeks ago, the host randomly lost network connection. By
this I mean I could not connect to the services on it, or ping it.
Also was the status of the guest.
On Friday 03 February 2012 08:07, the following was written:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0, but did not find where to
explicitely
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want to bridge eth2 and eth3, with a bridge
named br0.
Searching the web I only found about creating a file
On Saturday 04 February 2012 19:18, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 11:56 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
On Friday 03 February 2012 09:10, the following was written:
On 02/03/2012 08:07 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote:
Hi all,
Having a 4 NIC server, I want
On Tuesday 14 February 2012 15:21, the following was written:
Is there a way to add a rule to the nat table (CentOS 5.7) that would
alter the port number of tcp packets destined for the server itself? I
have ip_forwarding enabled, but the packets don't seem to hit the
prerouting chain.
On Saturday 03 March 2012 00:35, the following was written:
I escalated to the DC manager and this is what he replied:
I'm sorry your having a hard time with software raid on your server and
our install process. From what I remember talking with out techs long
ago about this is, that
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on
my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are
running and if I can stop them. Thnx.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:44, the following was written:
From the looks of things, you have 8 CPUs (or cores), and these standard
processes are being started on a 1 per core basis.
I have a quad-core proc, and have 4 of each of those processes (0-3).
That is what I was thinking but
Hello,
I need to know if there is something I am missing about file permission as I
believe I am seeing some strange stuff on my system. I have a directory as
follows:
drwxrwxrwx 7 root root 4096 Mar 10 13:35 temp
In this directory I have a file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 137 Oct 30
On Saturday 10 March 2012 13:45, the following was written:
Thnx everyone. I was under the impression that even though you had access to
the directory you still could not touch a file that you were not part of the
owner or group unless the bits were set.
--
Regards
Robert
Linux
The
On Wednesday 27 August 2008 19:27, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html
Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can
haul with me on my plane ride this weekend?
Nope, but I'm open to suggestions. :)
--
Regards
Robert
On Thursday 28 August 2008 05:50, Mark Quitoriano wrote:
hmmm... yeah i think is et everything to 300 which is not good. What
is the recommended TTL settings? some sites recommend 4 days some 1
hour.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Michel van Deventer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 29 August 2008 17:26, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Where is the correct place to control what traffic is masq'ed out?
This is what I have, but I was told the Forward chain isn't the right
place to do this?
iptables -A POSTROUTING -t nat -o $WAN -j MASQUERADE
iptables -A FORWARD -i
On Friday 29 August 2008 17:52, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Postrouting is the correct one. After everything is routed it is MASQ
before leaving the interface.
That makes sense, but I am stuck at making the transition, should I simply
pull the port specifications from my third line in the
On Friday 29 August 2008 18:38, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
No port or packet types are needed as everything needs to be MASQed.
Sorry, I wasn't clear. I only want ports 80/443 translated for internal
clients so I do need a rule of some sorts.
We should be talking live. Why don't your join
On Sunday 31 August 2008 22:31, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
We should be talking live. Why don't your join the #centos-social on
freenode so we can chat real time?
Robert,
Just got back from my trip and reading that Tutorial, it went on to state
what I now find to be two distinct
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 17:00, Scott Silva wrote:
Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states on
the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data available
And yes I have eth0 up and
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:18, John R Pierce wrote:
Either way, ethtool should show you detected and current link states
on the connection ;
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data available
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:20, Les Mikesell wrote:
That is not always the case. I cannot get ethtool to work.
~ $ /sbin/ethtool eth0
Settings for eth0:
No data available
And yes I have eth0 up and running.
Does mii-tool work?
Nope. Don't understand why. Maybe a
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:53, nate wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
And yes I have eth0 up and running.
What network driver?
On-board port:
Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (rev 13)
Driver:
sk98lin
--
Regards
Robert
On Friday 12 September 2008 14:56, Robert Nichols wrote:
Josh Donovan wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
When I asked about a similar problem a while back, the
SELinux folks
told me that bind-chroot was not supported under SELinux
because
SELinux already provides better protection.
On Friday 19 September 2008 23:38, David Petruzzella wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
On Tuesday 09 September 2008 18:53, nate wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
And yes I have eth0 up and running.
What network driver?
On-board port:
Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology
Hello everyone,
While I know this isn't Centos related, you guys seems to be on top of your
game around here. Sorry for the off-topic.
I'm looking for a tool to monitor my servers and send either an email or page
or both when something breaks. I would like it to monitor all sorts of
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 05:32, Jim Wildman wrote:
On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote:
I have been using Nagios for monitoring the network and a few servers.
It works fine. It's not the easiest thing to get it working properly.
Regards
M.
Have not tried it,
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 01:15, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Have you looked at Nagios or Groundwork? There are some howto's on
http://www.howtoforge.net
Was not aware of this site. Big Thnx!
--
Regards
Robert
It is not just an adventure.
It is my job!!
Linux User #296285
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 16:25, John R Pierce wrote:
Robert Spangler wrote:
This looks interesting. Will have to read up on it some.
Just wondering if I can configure it to allow many people to setup
monitoring different way on the same device?
nagios monitors are configured
On Friday 10 October 2008 09:54, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
I'm looking for a good web based script / website that can do a full
ananlysis on DNS namservers.
Can someone please recommend something good to use?
Try this one;
http://www.checkdns.net/quickcheckdomainf.aspx
And if
On Thursday 23 October 2008 09:53, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Try adding it manually to the iptables config.
# vim /etc/sysconfig/iptables
And then restart iptables.
Not recommended. Do 'service iptables save' as Filipe posted.
You will need to explain why this is 'Not
On Tuesday 02 December 2008 17:58, Alexander Farber wrote:
why does iptables-save print 2 numbers in square brackets?
Is it used for anything? Is it number of inspected packets
(and what's the other number then)?
It is packetand byte counters.
And what does *filter mean?
Not sure
--
On Thursday 04 December 2008 04:21, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
Hi,
I know these are a few iptbales questions. NOT CentOS, anyway, I am
running a firewall on centos 5.x.
If you can response, it would be fine.
I want to add a SNAT rule for one user in LAN to access one particular
On Wednesday 31 December 2008 16:05, chloe K wrote:
ls the network address traslation in centos5.2 different?
Nope.
I disable the default iptable rule and use the following commands but I
can't connect http://public:8080 from outside to this host 192.168.0.10
port 80
eth1 is
On Friday 02 January 2009 00:16, Kenneth Burgener wrote:
On 1/1/2009 8:13 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
Your rules are in need of help.
First off I am not even sure what you are doing will work, i.e.;
--append or --table
These are written as '-A' and '-t'
--append and --table
On Thursday 22 January 2009 17:28, Agile Aspect wrote:
Regarding item (2), I would guess I would have to add the following
entries:
Active:
-
-A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 20
--sport 4:6 -j ACCEPT
-A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp --sport
On Friday 17 July 2009 08:14, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The mirrorlist entry in my Fedora-11 /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-update.repo
reads:
mirrorlist=https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released
- f$releaseverarch=$basearch
As far as I can see, this means that yum is
On Monday 03 August 2009 00:36, Les Mikesell wrote:
Drew wrote:
It's a bit of bad form to use NAT and private addresses at all because
the internet really wasn't designed to be segmented, but everyone does
it.
Why is NAT bad form?
I don't mean to imply it shouldn't be used -
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the main/master
server would fail.
2. Can I have each subnet be a master for itself and a
On Friday 14 August 2009 21:29, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already
On Friday 14 August 2009 23:31, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
If you are worried about valid config then you should be using
the tools that
come with Bind instead of relying on some third party software.
named-checkconf for checking the configuration of Bind
named-checkzone for
On Tuesday 25 August 2009 14:35, Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:37 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org wrote:
If so, in CentOS 5.3 that package is called pirut and the individual
file that runs is called puplet.
It seems that puplet is not working correctly after the
On Thursday 01 October 2009 16:56, ML wrote:
I have a home business circuit and I am gearing up to host my business
affairs in my place. I have Comcast and 13 static IP's.
I have an extra PIII 1U, 2 9gb SCSI, 1gb RAMm dual NICS.
If you can, I would place a 3rd NIC into this device and use
Hello,
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I have read
a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually deps are
missing. :(
Thnx
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
___
CentOS
On Sunday 11 October 2009 01:22, Lucian @ lastdot.org wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I have
read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as usually
deps are missing. :(
Usually rpm -Uhv
On Sunday 11 October 2009 05:35, lostson wrote:
Can anyone tell me how to get the 2 in the Subject line to work? I
have read a lot about adding this or that repo but still no joy as
usually deps are missing. :(
Personally I use rpmfusion repo which you can fine here
On Monday 19 October 2009 17:18, Bowie Bailey wrote:
The logs on my mail server are filling up with this kind of thing:
Oct 19 17:03:51 bnofmail kernel: REJECT: IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX:XX SRC=195.140.240.6
DST=XX.XX.XX.XX LEN=189 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=52
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 04:11, vijay shanker wrote:
This file MUST be edited with the 'visudo' command as root.
NO, it MUST not be edited with 'visudo'.
YES, you should use 'visudo'.
You can edit sudoer with vi or vim and save the changes too. Just read what
it tells you you need to do
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:36, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Dear Ryan.
is there a way to combine iptables parameters like: iptables -A OUTPUT
-p UDP -p TCP -d $IP1 -d $IP2 ?
Each of those parameters is called a match, in IPTables-speak. You
can specify multiple matches in one
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 15:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
This is irritating: I've got a server I just upgraded to 5.4, then
rebooted, only to discover that it just *sits* there at the grub boot
menu. I looked at grub.conf, and uncommented hiddenmenu (which should have
been done long
On Wednesday 28 October 2009 16:44, Marcus Moeller wrote:
does it work to define iptables rules with a fqdn as destination
instead of an IP address? Or is it useful to resolve the name first
using e.g. nslookup, writing the result to a variable which is then
used within the -d statement?
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
