Re: [CentOS] ZFS

2014-09-15 Thread Warren Young
On 9/15/2014 14:48, Andrew Holway wrote: Any comparison between ZFS and non-ZFS probably overlooks things like fully-checksummed data (not just metadata) and redundant copies. ZFS will always be slower than filesystems without these features. TANSTAAFL. Not really true. It hugely depends

Re: [CentOS] Bare drive RAID question, was RE: *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

2014-09-05 Thread Warren Young
On 9/5/2014 07:18, Richard Zimmerman wrote: Until I read this thread, I've never heard of building RAIDs on bare metal drives. I'm assuming no partition table, just a disk label? I don't know what you mean by a disk label. BSD uses that term for their alternative to MBR and GPT partition

Re: [CentOS] Bare drive RAID question, was RE: *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

2014-09-05 Thread Warren Young
On 9/5/2014 08:18, Scott Robbins wrote: On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 08:01:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: I don't know what you mean by a disk label. There is another method of disk naming, I think it gained popularity between /dev/sda and UUID, that was something like LABEL=swap or LABEL=root

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue

2014-09-02 Thread Warren Young
On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea). Nothing wrong with that, particularly with big midden volumes like this one. I added /dev/sdc to /dev/md4, and it started rebuilding. *facepalm* You forgot the primary maxim

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue

2014-09-02 Thread Warren Young
On 9/2/2014 12:05, Keith Keller wrote: On 2014-09-02, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 8/29/2014 14:26, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Note that we did this on *raw*, unpartitioned drives (not my idea). Nothing wrong with that, particularly with big midden volumes like this one. Indeed

Re: [CentOS] An R rpm question

2014-09-02 Thread Warren Young
On 9/2/2014 12:37, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: The server they want downgraded is running 4.1.0-5; ?? The latest version of R is 3.1.1: http://www.r-project.org/ Do you mean 3.1.0-5? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Packages cmake (base) and metis (epel) conflict with each other

2014-08-25 Thread Warren Young
On 8/25/2014 15:06, Peter Wood wrote: I don't recall ever running into a conflict between packages in base and packages in epel repositories. I see it here, too. It's clearly a packaging bug, probably due to the fact that the more recent Red Hattish Linuxes use CMake 2.8+. EPEL has a

Re: [CentOS] Port scanning from MicroSoft?

2014-08-25 Thread Warren Young
On 8/25/2014 18:18, Nathan Duehr wrote: How one could get into the VM business without KNOWING idiots would happily pay for and utilize VMs on big bandwidth to do stupid human tricks, and take appropriate precautions NOT to become part of the problem… is beyond me. Easy. 1. Most of these

Re: [CentOS] Some thoughts on systemd

2014-07-17 Thread Warren Young
On 7/17/2014 11:39, Keith Keller wrote: (Not suggesting that systemd actually solves this issue, only that boot time is important in some use cases.) Well, *something* is making EL7 boot a lot faster than EL6. My EL6 test VM takes almost twice as long to boot to a console login (runlevel 3)

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 in VirtualBox

2014-07-10 Thread Warren Young
On 7/10/2014 15:02, Wes James wrote: So for some reason the installer has the interface as default off. Probably security. It gives you a chance to boot the new box up and tighten things down before turning on the Ethernet port. To make it come up on first boot, go to the Configure - General

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2014-06-17 Thread Warren Young
On 6/16/2014 15:58, Chuck Campbell wrote: If they keep going through this ip block, they will still get 255 attempts at the root password and 1020 attempts at other login/password combinations before they are blocked by fail2ban. I'm glad you got your firewall problem sorted out, but I can't

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

2014-06-17 Thread Warren Young
On 6/17/2014 19:35, Chuck Campbell wrote: I haven't done the load stats, but it appears to me that a hundred of these crackers hitting my machine at these rates is likely to deny my legit users some resources. So increase the fail2ban time from the default (5 minutes, as I recall) to 1 hour,

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-15 Thread Warren Young
On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: [*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes, which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available today. I’ve been wondering what 500 TB looks like, so I worked it out. It requires

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-12 Thread Warren Young
On 6/11/2014 07:11, Timothy Murphy wrote: Does XFS have any advantages over ext4 for normal users, eg with laptops? If you graph machine size -- in whatever dimension you like -- vs number deployed, I think you'd find all laptops over on the left side of the CentOS deployment curve. I'd

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-12 Thread Warren Young
On 6/12/2014 12:54, Paul Heinlein wrote: On Thu, 12 Jun 2014, Jeremy Hoel wrote: This little bit here is awesome and made me laugh. Thanks! Agreed. Warren wins the Internet today. Thank you, thank you. Now go read some What if? to see how a true master plays this game. [*]

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-10 Thread Warren Young
On 6/10/2014 14:25, Tom Bishop wrote: And the When will Centos 7 be released questions begin in 3...2...1 It's different this time. The CentOS people have had inside access to RHEL since December last year.[1] So, when will CentOS 7 be released? :) Yes, I see Jim Perrin's post today[2] that

Re: [CentOS] Information Week: RHEL 7 released today

2014-06-10 Thread Warren Young
On 6/10/2014 15:34, John R. Dennison wrote: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 03:28:55PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: It's different this time. The CentOS people have had inside access to RHEL since December last year.[1] They have the same inside access to RHEL as everyone else; namely the RHEL 7

Re: [CentOS] Mother board recommendation

2014-06-03 Thread Warren Young
On 6/3/2014 12:26, Lists wrote: Registered/Unregistered, CAS timing, single/double/quad ranked, never mind voltages, and making sure your CPU supports it! All of those specs are listed in the motherboard manual. If you're buying your RAM from a reseller that doesn't give you the

Re: [CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

2014-04-29 Thread Warren Young
On 4/29/2014 13:05, Les Mikesell wrote: can you tell it that adding a USB device and picking up a dchp address is OK, but you don't want to change your default route just because dhcp offers it? Mixed DHCP and static IP configurations is a very useful but often neglected combination. [1]

Re: [CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

2014-04-29 Thread Warren Young
On 4/29/2014 13:17, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I mean, this is an ENTERPRISE o/s, and that means, heavily, *servers*, and does anyone actually use wireless, or anything other than hardwired, for a server? I think you're setting up false dichotomies here. It isn't about desktop vs server, or

Re: [CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

2014-04-29 Thread Warren Young
On 4/29/2014 14:02, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Trains stop at a train station, buses stop at a bus station Taxis stop at the train station, cars park at the bus station, busses pull up to the airport... The lines aren't as sharp as you're trying to draw them.

Re: [CentOS] Disappearing Network Manager config scripts

2014-04-29 Thread Warren Young
On 4/29/2014 14:15, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Compute node... it automatically detects a GPU(s)? It comes with PBS/Torque installed? Fuse? Gluster? Ready to be joined to a cluster? I'd like to see what their definition of compute node is It's probably the RHEL7 version of their HPC

Re: [CentOS] RHEL7 beta discussions?

2014-04-24 Thread Warren Young
On 4/23/2014 12:37, Warren Young wrote: 5. Save the following as /etc/httpd/conf.d/rhel7rc.conf: VirtualHost *:80 DocumentRoot /var/www/html/rhel7rc ServerAlias rhel7rc That should be ServerName, so that Apache serves from the rhel7rc directory only if you call

Re: [CentOS] RHEL7 beta discussions?

2014-04-23 Thread Warren Young
On 4/2/2014 07:16, Jim Perrin wrote: I have to add the DVD as a repo. Here's what I do: You shouldn't need to do this. There should be a redhat.repo file in /etc/yum.repos.d I didn't have such a thing on the RHEL7 beta VM I set up, nor on the RHEL7 RC I just set up. /etc/yum.repos.d was

Re: [CentOS] RHEL7 beta discussions?

2014-04-23 Thread Warren Young
On 4/23/2014 12:57, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Perhaps it only appears if you attach a RHN subscription to the machine? No. It has been a while but I'm pretty sure when I installed on a laptop I ended up with rhel-beta.repo I

Re: [CentOS] Linux malware attack

2014-03-28 Thread Warren Young
On 3/25/2014 10:38, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:18 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: #5 (non-standard port) is very useful. Huh! That's the *only* rationale I've ever heard for security through obscurity that actually makes sense. It's all obscurity even if you think you can

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-21 Thread Warren Young
On 3/20/2014 10:33, SilverTip257 wrote: And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo desktop was detected as p5p1. Just because the MAC chip is soldered to the motherboard doesn't mean it can't be on the

Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.10, Firefox ESR 24.3.0, Rendering Failure

2014-02-13 Thread Warren Young
On 2/13/2014 20:19, Always Learning wrote: Further to my very recent concerns that ol type=a gives digits. type=a was depreciated in HTML 4.1. depreciated means to me to be of a lesser value The word in the spec is certainly deprecated. No i. Depreciated is a different word. I now

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox...

2014-02-12 Thread Warren Young
On 2/12/2014 15:04, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: I guess it is hard to get it tested without making it the default. No need to guess. There's plenty of evidence that at a certain point, software needs to be battle tested to shake the last bugs out. Take btrfs. It's been included in shipping

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox...

2014-02-11 Thread Warren Young
On 2/11/2014 12:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Save as (why isn't there an open?) a .pdf, pull it up in acroread, and print, and everything's fine. The Firefox PDF engine is new, and PDF is complex. Hence, Firefox PDF still has problems. This is almost certainly not the right list to get this

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox...

2014-02-11 Thread Warren Young
On 2/11/2014 14:27, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Phys Rev E, vol 77, article 030902. Do a print preview, which takes a long time, then look at the scales to the graphs on pages two and three. APS » Journals » Authorization Required Authorization Required Individual Subscribers Please log

Re: [CentOS] Speaking of firefox...

2014-02-11 Thread Warren Young
On 2/11/2014 14:36, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: for right now, that was the one that showed the problem. PRX is open-access: http://prx.aps.org/ Perhaps you can come up with a cite in that or another open-access journal, like arXiv? ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] OT hard disk geometry

2014-02-10 Thread Warren Young
On 2/7/2014 16:40, Timothy Murphy wrote: my HP SuperMicro drive-bay. SuperMicro is OEMing for HP now? In this the power connector(s) are in the same position as the empty slot above, The 4 pins next to the SATA data connector on the Seagate drive are nonstandard. Their purpose is not

Re: [CentOS] OT hard disk geometry

2014-02-06 Thread Warren Young
On 2/6/2014 17:57, Timothy Murphy wrote: I recently purchased a 2TB WD hard drive (WD20ESRX), From where? A search on wdc.com says there is no such part number. Did you mean E*Z*RX? Can you take pictures of the drive, both sides, and post them for our perusal?

Re: [CentOS] Memory leak - how to investigate

2014-02-03 Thread Warren Young
On 2/3/2014 12:59, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Kwan Lowe wrote: Mem: 1361564k total, 1264324k used,97240k free, 8428k buffers That doesn't look like a lot of memory.. Possible to add another .5G or so? Ah! I missed that. Is it actually the case that your server doesn't even have 2G

Re: [CentOS] Memory leak - how to investigate

2014-02-03 Thread Warren Young
On 2/3/2014 13:39, Les Mikesell wrote: A new child process will share almost all memory with the parent, slowly growing as values change. The trick is to load up as much as possible in the parent before the children start forking off. If the parent does little more than initialize the web

Re: [CentOS] OT hardware question

2014-01-31 Thread Warren Young
On 1/31/2014 12:55, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hmmm... that $99 each camera gets expensive, fast. Have you considered that part of the reason you're having hardware problems is that you're using $19 cameras, and expecting professional results from them? $99 for a networked PoE camera is

Re: [CentOS] OT hardware question

2014-01-31 Thread Warren Young
On 1/31/2014 15:06, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: That's not going to happen. The budget won't allow that much for this item. So find the person who chose that arbitrary number, and explain to them that in their ignorance, they chose a number that has no connection with reality. Ask them -- now

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

2014-01-17 Thread Warren Young
On 1/17/2014 12:11, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Jim Perrin jper...@centos.org wrote: Offering free RHEL would fracture and destroy several communities, I strongly disagree with that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Linux_distributions I count 115

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

2014-01-17 Thread Warren Young
On 1/17/2014 13:33, Les Mikesell wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 2:07 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Anyway, if you want a wide-open Linux, Les, you know where to get it. Sigh..., It's complicated. I want stability and reliable security updates. But I don't like being dependent

Re: [CentOS] Advice in Time Sync

2014-01-15 Thread Warren Young
On 1/15/2014 00:56, Ku Wei Xiong wrote: How to set up timing if NTP was block by ISP? Perhaps your ISP is just blocking NTP servers outside your country. I believe the telephone number you gave in your signature terminates in Thailand, so try using th.pool.ntp.org. That domain name will

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-15 Thread Warren Young
On 1/15/2014 05:41, mark wrote: On 01/14/14 20:17, Warren Young wrote: Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I run ifconfig unless I want to dig through the full listing. What do you mean, slot? All of my servers, and our systems at home, the NIC's on the m/b

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/13/2014 07:33, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: is there a CentOS version of that beta? Not yet publicly available. I've heard they have something running in the development environment, but that they're still working on getting some of the RPMs to build. That's a prerequisite for generating

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 13:41, Les Mikesell wrote: It seems like taking the list from 'rpm -qa' on a running machine and feeding it to 'yum install ' I suspect it's not actually that simple. I think you'd need to do a fair bit of processing on the rpm -qa list to be able to build a yum command

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 14:32, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: configure can't find the interface, Were you aware that RHEL 7 now uses Consistent Network Device Naming (http://goo.gl/Z0ydDF) in more situations? It was optional in RHEL 6 (http://goo.gl/TiuTP9) but is all but enforced in RHEL 7. Everyone, drop

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 16:37, Scott Robbins wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: Everyone, drop a tear for the dead eth0. sniff We will miss you, eth0! Haven't played much with it in CentOS. In Fedora, at present, it is a bit of pain as both biosdevname and systemd

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 17:33, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: If the system's BIOS does not have SMBIOS version 2.6 or higher and this data, the new naming convention will not be used. Apparently VirtualBox emulates SMBIOS, since my RHEL 7 VM uses this new scheme.

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 18:23, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/14/2014 5:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: I don't know about less consistent, but I always considered it a feature in Linux vs the BSDs or big iron Unix that I could always count on the first network interface being eth0. BSD and big iron Unix named

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 18:34, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Now I have to remember which *PCI slot* my Ethernet card is in when I run ifconfig unless I want to dig through the full listing. Yes, but that's something you _can_ know. How

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 19:10, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/14/2014 5:55 PM, Warren Young wrote: I know the problem you mean, but doesn't the HWADDR setting in the ifcfg-ethX file fix the problem? Doesn't that force ifup eth0 to bind that file's settings to the right physical interface? In the old days

Re: [CentOS] A question about 7

2014-01-14 Thread Warren Young
On 1/14/2014 19:54, Les Mikesell wrote: On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote: If you are old enough, you might remember unix versions that named disks by controller, bus, target numbers. /dev/rdsk/c0t0n0q0w0e0p1k5n8 :) It's another reason I took to Linux

Re: [CentOS] Why does 'mysql' user has /bin/bash shell?

2014-01-10 Thread Warren Young
On 1/9/2014 03:50, John Doe wrote: Default MySQL installation on CentOS sets /bin/bash as shell. I'm on a user cleanup task where I want reduce unneeded privileges to users. Its password should be locked. I just tested here on an EL6 VM that didn't have mysql-server on it before: #

Re: [CentOS] Why does 'mysql' user has /bin/bash shell?

2014-01-10 Thread Warren Young
On 1/10/2014 12:14, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 10.01.2014 20:11, schrieb Warren Young: I just tested here on an EL6 VM that didn't have mysql-server on it before: # grep mysql /etc/shadow mysql:!!:16079:: in the config file where the users shell is defined you may find more

Re: [CentOS] Why does 'mysql' user has /bin/bash shell?

2014-01-10 Thread Warren Young
On 1/10/2014 13:09, Reindl Harald wrote: i know that but the question is still WHY I don't think there is a good reason. Someone made a mistake. File a bug report upstream. I've now downloaded and examined the .src.rpm for every 6.x point release plus that for 5.10, and they all do this.

Re: [CentOS] Why does 'mysql' user has /bin/bash shell?

2014-01-10 Thread Warren Young
On 1/10/2014 00:40, Luigi Rosa wrote: I checked in my CentOS 6 installations. Only one (the latest) has this issue, so it could be something added/modified in the lastest months. I don't see how that can be. I've checked the spec file in the mysql.src.rpm for every 6.x point release from

Re: [CentOS] Can we trust RedHAt encryption tools?

2014-01-10 Thread Warren Young
On 1/9/2014 15:52, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: Only algorithm they compromised was an RNG that got pretty strong thumbs down from the real cryptographers. They have not compromised any IETF standard; Not quite - anyone mandated to POSIX standards are effectively

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

2014-01-08 Thread Warren Young
On 1/8/2014 01:14, Sorin Srbu wrote: Redhat already has Fedora as a testing ground. True, but Fedora is a bleeding-edge Linux, while CentOS is a stable Linux. Both have their place. Red Hat knows there are pieces of the Linux market it will never be able to grab significant share in.

Re: [CentOS] EL7 mirror: There is no installed groups file.

2014-01-08 Thread Warren Young
On 1/8/2014 17:00, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 01/07/2014 08:27 PM, Warren Young wrote: (I'm trying to set up a CUPS server. So yeah, X11 is a prerequisite for installing a printer now. Lovely.) How about using http://localhost:631 with lynx or some other such text based browser. I ended up

[CentOS] EL7 mirror: There is no installed groups file.

2014-01-07 Thread Warren Young
I installed the RHEL 7 beta here to test while waiting for CentOS 7 to arrive. On noticing that yum didn't work, I decided to set up a local mirror. I rsync'd ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages/ to a local web server here, then regenerated the repodata

Re: [CentOS] nautilus

2013-12-30 Thread Warren Young
On 12/28/2013 08:09, Eero Volotinen wrote: xhost + is very dangerous way to do that as it allows all clients to connect to display(s) Dangerous depends on your local trust model. Back when I was new to Unix -- a couple of decades ago, before widespread firewalls and such -- we tended to trust

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

2013-12-20 Thread Warren Young
On 12/19/2013 19:50, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/19/2013 6:43 PM, Darr247 wrote: On 20 DEC 2013 @02:06 zulu, John R Pierce wrote: how many XP systems are still in use? We have 3 XP desktops connected to the LAN in our home. that was a rhetorical question, of course I'd expect THIS email list

Re: [CentOS] TCP port to TTY/Serial Port?

2013-12-20 Thread Warren Young
On 12/20/2013 08:13, Joseph Spenner wrote: But, I can never get the text to show up in the minicom window. You know the aphorism about hammers and nails? minicom is an awesome hammer, and here you are, presenting a problem that calls for a ratcheting box wrench. minicom is great for

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-19 Thread Warren Young
On 12/17/2013 18:57, Andrew Wyatt wrote: Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they didn't fit on the media though, I've run into two of these myself: libedit and libgd. Both of these are living, useful libraries, without direct replacements.[*] Clearly there are

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-19 Thread Warren Young
On 12/19/2013 12:16, Connie Sieh wrote: Look at lftp ftp.redhat.com:/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages ls libedit* Thanks for the tip. The VM I'm testing RHEL 7 beta on isn't network-connected, so I guess I'm just going to have to mirror that directory.

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-16 Thread Warren Young
On 12/13/2013 16:35, Michael Hennebry wrote: I note the absence of PAE for CentOS. I've read that PAE can be important. Only if you're trying to address more than 4 GB of RAM on a 32-bit system. Even then, most software doesn't take advantage of it. PAE is an old hack Intel invented in the

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-16 Thread Warren Young
On 12/15/2013 16:21, Michael Hennebry wrote: the yellow stuff looks suspicious. It's a kind of strain relief. Without that flexible glue, dropping the computer could snap those caps off at their base. Since this is the sort of thing that occasionally happens to computers in shipping,

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-16 Thread Warren Young
On 12/15/2013 16:49, Michael Hennebry wrote: Looks like I'll need to see whether I still have my multimeter. That's not likely to tell you much. About the only thing I'd trust a typical DMM to tell me about a PSU is whether its rails are within voltage spec. You must do that test under

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-16 Thread Warren Young
On 12/16/2013 09:53, Michael Hennebry wrote: The one with the visible VENT and 105 printing? Vent just calls out that there is a vent on the top of the cap, which it obvious without the label. It's the scoring in the metal, which allows the top of the cap to break open in a controlled way if

Re: [CentOS] Finally.... CentOS on iMac core 2

2013-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On 11/25/2013 09:10, Warren Young wrote: Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2, Confirmed: http://goo.gl/hfwtqF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-13 Thread Warren Young
On 12/13/2013 16:20, Michael Hennebry wrote: Any ideas on how to proceed? There may be a final screw under one of the stickers. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-12 Thread Warren Young
On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote: Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the release upsteam In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall there being speculation that building the next major release wouldn't be as troublesome, for various reasons[*].

Re: [CentOS] Do I need a dedicated firewall?

2013-12-12 Thread Warren Young
On 12/11/2013 22:00, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: I have a CentOS 6.5 Server (a few TB, 32gb RAM) running some simple web stuff and Zimbra. I have 5 static IP's from Comcast. I am considering giving this server a public IP and plugging it directly into my cable modem. This box can handle

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public

2013-12-12 Thread Warren Young
On 12/12/2013 09:13, James Hogarth wrote: On 12 December 2013 15:32, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 12/11/2013 08:56, Karanbir Singh wrote: Within CentOS, we are going to do a CentOS7Beta1 build to match the release upsteam In the aftermath of the CentOS 6.0 trauma, I recall

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC manufacturer chooses not to populate. If you decide to put a fan there, be sure to orient it so it blows in line with the

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-06 Thread Warren Young
On 12/6/2013 18:00, John R Pierce wrote: On 12/6/2013 4:39 PM, Warren Young wrote: On 12/6/2013 16:34, Michael Hennebry wrote: There is a place for a front fan, but no fan there. It's common for cheap PC cases to have places for fans that the final PC manufacturer chooses not to populate

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-04 Thread Warren Young
On 12/3/2013 22:09, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2013, Patrick Lists wrote: They mention high-purity isopropyl alcohol. The highest purity I've ever seen is 70%. The vast majority of the impurity in commercial grade alcohol is water. Capillary action sucks the fluid into all kinds

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-04 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:49 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 12/4/2013 10:44 AM, Warren Young wrote: Bottom line: 70% is too impure for this task. Huh?!? I've cleaned numerous CPU-heatsink surfaces with 70% isopropyl, never had any problem…. I'm not saying it's impossible

Re: [CentOS] died again

2013-12-04 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 4, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Michael Hennebry henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote: On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Warren Young wrote: At $11 for a couple of tiny bottles, both of which you have to use together, it's another 2-3x more expensive than tape head cleaner. For me, the bottom line is how

[CentOS] Most efficient way to create a CentOS 3 test VM

2013-11-26 Thread Warren Young
I'm about to create a new CentOS 3 VM for testing, since we still have a bunch of deployed machines running that OS. (Don't yell at me about using old OSes. These machines won't get un-deployed until they fall over dead of natural causes. Until the last one dies, we need test and build VMs

Re: [CentOS] Finally.... CentOS on iMac core 2

2013-11-26 Thread Warren Young
On 11/25/2013 09:10, Warren Young wrote: On 11/25/2013 08:22, Wes James wrote: Oh. OK. I didn't realize CentOS wasn't using grub2. Are there any plans for CentOS to move to grub2? No. Upstream uses grub1, so CentOS uses grub1. Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2, but there's no good reason

Re: [CentOS] Finally.... CentOS on iMac core 2

2013-11-25 Thread Warren Young
On 11/25/2013 08:22, Wes James wrote: Oh. OK. I didn't realize CentOS wasn't using grub2. Are there any plans for CentOS to move to grub2? No. Upstream uses grub1, so CentOS uses grub1. Presumably RHEL7 will use grub2, but there's no good reason to hold your breath waiting for it.

Re: [CentOS] Running MacOSX as VM under CentOS 5.10?

2013-11-06 Thread Warren Young
On 11/6/2013 12:21, Robert Heller wrote: Is it even remotely possible to run MacOSX (or Darwin) as VM under CentOS 5.10 / xen? Darwin isn't going to do you any good, since you need to test GUIs. Darwin is OS X minus everything Apple proprietary, including Cocoa, Finder, Dock... Or am I

Re: [CentOS] Running MacOSX as VM under CentOS 5.10?

2013-11-06 Thread Warren Young
On 11/6/2013 17:29, Warren Young wrote: I don't really have the *physical* room for an iMac, unless the screen is tiny. OS X comes with VNC, configured and ready to go. Although OS X does make a reasonable server, it's even better as a client OS. Have you considered flipping this problem

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On Oct 24, 2013, at 8:01 PM, Lists li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: Not sure enough of the vernacular Yes, ZFS is complicated enough to have a specialized vocabulary. I used two of these terms in my previous post: - vdev, which is a virtual device, something like a software RAID. It is one

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On 10/25/2013 00:44, John R Pierce wrote: current version of OpenZFS no longer relies on 'version numbers', instead it has 'feature flags' for all post v28 features. This must be the zpool v5000 thing I saw while researching my previous post. Apparently ZFSonLinux is doing the same thing, or

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On 10/25/2013 11:33, Lists wrote: I'm just trying to find the best tool for the job. Try everything. Seriously. You won't know what you like, and what works *for you* until you have some experience. Buy a Drobo for the home, replace one of your old file servers with a FreeBSD ZFS box,

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-25 Thread Warren Young
On re-reading, I realized I didn't complete some of my thoughts: On 10/25/2013 00:18, Warren Young wrote: ZFS is nicer in this regard, in that it lets you schedule the scrub operation. You can obviously schedule one for btrfs, ...with cron... but that doesn't take into account scrub time

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-24 Thread Warren Young
On 10/24/2013 17:12, Lists wrote: 2) The ability to make the partition bigger by adding drives with very minimal/no downtime. Be careful: you may have been reading some ZFS hype that turns out not as rosy in reality. Ideally, ZFS would work like a Drobo with an infinite number of drive

Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux in production?

2013-10-24 Thread Warren Young
On 10/24/2013 14:59, John R Pierce wrote: On 10/24/2013 1:41 PM, Lists wrote: 1) you need a LOT of ram for decent performance on large zpools. 1GB ram above your basic system/application requirements per terabyte of zpool is not unreasonable. To be fair, you want to treat XFS the same way.

Re: [CentOS] SysRq over usb serial adapters

2013-10-01 Thread Warren Young
On 9/30/2013 21:34, Barry Brimer wrote: I'm using 115200, 8N1, VT102. I can echo m /proc/sysctl-trigger, and dmesg shows that the sysrq was received when initiated via the procfs interface. But not over serial, and that's what I need. I could be wrong .. but you may need to edit your grub

Re: [CentOS] Linux tool to check random I/O performance

2013-09-04 Thread Warren Young
On 9/4/2013 13:44, mcclnx mcc wrote: for sequence I/O performance test we can use hdparm -t /dev/xxx bur for random I/O performance test which Linux command I can use? I use Bonnie++ for that: http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Actually, I've been using the experimental pre-2.x version:

Re: [CentOS] Macromedia Flash data (compressed), version 9

2013-08-13 Thread Warren Young
On 8/13/2013 10:48, Scott Robbins wrote: It seems to me that if firefox could play it from far away, firefox should be able to play it on my computer. So far, that seems not to be the case. What happens if you add .swf to the file's name. This doesn't work because Firefox proper doesn't

Re: [CentOS] Motherboard and chipset compatibility

2013-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2013 11:01, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: VERY STRONG RECOMMENDATION: DON'T buy Supermicro. They have a *lot* of trouble with this new, fuzzy concept called quality control. We have a *lot* of SuperMicro based systems in the field, and they aren't failing. In fact, I can't remember the last

Re: [CentOS] Motherboard and chipset compatibility

2013-08-12 Thread Warren Young
On 8/12/2013 12:54, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Well, *all* of these are rackmount servers, with no moving-the-server wear. Our servers are all rack-mounted, too, and pretty much never get moved after being installed. In any case, I was referring to wear in the electromechanical components of a

Re: [CentOS] OT: UPS battery vendor, cont'd

2013-02-14 Thread Warren Young
On 2/13/2013 06:12, mark wrote: Huh. No, I want to pay on the order of $12/individual battery, Please don't misuse order. It's a corruption of the scientific term order of magnitude[1][2] which, used correctly, means that the values you're comparing use the same factor of 10 in scientific

Re: [CentOS] Anything Like Solaris' Live Upgrade?

2013-01-29 Thread Warren Young
On 1/29/2013 12:03, Tim Evans wrote: I suppose it's not possible in this forum to ask such a question and not get into religion. Kinda like the U.S. Congress. Um. Yes. shakes head to clear the loony I know you think you're asking for an additional freedom that you feel CentOS doesn't

Re: [CentOS] Anybody running cadence on CentOS 6 ?

2013-01-09 Thread Warren Young
On 1/9/2013 12:54, Connie Sieh wrote: Can you add real graphics hardware such as a Nvidia card. Seconded. Why in the world are you trying to run high-end CAD software with chipset graphics? A $200 nVidia board is a round-off error compared to the price paid for the software license and

Re: [CentOS] bind vs nfs

2012-11-05 Thread Warren Young
On 11/5/2012 07:56, Leon Fauster wrote: /vhost/one/htdocs/media /vhost/two/htdocs/media /vhost/.../htdocs/media How big does ... get? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Perl - strict.pm not found

2012-10-10 Thread Warren Young
On 10/10/2012 4:38 AM, John Horne wrote: The problem is that 'strict.pm' is located in /usr/share/perl5 (as it is on our other servers), and /usr/share/perl5 is specified in @INC. Perl can do this is when you've run it out of file handles, then someone tries to load a not-previously-loaded

Re: [CentOS] Digi Acceleport Xem

2012-09-14 Thread Warren Young
On 9/14/2012 1:50 PM, Sidney Abrahams wrote: I tried that and it worked, but the chkconfig -- add dgap did not. You've added a space to the command, which breaks it. The command is: chkconfig --add dgap ___ CentOS mailing list

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >