Dotan Cohen wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 19:35, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
Which shows it's working... but painfully slowly. Bandwidth and especially
latency is killing you.
Other than getting a new ISP, is there anything that I can do about the
latency?
I can smoothly run
Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Greetings,
Thanks Les for your reply. (I dont top-post normally, but this was an
emergency)
Emergency? Sorry, but your posts are leading me to think that you have
lost it.
Have you looked at Ubuntu's setup? I don't think it deals with GPU's but it
might be
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll read up more about them. The
bond0 and just works sounds simple which is a Good Thing! The problem
was the last time I tried to cross connect multiple switches,
everything just died so there must be something a bit more involved?
:D
Idea being that the dumb switches are used solely for local data
transfer between up to X number of App servers and storage nodes. The
managed switch then handles only external communications as well as
any firewalling.
Oh you have dumb switches in the mix? Not going to work as Gordon has
Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
Why mode 4 of course.
Ouch. Never used that mode.
Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
Hakan Koseoglu wrote:
HiChristopher,
On 08/07/10 10:25, Christopher Chan wrote:
Why mode 4 of course.
Huh? Like why? It's the recommended mode unless the switch does not
suppoprt it or the boards don't.
I never realised this is the recommended mode. Do you have pointers
where it is
JohnS wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:51 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
I think some bridge or vlan scenarios require promiscuous mode (and the
corresponding disabling of hardware acceleration). Maybe the real issue is
that
something accidentally disabled it and you now only work when
Les Mikesell wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 05:09 PM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
On 07/08/2010 05:08 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Hmmm ... which bond mode are you using?
Why mode 4 of course.
Ouch. Never used that mode.
Huh? Like why
Christopher Chan wrote:
And now the thing is working again...
It's not working again.
Running tcpdump -i vlan seems to trigger something to get the network
working again but as soon as I stop tcpdump...nada, zip, zilch.
Any ideas? I see no errors in the logs whether of the switch or the box,
Les Mikesell wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
And now the thing is working again...
It's not working again.
Running tcpdump -i vlan seems to trigger something to get the network
working again but as soon as I stop tcpdump...nada, zip, zilch.
Any ideas? I
Are you running a proxy for http? It would be rather
surprising that internal machines can access the Internet
without forwarding turned on otherwise. When you say internal
machines cannot access your server, are they connecting to it
via the local interface's ip or the Internet ip?
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
raid1/iscsi if you have a single host accessing the data or gluster if
you have more than one host accessing the data...
This is starting to look really complicated with NCP Storage units on
zfs -
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 6/29/10, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
gluster don't care about underlying filesystem...it don't support acl
yet for a reason
Could you elaborate on that? Although at the moment I don't appear to
have a need for ACL
CList wrote:
I have been trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a Intel SR1530SHS, Intel
S3200SH
mainboard.. It has a 3 x 1TB sata hotswap drives with LSI software raid
onboard.
fake-raid alert!
I had configured the LSI to have Sata0 and Sata1 with raid 1 and the
third
drive as a hotspare drive.
CList wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to install CentOS 5.4 on a Intel SR1530SHS, Intel S3200SH
mainboard.. It has a 3 x 1TB sata hotswap drives with LSI software raid
onboard.
fake-raid alert!
I had configured the LSI to have Sata0 and Sata1 with raid 1 and the third
drive as a
Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/5/2010 12:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Try to run the same IO operations as your production server is running.
Bonnie++ could be good application for benchmarking. Also run some
parallel rsync, rm, find, etc proccesses.
I am with John Pierce on this one, role and app
Georghy wrote:
Tru Huynh a écrit :
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Georghy wrote:
(1)Download that driver :
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=YProdId=3117DwnldID=18570lang=fra
from the intel support web site
You should have started your installation
Georghy wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher a écrit :
Georghy wrote:
Tru Huynh a écrit :
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 03:03:00PM +0200, Georghy wrote:
(1)Download that driver :
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=YProdId=3117DwnldID=18570lang=fra
from
Georghy wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher a écrit :
xe dd (assuming you have a floppy [is usb supported?] disk with the drivers)
A floppy isn't enough because the driver is about 2.7Mb so I use a USB
Stick. It should be the same with a Floppy.
It seems that the system doesn't find
Jure Pečar wrote:
Ray Van Dolson wrote:
I think what you want is a proper storage array with mirrored write
cache.
When ext3 came into widespread use, a popular method to cache frequent
fsyncs was to run it in a full data journaling mode, with external journal on
a separate disk.
This
Brian Sr wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 14:29 +0100, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Here's a question: are you using your old configuration files? You might
want to compare the default from the install with the old ones - there may
be deprecated or defunct or invalid options.
Have
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Robert Heller wrote:
I suspect that this is a simular case to what I did: I have a server
with 4 drives. I have several (small) RAID1 partitions (/boot, /,
/usr, /var, etc.) with 4 mirrors and one large RAID5 with three
partitions and a hot spare (a LVM volumn group,
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
No, not yet, but I always recommend setting up your data arrays
manually so your intimately familiar with how they are constructed and
the mdadm command usage is fresh in your head.
Did you know with Neil's raid10 implementation you can store 3
JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 23:19 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
Mysql by itself has built in clustering though
there can be significant limitations in it depending on your
requirements.
I agree. The built in cluster has too many limitations to
be useful, but MySQL master-master
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 12:34 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
Hello,
Can somebody recommend CentOS-OK, dual socket motherboards for compute
elements? A quick look up at Intel
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Can anyone, who has used both Postfix Exim please share some experience
with me? Which of these 2 did you prefer to use, and why?
I have not used exim but I know someone who swears by it. It is highly
configurable and had stuff like sender based routing before postfix did.
Susan Day wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote:
2010/2/26 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
The following message appears to have been sent, but in fact never does
reach their destination:
[root qmail-send]# tail current
B.J. McClure wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 08:57 -0400, Susan Day wrote:
snip
With respect to Kai's suggestion I find a qmail list, I'm sorry to say
there don't appear to be ANY discussion lists for ANY email servers
that are active. I'm desperate to get this working.
TIA,
Suzie
How
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
postfix has a very active mailing list -- the originator and primary
developer, Wietse Venema,responds to posts quite often, as well as
many other postfix experts.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Susan Day wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:25:38 -0400:
Sorry, but this has NOT been my experience. I just tried that list
__last_week__ and __no__ responses, no activity, either.
Maybe that's because of the nature of your questions. I get the impression
that you are
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote on Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:01:28 +0800:
Programmers always have a hard time picking up on the
system admin side of things.
Still they should be able to find the best avenue for their questions, or
not?
Fair question. But we don't have
Brian Mathis wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Dominik Zyla gavro...@gavroche.pl wrote:
And please, stop send mails with html encoding.
--
Dominik Zyla
No, do not stop sending emails with HTML encoding.
Welcome to the second decade of the 21st century. We may not have flying
Mihai T. Lazarescu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:34:34AM -0400, Susan Day wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Simon Billis si...@houxou.com wrote:
Why?
That is a good question - I guess that google's email system thinks
you're
sending them spam. If you want your mail to be
Eero Volotinen wrote:
2010/2/24 Susan Day suzieprogram...@gmail.com:
Hi;
[r...@13gems beno]# netstat -ltnup
Active Internet connections (only servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State PID/Program name
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:3306
Susan, is qmail-send running? tcpserver is used to run qmail-smtpd to
accept emails but qmail-send does the actual queue processing and delivery.
27755 ?S 0:00 multilog t s10 n20 /var/log/qmail/qmail-send
Susan, why do you say the email server is broken?
'tail -f
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Also, what would have caused this all of the sudden? This box has been
running fine for months.
Well, do you think that computer hardware lives forever?
They don't? /me stares at 486dx with a working floppy drive and working
floppies from the eighties and early
Craig White wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 09:50 -0500, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 10, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
wrote:
If you have hundreds or thousands of users and hundreds of groups,
well good luck. It is extremely hard to automate
If you have hundreds or thousands of users and hundreds of groups,
well good luck. It is extremely hard to automate assigning these uids/
gids and making sure they don't collide with each other or other unix
systems and doing it by hand is a torture reserved for the ninth
circle of
Wbinfo -u wbinfo -g do indeed work for me however getent passwd or getent
group returns no AD users or groups. I have winbind entries in nsswitch for
both the passwd group entries. Josepeh, I will try a newer RPM from a
different repository and see if that resolves my issues. Did my
Sergej Kandyla wrote:
Christopher Chan wrote:
On Thursday, February 04, 2010 03:48 PM, Hadi Motamedi wrote:
Dear All
I need to install Windows as guest on my CentOS 5 as host . Can you
please give me the link to download the requierd rpm package for this
purpose ?
Thank you
yum
Ah, well #1 on his list then is to figure out what he is running!
LOL, I know it sounds quite noobish, coming across like I've no idea
what DBMS it is running on. The system currently runs on MySQL but
part of my update requirement was to decouple the DBMS so that we can
make an eventual
Anas Alnaffar wrote:
I tried to run this command
find -name *.access* -mtime +2 -exec rm {} \;
Should have been: find ./ -name \*.access\* -mtime +2 -exec rm -f {} \;
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On the machine where I had the problem I had to run memtest86 more than a day
to
finally catch it. Then after replacing the RAM and fsck'ing the volume, I
still
had mysterious problems about once a month until I realized that the disks
are
accessed alternately and the fsck pass
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 12/01/10 00:02, Christopher Chan wrote:
problems mostly centered around management and performance issues. the
world is littered with stores of cciss fail
Really? Man, I have been given this spanking new HP DL370 G6 and running
Centos 5.4 on it...
I've got a
Which is why I specifically said 'performance wise' as respects 3ware. I
don't remember anything bad about 3ware stability wise or monitoring wise.
Is that supposed to be a joke? 3ware has certainly had their fair share of
stability problems (drive time-outs, bbu-problems, inconsistent
Benjamin Donnachie wrote:
2010/1/12 Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk:
Eeek! That thing will be hosting the school's vle. Looks like I better
memorize the after hours password for HP support.
I have had lots[1] of problems lately with DIMMs becoming defective
adapter too but that is of
no consequence with storage right now.
Regards
Per Qvindesland
At Tisdag, 12-01-2010 on 11:57 Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 12/01/10 00:02, Christopher Chan wrote:
problems mostly centered around management and performance issues
John Doe wrote:
From: Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com
This is not directly related to CentOS but still: we are trying to set up
some storage servers to run under Linux - most likely CentOS. The storage
volume would be in the range specified: 8-15 TB. Any recommendations as far
as
Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system--
-cpu--
r b swpd free buff cache si sobibo in cs us sy id wa
st
8 1
Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 31.12.2009, 12:34 +0100 schrieb Chan Chung Hang
Christopher:
Look at the first two columns. What column have higher numbers? If r,
you're CPU-bound. If b, you're I/O bound.
procs ---memory-- ---swap-- -io --system
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
Hi,
Yes, these figures indicate that you are fairly close to being cpu bound.
What kind of filtering are you doing? If you have any connection
tracking/state related rules set, you will need to be using a fair
amount of cpu.
Initially, when the load start going
Peter Serwe wrote:
I'll second damn near everything nate said, and hopefully add a tidbit or
two.
If you're new to BSD, you may want to consider the pfsense project in the
aforementioned active-active configuration.
It gives you a nice, intuitive gui to manage your failover firewalls, if
Alan McKay wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Christopher Chan
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
A cluster filesystem
OK, but you've just given me a circular definition.
When you do not need/want a cluster file system
and again ...
Okay, a cluster/distributed file system
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM for a cheap storage data pool (10 x 1 TB usb drives = 10 TB cheap
storage in a single mount point).
How about eSATA? Surely an
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Scott Ehrlich wrote:
I have a client with a handful of USB drives connected to a CentOS
box. I am charged with binding the USB drives together into a single
LVM
Timo Schoeler wrote:
[off list]
Thanks for your eMail, Ross. So, reading all the stuff here I'm really
concerned about moving all our data to such a system. The reason we're
moving is mainly, but not only the longisch fsck UFS (FreeBSD) needs
after a crash. XFS seemed to me to fit
Mathieu Baudier wrote:
LVM like md raid and drbd is a layered block device and
If you turn the wire caches off on the HDs then there is no problem,
but HDs aren't designed to perform to spec with the write cache
disabled they expect important data is written with FUA access (forced
unit
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Christopher Chan spake:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org
wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in
RHEL
anyways, and B) I've
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Chan Chung Hang Christopher spake:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
thus Christopher Chan spake:
Ian Forde wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org
wrote:
John R Pierce wrote
Miguel Medalha wrote:
I am about to install a new server running CentOS 5.4. The server will
contain pretty critical data that we can't afford to corrupt.
I would like to benefit from the extra speed and features of a ext4
filesystem but I don't have any experience with it.
Is there some
Jure Pečar wrote:
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:48:56 -0800
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL
anyways, and B)
John R Pierce wrote:
Timo Schoeler wrote:
For enterprise environments my favorite FS is XFS, YMMV, though.
I've always avoided XFS because A) it wsan't supported natively in RHEL
anyways, and B) I've heard far too many stories about catastrophic loss
problems and day long
Alan McKay wrote:
Hey folks,
We've got some new hardware and are trying to figure out what best to
do with it. Either run CentOS right on the bare metal, or
virtualize, or several combination options. Mainly looking at :
- CentOS on bare metal
- CentOS on ESXi 4.0 with local disk
-
ML wrote:
People went back and forth on the list saying that if a hardware
controller was out of the budget right now RAID 10 would be the best
solution.
That is raid1+0. raid10, under md, is something else different from raid1+0.
It seems that the installer wont let you create two
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
How can I RAID 10 on install?
Does anyone know if this approach:
http://www.howtoforge.com/install-ubuntu-with-software-raid-10
Will work for CentOS?
Never tried the Centos LiveCD so I cannot say but manually creating the
raid1 arrays and then striping them
James Bensley wrote:
Wait a minute, didn't someone just try and offer their help to the
community;
Where in their email did they mention cpanel?
Sorry, got mixed up. I thought he was talking about what he was doing
for his company. Just kind of wary of people who go: Calling all Hackers
James Bensley wrote:
2009/10/22 Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
Sorry, got mixed up. I thought he was talking about what he was doing
for his company. Just kind of wary of people who go: Calling all Hackers
but they actually mean Calling all Crackers
Jonathan Moore wrote:
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 7:51 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
You can, if you connect the iscsi block devices into one machine that can
combine them in one or more md raid devices, put a filesystem on them, and
export via nfs and/or smb to the systems
Jerry Geis wrote:
Hi all,
I have a local user account call panel on a machine.
When I use the mail command to manually send email to the panel account
it over 1 minute until that mail actually deposited in the mail account.
What setting is that reduces this time?
I changed
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
Does anyone know about some free (as in beer, and maybe as in speech)
software
which would implement authentication and authorization of a user prior to
issuing a valid dhcp lease?
I imagine the following scenario: someone walks into my office building with
a
Toby Bluhm wrote:
You Centos guys just aren't getting the message are you?
We need to know EXACTLY what is going on with the release! None of this
soon crap will do. Please post a progress report on packages built,
isos transfered, server update progress by region, hours worked,
Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
testing mail delivery
deliver failure: 550 Administrative Prohibition
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
When you say go voip, do you mean use sip for the stations only or also
for the trunks?
My experience (and the experience of those I know) is that SIP trunks
don't really work consistently. But, when I say I need to learn VOIP
I'm mostly talking about the station side. My goal is to
Ron Blizzard wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Tait Clarridge t...@clarridge.ca wrote:
CentOS is great for server use and if you want to learn CentOS for use
as a server, Fedora is a great place to start because they are both
redhat based. Chances are that if you got something to
You can get asterisk packages from rpmforge on Centos...but on Ubuntu
you do not have to add an extra repository to get asterisk.
Don't bother with that, go straight to the source!
http://packages.asterisk.org/
These get updated rather quickly.
Ah, now that will definitely
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Geoff Galitz a écrit :
Ubuntu has the LTS releases, which are long term stable releases. They are
supported for five years after release.
Ubuntu Long Term Support is three years for desktops and five for servers.
In the last LTS version (8.04), half of the
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher
christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote:
Which mail client is that supposed to be for? And: Don't the mail
clients create those folders themselves via IMAP if they are needed?
I've never seen the need to do
CentOS List wrote:
Hi,
I have an existing iptables as follows:-
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-securitylevel
# Manual customization of this file is not recommended.
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0]
:RH-Firewall-1-INPUT - [0:0]
-A
Luis campo wrote:
hi,
have installed centos 4.7
We have installed qmail + simscan + vpopmail + SpamAssassin + clanAV
and when we send a mail from a particular domain, the following error leaves
us
How about changing that combination of qmail + simscan to postfix +
clamav-milter +
Tom O'Connor wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:24:52PM +0100, Tom O'Connor wrote:
If anyone has any ideas for further debugging, or other routes for
support. I'm running out of ideas.
Enterprise Linux 5.4 with included official FUSE support
However, we are NOT accepting monetary donations at this point. We will
not accept monetary donations until there is something in place where
more than one person has to approve any spending and some kind of
committee is in place to manage incoming and outgoing funds.
ooh, ouch. A
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Has anyone succesfully setup, and used CentOS as an iSCSI server? I'm
trying to setup a server with 4x500GB HDD's, setup in RAID 10 to act
as an iSCSI server for a virtualization project, but I can't find a
decent howto on how to setup an iSCSI server using CentOS.
I would
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher schrieb:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Has anyone succesfully setup, and used CentOS as an iSCSI server? I'm
trying to setup a server with 4x500GB HDD's, setup in RAID 10 to act
as an iSCSI server for a virtualization project, but I can't
chan, I already have CentOS 5.3 setup, and we need to use this as far
as possible, due to some of the other software that we'll be using.
See Joseph Casale's post then. It is not quite available on Centos. Roll
your own is the name of the game.
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
Can I suggest ZFS on Solaris/OpenSolaris? Real breeze to setup.
As for Linux, it has been a while but are there still two iscsi-target
implementations? Has any one of them got into the mainline (Linux - not
Redhat - although if Redhat will support one implementation I
Miguel Medalha wrote:
You might be interested in this article:
Why is RAID 1+0 better than RAID 0+1?
http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
The whole raid1+0 or raid0+1 argument was really only relevant in the
days of pata when one disk dying on one channel might take out the
MontyRee wrote:
Hello, all.
I found that so many unnessary queue files are saved at
/var/spool/clientmqueue/ directory.
How do you know they are unnecessary?
I tested two way to delete these files.
1.
# rm -rf /var/spool/clientmqueue/*
2.
# cd
Now the Designers groups should have rw rights for Projects and subfolders
The draghtsmen should be able to upload only files (not folders) to
Final subfolder. They are not allowed to modify/delete anything
anywhere. They will not have any permission in project folder
any ideas?
Also processes you thinkk you DO recognize:
Just for testing how alert my co-workers were, i had a program called
kswapd, just calculating prime-numbers...
They never noticed. ;-)
Without any preperation it's harder. No point in installing tripwire,
activating apparmor/selinux afterwards.
I didn't know that IPCOP could run on one that old. I have one like
that up in the attic, time to bring it back down. Before I upgraded to
5.3, I was running 4.7 with FireStarter and did not have any troubles.
As soon as I get some sleep I will be looking in to setting it up.
If it
So I started looking around in /var/log. I looked at my secure logs and
saw nothing out of the ordinary. I looked in samba and found a log file
58.239.84.158.log. I opened it up and it said the following:
[2009/08/15 06:31:34, 0] lib/access.c:check_access(327)
Denied connection from
A response I got from the local LUG here in Hong Kong to a post about
translating the wiki articles into Chinese pointed me to the links below:
http://www.centoschina.com/
http://apt.nc.hcc.edu.tw/web/student_server_centos/student_server_centos.html
Posted just in case the Centos team has an
Kristopher Kane wrote:
I get to learn something new at his expense, (which is now just a scare)
nice successor eh? :-D
Maybe you could point him to this list for lunch time lesson reading,
however, you won't be able to talk about him behind his back anymore.
Haha, I am not
Lanny Marcus wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Kristopher
Kanekristopher.k...@gmail.com wrote:
I get to learn something new at his expense, (which is now just a scare)
nice successor eh? :-D
Maybe you could point him to this list for lunch time lesson reading,
however,
Robert Nichols wrote:
Ross Walker wrote:
Since you don't know if LVM has a recovery path how can you imply it
doesn't?
I've seen plenty of evidence that tools for LVM recovery are lacking.
I see postings from people asking about recovery of damaged LVM
volumes and not getting
First of all, I would dd a copy of the whole drive off to another drive, so
you can have a few goes at this.
How do you know only those bits where lost?
The dd command zeros the first 64 sectors, that is, the mbr and then the
next 63 sectors which would the bootsector of the first
Max Hetrick wrote:
Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
1) The Title of the article says How to Setup a Software RAID on CentOS 5
2) My successor is a real HK bred and born person so his command of the
English language is like most such persons; that is to say, very poor.
3) Regarding
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
Wiping out the MBR and the next 63 blocks apparently only wiped out grub
stage1, partition table, and part of the lvm config data.
I get to try to do a lvm 'recovery' at his expense now but this is my
first time...has anybody ever tried
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
