Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne

2014-11-16 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, November 16, 2014 12:21 AM, Always Learning wrote: On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 11:50 -1000, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote: I could do that I suppose, but I haven't and probably wouldn't have the time necessary to separate out the emails between the two accounts. I already have 6+ email

Re: [CentOS] CentOS list SPAM problems

2014-11-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 14, 2014 07:01 AM, Peter wrote: So let's stop ragging on James, he's done what he should be doing and it's the CentOS server that has mucked things up here. Peter Yes, we don't need Spam-L or NANAE atmosphere here. ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] Software RAID10 - which two disks can fail?

2014-04-08 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 03:47 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: As far as I know raid10 is ~ a raid0 built on top of two raid1 ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nested_RAID_levels#RAID_1.2B0 - raid10). So I think that by default in my case: No, Linux md raid10 is NOT a nested raid setup where you build

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CentOS Project joins forces with Red Hat

2014-01-07 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 05:14 AM, Digimer wrote: Fantastic news! CentOS and RHEL have been mutually beneficial projects for years. As a user of both, I am extremely happy to see the ties grow between the communities. digimer Centos for the desktop! RHEL for the backend! Okay, I'm

Re: [CentOS] build postfix spec w/ mysql

2011-11-20 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, November 20, 2011 02:11 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: hello list! I am attempting to build an rpm of postfix that includes support for mysql. I've done this before with earlier versions on postfix but I am staring at this spec file until my eyes bleed and I just don't see why when I

Re: [CentOS] Bind9 zero day bug - CVE-2011-4313 - when will there be an update in Centos 5+6 ?

2011-11-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 18, 2011 05:47 PM, Morgan Cox wrote: Hi. http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2347 There is updated packages for Debian (and Ubuntu) already. Do you know how long until Centos release an update to bind ? I have looked here and couldn't see any info -

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 10:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: Letters? You mean the things that the Post Office used to deliver? Who does that anymore? Maybe a picture or video clip instead... Gee...business people that's who...at least until we get some to use and legal digital signing. But

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 smb authentication?

2011-11-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 18, 2011 03:53 AM, Ron Young wrote: Oops! My apologies for the thread hijacking. Thanks for the reminder Phil. I was mentally keyed to the samba issues and ignored the C6 and AD issues. In my case there is no AD domain involved and samba is already at the 3x level.

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-16 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 07:44 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: I find it very hard to believe that 90% of Chinese are using desktops. What about all those girls tweeting on the bus to school? There must be billions of them. Farmers/peasants have phones? All those

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:41 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Benjamin Franz wrote: What percentage are using iPhones and Androids to access the internet? I'd guess it is already over 50%. Mobile devices still have *under* 6% of the internet browser market. See

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Vreme: 11/15/2011 04:14 PM, Rob Kampen piše: run a virtualbox with windoze XP for a realtor app that only works on IE (yeah, go figure, we are in 2011 and they force everyone to use IE) Install PlayOnLinux (Wine

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 12:38 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: Worrk is worrk (germaniK accent intended... :) ). Home is Home. Laptops are very much entertainment and educational devices. Things useful at home even if you aren't interested in technology for its own sake or using it for

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 01:01 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP. Something for Postfix to deliver the mail too. Mail store != imap server. Mail store = structure

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 01:04 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: +1 The shipped packages on most distributions are a bit lame; Simon's packages are the way to go. They also provision everything as Skiplist [Cyrus' preferred DB format] avoiding the ugliness that is Berkley DB [issue with

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, November 12, 2011 03:59 PM, Nataraj wrote: I believe the standard desktop uses Ubuntu's own installer. The Ubuntu server and the 'alternative' distribution use the debian installer. I fought with it at first, but it is much more flexible than the redhat installer. You can

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 07:23 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 01:10 -0500, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: CentOS Community I was wondering if anyone had a good resource or procedure for a step by step in installing a mail server with Centos. There ARE documents on

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 11:33 PM, Craig White wrote: 7- The install, of the virtual host, added libvirt. It did not however install things like virt-install or any other virt software. Infact, no guest installation tools were added, though things like virsh were installed. Sigh. 8-

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 12:37 AM, Thomas Johansson wrote: Compare systemd to Solaris Service Management Facility. Solaris SMF is a very nice and useful part of Solaris. A lot of similarities between systemd and SMF. Solaris is mainly a server OS.

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 11:49 AM, Craig White wrote: If you want something heavy duty you could simply 'apt-get install shorewall'' but I suspect that you just want to be pedantic. The point that Lamar made - that was that there wasn't any firewall installed by default at all, which I

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: For CLAMAV you need to have clamd running and a milter. I'm not certain what milter's are current - when I set one up they were all

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 12:33 PM, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 12:12 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: I would not have said much if you have pushed Debian but Ubuntu? It's a joke. I only happen to have one Ubuntu Hardy server because I did not have a Centos disk at hand

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:28 PM, Craig White wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 13:23 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: Sorry, I keep forgetting about that crap... Never touched it and never wanted to after I heard the screams from a friend who used cyrus and swore by it until he got

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, November 11, 2011 01:31 PM, Craig White wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 21:12 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/10/11 4:48 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: You don't mention a mail store [IMAP Server]? Such as Cyrus IMAP. Something for Postfix to deliver the mail

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-09 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 09, 2011 02:36 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/08/11 10:10 PM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote: I was wondering if anyone had a good resource or procedure for a step by step in installing a mail server with Centos. There ARE documents on google, however almost all that i've

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox on CentOS 6.0?

2011-11-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 04:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Vreme: 11/02/2011 09:10 AM, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez piše: I had problems with VBox 4 in my CentOS6, so I had to install VirtualBox-3.2-3.2.12_68302_rhel6-1.x86_64 and I am very very happy with it. VMware Server meant a

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox on CentOS 6.0?

2011-11-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:33 PM, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote: 4.0.x was okay for me (Windows server guests) but 4.1.4 was a complete disaster. The guest literally moved at SNAIL pace. Removed all cores save one and then it moved at TURTLE pace. 4.1

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox on CentOS 6.0?

2011-11-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:33 PM, John Hodrien wrote: On Wed, 2 Nov 2011, Christopher Chan wrote: 4.0.x was okay for me (Windows server guests) but 4.1.4 was a complete disaster. The guest literally moved at SNAIL pace. Removed all cores save one and then it moved at TURTLE pace. 4.1

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 10:38 PM, Marcio Carneiro wrote: I think it is time to reconsider and think on OpenIndiana. Er...once the illumos kernel team sorts out that zfs bug that is currently plaguing some io151a users yes. /me not moving an inch from oi_147 till then.

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, November 03, 2011 03:35 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 11/02/11 12:19 PM, Marcio Carneiro wrote: OpenIndiana.org I wouldn't want to hitch my sleigh to something dependent on Oracle's good will. It is not dependent on Oracle's good will. Not any longer as they have switched to

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote: Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a): Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS is that some (or many?) are migrating to Ubuntu/Debian rather than to other RHEL clones, which might eventually hurt the entire Red Hat

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-01 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 11:47 AM, fred smith wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:30:57AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:47 AM, David Hrbáč wrote: Dne 1.11.2011 17:27, Akemi Yagi napsal(a): Real problem with recent release troubles with CentOS

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, October 31, 2011 12:11 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Vreme: 10/30/2011 03:46 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn piše: On 10/30/2011 02:14 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: I do not think there is much to be worried for now. Most/all security patches will come out fairly fast now that CR repo

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 04:31 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Craig Whitecraigwh...@azapple.com wrote: /me is puzzled. You spelt it correctly. Maybe not so keen on learning the intricacies of Debian and the 'Debian way'. Linux is still Linux and while

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, October 30, 2011 08:38 PM, William Warren wrote: Or move to another distro that has timely security updates and long term support like Centos. What...Ubuntu LTS? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-10-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, October 29, 2011 04:36 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: It's a bad thing if you think clones should exist at all. Realistically, we would all probably be better off jumping ship the day of the fedora/EL split, but I've just been too lazy to learn to spell apt-get. /me is puzzled. You

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

2011-10-25 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1] http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4#Current_Status That is the official story - but try it - it works *BETTER* than an

Re: [CentOS] Samba + Openldap

2011-10-25 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, October 26, 2011 10:16 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 07:57 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, October 25, 2011 11:38 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Samba 4 is currently not yet in a state where it can replace existing production deployments. [1] [1

Re: [CentOS] Fried Email Server! Perl Problem

2011-10-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, October 19, 2011 06:40 AM, Jack Fredrikson wrote: From: John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 4:45 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Fried Email Server! Perl Problem On 10/18/11 1:16 PM, Jack Fredrikson wrote: @40004e9ddbd81c826894

Re: [CentOS] RHEL 5.2 beta relased

2011-10-09 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, October 10, 2011 03:23 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: Greetings, http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/red-hat-enterprise-linux-62-beta-is-out-now/9686 Thanks for taking us back in time. :-D ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Kerberos auth

2011-10-06 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, October 06, 2011 08:52 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: On Oct 6, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Bazybaz...@gmail.com wrote: I'm thinking of implementing centralized authentication using Kerberos on 48 servers, all Linux. I have no Active Directory. Can you please point me out to where I should

Re: [CentOS] Choosing a CentOS version

2011-10-04 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, October 04, 2011 02:17 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 10/4/11, m.r...@5-cent.usm.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Note that the above is true of every single o/s: for example, I think Windows XP is approaching EoL, while Internet Exploder 6 is *past* that (and there was much rejoicing).

Re: [CentOS] innovation of micro$oft...

2011-10-01 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, October 01, 2011 02:22 PM, lancebaynes87 wrote: http://chrome.blogspot.com/2011/09/problems-with-microsoft-security.html It was just an accident, or not, mr. micro$oft? ...f*ck you.. I don't think this chap will fit in here... ___

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-26 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, September 26, 2011 06:40 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: If it's not supported it shouldn't be enabled and easily (ab)used. This is part of the reason you have to add a boot argument to get CentOS to do a version upgrade; it's known to not work properly, and thus is semi-hidden. Now

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-24 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, September 24, 2011 03:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, September 23, 2011 02:35:40 PM Craig White wrote: I moved to Ubuntu on my own server, some of my customers servers as has my employer. This is not a Ubuntu list. I have had my share of problems with more than one of the

Re: [CentOS] Finding i/o bottleneck

2011-09-23 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, September 21, 2011 09:33 PM, Nicolas Ross wrote: In the meen time, I'd still like to find a tool to know what files are requeted to the filesystem and what ones are being waited for... atop and iotop are tools that do that...when the kernel has been appropriately patched or the

Re: [CentOS] Ekiga - camera

2011-09-21 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 01:55 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: dear All, when first installing CentOs some 6 months ago, I noticed this strange thing called Ekiga. You need an ILS server/service or a sip server to make ekiga useful. ILS is going/has gone the way of the dodo...so any sip

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-21 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 12:50 AM, Craig White wrote: I don't have to worry about 'long term support' Cause there is none. Ubuntu != Debian No LTS? - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS For Ubuntu's definition of 'support'. It is in no way comparable to what you can get in

Re: [CentOS] This doesn't make sense

2011-09-21 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, September 22, 2011 07:00 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 5:46 PM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: No LTS? - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS For Ubuntu's definition of 'support'. It is in no way comparable to what you can get

Re: [CentOS] ekiga

2011-09-19 Thread Christopher Chan
Hadi, Forget it. I suspect you would have to upgrade a whole load of libraries and if it were you doing it, you will break your system beyond recognition. Christopher On Monday, September 19, 2011 12:48 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: Dear All I have installed Asterisk on my centos 5.0 and I have

Re: [CentOS] ekiga

2011-09-19 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, September 19, 2011 03:30 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: On 9/19/11, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: Hadi, Forget it. I suspect you would have to upgrade a whole load of libraries and if it were you doing it, you will break your system beyond recognition. Thank

Re: [CentOS] ekiga

2011-09-19 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, September 19, 2011 06:30 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: Thank you very much for your help. Excuse me, do we have other sip clients rather than ekiga that I can give them a try? The ekiga 2.0.2 is too old to work with my new Asterisk version on my centos 5.0 . I will upgrade my other

Re: [CentOS] sarg

2011-09-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, September 19, 2011 06:34 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 09/18/11 2:17 PM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: I am running squid + sarg, how can I change the ip-address in the generated report into username? The users are free to surf the web anonymously, no need to provide a login or any

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 08:21 PM, Always Learning wrote: The integrity of the data can be divided into two aspects: ensuring the data remains constant (unaltered) while stored, which is the responsibility of the operation system and the database software, and the data's integrity from

Re: [CentOS] Upgrade from 5.6 = 5.7

2011-09-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, September 15, 2011 09:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 09/14/11 6:03 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote: One day, if I have time, I want to programme a complete commercial accounts systems using HTML, PHP and MySQL. Its a piece of cake to do well (meaning easily) but a little time

Re: [CentOS] Dedup (again)

2011-09-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, September 16, 2011 11:58 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi all, Back in March someone asked about deduplication in Centos and I replied I'm using LessFS. I want to report that my overall experience is that I have performance issue up to the point that I would like to abandon it. The

Re: [CentOS] fax over ip?

2011-09-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 02:32 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: On 9/13/11, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:51 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: Thank you very much for your help. I have experience with Asterisk but on my Debian not on my

Re: [CentOS] fax over ip?

2011-09-12 Thread Christopher Chan
Do us a favour. Please stop posting here and go find a fax over ip provider if you can. If you actually manage to find one, ask that provider for the software. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] fax over ip?

2011-09-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:51 AM, hadi motamedi wrote: Thank you very much for your help. I have experience with Asterisk but on my Debian not on my centos. It is serving as DECT server for telephony calls. It can provide sip calls as well. Do you mean it can event provide fax over ip?

Re: [CentOS] OT: help with email list reading programs w/ best features to read the centos and other lists that can filter people etc

2011-08-30 Thread Christopher Chan
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:46 PM, R - elists wrote: we need to filter out various peoples posts on this list would some kind soul(s) please direct us in locating the best email list reading programs w/ the best features to read the centos and other lists. It's not an email program but

Re: [CentOS] Upstart file format

2011-08-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote: Where can I find documentation on the new format of the files in /etc/init.d/? You mean /etc/event.d? Upstart...I thought Centos 6 uses systemd? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Upstart file format

2011-08-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:03 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: It does seem, though this may be my age and grouchiness speaking, that much of the development used to be done by people who thought like system administrators, whereas these

Re: [CentOS] Upstart file format

2011-08-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:16 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote: On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:57:22 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 09:51 AM, Michael D. Berger wrote: Where can I find documentation on the new format of the files in /etc/init.d/? You mean /etc/event.d

Re: [CentOS] Off topic list for centos please?

2011-08-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, August 28, 2011 09:59 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 14:39 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: heh, I've been to belgium 8 times in the last 5 years. Its never failed to rain on me ( even snow one in a while ). A CentOS Conference would be nice, its been brought up

Re: [CentOS] Apache Changing IPtables C 5.6 via Apache

2011-08-21 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, August 21, 2011 08:46 PM, Craig White wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:00 +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 02:50 +0200, Patrick Lists wrote: Maybe SELinux blocks Apache from writing to /etc/sysconfig/iptables? Have you looked at ? These apps seem to offer a

Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights

2011-08-17 Thread Christopher Chan
OpenIndiana has all that builtin... /me ducks. - Original Message - From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:03 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights On 08/16/11 12:59 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: ie. you

Re: [CentOS] drop manitu.net

2011-08-13 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:28 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: That conversation would make sense if there were any spam blockers that cared about the collateral damage to unrelated hosts that happen to be So, in your experience, there aren't *any*, they all block an entire range? If so, why is

Re: [CentOS] dual sound

2011-07-29 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 03:29 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: On 7/29/2011 1:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: And I've had the external speakers jacked in both in the front headphones jack, and the traditional one in the back, and sound comes both

Re: [CentOS] VLAN's

2011-07-23 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, July 22, 2011 10:55 PM, Jennifer Botten wrote: Hi Julio, -A FORWARD -i eth2.2 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 10.30.4.28 -p udp -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth2.2 -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 192.168.0.0/24 -p tcp -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth1 -s 192.168.0.0/24 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -p tcp -j ACCEPT -A

Re: [CentOS] SPAM on the List

2011-07-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:19 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: SPAM-L is that way == oh wait, it's dead... Maybe we can keep discussions about blackhat, incompetent networks, about SMTP, open proxies/relays, honeypots and what have you off this list? Just limit it to sendmail/postfix/exim

Re: [CentOS] SPAM on the List

2011-07-18 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 11:29 PM, 夜神 岩男 wrote: On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 22:17 +0800, Christopher Chan wrote: On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:19 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: SPAM-L is that way == oh wait, it's dead... Maybe we can keep discussions about blackhat, incompetent networks, about SMTP

Re: [CentOS] cent0s-6 and virtualbox

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote: I want to get a look at Cents-6 The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42 The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box with the same result I boot from the CD (wich have been

Re: [CentOS] cent0s-6 and virtualbox

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 09:32 AM, Christopher Chan wrote: On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:52 AM, Michel Donais wrote: I want to get a look at Cents-6 The computer is a portable Thinkpad T-42 The base OS is Windows XP Professionnal I tried to use both Microsoft Virtual PC and Oracle Virtual Box

Re: [CentOS] firewall?

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is the centos mailing list for basic users like me? Try ubuntu-us...@lists.ubuntu.com They always have spoon and milk powder ready and then some.

Re: [CentOS] firewall?

2011-07-17 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:30 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: On 7/18/11, Christopher Chanchristopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: On Monday, July 18, 2011 01:14 PM, hadi motamedi wrote: Thank you very much for your reply. Can you please let me know what is the centos mailing list for basic users

Re: [CentOS] really large file systems with centos

2011-07-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:20 PM, Devin Reade wrote: Two thoughts: 1. Others have already inquired as to your motivation to move away from ZFS/Solaris. If it is just the hardware licensing aspect, you might want to consider ZFS on FreeBSD. (I understand that unlike the

Re: [CentOS] really large file systems with centos

2011-07-15 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, July 16, 2011 04:24 AM, Devin Reade wrote: --On Friday, July 15, 2011 10:54:35 PM +0800 Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: I would not touch ZFS on FreeBSD with a ten-foot pole. Would you care to elaborate as to why? And specifically if it is particular

Re: [CentOS] Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card

2011-07-12 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 04:27 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: John R Pierce wrote: On 07/11/11 6:10 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: Wait, wait. So using SSDs as FAST writing disks is a load of hogwash? You still need stuff like umem nvram cards? What's the deal with things like Fusion IO

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-11 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 11, 2011 10:03 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: Ljubomir The Wise wrote: Short version (I am hungry): Experience (19 years of Windows phone support and 5 years of Linux administration and usage as a desktop surrounded by Windows users) says that in order to convert (reluctant)

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-11 Thread Christopher Chan
On Monday, July 11, 2011 11:09 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On Monday, July 11, 2011 10:03 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: Ljubomir The Wise wrote: Short version (I am hungry): Experience (19 years of Windows phone support and 5 years of Linux administration

Re: [CentOS] Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card

2011-07-11 Thread Christopher Chan
- Original Message - From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card On 07/11/11 9:30 AM, Drew wrote: Which is funny because Intel's SASUC8i (rebranded LSI3082E-R) is true

Re: [CentOS] Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card

2011-07-11 Thread Christopher Chan
- Original Message - From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 8:34 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Suggest Hardware Raid Controller Card On 07/11/11 5:16 PM, Christopher Chan wrote: Who needs bbu when you can get an SSD to work with your

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 12:24 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:35 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, July 08, 2011 12:01:36 PM Christopher Chan wrote: Professional Wireless Router? That knocked me off my seat :-D. 'Wireless router' has become

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com/applications_list Aw, nobody put in a word for NOD32 from Eset?

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 09:52 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Sunday, July 10, 2011 03:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Also worth mentioning is that there is Kaspersky for Linux Workstations and Servers, and even for the Mac: http://www.kaspersky.com

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 05:50 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: I must be the only one keeping entire/beggining of the conversation in mind why replying. Either that or I am nutz. Which one would you have us believe? :p But seriously, one thing you have to understand is that threads always

Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 10:41 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: The actual point I wanted to make is not what western world has done to my country, that has been, is now (Libya for instance) and will be, and I am not moping about that. But looking from the other side of the presented truth (by

Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:31 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 17:29 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Hey, you are on my side. We are Europeans so we should be bothers AND we both like Centos :-) OH yes, you lot should be BOTHERS. :-D

Re: [CentOS] Working with the upstream vendor

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 11:23 PM, Always Learning wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Redhat has gone BEYOND the GPL. The GPL only requires that you make the source and build scripts available to those that you distribute to. Nor are you required to make the source/build scripts available

Re: [CentOS] Celebrating Centos 6.0 Day World-wide

2011-07-10 Thread Christopher Chan
On Sunday, July 10, 2011 05:12 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 02:05:26PM -0700, Craig White wrote: The reality is that applications are becoming more and more web based SAAS and as the costs of specific applications needed on specific platforms (ie, Quickbooks) rise, web

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

2011-07-09 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 10:35 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: On Friday, July 08, 2011 12:01:36 PM Christopher Chan wrote: Professional Wireless Router? That knocked me off my seat :-D. 'Wireless router' has become associated in my mind with that device you put in homes. So what professional wireless

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

2011-07-08 Thread Christopher Chan
On Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: The Apple Airport in an Intel Mac is Broadcom; many Intel Dell's have the option of Broadcom, which is typically less expensive than the 3945 or similar Intel wireless chipset. My Dell Inspiron 640m came with

Re: [CentOS] Where can I download centos 6

2011-07-08 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:48 PM, Mark Bradbury wrote: Reading QA web site, fair estimate is it will take 2-3 days for us to be able to download, since there where last minute changes to some packages and sync to external mirrors should have started last night and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 supported hardware

2011-07-08 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, July 09, 2011 12:48 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Thursday, July 07, 2011 11:53 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Lamar Owen wrote: The Apple Airport in an Intel Mac is Broadcom; many Intel Dell's have the option of Broadcom, which is typically less

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

2011-07-05 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 07:28 PM, James Hogarth wrote: If you're running a database on it, you might re-think using a journaled filesystem. For that, ext2 will be faster and much less prone to unrecoverable data loss. Did you mean EXT4, or in actual fact EXT2? I thought EXT4 was faster

Re: [CentOS] ext4 in CentOS 5.6?

2011-07-05 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 10:26 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote: (I'm sharpening my axe for the Use ZFS, it's bulletproof discussion.) /me puts on asbestos suit...stares...switches to asbestos armor instead. HAHA, what's your take on ZFS then? We've been running ZFS on a few storage servers,

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

2011-07-02 Thread Christopher Chan
On Saturday, July 02, 2011 09:42 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Jason Pyeron wrote: Could you (or anyone) suggest a cheap UPS? This is only a tiny server (HP MicroServer) on a home LAN. http://www.amazon.com/APC-Back-UPS-shutdown-software-UPS- BE350G/dp/B001985SWW/ Thanks, I'll look into that.

Re: [CentOS] Power-outage

2011-07-01 Thread Christopher Chan
On Friday, July 01, 2011 11:46 PM, Brunner, Brian T. wrote: centos-boun...@centos.org wrote: On 7/1/2011 10:59 AM, Robert Heller wrote: APC UPSes are supported by apcupsd. Other brands, not so much. Some (read: cheaper models) have their own special protocol and don't include Linux

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

2011-06-28 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 04:05 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 02:38 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: John R Pierce wrote: On 06/27/11 10:43 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: note that doesn't show all the pertinent info. I prefer `iptable -L -vn

Re: [CentOS] iptables port forwarding

2011-06-28 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 05:22 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: Christopher Chan wrote: Er, you are not making much sense here. John posts that -v is needed to not get the 'digested result' but the 'full result' and then you go off on a branch about iptables-save. Oh, I still don't see what

Re: [CentOS] Mail Question

2011-06-28 Thread Christopher Chan
On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 07:54 PM, Bo Lynch wrote: On Mon, June 27, 2011 8:18 pm, Christopher Chan wrote: On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 03:01 AM, Bo Lynch wrote: /var/mail/farmer for user farmer. cannot open file: File too large self compiled postfix

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >