icktime.symantec.com/39tX9Zv3dbX6w8rkcpnA46w7Vc?u=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos
--
Grant Street
Senior Systems Engineer
T: +61 2 9383 4800 (main)
D: +61 2 8310 3582 (direct)
E: grant.str...@al.com.au
Building 54 / FSA #19, Fox Studios Australia, 38 Driver Avenue
Moore Park, NSW 2021
AU
Hello All
Up until now we have been using standard PXE boot to do kick start installs of
centos boxes. With recent machines however they come by default as EFI boot. We
can set them to legacy but I would like to solve this before this option goes
away.
Just wondering if anyone has any
don't forget you can define PXE config files based on the IP, IP range
or MAC address of the server. This means that you don't have to select
the correct pxeboot option from a PXE menu it will select the most
precise config file automatically.
see the following
On 30/09/14 08:29, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Mon, September 29, 2014 4:26 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Peter Brady
subscripti...@simonplace.net wrote:
I also mirror EPEL. And publish it
what's in your Xorg log file in /var log?
What is in your xorg.conf?
Grant
On 16/07/14 12:49, mark wrote:
As I posted yesterday, 6.5, a new Dell with a Quadro k2000. I installed
kmod-nvidia, and startx works fine... but runlevel 5 fails.
Any suggestions?
mark
On 10/07/14 07:09, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
Did you keep track of the time you spent keeping [desktop RHL 5.x] working?
My employer put a line item on my timesheet for it, so, yes, I kept
track of it and got paid for it. Those paper
I don't know why they weren't in the release notesmaybe because it's
a preview release? They were issues in the Kernel. If you have a look at
the output of
rpm -q kernel -changelog|less
you can see a whole swag of changes in 2.6.32-405.el6
On 03/04/14 12:34, Rita wrote:
thanks for your
Hi
We are testing out the efficiency of cachefs and I was wondering what
values other people use to decide if
* cachefs is providing value?
* cache size is the right/best/optimal size?
* There is enough cache hits to make it worth while?
* what files are being re-used(read from cache) the most?
*
8 matches
Mail list logo
