le I welcome the Red Hat announcement I really could do
without the "shakeup" and all the additional work that it triggers.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
C
t, I am looking for something similar.
GnuCash has been working fine for me for several years.
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Warren Young Sent: April 22, 2015 20:46
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank
h...@forsoft.com wrote:
I have done some what if testing.
Using which tool? My simulator, or something you cooked up
yourself? If the latter, would you care to share?
I cobbled something
From: Warren Young Sent: April 21, 2015 14:13
On Apr 21, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Kay Diederichs Sent: April 21, 2015 03:43
instead of having 20 for all of them, set
the first filesystem to 17, the second to 19, the third to
23, and the
fourth to 29
From: Les Mikesell Sent: April 21, 2015 09:54
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I am trying to avoid running them at the same time in an effort to
avoid 70 minute boot times (which is what happened on the weekend).
How many filesystems do you have?
It varies
From: Gordon Messmer Sent: April 21, 2015 10:30
On 04/21/2015 09:40 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I accept that fscks are required on a periodic basis and I
am willing
to reboot more often to achieve these but I would like to minimize
downtime (during the reboot) where possible.
Why
From: John R Pierce Sent: April 20, 2015 23:58
On 4/20/2015 9:08 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
The second idea was to set each filesystem to a different
random count
value. This would run the risk of having two or more executions at
the same time but it would probably not be very frequent
From: Kay Diederichs Sent: April 21, 2015 03:43
On 04/21/2015 06:08 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
The second idea was to set each filesystem to a different random
count value. This would run the risk of having two or more
executions at the same time but it would probably not be very
will not address my concern.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Mark Milhollan Sent: April 21, 2015 05:35
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
CentOS 6
From ''man fstab'' ...
The sixth field, (fs_passno), is used by the fsck(8)
program to determine the order
in which filesystem checks are done at reboot time
.
And unless you reboot frequently you are probably hitting the time
setting, not the mount count.
This is in fact what transpired on the weekend and I would leave this
in place as a protective measure.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: April 20, 2015 21:09
Over the weekend I had to reboot one of my systems and got hit with
fsck runs on all of the filesystems. I would not mind so much except
doing them all at once took over an hour. I would like to be able to
stagger these, ideally only
count
value. This would run the risk of having two or more executions at
the same time but it would probably not be very frequent.
Does anyone have a suggestion for a better way of doing this?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: Reindl Harald Sent: November 5, 2014 01:22
Am 05.11.2014 um 02:07 schrieb Hugh E Cruickshank:
From: John R Pierce Sent: November 4, 2014 16:53
On 11/4/2014 4:49 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
We are looking for a way to automate the handling of
bounced emails.
what do you want
application software. But thanks
for the suggestion.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
.
There definitely are judging by the number of bounce messages we
receive hours and sometimes days later for messages that have not been
queued in our mail server.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
packages?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: John R Pierce Sent: November 4, 2014 16:53
On 11/4/2014 4:49 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
We are looking for a way to automate the handling of bounced emails.
what do you want to do DO with these bounced mails?
Our application software generates emails on behalf of our clients
From: John R Pierce Sent: November 4, 2014 18:14
On 11/4/2014 5:07 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
The bounceHammer package appears to do this but I would then need to
figure out how to either read or convert their database (YAML/JSON).
what language is your application written in? most
for BH instead.
That was the way I was leaning based on the little research I have done
so far. The confirmation is appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
duplicate packages
(your suggestions would probably have helped with that). It was also
necessary to reinstall the kernel packages but everything seems to be
humming along fine now (and up to date as well).
Thanks to all who provides feedback and suggestions.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank
in the recovering from this.
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
FromJitse Klomp Sent: December 4, 2013 14:47
On 12/04/2013 11:34 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I am having problems with a CentOS 6.4 box that I was in the process
of doing a yum update to 6.5. Unfortunately the system hung during
the update and I was forced to reboot it and it is now
From: Frank Cox Sent: December 4, 2013 15:04
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800 Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
That happened yesterday and I can not recall specifically what it said.
I am currently in the process of backing up the hard drive before
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: December 4, 2013 15:09
From: Frank Cox Sent: December 4, 2013 15:04
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800 Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
That happened yesterday and I can not recall specifically what it
said. I am
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: m.r...@5-cent.us Sent: April 30, 2013 12:13
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Well, more like create a bootable flash drive and copy the
.exe to it -
there doesn't seem to be *anything* other than the damn .exe.
Have a look at:
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport
that the Firmware DVDs have been replaced by
the new Service Pack for ProLiant (also bootable).
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman
From: Patrick Lists Sent: October 16, 2012 22:11
On 10/17/2012 02:51 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I am attempting to setup OpenLDAP on c CentOS 6.3 platform. I have
been able to locate numerous online how to documents but none seem
to work correctly on CentOS 6.3. I believe
like that. It seemed to work (though I've done only basic
testing on it so far).
Thank you but without having a working slapd.conf (or for that mater
any slapd.conf) file I will not be able to take advantage of this.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: Greg Bailey Sent: October 19, 2012 12:15
On 10/19/2012 11:28 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Thank you but without having a working slapd.conf (or for that mater
any slapd.conf) file I will not be able to take advantage of this.
I started with the slapd.conf in:
/usr/share/openldap
in the right direction I
would greatly appreciated it. I have been fighting with this off and on
for the couple of weeks and it is driving me up the wall!
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS
on his web site on how to do this:
http://dag.wieers.com/howto/compatibility/
So far we have not noticed any significant performance issues as a
result of this change.
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: June 26, 2012 16:01
It appears that the terminfo ansi-m file is no longer distributed with
the CentOS 6.2 (along with many others). Can anyone advise how I can
obtain this file? As a work around I have copied the file from a
CentOS 4 box but that is probably
.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
would be gratefully appreciated.
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Scott Silva Sent: June 19, 2012 15:51
It looks like you installed 32 bit OS... I don't think it
sees over 16 gigs...
Yes it is 32-bit but if there is a 16GB limit on memory then I am
going to need to revert to CentOS 5.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software
and you're using a non PAE
x86 kernel?
It was my understanding that PAE is now built into the standard kernel
but I will check on this further.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
for RHEL5 (or possibly 6) which does support the memory
in 32-bit mode.
The reason for the restriction to 32-bit is because of other software
that we must run that does not work correctly on a 64-bit OS.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
some testing to see
if our requirements would be practical or not.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
system.
http://zfsonlinux.org/
Hi Nataraj:
Thanks. I had not seen this one. It does look more promising than the
zfs-fuse package.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
suggestions look interesting and we will check them both out.
Thanks, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
available at the time (probably RHEL6).
We will then look at upgrading all the backup and development servers
to the corresponding CentOS version (CentOS6?).
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS
of time
chasing this down before I have to bite the bullet and go with what
we have.
Thanks again of your feedback and to all the others who have responded.
Everyone's comments have been greatly appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
environment but I have hardware that is capable
of doing the job that I am looking for so why should I buy new hardware?
I would never get approval for the purchase because there is no way that
I could justify the expenditure.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
there been able to get LessFS running on CentOS 5.7 and
can provide some pointers?
If not LessFS can you suggest an alternate deduplication software?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
These being different OSs would not be viable for us as we need to
maintain RHEL compatibility.
(ZFS pool version = 28)
This looks promising but the latest Linux version (0.7.0) only has
pool version 23. I will check this out further.
Thanks for your response.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Les Mikesell Sent: January 16, 2012 20:55
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
If not LessFS can you suggest an alternate deduplication software?
Backuppc dedups (and compresses) at the file level using hardlinks.
Not quite as effective as a block level if you
the box. I have a spare DL380 and a couple of IBM EXP400
disk arrays that I would like to configure as a backup database server.
Any and all comments will be appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
just asked a similar question
a month ago for a PCIe card in an HP server...
Thanks. That is an excellent suggestion and one I should have thought
of as well (but I did not). I will give it a try right now.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: February 3, 2011 12:06
From: Joseph L. Casale Sent: February 3, 2011 11:59
While I haven't, I also agree it should, but you can email
supp...@lsi.com and ask, they have top notch support, I just asked
a similar question a month ago for a PCIe card in an HP
with CentOS 4.8 and 5.5 without problems. My concern was with using
the 320-2E units in an HP DL380G5 box with CentOS 5. This is something
that I have no experience with and I was asking if anyone had had it
working in the HP box.
Thanks for your comment.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward
From: John R Pierce Sent: February 3, 2011 16:41
On 02/03/11 3:32 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: compdoc Sent: February 3, 2011 15:23
I have an Altos G510 server, (two xeon sockets) and it has a Megaraid
scsi 320-0X PCI-X controller that 5.5 recognizes.
Maybe there's a chance
From: John R Pierce Sent: February 3, 2011 17:14
On 02/03/11 5:06 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I will reconsider the need for all three arrays and see if I can go
with the PCI-X cards.
If this is SAS stuff, you can generally daisy chain a few trays of
drives, at the expensive of total
at the first place since I only need to purchase one
riser ($200.00) instead of three 320-2E cards (price varies from $275
to $700 each depending on the source).
Thanks to all for your responses. They were all appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward
to manually run kudzu to add the drive or am I just
borrowing trouble by trying to do this?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo
From: Brian Mathis Sent: May 27, 2010 15:27
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank
h...@forsoft.com wrote:
I know that I can just reboot the system and kudzu will add the tape
drive back in during the boot process however I was wondering if it
would be possible to manually
that it will recognize it on a reboot however I did not want to
wait until a reboot was convenient. I was looking for a way to add
the drive without having to do a reboot. Brian's suggestion has
worked and I am now using the tape drive without having to do a
reboot.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank
point me in the right
direction?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: April 13, 2010 15:07
I have found one suspicious entry in /var/log/messages:
Apr 12 17:34:14 fisds0 named[5210]: client 192.168.2.7#10242: updating
zone 'forsoft.com/IN': deleting an RR
This would seem to indicate that the printer itself has
.
Some day when I have some free time (yeah right!) I am try to figure
what the actual cause is.
Thanks very much for your comments, they are greatly appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
this by using service named start but I should not
have to do this. Has anyone encountered something similar and can pass
on some words of wisdom?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
start
command unknown rather than accepting the command and indicating
a communication problem.
So file a bug with the BIND developers about this rather obvious
'bug'.
Good suggestion and I have done so.
hec
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: John R. Dennison Sent: November 25, 2009 15:57
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 03:36:09PM -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
That would explain a lot but it would have been more useful if the
rndc command had returned an error saying something like start
command unknown rather than accepting
From: Arturas Skauronas Sent: November 25, 2009 16:04
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Hugh E Cruickshank
h...@forsoft.com wrote:
CentOS 4.8, BIND 9.2.4
3. Delete the journal files:
rm *.jnl
why to do that?
you can do simple zone update by:
rndc freeze [zone]
if you got error like
needed to be running :)
True but in my feeble defence I was following someone else's example
procedures (and following them blindly it would seem). I would think
that my suggested change, while not strictly required, would result
in improved usability of the software.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E
Hi All:
It appears that the RPMforge.net site is down. Can someone confirm
and possibly advise when it might be expected back?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 3, 2009 00:25
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 19:40
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to
do special routing, I believe there will be a problem
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 19:40
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 2, 2009 19:34
If the box is the also the mx for the domain for which you want to
do special routing, I believe there will be a problem if you apply
that sender_based_routing patch. They cannot
of those little jobs that I am
responsible for and I just have not had the time to review/learn a
new MTA so I muddle on with the devil I know.
Thanks for your suggestion it has definitely given me something to
think on and possibly work with.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software
input (and everyone else's).
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Ron Loftin Sent: September 2, 2009 11:48
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 11:38 -0700, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Christopher Chan Sent: September 1, 2009 23:04
I cannot believe the file is dated 2004. Ah well, I got rid of
sendmail and replaced it with postfix in 2003 while I
+ and will not work with my 8.13.
I have also found some documentation for both at:
http://www.theillien.com/Sys_Admin_v12/html/v13/i02/a8.htm
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
at the our
development offices (no mater how hard I tried I just could not
squeeze them into that half-rack cage).
Thanks again for your input.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: September 2, 2009 18:27
For those that might be interested I have found one other alternative
called Smart Table available at:
http://www.jmaimon.com/sendmail/anfi.homeunix.net/sendmail/smarttab.html
However it is for sendmail 8.5+ and will not work with my
needs to be defined for
sender_based routing.
I will see if I can cook up something on a Centos 4 box.
Thanks for the offer but I would hold off for now. I am going to give
the Smart Table solution a try first as it seems to be a little
cleaner/easier/somethinger.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E
, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
that in to this feature as well.
Thank you very much.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
for this
domain name to/from one mail server.
It is not critical but it would have been nice to do. I am not going
to waste too much more effort on this as I have more critical things
that need my time.
Thanks to all that replied!
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software
on in years so that may be
a contributing factor as well.
Anyway, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. They
are appreciated.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: August 14, 2009 14:18
I am looking for some possible recommendations on the handling of our
internal DNS services. First some background...
I would like to express my appreciation to all those that responded to
my request (particularly Robert). I do not have
, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Robert Spangler Sent: August 14, 2009 16:18
On Friday 14 August 2009 17:17, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Here are my questions...
1. Is the BIND master/slave the appropriate approach?
Yes, you should already have something like this in case the
main/master server would fail.
I
for checking the zone file.
There are man pages for both that explain how to use them.
I will check those out but what about the ease of use factor. Would
you suggest something like webmin over had tailoring the config files?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software
to a different port:
[snip]
Hi Filipe:
Thanks for the additional info. That will be of great help.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
be greatly
appreciated.
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
(rpc.statd?) binding on the rsync port, so the rsync server could not
start as the port was already in use.
Hi Filipe
Give the man a cigar! rpc.statd strikes again.
Now to figure out how to fix that.
Thanks.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
From: Semih Gokalp Sent: April 24, 2009 11:35
I use echo $0 for get script name but it has printed
/usr/local/bin/scriptname but i want to only print scriptname
Try: `basename $0`
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
how good it is but you might want to have a look.
HTH
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
not recommended. It will work but you will see a
significant reduction in performance. We strongly recommend that our
clients go with RAID10 (as in RAID 1+0). In-house we only use RAID10.
Just my 0.02CA.
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
waiting on the ISP to fix it up.
My thought was can we configure this in our mail server so that we
and our client do not have to suffer with this again?
TIA
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS
From: Frank Cox Sent: April 9, 2008 20:01
On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:54:28 -0700
Hugh E Cruickshank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to force sendmail to use a specified host name for
outbound email to a selected domain name instead of the host name
that can be found by looking up
since of course the isp's kludge will break now and then.
Too true. Eventually we will be moving the whole shebang to a co-lo
facility so that will probably avoid the problem as well (a little
overkill but it should work).
Thanks, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward
this helps :)
I am sure it will.
Thanks muchly!
Regards, Hugh
--
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: April 9, 2008 20:43
From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
Sendmail
like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
http://www.sendmail.org/m4/mailertables.html
Give
From: Les Mikesell Sent: April 9, 2008 21:10
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Clint Dilks Sent: April 9, 2008 20:32
Hi, It has been some time since I have had to do anything with
Sendmail
like this, but I believe mailertable is what you need. See
http://www.sendmail.org/m4
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
