This week's FLOSS Weekly interview is about ClearOS (audio/video at
http://twit.tv/floss168). Apparently they have taken the CentOS
developer's frequently given advice to go away and do it yourself and
will have a 'ClearOS core' release that is their own rebuild from Red
Hat
Subject: Re: [CentOS] xferlog not rotating.
To: centos@centos.org
Message-ID: 20110520144308.ga23...@bludgeon.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:44:49AM -0400, Steven Crothers wrote:
It's a bit funny that logrotate is difficult to fix for
- Original Message
From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:01:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:31:04PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
Seriously, just skip over my posts. I
- Original Message
From: Garry Dale garry.d...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:37:33
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
(someone) wrote:
Why does the website say something so different, then?
Seriously? Are people
- Original Message
From: Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 1:59:19
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Seriously, just skip over my
It sounds to me like your big beef is that you can't run the CentOS
distribution the way *you* want it run. Whether you agree or not,
doesn't change the fact that CentOS *is* enterprise ready.-- and many
enterprises use it. The only time there are significant delays in
No, I would just
- Original Message
From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 21 April, 2011 2:58:36
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Ian Murray wrote:
I have it black and white
And do us a favor? Take your own advice.
I always try to state as far as I know, as far as I can tell, in my
opinion/belief.
Can we recall that I commented on the fact that a major Linux magazine had put
up a pretty damning article. I don't know why I am getting attacked for that.
Respected? I can't recall a single article of his that mentioned CentOS
that wasn't disparaging. I find such one-sided and opinionated writings
hard to respect.
Okay, maybe that was an assumption too far in regards to respect.
Perhaps not so one-sided if he had received an email
No. News reporting is about picking up and distilling the sentiment
of what's going on. The article has done that. It doesn't have to be
a complete factual research project with totally fair and balanced
chances for everyone to have their say. If the Devs had responded,
that would
Is there anything else relevant to add?
___
Yeah, please can someone fix the front-page to better reflect the distribution
for what it is, rather than the sales pitch that is there now. Not everyone has
read about it ad nausem on this list.
- Original Message
From: Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 21:32:35
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Wednesday, April 20, 2011 03:29:07 PM Ian Murray wrote:
My big beef has always been that the website
But to allude to
him as a respected industry member is greatly stretching things when
every article that mentions CentOS is disparaging and I can't recall any
article even ending on a positive note.
Try google: http://lwn.net/Articles/123934/
(For the record, I couldn't find any
- Original Message
From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 20 April, 2011 23:04:50
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On 04/20/11 2:51 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Is there anything else relevant to add
Here's a more objective view from Linux Mag:
http://www.linux-mag.com/id/8608/?hq_e=elhq_m=1231269hq_l=12hq_v=41484763bd
If you have trouble with the link, some relevant quotes:
Wow, that must smart. Still, should come as no surprise as it has all been said
on here before... many
I am sure if you do then you will have a mailing list on which your
fanbois can post that they want to give you money.
But this list is not for that purpose.
Once again an unnecessary personal attack. If anybody round here has fanbois,
the CentOS devs! Not language I would normally
This is really disrespectful to talk about on here. The devs spent a ton of
their spare time to develop centos, last thing you should talk about is
starting competing projects...
Peter.
Erm, the dev(s) *suggested* using an alternative distribution. The stated aims
are different, so
- Original Message
From: aurfal...@gmail.com aurfal...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tue, 12 April, 2011 20:10:14
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Dag's RHEL Rebuild Project.
On Apr 12, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
This is really disrespectful
The goal of the centos project is to produce an RPM that is exactly like
the upstream RPM in every way that is legally possible.
The checks we do look at libraries that binaries link to, size of the
packages and a list of the files the RPM installs.
We would like for all RPMS to
John, please stop cluttering the list with your complaining. It's
making a right mess for those of that wish to discuss the project and
its direction.
Wow. Pot? Kettle? So, let me get this straight. People are
able to bitch, whine, complain and needlessly threaten to
I'm really tired of this.
Ralph: please unsubscribe everyone who can't shut his mouth. Thanks.
A lot of of less-vocal people will thank you.
Kai
___
Wow Kai, maybe you should suspend the mailing list?
At least that
As I seem to have started this little subsection of the thread, please
let me give just one small example to help clarify the situation as it
appears there is still a lot of misunderstanding surrounding this issue.
Let's look at kernel modules, kmod packages. They are built against
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Fri, 8 April, 2011 13:37:19
Subject: Re: [CentOS] STOP THIS THREAD NOW!
STOP IT!
Kai
If we carry on long enough, Godwin's Law will kick-in and that will be the end
of it. I have had
These people are priceless and don't deserve to be
submitted to the harshness we have been witnessing lately.
And everyone else is worthless and deserve the rudeness handed out by the devs?
Why don't you make comment on that or is that perfectly acceptable because of
who they are?
- Original Message
From: Radu Gheorghiu r...@pengooin.net
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 7 April, 2011 16:55:49
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On 04/07/2011 06:49 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
These people are priceless and don't deserve to be
submitted
If you WANT a service level agreement with me, then you may contract for
one. If you pay me enough, I will guarantee you updates on what ever
schedule you are willing to pay for. I will be very professional in my
dealings with you in that case too.
When you want something that is
If you do not like how your hairdresser does you hair you will go to
other one. If you do not like the taste of bread you are buying, you
will go and by from other bakery.
I have never been insulted or belittled by my hairdresser as we discuss how my
hair is best cut. My bakery has
Actually I just finished an email to Connie and Troy over at
SL, sharing some detail on project management with them
They are each friends, and it does not cause me a moment's
pain or raised blood pressure when SL is mentioned or when
someone 'threatens' to use their project's
- Original Message
From: R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 7 April, 2011 21:58:08
Subject: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
hair is best cut. My bakery has refused to sell me sliced bread
http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16
specifically item #2 in guidelines. Here, let me summarize it
for you: Do Not Top Post.
KB top posted yesterday. Did you correct him? Thought not. If your going to be
anything, please be fair.
If you're
- Original Message -
From:Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
This thread or others like it will continue
wrong. It will continue as long people bite. Stop biting the bait!
Kai
Oh, the irony Likewise.
Somebody will still keep coming onto ask the questions, esp.
Thats a very good question, and something more people should be asking
: here is a terse reply : adopt a part of the distro, contribute tests
and take ownership of driving support for those components forward ( so,
wiki content, support in irc channels and support for users on those
to Yahoo.
Assuming it wasn't just a very cheap and childish shot, of course.
Obviously it wasn't so broken that you weren't able to read or reply my mail. I
can't imagine what terrible hardship it has caused you.
On 04/06/2011 12:55 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
Its easy to fixate on the idea
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Wed, 6 April, 2011 17:15:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 Update?
Your mail is broken because it doesn't contain correct threading headers
(In-Reply-To). Because of that it just threads
On 04/06/2011 03:19 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
firstly, get a better email client. Your existing one is broken.
Irrelevant, unhelpful and quite rude.
mailing lists are setup to retain thread sanity, its expected people use
mailclients that can honour that. If yours cant and you prefer
On 04/06/2011 09:30 PM, Ian Murray wrote:
As previously stated, in-reply-to isn't a mandatory field as far as I can
tell, so it is a stretch to call it broken. However, now that someone
actually
stopped the time-wasting and told me the issue precisely, I was able to
rectify
- Original Message -
From:Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To:centos@centos.org
Cc:
Sent:Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 13:21
Subject:Re: [CentOS] KILL THIS THREAD ( Centos 6 Update?)
+100
Kai
Anybody that thinks this thread can be killed is so badly mis-understanding
What makes you think CentOS is not willing to be commercially sponsored?
(Or only work developing CentOS?)
I would LOVE to be able to do CentOS as my only job.
No one that we know of is willing to pay a full time salary for 1 or 2
or 3 people to develop CentOS. If they would pay for
What the CentOS project would be interested in (from a corporate
provider) would be to hire people and allow them to do CentOS related
things.
We are not interested in being paid in addition to our current work, but
making taking care of CentOS our only work.
There are many things
There have been a number of recent conversations on the developer list and
this list about CentOS. My initial thought was why not have CentOS and SL
merge. Since they have different goals I can understand the reason not to.
So my next question is, has no corporate entity offered to sponsor
--- On Thu, 3/3/11, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6 - What are you looking forward to?
To: Digimer li...@alteeve.com
Cc: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org, David Sommerseth
d...@users.sourceforge.net
I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door
so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my
understanding that Critical security updates and those that are
remotely exploitable would be pushed out ahead of 5.6.
That is my
No one is taking you wrong here;
Did you check with everybody before you spoke for them all?
How about the project
renames the distribution to IfYouDontLikeItYouAreNotForcedToUseItOS?
That is a fantastic idea because IMHO it would be a much fairer assessment of
the
Calling it Enterprise is important because doing so establishes the
*origin* and the *objective* of the work: a BUG-FOR-BUG-IDENTICAL
de-branding/re-branding of Red Hat ENTERPRISE Linux.
How about BugforbugIdenticaldebreandingrebrandingofupstreamenterpriselinuxOS?
Only joking. I take
- Original Message
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tue, 22 February, 2011 20:08:21
Subject: [CentOS] was: Re: Any update on 5.6 / 6?, is please kill for
another
month
Can we *please* kill this thread, which has run on
I think 8 million unique machines disagree with you assessment. Who
knows, maybe all 8 million are wrong and the 10-20 people who are
discussing it on this list are right.
Man, you could build a killer botnet if you wanted to!! (which strengthens your
argument about the point about the
Are they paravirt of HVM guests? qemu might have something to do with it if HVM
guests are involved.
- Original Message
From: Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tue, 22 February, 2011 23:29:29
Subject: [CentOS] how to optimize CentOS XEN
Seeing as how we are currently dealing with 2 trees in the QA directory
for testing right now (4.9 and 5.6) ... 6.0 will be waiting until we get
those out of QA.
I recall discussing this off-list with Johnny, like a year and a half ago (Wed,
12 August, 2009 14:25:18)
I said
2. Add more staff. As a small business owner, the very last thing you
want to do is add more staff when you are in a slammed state. It takes
all of the 'productive' workers time to train the new staff and output
slows to a crawl.
.
- Original Message
From: Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Mon, 21 February, 2011 21:12:57
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Air Conditioning - ON!
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Ian Murray wrote:
Plus, rename to something that doesn't suggest
Now Fred had read this book about how adding farmers to a field won't
necessarily make the fruit grow any faster. Maybe it's true, he
thought. Some of the experienced farmers had already been helping
anyway, so that was something.
Perhaps Fred confused people by calling his fruit
There is no reason for any individual to have a computer in
his home.
Google thinks the same, don't they?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
No the example above shows a telnet to port 25 connecting - which I can
reproduce too - but there is no 220 response as there should be from a
I am late to the thread (and I haven't a clue what we are talking about in
fact), but I get a 220 when I telnet into that IP address...
Escape
[herr...@stones herrold]$ telnet 178.63.65.136 25
Trying 178.63.65.136...
Connected to 178.63.65.136.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 mercury.localdomain ESMTP Postfix
quit
221 2.0.0 Bye
Connection closed by foreign host.
[herr...@stones herrold]$
Something between your local
I
was planning to evaluate devical, but have not tried it yet:
href=http://www.davical.org/; target=_blank
http://www.davical.org/
I would welcome comments from anyone with
experience with devical.
DAViCal is excellent. Perhaps more at home on a Debian based disty, but can be
i am looking to open vpn remote page now do you know where could i set
client's sites that allow to connect or not ?
I can't remember if there are other controls, but AFAIK the primary method of
saying who is allowed is via certificates that you create when setting it up.
It is still unclear
yes exactly that is what i need to do murrayei
could you describe a little more
If 'B' in my previous description is a single machine, need not route and the A
to C issue goes away.
My OpenVPN/Iptables skills are not strong enough to describe it in general
terms and has been previously
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/PXE , maybe it's a bit easier to
download full centos dvd and install from it?
It's a hardware issue with the server drive. Having said that, the CentOS net
install CD is pretty small, so server's drive might read it enough to get
going...
- Original Message
From: aurfal...@gmail.com aurfal...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Thu, 21 January, 2010 20:07:27
Subject: Re: [CentOS] trouble shooting slow ssh logins
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that my ssh logins to a
- Original Message
From: Adrian Sevcenco adrian.sevce...@cern.ch
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Sat, 16 January, 2010 15:27:12
Subject: [CentOS] raid1 creation :: not large enough to join array
Hi!
I have 2 identical hdd (1002FBYS) with the same firmware, etc ..
The dates are likely based on when the ISO was actually created. Therefore,
if the ISO was generated on Oct. 1st and no issues were found with it in QA,
then the date you are seeing on the mirrors is correct. The ISOs are based on
the original 5.4 tree and don't include updates that Red Hat
Here's the way I'm going to take care of the problem. Figure eight
weeks out for CentOS from the time Red Hat is released. If it gets
done quicker than that, I've got a bonus.!
...and ignore any announcements in the meantime, as they may be red-herrings?
Take a I'll believe it when I see it
Irrespective of the discussions about the release procedure and visibility,
etc, I'd like to thank everyone that put effort into making the CentOS 5.4
release happen..
I know I won't be alone in wishing to express thanks.
___
CentOS mailing
I've got about a dozen machines which are running the -164 kernel in the
dom0 with about 20 VM's running various kernels under there for i386 and
x86_64 with no problems.
your problem is most likely caused due to issues in the non CentOS
components.
Thanks for the response.
Where did
Where did you get the hypervisor from and what version are you running?
This is the CentOs list, and I tend to run my stuff as close to the
distro tree as possible.
Then that might be why we are having different experiences with the new kernel.
I'll take it to the Xen list.
Thanks for
.
On 09/17/2009 08:39 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
Where did you get the hypervisor from and what version are you running?
This is the CentOs list, and I tend to run my stuff as close to the
distro tree as possible.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
Hi,
I just upgraded the my Dom0 kernel on my Xen machine and it failed to boot. The
hypervisor itself comes from the Gitco repository.
I couldn't catch the exact reason, other than it said something about no proper
root and failing to synch. It rebooted a second or so later and I can't seem to
- Original Message
From: Jerry Geis ge...@pagestation.com
To: CentOS ML centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, 24 August, 2009 14:32:00
Subject: [CentOS] self signing certificates
hi all,
I have gone through the process of self signing certificates.
Aside from the pop-ups about
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 21 August, 2009 10:31:22
Subject: Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest
Ian Murray wrote on Fri, 21 Aug 2009 02:09:04 + (GMT):
[r...@xen
Again, I think this is the wrong way to go, it's outdated. I've never done
it this way and I think this How-To is derived from very old Xen versions
and got updated a few times over time without changing the basics. It
*may* work, but it's complicated to follow and overly complex, e.g.
- Original Message
From: ann kok oiyan...@yahoo.ca
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 15:10:09
Subject: [CentOS] needs help about vps
hi all
anyone have experience about vps
which one is better?
Depends what you are trying to do run multiple
- Original Message
From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 19:31:21
Subject: Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest
Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):
Actual, virt
This (and other replies) lead me to two possible culprits:
- either the graphical console over X11 is not a good idea (but I
can't imagine that, it shouldn't shoot the kernel)
- I always installed as a paravirtualized machine, Could it be that
the install-kernel on the 5.3-media is
- Original Message
From: Bernhard Gschaider bgschaid_li...@ice-sf.at
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, 18 August, 2009 18:56:36
Subject: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest
Hi!
I have the following problem: I have a server (CentOS 5.3 x86_64)
There is a very large issue with all people running VPS machines that are
waiting for upgrades.
Why are VPS's any more affected than bare-metal machines?
It will be greatly ironic if Redhat release the fix after they release 5.4, or
as part of 5.4. I will try not to say I told you so.
- Original Message
From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 3:31:32
Subject: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
Looks like the chum did not have to lose any data.
- Original Message
From: Chan Chung Hang Christopher christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, 14 August, 2009 10:00:41
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Fortunate clueless dd chum - lvm recovery
First of all, I would dd a copy of the
/2009 01:34 AM, Ian Murray wrote:
...
Under Ubuntu (NB the drive was under /dev/sdb under Ubuntu - is this a
clue?!?):-
Some HP machines have the same symptoms you describe:
Slow disk IO with CentOS, fast with Fedora.
The cure is to append
hda=noprobe hdc=noprobe
to the startup parameters
This applies to 5.X as it stands, as 4.X. Once RH 5.4 hits the streets, then
CentOS 5 users will be in the same boat. I would hope nobody feels they are
getting beaten up about this. The intention is not to beat anybody up. Anyway,
I am going to try *really* hard not to post on the matter
list centos@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, 12 August, 2009 9:10:32
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Murray wrote:
Okay, I stand corrected. Not new to the net, though... and I know
threading is not done per subject. I
] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board
On Aug 12, 2009, at 6:23 AM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
If anybody feels they must send complaints, execute personal
vendettas, issue death threats, etc please do it off-list.
actually, enforcing community norms in public is useful and important
Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2009 10:31:21
Subject: Re: [CentOS] [Off-list] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board
Ian Murray wrote on Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:51:05 + (GMT):
I hit reply and changed the subject.
Please stop doing that.
That's what I
vent
/vent
smirk
Long live the kings
/smirk
-Ray
I must admit, may be I missed something here, but there seems to be quite a bit
of outpouring of appreciation on this thread. I am sure that all that give up
their time and effort to make CentOS happen really deserve all the thanks and
at least.
From: Ron Blizzard rb4cen...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2009 22:06:05
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Les Mikeselllesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Ian Murray
: Alexander Georgiev alexander.georg...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 August, 2009 8:57:17
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow IDE on GeForce 8200 board
2009/8/11 Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk:
In my haste for help, I stupidly hit reply and changed the subject which I
I believe it is better to make
a different choice of distro, than to ask for substantial changes in the
current one, especially if other people should do that extra work for you.
Believe what you like, but I believe it's better to raise my concern for
discussion in the first instance. For the
You are probably right there. I lost interest in Linux for ages because of what
RH did. It was CentOS that re-ignited my interest. I felt like I could 'get
back' what I had lost when Redhat killed RHL. I didn't 'get' the security
implications of the rebuild stuff til it was explained to me the
I have a system who's normal activity is running Xen 3.3.1 with Centos 5.3 as
the DomU. I had reason to connect an IDE drive to the single IDE interface that
this board has. I was getting slow performance. hdparm -t revealed that the
thoughput was down to just 2.7 MB/sec. After some tweaking
I've rambled on too long. But seriously, what is you want? CentOS is a
great Linux distribution, so what's the problem?
The 'progress' I am talking about it making those 4 million installs into 5
million installs, if that is important. (I wish 4 mill installs hadn't been
raised, because on
People who do not understand the technical issues involved do not see
why we can't just snap our fingers and put out the packages ... well, we
can't.
What you explain makes perfect sense and so thanks for taking the time to
explain. I was only basing my understanding on what Karanbir wrote on
...@centos.org
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Sunday, 9 August, 2009 13:54:50
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ian Murray wrote:
snip
WRT to the one valid issue that you raise ... let me explain the
TECHNICAL reason why you can not release
Well, I know I have benefited from the discussion because I understand the
challenges that face the CentOS team with regards to security updates whilst
they are rebuilding a point release. As has been pointed out to me, we're
between a rock and a hard-place and it isn't just a simple matter of
I can't say I have been following this thread in its entirety, but the beauty
(?) of free speech is that even the ill-informed get to have a say. :o)
Anyway, I think there is a general problem with the name Community ENterprise
OS. Well, Community can't refer to us users because every O/S has a
4 million unique machines do not agree with you, regardless of what you
want to believe.
I don't think the machines have an opinion, either way. :o) Seriously, I
suppose you are using the '4 million machines we must be doing something right'
argument which is fair comment, if perhaps a
and it's working fine for
what I wanted.
From: Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July, 2009 23:54:15
Subject: Re: [CentOS] modern motherboard for centos-5
Scott Silva wrote:
on 7-6-2009 2:50 AM Ian Murray
I think these drivers were merged into a the kernel a bit later in the kernel
than CentOS uses, although am a bit surprised upstream didn't backport. Before
I set the machine up for proper, I tried a live Ubuntu disk which recognised
the ethernet no problem, which lead me to figuring out what
Well, despite what you say about ASUS, I recently bought an M3N78-VM
(http://www.ebuyer.com/product/152752 - although the net card specs are wrong)
because it was cheap and it supported 8gb. The only problem was the lack for
forcedeth drivers in standard CentOS, which I download from somewhere
97 matches
Mail list logo
