) to allow you to both use the
filesystem *and* automatically propagate all updates to the new volume
during the migration.
- Jerry Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
to the system from backup ;)
What can you recommend?
I would recommend Clonezilla: http://clonezilla.org/
--
Jerry Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 11/23/2013 07:40 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
I doubt it was an actual 80386. For some years the minimum CPU
requirement has been i686, which was Pentium Pro or greater. More
recently the additional requirement of a CPU with PAE capabilities. I
rather doubt that a processor that ran RH9 (a
On 07/27/2012 07:23 AM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote:
As a followup, I've determined that it is network related, but I'm still
not sure what the problem is. I did go back to CentOS 5.2, but the problem
still exists with that version, too.
Basically, what seems to be happening is that the network
On 06/05/2012 07:30 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
In dealing with an unrelated issue I came across this in rsyslog.conf.
[...]
Why is there a - before /var/log/maillog?
[...]
A leading '-' indicates the the log is written asynchronously. It is a
performance tune to keep writing the syslog from
On 05/13/2012 10:16 AM, bob wrote:
from what i get it is a problem with libvirt, using a bridge that is
going through a bondon the same machine.
It must be rather detailed to fix and only a few people seem to use that
route. (like you and me)
I've been running 14 CentOS5 VMs with
On 04/05/2012 05:38 AM, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
CentOS Community,
What commands can I use to check the disk health of the system when LVM2
is being used on top of a RAID 10 using a HARDWARE 3ware raid card. The
OS sees a hardware raid usually as one big drive. Is there a way to
check the
On 06/14/2011 08:41 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Yeah, but some people appear to think (or at least that was what I got
from the post of the guy I was replying to) that fedora is good enough for
production.
*blink*
Absolutely not. I was talking about Ubuntu Server LTS. I don't use
Fedora for
On 06/09/2011 08:37 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
I'd highly recommend perl for this because it can also do the SQL part
directly via DBI without all of the intermediate contortions you'll have
to do in files otherwise. It should take about half a page of your own
code to connect to the DB, read
On 05/23/2011 09:39 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/23/2011 02:31 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
Just be aware that SSDs wear out. They have a limited number of write
cycles. Nowadays they all do 'wear levelling' to even the writes
across the drive but even so they don't last very long in heavy
On 05/23/2011 11:01 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Now, the question is, is is there any way to tell EXT3/4 to use a
separate drive as a cache drive for the same purpose? OR, how about
telling CentOS to use a separate drive for caching purposes in the
same way?
You can use an external journal on a
On 05/18/2011 08:06 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 05/17/2011 09:19 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
There are some googlable ways to feed a list of filenames to vim, but I
stumble on weird results.
[...]
The easy way for me is 'avoid the shell - use Perl instead':
perl -e 'my @files =
On 05/17/2011 03:06 AM, John Doe wrote:
Maybe all the non-technical discussions could go into a CentOS
Politics/Philosophy new list...?
And on that note, some required reading for everyone in this floating
flame war. Don't skim it - read it.
http://www.shirky.com/writings/group_enemy.html
--
On 04/15/2011 06:05 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
Woohoo, next we will be seeing md raid6 also giving comparable results
if that is the case. I am not the only person on this list that thinks
cache is king for raid5/6 on hardware raid boards and the using hardware
raid + bbu cache for better
On 04/07/2011 03:52 PM, Scott Silva wrote:
The GPL says they must release source. It doesn't say they have to also
release any magic spells they use to compile it.
Actually, it *does*. If the code was released with missing 'magic fairy
dust' required to actually compile the GPL derived
On 03/27/2011 02:57 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
Some may be bored with the subject - sorry...
Still not decided about virtualization platform for my webhotel v2
(ns, mail, web servers, etc.).
KVM would be a natural way to go, I suppose, only it is too bad CentOS 6
will not be out in time for me
On 02/15/2011 07:59 AM, R - elists wrote:
Eero,
that is great, as long as you consider and actually donate to CentOS
regularly
statistically, most people that download or use CentOS, do not donate.
That, statistically speaking, could be influenced by the fact the
monetary donation page
On 01/27/2011 07:37 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 27 January 2011 15:06, Sorin Srbusorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
Hi all,
For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on CentOS
5.5, how has it panned out? Does it perform as expected? How do you feel the
stability,
On 01/25/2011 09:19 AM, ken wrote:
Bug, explainable, or expected?? Checking the status of mysqld as root,
then as a regular user:
# /etc/init.d/mysqld status
mysqld (pid 4806) is running...
$ /etc/init.d/mysqld status
mysqld dead but subsys locked
As expected. The PID file for MySQL is
On 01/25/2011 09:49 AM, Always Learning wrote:
I persuaded a reluctant friend to buy a new computer. I enthusiastically
extolled the joys and benefits of Centos and promised to install it on
his new machine - dual booting with Micro$oft Windoze 7.
[...]
For a new laptop your best hope for a
On 01/20/2011 02:55 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
I don't agree with that, sorry.
A few years ago one of our staff members decided his salary isn't good
enough so he started a side-line business, on our company time. He
stole some of our client's data (contact details, emails, and even
contracts)
On 1/16/2011 9:24 AM, compdoc wrote:
I've seen one memtest iteration pass, but 2 or 3 were needed before a
failure showed up. That's not usually the case, though...
I have a server right now which passed three memtest iterations but
throws intermittent errors on one DIMM when it gets warm
On 01/06/2011 05:47 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
I need to tar up a good 100 GiB of files, but tar is progressing at a
rate of about 1 MiB per second. Is there something, anything, faster?
tar is normally screaming fast unless you use bzip2 compression (or gzip
compression on an underpowered CPU).
On 12/13/2010 12:05 PM, Sven Aluoor wrote:
2010/12/13 Pintér Tibortib...@tibyke.hu:
On 12/13/2010 06:30 PM, Ritika Garg wrote:
I have CentOS5.5 installed in the system. After updating the version of
firefox, the videos are playing on the internet. Earlier the message
flash player download
On 12/13/2010 04:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 12/13/2010 6:08 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I don't know about that. I started on Apple Integer BASIC back in 1980,
dropped to assembly on multiple platforms, and eventually ended up doing
OO style design in Perl in the 90s *before* it officially
On 12/11/2010 09:24 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote:
With 100TB, DIY is out of the question ;-)
I wouldn't say that. It would be...challenging...but not out of the
question.
But Aberdeen (note - I have no financial interest. They are simply
someone I've seen marketing Linux based SAN/NAS machines
On 12/08/2010 07:03 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
Honestly, I had no one in mind.
I remember in an effort to get a life outside tech, I joined a mailing
list for something else. I hadn't realized how most people top post,
don't trim, and still use aol.
It really is worth noting that the
On 12/06/2010 06:06 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Did you take a look at the AVC messages? Are you running setroubleshoot?
Yes to both.
Usually running something like restorecon -R -v /var/ftp would have
cleaned this up, if it is a simple mislabel in /var directory.
The point is *I shouldn't
On 11/28/2010 09:31 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
[...]
And then, one day, it won't work. Worse - it doesn't always *log* what
it is doing in a way that you can figure out. Occasionally not at all.
So you spend a few hours poking at the system until you try the magic of
turning off SELinux. And
On 10/19/2010 04:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Yes, to partners :)
I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
source code available for most of it.
GPL doesn't say you have to distribute source code to the whole world,
only to people
On 10/19/2010 04:16 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
hi Guys,
On 10/19/2010 12:00 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I'm pretty sure Deyan is referring to their GPL obligations to make the
source code available for most of it.
.. this has nothing to do with it...
Yes, it does.
On 10/19/2010 05:03 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 10/19/2010 12:52 PM, Jerry Franz wrote:
Once you publish/distribute GPL licensed code to *anyone*, your
obligation to provide source kicks in for *everyone*. In practice, few
people hammer at a company in process over it. But you *can*.
I am
On 10/19/2010 05:37 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Only on v3 license code. Most code is still under v2.
and what license is the distro shipped as ?
That is a very good question. The *support and subscriptions* are under
RH's own license. The *code* in the packages are under the licenses of
On 10/19/2010 06:10 AM, mehdi wrote:
how open yum.conf in mode read write
1. You need to do it as the 'root' user. Log in as 'root' and then you
will be able to edit it.
2. Please don't hijack unrelated threads. To start a new topic, post a
completely new message with a usefully relevant
On 10/13/2010 1:11 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
But the ifcfg-ethX scripts don't run if the HWADDR entry doesn't match
the NIC MAC. How do you get the right name connected to the right nic
so you can even run ifconfig sensibly?
You don't *have* to use HWADDR in the ifcfg-* file. Just comment it
On 10/08/2010 03:25 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 10/8/2010 4:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
But OS X can legally only run on Apple (tm$$$) systems, where Linux can
run on *anything* and anybody's inexpensive hardware.
Apple hardware is fairly priced when compared on quality. Yes,
On 09/03/2010 02:15 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
This is good info!
What I am wondering is if there is a way to prevent new kernels from becoming
the default by... default?
That way one won't be pleasantly surprised that after a long uptime and
several updates, that on the next reboot their
On 08/14/2010 03:58 PM, John Hinton wrote:
For uninterrupted delivery of dynamic content from the database... or no
downtime, replication to a slave is the way to go. This is 'sort of' a
T-ing effect, except it is to another database. That slave database
however can be stopped, a mysgldump
On 8/12/2010 8:03 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Warren Young wrote:
The strategy I recommended is based on the fact that its worst case
behavior (a small negative jump every hour) is not a problem for me. If
it is a problem for your application, you need a different design.
It's a bad idea in
On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
Hello,
Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x?
I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I use Intel quad port boards.
They work fine.
--
Benjamin Franz
___
On 08/12/2010 05:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Why do you need any other process involved to work with a data stream? If you
want to collect it to a remote file, you can | ssh remotehost 'cat
path_to_file'. Just be sure to quote the redirection so it happens on the
remote side.
At a
On 08/12/2010 06:06 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Jerry Franzjfr...@freerun.com wrote:
On 08/12/2010 05:56 AM, Daniel Bruno wrote:
Someone can indicate some Ethernet device Quad 10/100 to use with CentOS 5.x
I don't know about 10/100. For 10/100/1000 I
On 08/10/2010 07:12 AM, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
You don't have to restart the guest to add or remove aliases:
yes I am aware of that, and that's why I'm wondering whether it is
better to use aliases rather than to add virtual interfaces (which
does require to restart guests with our KVM
On 08/07/2010 11:05 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
On 08/07/2010 10:55 AM, James Bensley wrote:
On 7 August 2010 17:41, Laurent Wandrebeckl.wandreb...@gmail.com wrote:
so a mount -t ext4 should work, as kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 provides
On 7/17/2010 2:11 AM, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
Q. If I can compute in cloud, in which cloud can I supercompute at an
affordable or sponsored cost?
I may be a gamer, AE student, Graphic designer, renderer and so forth.
Now which part of above you did not understand?
sigh... how I hate
.
--
Jerry Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 7/10/2010 2:21 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
I've been reading that it's possible to set up a system with multiple
NIC to provide redundant internet connectivity such that it will
switch to a secondary connection if the primary ISP fails.
Is it possible in a similar way to setup redundant
On 6/25/2010 7:33 AM, Brian Mathis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin
centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wondering if virtualization could be used as a cheap redundancy
solution for situations which can tolerate a certain amount of
downtime.
Current recommendations
On 06/09/2010 12:32 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
Eero,
I've got 4 GB of swap. At the moment all 4 GB less 100 MB of it is
available. That logically should be enough to allow me to upload a 2
GB file, I would think.
Looking at the bugtracker: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3118
PHP is not
On 05/26/2010 08:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/26/2010 08:44 AM, Benjamin Franz wrote:
[...]
The *theoretical* system security improvement of SELinux is trumped by
the *practical* observation that I have had existing systems broken by
SELinux multiple times on the mere handful of
On 05/27/2010 08:51 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 05/27/2010 05:55 AM, Jerry Franz wrote:
I have *twenty* virtual machines I deploy updates to before it ever
touches my production systems. Not everything is testable on
non-production machines.
...
Now back to fixing
On 05/25/2010 04:11 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Hi Brian,
I've been all over the environment comparisons before, I think. The question
currently is:
What can be the difference between
/home/smb restart - which works, and
/etc/init.d/smb restart - which fails
when a diff between the two smb
On 05/20/2010 04:46 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
Also, since sh /etc/init.d/smb (re)start works but /etc/init.d/smb
(re)start doesn't, I can't see how the difference between those two
invocations would change the handling of the lock files. It's still the same
script being run. Just some change
On 05/19/2010 06:14 AM, John Doe wrote:
From: Matt Keatingkeats...@gmail.com
I don't usually use iozone (I usually use bonnie++) so take this with
a grain of salt, but those speed look suspiciously like cache speeds.
Bump the size (-s parameter) up to twice your real RAM size.
On 05/03/2010 04:50 AM, premr...@digilink.in wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have a software protection for my hardisk. I have some
query regarding that
(1) In Centos, is it possible to do a hardisk protection. Ex : Even if
the hardisk is taken from a PC and
used on another PC, it should not
Benjamin Franz wrote:
And I just learned something new. According to
http://communities.vmware.com/thread/105144;jsessionid=DE9B4FFB861971525BEDBD8984F6A670?start=15tstart=0
if you use /dev/shm for your tmpDirectory you don't pay the 'double the
memory' penalty. I am testing it now.
To
Tracy Phillips wrote:
1) Use a wildcard cert. You can use *.somedomain certs to serve
multiple
SSL domains on a single IP so long as they fit in the *.somedomain
pattern.
This is incorrect.
apache can't read the headers since the traffic is encrypted. If it
can't read
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi Oliver,
It's not the same thing :)
Although they work, and do the same, the installer CD mdadm needs to
support it. The specific appliance that I want to install, doesn't
support RAID 10, so I need to install RAID 1 + RAID 0, i.e. setting 2x
RAID 1 mirrors, and then
Noob Centos Admin wrote:
I got itchy fingers over the weekend and decided to fix what wasn't
broken and upgraded one of the older servers from Centos 5.2 to Centos
5.3. Following the recommended process of updating glibc and such
before the rest, it appeared to work perfectly and rebooted
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Hi all,
Does anyone know of a good free rsync type program for Windows
platforms? Like most of us, I need to work on both Windows Linux
environments, and would like to sync some data (music, videos, photos,
documents, thunderbird profiles, FF bookmarks, etc) between a
Per Qvindesland wrote:
Hi List
I am hoping that someone here could perhaps give me a straight answer
on a question that someone asked me today
I have always belived that if you have 5 hard drives 1 50gb second
50gb third 20gb fourth 60gb firth 30gb that the largest would then be
the
dnk wrote:
I have a centos box that will need to ssh into 2 other centos boxes
(with keys). Now one of these boxes is a firewall, and another is a
system behind the firewall. I have rules in my firewall to punch into
the system behind the FW.
Now if i connect to the IP (sine the public
Paul Hussein wrote:
there still doesnt seem to be a 64bit java plugin
You can use the 32bit plugin if you change the launcher script to launch
the 32 bit version of firefox instead of the 64 bit version.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org
dnk wrote:
Hi there,
I am currently setting up a server that will house my backups (simply
using rsync).
This system has 4 X 500 gb drives and I am looking to raid for max
drive space and data safety. Performance is not so much a concern.
My experience with software raids in nil,
Benjamin Franz wrote:
Make a RAID5 as follows for a LVM partition using the rest of your
available space as follows (just under 1500 Mbytes):
Sorry. Typo. Just under 1500 Gbytes.
--
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Jim Perrin wrote:
I'm looking to do a bit more monitoring of my 3ware 9550 with smartd,
and wanted to see what others were doing with smart for monitoring
3ware hardware.
Do you have the smartd.conf configured to test, or simply monitor health
status?
Are you monitoring the drive as centos
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Jim Perrin wrote on Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:47:43 -0500:
or packaging
oversite in rpmforge
no, I know it works.
I just installed it from rpmforge using 'yum install rrdtool' with no
problems.
--
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Jerry Franz wrote:
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[...]
Basically, count the number of appearances of every number in your set. If
you
have a set a priori bounded from above and below --- which you do,
[1, n^2] --- you first allocate an array of integers of length
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Sunday 14 December 2008 03:33, Jerry Franz wrote:
[...]
By definition, your proposed algorithm is O(n^2), not O(n).
;)
Oh, you mean because the upper bound is n^2, right? Sure, of course, this
particular case is O(n^2). Your proposal in your other post
David Hláčik wrote:
Well, something with linear complexity O(n) which i have to prove,
Merge sort, Insertion sort or selection sort does not have O(n) complexity.
I believe that something like RadixSort, CountingSort, BucketSort
altought i am not sure
I'm not especially inclined to do
Marko Vojinovic wrote:
[...]
Basically, count the number of appearances of every number in your set. If
you
have a set a priori bounded from above and below --- which you do,
[1, n^2] --- you first allocate an array of integers of length n^2.
By definition, your proposed algorithm is
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Gordon McLellan wrote:
I meant SAS; specifically Seagate Barracuda ES.2 drives. Here's a
tiny version of their huge url:
http://tiny.cc/3X9fI
No, they are not the super fast and expensive 15krpm database drives.
Indeed. They're not SAS either.
Matt wrote:
Right now its running pretty good but here it is.
Device:rrqm/s wrqm/s r/s w/s rsec/s wsec/srkB/swkB/s
avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
sda 0.60 142.80 67.20 170.20 678.40 2292.80 339.20
1146.4012.52 118.53 615.66 4.21 99.92
You
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
[...] IOW: What did you try to do? What happened? What did you expect to
happen? What does your config look like? Are there any errors in the log
file?
Ralph
[...]
Indeed. Here is a summary:
Mag Gam wrote:
I need to copy over 100TB of data from one server to another via
network. What is the best option to do this? I am planning to use
rsync but is there a better tool or better way of doing this?
For example, I plan on doing
rsync -azv /largefs /targetfs
/targetfs is a NFS
75 matches
Mail list logo
