Eero Volotinen wrote on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:00:51 +:
> Maybe your repodata cache was a bit old :)
Yeah. I would have thought it checks the date of the file and tries to
update it when it's that old. Anyway, clearing the whole yum cache was a
good idea as I don't need the 5.8 rpms anymore.
Hi!
I revived an old disk with CentoS 5.8 on it and want to update it to
5.latest (=5.11). However, it insists on getting 5.8 files. From the past
I remember I would get a major release jump from 5.n to 5.m automatically.
Or do I remember this wrong?
I googled a bit around, but couldn't really
I've been using IUS in the past. They have a good way of naming their
rpms, so they don't interfere with the RH rpms. But they don't support
older CentOS versions still on extended support as long as I needed them.
And they don't provide as much php-related rpms (f.i. pecl-stuff) as remi
does.
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST):
> It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue
> to be supported by Red Hat with security patches.
Exactly.
Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and
5.6 are really state of the art and
I would rather work on single files or tars on directory basis. Using a
single big file creates a very large single point of failure.
Or use an encrypted file system (of course, also a single point of
failure, but probably better handling).
Kai
___
That's ridiculous, you don't even know what's wrong or if it's wrong at
all or what you want him to do but you have to cry it out loud to the list
to put social pressure on him. Please move this to private mail and
understand that Gmail is *not* what rules email best practice and also try
to
Les Mikesell wrote on Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:13:07 -0600:
Well, no.
Well, *yes*. It's not business to be carried out on the list nor does the
guy who moans about it seem to know why. And if you are the second from
Gmail then please move it off-list as well. It's really not anyone's
problem on
I noticed this as well but did some homework ;-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147189
https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-6277
If I understand it correctly they think it's not exploitable anymore.
Still think it should get patched immediately as there is an upstream
What you want to do it seems is change the hostname for access of some
users. Although, if it is local access, they should have access to
localhost and it doesn't matter which hostname the machine has.
Also, initially, you have to set the root password.
Almost everyone uses PHPMyAdmin to
I made a test update of only Postfix and don't see a problem.
There's indeed a new main.cf file saved as main.cf.rpmnew and there's also
a new main.cf.default file which contains all default settings of
postconf.
The data_directory apparently changed from /etc/postfix to
/var/lib/postfix which
Digimer wrote on Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:18:17 -0400:
I think it would be really good if everyone took a step back, took a
deep breath, and relaxed. This thread has generated a surprisingly (and
to me baffling) amount of negativity.
I don't know how long you have been on this list, but it's a
Mingfei Hua wrote on Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:05:33 +:
This issue happened again, who can help on this? system load up to
72, but /proc/stat only show that 2 processes were running and no
process blocked
As others have already said, you are not giving and you are not looking at
relevant
EasyBCD is an extra software, just google it.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
James B. Byrne wrote on Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:06:20 -0400:
23.102.173.124
Google says: http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/26486/failed-rdp
-brute-force-attack-from-microsoft-ip-address
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
It seems the syntax for AllowUsers in sshd_config is not the same that is
given in man sshd_config and in several documentation on the web.
(http://www.openssh.com/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=sshd_config)
e.g.
AllowUsers root
does work.
AllowUsers root username
does not work.
If I try to login as
Reindl Harald wrote on Thu, 26 Jun 2014 13:04:21 +0200:
not true
Don't say it's not true. ;-) I tried it at least half an hour with all
possible combinations and only the user@* pattern worked. I made
absolutely sure that I restarted the ssh server each time. I know also
pretty well, that I
David Vrabel wrote on Tue, 27 May 2014 13:04:21 +0100:
still do a text-console (in theory).
Is this an interesting use case?
It comes in handy for instance if there's something wrong with networking
in the guest ;-) Also, I've used it in cases where the load was very high
or when the
Timothy Murphy wrote on Fri, 07 Feb 2014 23:40:24 +:
As you see, there is an empty (and slightly smaller) slot
between the SATA connectors and the power connector.
That power connector is a jumper bay. As Miguel explains the two L-
shaped things are what gets used for SATA (the short one
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:28:18 +:
I had better check if these do support SATA3 drives.
That jumper bay usually allows for setting to slower speeds. There should
have been a small leaflet with the drive explaining it.
Kai
___
Timothy Murphy wrote on Sat, 08 Feb 2014 13:50:07 +:
I'm having problems communicating with a remote server, with openvpn.
First, did you check that it works fine without OpenVPN (e.g. firewall
open)?
Second, what exactly are you doing/do you want to achieve?
VPN makes sense if you go
Andrew Holway wrote on Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:05:37 +:
You will need another server set up on the same L2 network that will
serve DHCP and TFTP and HTTP. You can set it up similar to the
following.
Well, I think he's lacking that option (e.g. setup DHCP in the same
network). What he wants
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:37:29 -0500:
And here's two thoughts that just struck me: first, they have no way to
apply to be whitelisted.
I think there are ways, they do maintain a whitelist. Maybe Hostmonster is
just not good enough to get on it. Did you consider that?
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:47:37 -0500:
I keep hoping, perhaps foolishly, that others who get hit with this will
add their voice, and that the list might go to using some other source to
block spam.
Oh, yeah, until the day where that list adds Hostmonster as well and
The list pays very well. It's just that your hosting provider is
regularly or irregularly on it. That's the only reason you think it
doesn't pay. Not a good reason. It pays for everybody else on this
list except you. Consider that. It may even pay for you, just that you
don't notice (less
Actually, Manitu, also known as NIXSpam, is quite a good list. I've been
using only this one and Spamhaus for years. Very good FP:Spam ratio.
I, too, had an issue with the list lately and contacted the maintainer of
the project who gave me a good explanation of why Facebook servers may be
Why do you post this statement to this list?
Also, poweroff does not mean for a server that it's not on power, it's
just not started. BMC, fans etc. are running.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
do not see anything is not a problem description that gives any
information to someone who wants to help you.
If you do not know if you can reach the correct website then place a
simple index.htm in the root that makes it identifable. Then access this
file. If you can view it then the httpd
John McKelvey wrote on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 23:27:55 -0400:
The catch is that I can not connect to
the box using SSH
That's obviously not true or just half of the story. Did you actually try
*sshing* in? Your title mentions sftp, not ssh. So, what software are you
using to connect? I would
Reindl Harald wrote on Fri, 20 Sep 2013 14:32:46 +0200:
/etc/rc.d/rc.local
Thanks for all the answers.
First, I omitted to explicitely state that these are web servers. There is
no dhcp, only one or, in a few cases, a few IP static IP addresses. Mostly
Centos 5. Changing the data is *not*
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:58:51 +0200:
Google suggests a file
/etc/rc.shutdown (or rc.local.shutdown?) which, if I understand correctly,
would be carried out after the init stuff for the shutdown (rc0) has been
done.
rc.local.shutdown or rc.halt don't work. Seems I have
This should really be directed at a PHP forum. I would suspect that
something with the server certificate is not ok.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:00:19 +0200:
Seems I have to use an init script
in rc0.d?
I tested the following:
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K000halt
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/K99zhalt
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/S000halt
/etc/rc.d/rc0.d/S999halt
Only /etc/rc.d/rc0.d/S000halt gets executed, e.g. the file that gets
Markus Falb wrote on Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:44:15 +0200:
https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39039
There's probably no way to work around. But it seems you can get along by
suppressing errors. The bugs have to be corrected upstream at Red Hat (=
backported from a newer php version), you would have
I have to change IP numbers across a number of virtual and physical
machines because of network center move. This has to be done before
network startup, of course. I'm thinking about the best method to do this.
Where should I include/init this script? Or would it rather make more
sense to do
Nan del bosc wrote on Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:59:58 +0200:
This is a Virtual Server from 1and1,
You should have said this in the beginning!
Can you be sure that this is a standard CentOS and not a version catered
by the provider? It may just be a problem with the virtualizing software.
You should
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 19:15:46 +0100:
Has anyone seen such a hardware failure where the link goes up but no
packets go over the wire? It seems a bit unlikely that this hardware
failure (and nothing else) should happen on a reboot after an upgrade.
It was indeed a weird
SilverTip257 wrote on Tue, 5 Mar 2013 12:28:29 -0500:
But it would have been helpful if you had shared more information (think
NIC model, NIC chipset, kernel module in use for that chipset).
Why? It's quite clear that this is a hardware failure. I tested a live CD
and PXE booting on it with
I upgraded one of my old machines running 5.x to the latest kernel (from
308.24.1 to 348.1.1).
After rebooting network connectivity was gone. I rebooted with the old
kernel, I also tried the one before it (308.20.1) still no luck. So I
assume it's got nothing to do with the kernel or even
thanks for the tip, but, unfortunately, this cannot be the case here.
Networking of the host is also affected, even when Xen is shut off.
I have no smart switches in this office and I ruled out switches by using
a direct connection to the laptop.
Kai
Gordon Messmer wrote on Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:29:58 -0800:
Check your bridge details and make sure that the ethernet device is listed:
brctl show
If those look good, send the content of
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-{br0,eth0} (or whatever eth device
is a member of the bridge).
Theo Band wrote on Wed, 19 Dec 2012 22:24:50 +0100:
It simply excludes This is... and make
and yum.
LOL :-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Mark LaPierre wrote on Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:28:46 -0500:
I don't see a package for the RT53XX. What now Charley Brown?
Are you looking for firmware or a driver? Firmware can always be acquired
from the vendor. You may not need updated firmware, anyway. But you want
the drivers, of course. And
Yihect wrote on Sat, 8 Dec 2012 21:31:54 +0800 (CST):
initrd /initramfs-2.6.32-kdev-v1.img
compare!
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Robert Moskowitz wrote on Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:28:46 -0500:
To NOT use firstboot, what do I have to add to the kickstart beyond
firstboot --disable
Maybe I didn't understand your question?
user --name=something --password=somethingstrong
- rootpw --iscrypted
(you can grab it from an
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Miguel_Gonz=E1lez_Casta=F1os?= wrote on Tue, 04 Dec 2012
02:09:26 +0100:
How can I enable that CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_STATE support in my kernel?
Sounds like your are not running the standard kernel, but something
provided by your VPS provider. If that is indeed the case you have
Mike Burger wrote on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 10:13:10 -0500 (EST):
True, but i386/i686 packages are usually still only located in the 32bit
repo directories...they're not usually intermingled in the actual download
directories, last I checked.
How many dozens of years did you last check? ;-)
repo's
1. as John notes, this is off-topic
2. did you notice that you give *no* information about the problem? (no,
failure to load is not a problem description.)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 22 Nov 2012 20:11:17 -0600:
Thank you both for the replies.
This was my own mistake combined with some depsolving weirdness of yum.
I have 386 and 686 excluded from the repo's because of the greediness to
install all versions of a package. At least in earlier
Johnny Hughes wrote on Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:16:41 -0600:
multilib_policy=best
Perfect, thanks!
I've never heard of this option before. I've been actively following the
list during the first major CentOS 5 releases and I should have noticed it
:-)
I added it immediately to some systems now.
I
I cannot install glibc.i686 on a x86_64 system because I get
Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.5-81 is needed by package
glibc-2.5-81.i686 (base)
glibc-common.x86_64 is installed, but it's apparently looking for i686.
There's indeed no glibc-common for i686.
There's also glibc.i386
Rob Kampen wrote on Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:08:09 +1300:
My confusion is that a reverse lookup of the IP gives me the clients
domain (dropping the mail(x) subdomain) thus I assumed it was the helo
domain name - which does not have rDNS - that was causing the reject -
maybe it was just a timing
Can you all please move this subthread the majority will NEVER use
smartphones elsewhere? Discuss it on Facebook if you have to.
Thanks!
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Sorry to be mean. But there are things off-topic and there are things
ooo-tooocc. And this one belongs in the
second category. Really, please take this elsewhere. Thanks.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Please don't argue. Just don't send any more way off-topic stuff in the
future. Thanks.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Did you check if the GET headers don't already contain the credentials?
If that page is identified as local intranet IE will send Windows logon
credentials with default security zone settings.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Actually, the main suspect is the program or person that is sending out
mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just user. Change it to a
qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN).
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Karanbir Singh wrote on Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:21:06 +0100:
You wont need to remove anything. As
long as you do not edit that file it will be managed by
centos-release-5-7 and centos-release-cr-5-7 etc.
Well, surely those people using their own mirrors will have to do
something ...
Kai
we block with manitu = nixspam as our primary RBL (followed by Spamhaus).
Results are excellent. Their blocking is very reasonable. It's also
possible to ask for inclusion in the whitelist. Obviously your great ISP
Roadrunner isn't interested in inclusion or is sending out so many spam
that
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 14:12:03 -0400:
I'm not sure who you're answering or agreeing with, but my point is still
that 90% of everybody blocked has no clue whatever about what to do about
it, and esp. the people with infected systems. A standard channel *to* an
ISP for this
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:46:22 -0400:
I'm sorry, nobody seems to get what I've been saying: I haven't been on
roadrunner for two years. I'm sending this email via bluehost, my current
hosting provider.
Ok, so you use Bluehost and one of their mailservers got on the list
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:07:49 -0400:
No. I've been blocked for a period ranging from hours to several days, and
kept getting myself unbanned, a number of times in the last couple of
years.
I see. So you got what you paid for.
Kai
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote on Thu, 11 Aug 2011 15:03:45 -0400:
I'm sorry if I've confused you.
*You* confused things. You mixed ISPs and hosting. You can't. You were
talking largely about ISPs and how their customers get blocked from
sending mail directly and how they don't have a clue. I was
Oh, there ...
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm not seeing funny characters on that pic.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Alexander Farber wrote on Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:47:05 +0200:
First I tried adding that file name to /etc/php.ini:
error_log = /var/log/httpd/php_log
I can assure you that you don't have to go the syslog way. Logging to a
php errorlog file of your choice works just fine. Check the file
Devin Reade wrote on Tue, 28 Jun 2011 07:06:20 -0600:
One excellent one ... is ... Cyrus
Basically all of them can do it. As you may have noticed he obviously
*wants* mbox format. If he would want to change to mailfolder format he
doesn't have to change *any* of his software mix.
I, too,
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:28:43 +0200:
You failed to mention that this is CentOS 4 kernel, am I correct it is
C4?
No, c4 is a host numbering scheme. This is the latest series 5 kernel.
2.6.18-238.12.1.el5xen. What I didn't mention is that it is the xen kernel
on x64.
Giovanni Tirloni wrote on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:04:26 -0300:
I'm not too familiar on how such thing should be reported. Should a bug be
created in the CentOS bug database?
There's another bug mentioned on the bugzilla page you referred to, 703084,
which is supposed to be exactly about this one.
Rudi Ahlers wrote on Fri, 24 Jun 2011 17:42:16 +0200:
it's 2 different list, with different people
and different input
Ask on one list first, wait, if you ask on another provide what you got so
far from the other list. That is plain courtesy.
Kai
I accidentally noticed this error written to the warn log on my Dell
R200's when the machines booted up after latest kernel update. Google
doesn't have this exact error, only a few with differently named devices,
but all seem to have to do with USB.
Could this be a bug?
Didn't see this error
Jerry Geis wrote on Mon, 20 Jun 2011 11:05:34 -0400:
The trimmming of the log files is just so they they dont take a bunch of
space on the HD.
use logrotate and zip them.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Les Mikesell wrote on Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:13:08 -0500:
Are the updates supposed to be synced to the mirrors before the announce
message goes out?
Of course, and you know that. Announce goes out when most mirrors *should*
have it, not earlier. But some may still not have it.
Kai
I've been getting weird results with the recent filesystem update. It
appears to be hanging at the transaction test stage endlessly. I can close
the ssh connection and the update still goes on. When I use screen I
cannot reattach after logout because the screen still shows as attached
and I
Johan Martinez wrote on Wed, 4 May 2011 14:49:52 -0500:
Thanks for the suggestions Richard and Kenneth. I installed drupal here and
it requires user running apache to have write access on filesystem.
Assuming you are running mod_php and safe_mode: that is probably because of
PHP safe_mode.
Kenneth Porter wrote on Wed, 04 May 2011 14:12:32 -0700:
Make the writable directories SGID and any files and subdirectories created
there will inherit the group ownership:
AFAIK, this works on Unix, but not on Linux. On Linux you have to use ACLs, as
Johnny already pointed to.
Kai
service xendomains stop ?
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Roland Roland wrote on Mon, 2 May 2011 15:09:00 +0300:
As you noticed above, my whole connection management is relying on
squid, i'm worried that it will process only traffic that's forwarded
to port 80 instead of everything going through the server. any idea if
thats the case?
Correct.
Paul Johnson wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17:23 -0500:
After that, what am I legally required to do?
This is not the place to ask.
I've just read that document and it seems to say that you could take
all of the RPMs exactly as they are built by RedHat and include them
on a disk, and you can
Peter Peltonen wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:51:08 +0300:
And I don't think you are even
given an option to define the default vg name during the installation?
Of course, you can ;-)
If you have only a few of these I'd rsync them over to dom0 lv's and
change domU fstabs and xen config
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:54:01 +0800:
if they are accessible via the Internet, then it means it wasn't
necessary to add any IP to a bridge.
FYI: the IP addresses of host and guest don't have to be in the same
subnet, e.g. your host may have a private, non-routable IP
The title gives a bit of info if that helps ;-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Les Mikesell wrote on Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:33:21 -0500:
But the difference from upstream is really the only thing specifically
centosy, and since it's binary compatible, that would leave us discussing
the
artwork Besides, we are just twiddling our thumbs here.
Are we? I don't see this
Les, I don't understand you, sorry. You talk about something that I didn't
ask for. You seem to make something of this thread that it isn't.
it's hard
to complain about the topic of how RHEL differs from Centos
Are you referring to this thread? It's not about differences. It's about
how to
Benjamin Hackl wrote on Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:51:13 +0200:
Just assign IP1 to eth0, IP2 to eth0:1, IP3 to eth0:2 and so on.
and if you really need a bridge you attach those to the bridge: br0,
br0:1, br0:2 etc. eth0 ist the *physical* interface for the bridge.
Kai
I think this would be a good question for rpmforge-users list. e.g. ask if
they can change the requirements in such a way that these rpms fit.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Alexander Farber wrote on Sun, 24 Apr 2011 09:04:30 +0200:
i.e. there is sudo service iptables save,
but I've yet to discover its usefulness
You can add rules on the fly and save them. For instance, I have a certain
starter script with iptables rules and other filtering stuff grown over
the
FYI: there is a list centos-virt.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Frank Chang wrote on Sat, 23 Apr 2011 11:56:31 -0400:
Kai Schaelzl, I think I underdetstand your email. Yes, I am replying
to a digest version. Could you suggest another client which we could
use the emails are arranged by threads.
No, if you are replying to the digest version there is no
These packages are quite new (only a few hours old). They must have been
accidentally not signed. Skip them for the time being.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Maybe the quickest way to find out is to install manually via PXE. Use the
same disk structure etc. you use in the kickstart, stay as close as
possible. If that succeeds compare the kickstart log for that install with
your kickstart file.
It's possible that you have some directive in there that
John Doe wrote on Thu, 22 Jul 2010 02:25:13 -0700 (PDT):
And that running in PAE would slow down some processes.
The overhead is minimal, if you want those extra 700 MB, do it.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
We use APC since upgrading to php52 as there weren't any eaccelerator rpms
available anymore. Haven't seen much difference. I'd be interested to know
if anyone did a comparison.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:45:07 +0200:
they are there. may be you should have to check it again:-)
you are right, I didn't get it with yum list.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
why do you think this should be asked here?
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'm not aware of an IPMI command that shows current power consumption.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
John Hodrien wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:37:16 +0100 (BST):
System Level | 126 Watts | ok
Ah, thanks. My systems don't show that :-)
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
+1
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
why don't you simply rsync down what you need? Installing of a mounted iso
via pxe is probably the less preferred method. rsync also gives you the
option of excluding stuff you don't need.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Try a yum update and look at the output. Now, with a new release this is a
good option, anyway.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Tom Brown wrote on Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:08:48 +0100:
because by removing them from the centos-release package and
rebuilding it they are not there in the first place.
Yeah, but you have to do that all the time (e.g. with each update).
Replacing with empty files is a one-time operation.
Kai
1 - 100 of 1148 matches
Mail list logo
