US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:03 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
Except that this issue does not affect BIND in rhel and thus CentOS
therefore making it yet more pointless drivel from the OP.
Please take off the blinders and realize there are lots of folks (some
x% of a million or
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Many thanks to Markus Falb for publishing his excellent research - the
same research that Larry could also have done.
This issue did not affect the versions of bind as shipped with
Red Hat Enterprise
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote:
It is not wise to install packages from sources because it messes the package
management.
Agreed; that is why folks like Jeff Johnson and John Stanley share
their knowledge about how to do it such that your outcome
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
US-CERT encourages users and administrators using the affected
versions of BIND to upgrade to BIND 9.7.3.
Optionally, one can wait on a backport.
This message is RECALLED even though:
1) US-CERT used the word affected.
2
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:43 PM, R P Herrold herr...@owlriver.com wrote:
- Never use an ISP that requires provising sufficient personal
information as needed to facilitate identity theft [1]; and
solicts credit card information without any indication of PCI/CISP
controls or privacy policy [2]
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
This is the last post I am making to this thread ... and maybe to this
list in general. During the build processes, here are the files that we
have had to add (at various times) to get packages to build. I have no
idea
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Corey Quinn co...@sequestered.net wrote:
The metaphor is Only as good as your last game.
What part of California are YOU from? :-)
An OKie by birth, this CentOS community member of lowest possible rank
lived at least five years each in West Germany and SoCal
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On the initial pass through builder for C4, maybe 30 packages needed to
be fixed because the links were bad.
On the initial pass through builder for c5, maybe 20 packages needed to
be fixed.
On the initial pass through
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 6:58 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record an archive of all mails sent to the mailing list
appears here... in this case in date order.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-January/date.html
To give you the benefit of the doubt I
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
If your server was really hacked, I'd start from scratch, and set the new one
up more defensively.
THANKS for your input; there exists a consensus, so that's what will
be done (replace 4.8 with 5.x). Troy says Fermi (a great
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 5:07 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity, have you ever thought about hiring a
competent admin?
Yes.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:03 AM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
Can you please keep the conspiracy nonsense to yourself?
John
--
Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give
offense.
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
I'd expect better behavior and conduct from someone who holds such a
title...
request for a learning moment
Since beauty is in the eye of the beholder(s), please select my most
egregious post(s) and let me know said
to.
It is for your own benefit.
Paul, I did as you suggest. An extract of said post is below the
sig. There wasn't a single response (I could be wrong about that, but
don't believe that is the case at this time).
kind regards/ldv/va...@texoma.net
-- Forwarded message --
From: Larry
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Don't understand what you mean by 'within our /19'. Have your IP ranges
changed? If your Bind date is corrupt, why not re-install Centos and
then restore the domains data from one of your regular backups?
Our network
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
I don't see the mock config or build scripts, however; perhaps I'm not
looking in the right place.
THANKS for a very helpful post.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
That just in from chunkhost.com, where you help them beta test Xen for $FREE :)
regards/ldv/va...@texoma.net
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so.
What do you have against CentOS FOSS
This was posted as a compliment to the CentOS Team and to the CentOS Community.
Should the vendor be asked for a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Rudi Ahlers r...@softdux.com wrote:
Larry, I suggest you leave this group while it's still safe todo so.
What do you have against CentOS FOSS
Absolutely nothing to the purity of Ivory soap :) 26 of our favorite
servers run CentOS.
Having read what Lamar
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:37 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
Your mentor? What do you mean by that?
The same thing Wikipedia says, namely:
a trusted friend, counselor or teacher, usually a more experienced
person. Some professions have mentoring programs in which newcomers
are
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
With 20/20 hindsight, it is clear that I shouldn't have posted the
original post asking the list for help and hopefully informing other
potential targets of the risk (read: there were no responses to the
original
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:39 PM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com wrote:
Joe, Randy and James are my mentors of 15, 5 and 5 years,
respectively, and all said the same thing, namely nuke and repave, be
sure to be current on BIND since it is a purpose-built box (ns1).
Perhaps is it a
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Just for the record ... we (the CentOS Project) do not recommend this
site. They are using our name without permission.
Attribution goes to EliteMoly:
CentALT repository not ready for mirroring, rpms not signed.
EPEL is
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
Can you please stop this? You are creating new thread after new thread
from old threads I wasn't interested in and set to ignore. Now you create
them as new threads, so I have to ignore these as well. This grows
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Can we all just get along? I love reading this list and posting my own
questions as well... But really - is this helping anyone?
We were taught by our Rhodes scholar debate mentor to refute untruths
and that is what I
Progress report on vetting CentALT repo:
quote
SRPMs now here http://centos.alt.ru/pub/repository/centos/5/SRPMS/
One of mirror CentALT here http://centos.tel.dn.ua/repository
Denis Frolov
2011-02-17, 12:09
/quote
___
CentOS mailing list
directly about an earlier post as I didn't feel
it added any value to this mailing list. This is exactly what I meant and
why...
On Thu, 17 Feb 2011, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Can we all just get along? I love reading
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Because they also have $dayjobs too ... Oracle (with billions of dollars
and unlimited machines and personnel) just released their el6 on Friday.
Is there some reason you can't buy RHEL6?
Johnny et al,
If ya'll are
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
As I said before, Oracle has not had their stuff released for very long
and while Scientific Linus has released some Alpha/Beta stuff along the
way, they also have not released 5.6 or 6.0 either. This is not easy.
It
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:54:14PM +0100, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
No, the sources are here:
http://oss.oracle.com/ol6/
And the RPMs:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
The CentOS Project can not afford to hire and pay someone a full salary
to do nothing but CentOS full time. If the project could do that, then
they would. But, if they did hire said person, then what would the
OTHER
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently there was some confusion around the release of SL 5.6
alpha. Troy Dawson cleared it up in his post to the main SL mailing
list:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
I just finished pushing through the 5.6 distro tree's into the distro
builders ( so isos get built etc and moved to qa ). Was hoping to have
this done by the weekend but a series of unfortunate incidents ( like
large
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
WRT the age of RHEL ... that is what enterprise Linux is. Fedora (or
Ubuntu non LTS, or opensuse, or Debian SID, or any number of other
alternatives) exist if you don't want the more stable (ie, older) items.
Again,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Always Learning cen...@g7.u22.net wrote:
Perhaps a mailing list entitle Centos Devoir (home work / jobs to do)
could carry a regular list of jobs that need doing ?
+1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Again, nothing wrong with their approach (I like Troy in any dealings we
have had), however it is not what CentOS does or is going to do. When
we release, we basically loose meaningful access to our machines for a
week
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
[1]: I say that with a pinch of salt though - EL6 is a tad overdue. A
lot of new projects and services need a codebase newer than whats on
offer in C5.
Karabir,
Should the effort to build community support for an
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/16/2011 11:17 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
I think I'll continue with the effort to get RedHat to see the wisdom
wrt certain essential elements of the Internet infrastructure (like
BIND).
I thought the RHEL 5.6
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Money is not the real issue. It is time, and more importantly trust.
Another minor correction: Karanbir has written on the list that he was
delayed by an HDD failure, so money is an issue IMHO.
As a rural ISP 2 miles east
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Gerhard Schneider
g...@ilsb.tuwien.ac.at wrote:
Perhaps I'm a little bit pragmatic, but..
I will upgrade to 5.6 when it's out - BUT I'm not really angry when
CentOS 6 would be CentOS 6.1 - if you want to be beta tester for a large
distibution you still can
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:36 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
How is a HDD failure at $dayjob an issue of project-related
money? Can you perhaps conflate more?
There's a lot of difference between writing
Was hoping to have
this done by the weekend but a series of
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
Am 16.02.2011 um 22:29 schrieb Larry Vaden:
Even further, the resistance to properly funding this project is
truly amazing.
Well, with money come a lot of strings attached.
Ja und nein.
Most likely, one would
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
N.B. pkgs.org is showing that CentALT is at current code and Fedora is
using a release candidate!
Per a discussion with an Internet2 professor this PM:
ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:36 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 04:24:05PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Rainer Duffner rai...@ultra-secure.de
wrote:
I think it a trit (0, 1, I don't know) naive to think that
money/donations
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
However...
77 lines of unnecessary untrimmed text removed. Is it too much
to ask you to be considerate to others and trim non-essential
text? I direct you to the mailing list guidelines
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:41 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 05:03:33PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
ACHTUNG: Note the repo is apparently without SRPMs so it becomes
difficult to vet.
This is a show-stopper for many, including myself. Thanks
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:46 PM, John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote:
issue? I don't get it. You seem to think that money is the end
all be all for OSS. I would suggest that's a mindset you may
wish to change as money doesn't drive OSS.
Are you saying there are no
thanks/ldv
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Ray Van Dolson ra...@bludgeon.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:59:48PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
packages, so
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
This wasn't the first instance. This guy has recently started a habit of
copying mails (that are not his own it seems) that trip him off right to
this list. That is bad practice. I do not want to get more of this.
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:47 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
It's still the case that a graphics driver error on linux can take out the
entire system, so it's not like linux is some sort of gold standard on this
front.
e.g., any modern Ubuntu can write 300 GB per day of
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com wrote:
While google perftools is not a part of either SL or CentOS, it *is*
in EPEL, and CentOS users can be users of EPEL
Then it's on-topic on the EPEL list, not here. e.g. ask there for an
updated version of the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are any number of 3rd party repos that maintain many newer
packages, so getting things into CentOSPlus is not the only option.
I would very much appreciate your referral to a repo that has a current BIND.
This may or may not be of interest to CentOS developers; if it is not
or if it is redundant of your efforts to keep atop of what's
happening, you have my apologies.
Whether it is joint or disjoint wrt to the upstream code is not known
at this point, but I have submitted a request for elucidation
In order to avoid a cross post, the following background quote is from
scientific-linux-us...@fnal.gov:
quote
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon e...@macmahon.me.uk wrote:
I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the
meeting here[1]:
difficult to find.
kind regards/ldv
Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Lorenzo Quatrini
lorenzo.quatr...@gmail.com wrote:
Larry Vaden ha scritto:
AFAIK, that's the status of the clones at this time. Still unexplained is
why
'host www.yahoo.com 208.67.220.220' and 'host www.yahoo.com 8.8.8.8'
got completely different answers
Hello CentOS Community Members,
What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient
code base for such important programs as BIND et al?
A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago
on the isc.org mailing list.
Is there any support among the CentOS
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
you mean like the bind97 available in c5-testing right now, that should
be in 5.6 soon ?
Karanbir,
WIth a lot of due respect, no, not exactly, since 9.7.0-P2 (if I'm
reading it correctly) was released almost a year
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
[1]: I say that with a pinch of salt though - EL6 is a tad overdue. A
lot of new projects and services need a codebase newer than whats on
offer in C5.
I agree with you 100%+.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
On 02/02/2011 06:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
If you feel that its the version you need or want, CentOS wont mind if
you were to build it and run it yourself.
btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Wednesday, February 02, 2011 09:31:43 am Larry Vaden wrote:
* The host/dig/nslookup utilities queried only servers from
resolv.conf. With this update, the utilities query the servers
specified on command line instead
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
btw, if you were to go down that route, the CentOSPlus repo would be a
great place to host such a package :)
One of the best advantages of CentOS is that we're not tied down to the
EL codebase in any repo outside the
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Phil Schaffner
philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov wrote:
So, out of morbid curiosity, and because it seems to have been my post
on the SL list you quoted that helped get you into this state, was
anything other than the replacement process actually broken?
Actually, it
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Larry Vaden va...@texoma.net wrote:
For various reasons which seemingly fail the necessary/sufficient
tests with the benefit of hindsight, I attempted to migrate a shell
machine which is the beach front from which I work (not a production
server) from CentOS
For various reasons which seemingly fail the necessary/sufficient
tests with the benefit of hindsight, I attempted to migrate a shell
machine which is the beach front from which I work (not a production
server) from CentOS 5.5 to Scientific Linux 5.5 yesterday.
Karanbir is quoted on this list as
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
logging utilities? intrusion detection? monitoring? anything that
leaps to mind that i can use to fill up a few more hours. i'm already
thinking of showing how to build and boot a new kernel. other ideas?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gabriel Tabares
gabriel.taba...@roboreus.com wrote:
Hi,
We have a HP DL385 G6 server that is having an issue. Two of the 4
network cards are not being recognised by Linux.
We have quite a few other servers with the same hardware and no issues
but, before I
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
bogomips : 1993.68
If cost is a factor, you should be able to find used hp/Compaq
rack-mount servers with Intel Xeon processors with these bogomips:
dmesg | grep -i bogomips
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 8:18 PM, fred smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
Below is some info that shows the problem. Can anyone here provide
helpful suggestions on (1) why it is doing this, and more importantly (2)
how I can make it stop?
Is there a chance /boot is full (read: are all
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Phil Savoie psavoie1...@rogers.com wrote:
Beginning DHCP transaction.
Jul 27 19:31:38 smurf3 dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client
V3.0.5-RedHat
Jul 27 19:31:38 smurf3 dhclient: Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems
Consortium.
Jul 27 19:31:38
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Changing dns to public services such as google or OpenDNS is not going
to help as DNSBLs like Spamhaus will have blocked access by these
services. Otherwise it would be simple to avoid paying for (business)
access to
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Changing dns to public services such as google or OpenDNS is not going
to help as DNSBLs like Spamhaus will have blocked access
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote:
on 4-15-2010 1:36 PM Larry Vaden spake the following:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Ned Slider n...@unixmail.co.uk wrote
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:36 PM, listserv.traf...@sloop.net wrote:
First, someone's going to ask - perhaps Zen's blocking you. I don't
think so. Here's why.
-We're non-commercial, using the definition set my spamhaus,
-mail connects TOTAL are well less than 100K a day. (Less than 10K in
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vadkan Jozsef jozsi.avad...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the best method to ban that ip [what is bruteforcig a server]
what was logged on the logger?
I need to ban the ip on the router pc.
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page but you may have to
run
Googling this (specifically the nvidia-bug-report line below) doesn't
find anything.
This is a server (console is text only, no GUI), so we may not need
x11 nor nvidia, I dunno for sure.
Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
kind regards/ldv
Transaction Check Error: file
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:23 PM, chloe K chloekcy2...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Thank you for your helping
but why user keeps downloading mails what he downloaded before?
I check the mail client setting and it works fine
If it is not server control, any hints about this problem
Most pop3 servers
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called oracle
enterprise linux which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm
curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be
any
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:53 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I would like advice for best practices to secure my linux boxes. Know if I
have been hacked, know of security breaches, etc.
Can anyone provide advice?
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/OS_Protection
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
Help,
Our server at work is down. The video memory is out. Its an old IBM PC300PL,
6892-12U, running SCO.
If anyone happens to a stick of this type memory and would be willing to sell
it, please let me know. Below are the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Lists li...@rheel.co.nz wrote:
I have done this and it works for new mail arriving but I need to onsend
the existing mail.
IIRC procmail can do this for you.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Victor Subervi victorsube...@gmail.com wrote:
What I was interested in doing was to make it impossible for root to login
directly, but rather enable other users to login and then su to root. So I
edited /etc/ssh/sshd_config to read:
#PermitRootLogin no
(It was
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, ML mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
I have acquired a Sun Fire VL 240. I know there is not a SPARC version
of CentOS.
Can anyone recommend a good OS for a machine that will do apache,
postfix, mysql, etc.
NetBSD?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Karl Kobata karl.kob...@syncira.com wrote:
- Port – if I set the port to anything other than 22 (default), using
ssh –p n...@servername, does not work. Yet if I leave keep the default,
then ssh n...@servername allows me to login.
You need to change
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ralph Angenendtra+cen...@br-online.de wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
Has anyone considered joining forces with Scientific Linux to reduce the
workload and give both a more robust infrastructure?
Yes, but the goals are rather different.
What is the most
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:32 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, oracle lacks credible inhouse support.
We also found this to be true.
Happy Thanksgiving/ldv
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
2008/11/25 mcclnx mcc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ORACLE unbreak Linux and CENTOS both source code come from Redhat LINUX.
Does there have other difference between CENTOS and ORACLE Linux?
Try subscribing and waiting on the next set of changes. We did, but
didn't have enough time to wait long enough.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to figure out if there's a way to get syslog.conf to direct
remote logging from a wireless access point to log to a separate file
instead of the main syslog and can't figure out how that could be done
from man
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 18:19 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying to figure out if there's a way to get syslog.conf to direct
remote logging from a wireless
Hello,
Does anyone know of a good URL that covers the remote install/upgrade
of a FC3 system to CentOS 4 or 5?
We have one physically stranded FC3 system which is a name server and
we need to upgrade to remove vulnerabilities.
Kind regards/ldv
Larry Vaden
Internet Texoma, Inc
What are the likely cockpit errors involved when getting POOR results
when running this test on an updated CentOS 5.2?
Kind regards/ldv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
z.y.x.w.v.u.t.s.r.q.p.o.n.m.l.k.j.i.h.g.f.e.d.c.b.a.pt.dns-oarc.net.
a.b.c.d is POOR: 26 queries in
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Johnny Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Larry Vaden wrote:
What are the likely cockpit errors involved when getting POOR results
when running this test on an updated CentOS 5.2?
Kind regards/ldv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dig +short porttest.dns-oarc.net TXT
94 matches
Mail list logo
