Just FYI:
I had several problems to install CentOS 7 with 512 MB RAM. No log
showed me that problem (I would expect a system check before).
With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ...
Best Regards
Oli
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700
Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:
On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with
more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:38:36 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 9/7/2014 11:31 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ...
doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough.
a $50 beaglebone black has 512MB ram, and is best
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:48:36 -0700
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 9/7/2014 11:44 AM, Oliver Schad wrote:
And CentOS 7 runs perfectly with 512 MB RAM
https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits says 1GB minimum for
x86_64.
It doesn't matter what it says. What matters
On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 15:04:12 -0400
Mike Burger mbur...@bubbanfriends.org wrote:
Oli...perhaps instead of taking out your anger and frustration on the
CentOS packagers
My first statement was a simple FYI so that you know this requirement
during installation.
I found one problem with the
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
tmpfs: /run/, 311 MB used
That is really funny: inside of this ramdisk is a tmp dir, with 279 MB
inside, where the biggest part is the squashfs image and some files
which are generated after start of installation
Ok, final result: deleting the initramfs files results in a clean
installation. So we waste ~300 MB RAM during installation with a file
nobody needs. Great.
Best Regards
Oli
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:45:40 +0200
Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:19:01 +0200
Hi all,
I have a problem with my SSH sessions if I reboot with CentOS 7: my SSH
sessions seems terminated after the network is already shutdown.
How to fix that with Systemd?
Thank you in advance and best regards
Oli
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Harald,
On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:45:02 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 30.08.2014 um 00:26 schrieb Oliver Schad:
I have a problem with my SSH sessions if I reboot with CentOS 7: my
SSH sessions seems terminated after the network is already shutdown.
How to fix
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 30.08.2014 um 01:40 schrieb Oliver Schad:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626477
Seems back again. I just wondering how such easy things can be so
hard so solve.
Oh no - don't tell me that update below fucks it up again
Here the list of dependencies - seems to be that SSH is on the top level
# systemctl list-dependencies
default.target
├─auditd.service
├─avahi-daemon.service
├─brandbot.path
├─cobblerd.service
├─crond.service
├─dbus.service
├─dhcpd.service
├─httpd.service
├─iprdump.service
├─iprinit.service
Hi all,
I'm a little bit confused about networking in Centos 7: I've copied my
bridge setup from a Centos 6 for KVM networking to Centos 7. I changed
the interface name to the new schema and I had expect that it would
work.
But:
The Bridges didn't came up with the following log message:
Error:
On Sun, 17 Aug 2014 16:17:38 +0200
Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit confused about networking in Centos 7: I've copied my
bridge setup from a Centos 6 for KVM networking to Centos 7. I changed
the interface name to the new schema and I had expect
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:05:07 -0700
Russell Miller duskg...@gmail.com wrote:
Generally when people get personal I figure I must have hit a nerve.
I must have hit a nerve.
I didn't say it was windows-like. I said it was more windows-like
than I was comfortable with. Even with multiple
On Tue, 08 Jul 2014 09:04:59 -0500
Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
And this is indeed the crux of the matter ... systemd is NOT just
about booting or boot up time (combing posts here .. but this is the
answer to, why use this on a server where fast booting is not
important).
Systemd
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:34:49 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Jonathan Billings
billi...@negate.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:22:54PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
And more to the point, /usr isn't supposed t be needed until you
are past
in and has a very clean view (otrs and RT tends to
show too much).
There is no system which fits all requirements for every purpose.
Regards
Oli
--
Oliver Schad
Geschäftsführer (CEO)
Automatic Server AG
E-Mail: i...@automatic-server.com
___
CentOS
17 matches
Mail list logo
