On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Is there some way we might utilize social media to help them
understand the demand?
I installed from the repo
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Steve Brooks wrote:
I installed from the repo given here a month ago and it works fine. I
something wrong with this google repo? Should I remove and reinstall from the
new one given here on this list?
Correction this is the repo file
[google-chrome]
name=google-chrome
Now that I look again, that appears to be the case.
Not only that, the radiator is tilted so that
only the right front corner is close to the board.
you would be very surprised at just how much time is spent
in trying to tear down a new system design. heat sinking
is an on going challenge.
I recently obtained a desktop computer with an nVidia video card:
from lspci:
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]
(rev a1
I had to open the case to connect the DVD
drive and saw what appears to be a fallen radiator:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Michael Hennebry wrote:
I recently obtained a desktop computer with an nVidia video card:
from lspci:
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G84 [GeForce 8600 GT]
(rev a1
I had to open the case to connect the DVD
drive and saw what appears to be a fallen
Hi,
After upgrading to kernel 2.6.32-431.1.2.el6.x86_64 the messages below
keep appearing in /var/log/messages.
--
ata16.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6
ata16.00: irq_stat 0x4001
scsi 16:0:0:0:
On Fri, 24 Jan 2014, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/24/2014 12:54 AM, Steve Brooks wrote:
[root@mach~]# sginfo /dev/scanner
INQUIRY response (cmd: 0x12)
Device Type3
Vendor:Marvell
Product: 91xx Config
Hi All,
I have been trying out XFS given it is going to be the file system of
choice from upstream in el7. Starting with an Adaptec ASR71605 populated
with sixteen 4TB WD enterprise hard drives. The version of OS is 6.4
x86_64 and has 64G of RAM.
This next part was not well researched as I
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-01-21, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.uk wrote:
mkfs.xfs -d su=512k,sw=14 /dev/sda
where 512k is the Stripe-unit size of the single logical device built on
the raid controller. 14 is from the total number of drives minus two
(raid 6
Hi All,
I know many of us here manage RAID on our Centos based servers so this may
be of interest to us all.
I ordered three new Enterprise hard drives this month from a well known
UK online retailer. The drives arrived as new in their anti-static
packaging. Before using one of the drives in
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 05:24:54PM +0100, Steve Brooks wrote:
9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 098 097 000Old_age - 2106
12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000Old_age - 80
replaced with new drives. Wow... I was also told by the online retailer
Sep 1 04:04:02 sraid1v kernel: do_IRQ: 4.110 No irq handler for vector
(irq -1)
Sep 1 04:59:22 sraid1v kernel: do_IRQ: 4.102 No irq handler for vector
(irq -1)
Sep 1 05:42:22 sraid1v kernel: do_IRQ: 5.224 No irq handler for vector
(irq -1)
Sep 1 05:43:42 sraid1v kernel: do_IRQ: 5.121 No irq
On Thu, 5 Sep 2013, Howard Leadmon wrote:
I setup a CentOS 6 server to use with KVM/QEMU, and I am getting the
following error a good bit, granted it doesn't seem to be causing any
trouble. I figured I would post and see if anyone has any ideas on the
issue, or if I can just dismiss it.
Howard Leadmon wrote:
I setup a CentOS 6 server to use with KVM/QEMU, and I am getting the
following error a good bit, granted it doesn't seem to be causing any
trouble. I figured I would post and see if anyone has any ideas on the
issue, or if I can just dismiss it.
If I look at my
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Markus Falb wrote:
On 02.Sep.2013, at 22:14, Steve Brooks wrote:
[2] This motherboard has a Marvell 88E8052 as a second NIC, currently
disbled in the BIOS. Problem is that the 88E8001 NIC has to be eth0 as
it is the one used in a flexlm license server file. In Centos
You don't actually need hwaddr in your ifcfg-* files -- though it's
probably not a bad thing to have the MAC in there. [As Scott pointed out,
it's all about what udev has in its rules.]
You also have to look at /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
+1
Yes, udev rules for network
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 02:02:08PM +0100, Steve Brooks wrote:
You don't actually need hwaddr in your ifcfg-* files -- though it's
probably not a bad thing to have the MAC in there. [As Scott pointed out,
it's all about what udev has in its rules
Hi,
I noticed that one of out Centos 5 servers with an onboard Marvell
88E8001 was showing some packet overruns.
# ifconfig -a eth0 | grep RX p
RX packets:1629537 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:3694 frame:0
So I thought about using a driver from elrepo the lspci id's suggest to
install
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.ukwrote:
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/25/2013 03:15 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
Ok here is the memory and kernel information it doesn't state PAE yet it
seems
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, Michael Duvall wrote:
Hi Guys, In a bit of a pickle.. Is anyone running the latest Centos
5.9
or earlier version with an Intel X79 based motherboard. I have a server
which needs the motherboard replacing asap and I have a spare
Sabertooth
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.ukwrote:
Hi Guys, In a bit of a pickle.. Is anyone running the latest Centos 5.9
or earlier version with an Intel X79 based motherboard. I have a server
which needs the motherboard
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/25/2013 11:41 AM, Steve Brooks wrote:
Thanks for the reply, I have included the lspci output from the new
board running el6. I am sure that the kernel is not PAE but can not
check as I am at home and the test machine is turned off at work
On Sun, 25 Aug 2013, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 08/25/2013 03:15 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
Ok here is the memory and kernel information it doesn't state PAE yet it
seems to recognise the 32G.
[root@app2 ~]# uname -a
Linux app2 2.6.18-348.12.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jul 10 05:31:48 EDT 2013 i686
Hi Guys, In a bit of a pickle.. Is anyone running the latest Centos 5.9
or earlier version with an Intel X79 based motherboard. I have a server
which needs the motherboard replacing asap and I have a spare Sabertooth
X79. I have a machine with a Sabertooth X79 motherboard to test on
which
On Tue, 6 Aug 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Eliezer Croitoru elie...@ngtech.co.ilwrote:
OK so back to the issue in hands.
The issue is that I have a mail storage for more then 65k users per
domain and the ext4 doesn't support this size of directory list.
The
On Fri, 7 Dec 2012, mark wrote:
On 12/06/12 19:23, Steve Brooks wrote:
Why are you doing all that piping and grepping? And the -F confuses
me...oh, I see. First, whitespace is the default field separator in awk.
Then, are you asking if there's a line with a . in it, or just any
non
Why are you doing all that piping and grepping? And the -F confuses
me...oh, I see. First, whitespace is the default field separator in awk.
Then, are you asking if there's a line with a . in it, or just any
non-whitespace? If the latter... mmm, I see, you *really* don't understand
awk.
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Nux! wrote:
On 10.11.2012 22:17, Bob Hepple wrote:
High and low searching (google, most of the repos in
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories) availed
nothing - has
anyone found a repo for gtkpod on centos-6? I seem to recall having
to use
fedora
Hi All,
Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following.
[root@... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0
e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010)
/dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit
e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck!
Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using
latest
On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Banyan He wrote:
I think it comes out from the app itself for the verification. The
question is if the soft raid supports by anyhow. Trying to build one
test box for it.
print_unsupp_features:
if (features[0] || features[1] || features[2]) {
int i, j;
Hi,
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.06.2012 13:58, schrieb Steve Brooks:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Hi, Steve,
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us
Hi All,
I was thinking of using ext4 on a new raid system of 20TB. I had read the
article (halfway done the page) titled Linux File System Fsck Testing --
The Results Are In
https://www.ultimateeditionoz.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=26180
They used CentOS 5.7 (2.6.18-274 kernel) and they state
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012, Alejandro Rodriguez Luna wrote:
Hi everyone, I was creating a script and i found something i can't figure out.
#/bin/bash
for i in $(cat certificates.txt)
do
echo $i
done
I expected this
RSA Secure Server Certification Authority
VeriSign Class 1 CA Individual
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, John Hodrien wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Lorenzo Martínez Rodríguez wrote:
Hi,
I have a working configuration with CentOS 6. Can you try to set next
lines in /etc/ssh/sshd_config and restart SSH server please?
#X11Forwarding no
X11Forwarding yes
#X11DisplayOffset
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
I just upgraded my home KVM server to CentOS 6.0 CR to make use of the
latest libvirt and now my RAID array with my VM storage is missing. It
seems that the upgrade to mdadm-3.2.2 is the culprit.
This is the output from mdadm when scanning that
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, John Doe wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
On my new Dell system, it's got a cardreader. More to the point, it's
got an idiot menu key... *right* next to the right control key, and just
where the annoying keyboard design has it cut down from the
oversize
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 03:10:33 PM Lars Hecking wrote:
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either. Gparted it
rather practical for regular plain vanilla partitions, but for more
advanced stuff and filesystems, fdisk is probably
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Marian Marinov wrote:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 10:36:54 Alain Péan wrote:
Le 12/04/2011 09:23, Matthew Feinberg a écrit :
Hello All
I have a brand spanking new 40TB Hardware Raid6 array to play around
with. I am looking for recommendations for which filesystem to use. I
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011, Gerhard Schneider wrote:
Did you check if you already have the G05 firmware on all RE4-GP?
The G04 firmware is not suitable for RAID.
http://forum.qnap.com/viewtopic.php?f=182t=25057
Yes all our drives are on G05 firmware.
Cheers,
Steve
Hi All,
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID controller. I ran a
smartctl short test on the drive and it failed with a read error. So I ran
the Western Digital's own diagnostic software (DLGDIAG), both the short
and extended test on the drive and it passed with no errors. So
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, compdoc wrote:
I have a WD RE4-GP which dropped an Adaptec 51645 RAID
controller. I ran a smartctl short test on the drive and it failed
with a read error.
What does smart say about reallocated sectors, pending sector count, drive
temperature, etc?
They are clean, no
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine..
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Les Bell wrote:
Kenni Lund ke...@kelu.dk wrote:
Fakeraid is a proprietary software RAID
solution, so if your motherboard suddently decides to die, how will
you then get access to your data?
Obviously, you restore it from a backup. RAID is not a substitute for
At a guess looks like your DNS is down, or like the Ben suggests no
servers in your
/etc/resolve.conf
Steve
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 7/10/10 6:20 PM, Smith Erick Marume-Bahizire wrote:
Hello
Please I want help in centos server I can ping the gateway or
my eth1
Thanks Gordon .. a relief .. I am still inclined to move data and rebuild
with all the current default EXT4 attributes.
Steve
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 10/05/2010 12:50 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
tune4fs listed the filesystem state as not clean. I remounted them
Hi,
The /etc/mke4fs.conf is below. This file has never been edited by me or
anyone else.
[defaults]
base_features =
sparse_super,filetype,resize_inode,dir_index,ext_attr
blocksize = 4096
inode_size = 256
inode_ratio = 16384
[fs_types]
ext3 = {
Hi Brent, Thanks for the reply.
I have to make a decision yes, it is not an easy one either, I read have so
many different reports, opinions that I now feel my brain has become rather
scrambled.. Wondering now if I should just have smaller filesystems and stick
with EXT3.. I have never used
In the two 11T EXT4 filesystems (raid level 6), referred to inprevious
posts, built on devices
/dev/sdb
/dev/sdc
tune4fs listed the filesystem state as not clean. I remounted them as
read only while I decided what to do. The next day I check them again and
tune4fs reports the filesystem
Hi All,
When a couple of EXT4 filesystems are mounted in a server I get the
message
Oct 1 18:49:42 sraid3 kernel: EXT4-fs (sdb): mounted filesystem without journal
Oct 1 18:49:42 sraid3 kernel: EXT4-fs (sdc): mounted filesystem without journal
in the system logs.
My confusion is why are
Hi,
Below is the output from tune4fs. From what people are saying it looks
like et4 may not be the way to go.
[r...@sraid3 ~]# tune4fs -l /dev/sdb
tune4fs 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009)
Filesystem volume name: none
Last mounted on: /sraid3/sraid3
Filesystem UUID:
Hi Miguel,
Thanks for the reply.
What people are saying? So instead of understanding and solving some issue
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. . The really odd thing here
is that on another raid disk created the
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Miguel Medalha wrote:
Filesystem state: not clean
You should really look at that line and at why it is there.
Thanks again Miguel,
Yep I have mounted the filesystems as read only for the time being. I am
inclined to move the data and rebuild the filesystem
Hi,
Since upgrading to 2.6.18-194 I am getting odd messages in the logs.
Such as;
sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
The output from
grep '120 seconds' /var/log/messages | tr : ' ' | awk '{print $10}' | sort |
uniq -c
6 nfsd
4 pdflush
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Scott Silva wrote:
on 6-7-2010 1:12 PM Steve Brooks spake the following:
Hi,
Since upgrading to 2.6.18-194 I am getting odd messages in the logs.
Such as;
sraid3 kernel INFO task pdflush 259 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
The output from
grep '120 seconds
Hi All,
Thought I would let those that are interested know that I had success in
running 24G on an Asus P6T with 24G kit of Kingston DDR3. While I was
putting this together I saw lots of forum posts asking if anyone had tried
it. Well we did here at our work and all looks great including
Do not use fsck on faulty hardware.
I would remove the drive attach it to another linux box with free storage
space on a file system larger than that of the whole damaged drive. Use
ddrescue to rebuild as much of the failed drive as possible them mount
the image produced from ddrescue and
Hi Gordon,
I am running a 51645, two 31605 and four 3405 SAS raid controllers from
adaptec plus a few more older 2820sa cards.
Two of the 3405 controllers have been running for nearly three years
without any issues at all.
The 5 series card has been working fine. They do run very hot so
63 matches
Mail list logo
