Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 2023-07-22 09:55, frank saporito wrote: > > On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > >> From my point of view, Red Hat doesn't really sell software. They > >> give away software. All of their software is available at no charge, > >>

Re: [CentOS] Current RHEL fragmentation landscape

+1 Frank Personally I am moving all my workloads to anything but. It's clear the direction that Red hat is taking and so be it. I've seen it multiple times with open source projects that just seems like greed kicks in and it's all about making the most $$ that they can. Oh and let's be clear,

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023, 12:17 PM Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-13 09:00, Tom Bishop wrote: > > as > > referenced by one of the many RH articles, we are all just freeloaders > > so we shouldn't be missed. > > > I don't believe there are any Red Hat articles that

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:48 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 2023-07-13 03:12, Simon Matter wrote: > > As I found out yesterday, the fragmentation of the "Enterprise Linux" > > ecosystem just started to come true. > > > I've been trying to figure out what SUSE meant when they announced a > "hard

Re: [CentOS] How will fragmentation help Red Hat

ky when they killed Centos but this is it for me, I will migrate my remaining servers over to anything but Redhat, they are dead to me. I had been using Centos for many years, when Karanbir Singh was running things and they would go to meet ups and you could get t-shirts etc..Was a great run but Redhat has ruined all that and now I just could care less what Redhat does from here on out. I'm nobody, but where I do work we have options for which linux distro that we want to run, I can assure you I will not be spinning up an Redhat instances...fool me once, fool me twice... Tom Bishop ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] C7 pam_oath.so changes group ownership of system file

One-time password (OATH) for `me': [...] User me may run the following commands on dormouse: (ALL) ALL [me@dormouse ~]$ ls -la /etc/users.oath -rw---. 1 root me 550 Jun 4 10:33 /etc/users.oath -- Tom Yates - https://www.teaparty.net

Re: [CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

bly, save for its effect on my internet traffic. -- Tom Yates - https://www.teaparty.net ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, José María Terry Jiménez wrote: El 11/10/21 a las 13:00, Tom Yates escribió: On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, José María Terry Jiménez wrote: Hello Perhaps the solution is this: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/70215HWADDR= thanks, but either that link is broken

[CentOS] C7: NM and changing MAC addresses

t or second frame with the "bad" mac address is always a BOOTP/DHCP frame, so i'm open to the idea that this is dhclient being "helpful", rather than NM. does anyone have any idea which daemon or service is responsible for this MAC-rebadging, and/or how i might sto

Re: [CentOS] almalinux?

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 9:11 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 4/5/21 1:42 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > > On 4/5/21 12:55 PM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote: > >> Also maintained by business unit, which might impact later changes > >> when you > >> tight your prod to it. > > > > A major part of the

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 2:44 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > I'll be the first to admit I don't like change and arguably I'm in the > wrong industry for that, but that's another matter. However I don't want to > throw away years of experience with CentOS/Fedora and time invested (mine > personally and

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream suitability as a production webserver

On Tue, Jan 5, 2021, 5:03 PM Jamie Burchell wrote: > > Probably. For a lot of users, Stream is a drop-in replacement that's > better than CentOS was > > We will need to (manually) migrate to Stream 9.x after 5 years instead of > 10 though? > > Well that's the part that hasn't fully been laid

Re: [CentOS] Blog article: CentOS is NOT dead

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 5:35 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/15/20 5:11 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 5:04 PM Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > >> On 12/14/20 8:25 AM, James Pearson wrote: > >>> Nicolas Kovacs > > Here's an interesting read which makes a point for

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 12:07 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:24:03AM -0600, Tom Bishop wrote: > > I know you and other RHEL folks keep saying this about cashing out etc, > but > > they could have kept stream and Centos stable at the same time but chose &

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 future

On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 11:06 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > > > > I don't think there will be a course change either, but for different > reasons. The motivation isn't "cashing/selling out". It's... actually the > stated motivation > https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/faq-centos-stream-updates#Q2 > > >

Re: [CentOS] Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by CloudLinux

On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 7:53 AM Scott Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:09:46PM +, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Dec, 2020 at 07:48:25 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote: > > > > > One assumes however, that this wouldn't happen with OEL, though one > never > > > knows. > > > > OEL =

Re: [CentOS] Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by CloudLinux

+1 Looks like between Springdale, Rocky and CloudLinux there will be options. Such a bad decision that RH made to do this... On Thu, Dec 10, 2020, 1:05 PM Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Someone is smarter then Red Hat/IBM, "Carpe Diem": > > Announcing Open-sourced & Community-Driven RHEL Fork by

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Stream from bottom works, what is this?

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:09 AM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:02:17PM +, Bernstein, Noam CIV USN NRL > (6393) Washington DC (USA) via CentOS wrote: > > That's my understanding, iff you automatically install all CentOS stream > > updates the moment they become available.

Re: [CentOS] dnf script to cherry pick updates and maintain RHEL compatibility

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 12:27 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 06:02:37PM +, James Pearson wrote: > > why don't they just make RHEL available to all for 'free', and you just > > pay for support if you need it - i.e. a bit like it is now, RHEL if you > > pay, CentOS if you

Re: [CentOS] [EXT] Re: https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

Well looks like the jokes have already started, some one from work sent this to me this morning - https://centos.rip/ No association etc not sure who etc... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Moving to CentOS 8 Stream

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 8:32 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > > > > > I thought I saw a reply from Johnny that streams wasn't quite ready, > maybe > > > he will chime in but that's what I thought I saw in a response. > > What, in amongst the hundreds of messages, he said it wasn't ready!! > Why

Re: [CentOS] Moving to CentOS 8 Stream

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, 8:01 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > > It's got to be done, so may as well test it ... > > The FAQ says to do: > >dnf install centos-release-stream >dnf distro-sync > > This I did and everything went fine. I checked before doing the distro- > sync and there was a load of new

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 11:29 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/8/20 11:19 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: > > Am I the only one to perceive CentOS/RedHat team members responses as > quite arrogant? > > I am sorry you feel that way. I was trying to help. Red Hat has > several programs where they

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 11:11 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > >>> I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with >

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 10:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > I see a lot of promises that Stream will have better engagement with > > the community. Why would we trust these promises? > > "Better engagement with the community" of course requires that

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, 10:15 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 12/8/20 10:41 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:39 AM Jonathan Billings > > wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:28:30AM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> You have published a CentOS Lifecycle that states

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

LOL, laughing with you not at you, license free RHEL. Just RHEL (IBM) wanting to increase the coffers for RHEL. I know, I know thats not whats really happening but yeah that is what is really happening. If you want a tested production worthy server install based on RHEL then you will have to pay

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:07 AM Rich Bowen wrote: > The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next > year we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat > Enterprise Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a > current RHEL release.

Re: [CentOS] Dumb Centos 8 DNF mirror question...

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:02 AM Tom Bishop wrote: > I have several Centos 8 machines that I update and every now and again I > will go through and update all of them and one of them will get a slow > mirror, like downloading the kernel at 50kb etc. With the newer version I > am unab

[CentOS] Dumb Centos 8 DNF mirror question...

I have several Centos 8 machines that I update and every now and again I will go through and update all of them and one of them will get a slow mirror, like downloading the kernel at 50kb etc. With the newer version I am unable to figure out how to force it to update the mirror list and hopefully

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020, 5:41 AM Peter wrote: > On 20/06/20 3:29 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > How is this going to be fixed .. Welcome to CentOS Stream > > > > Stream will be , once it is fully implemented, the ACTUAL development of > > RHEL the 'next point release' on git.centos.org in the open. >

Re: [CentOS] Blog article about the state of CentOS

*snip > > > Thank you for sharing, I found it interesting. > > My 2 Cent > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos +1 Longtime user but with the current sturcture they have turned it (centos8)

Re: [CentOS] Centos 8 minimal install

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020, 2:33 PM R C wrote: > just to piss off people like you, > > > you might know the type, they never really answer any questions, lurk > around on a forum like this > > acting like a (self-proclaimed) genius lecturing and patronizing people, > as if they have to be worthy > >

[CentOS] Centos 8 KVM and Win10 time

I didn't have this issue when using Centos 7 but for some reason now using 8 I have a windows 10 vm that keeps changing it's time to UTC. Centos appears to be using local time but something is telling it to change time. I have time sync running in windows and it syncs but then at some point when

[CentOS] Centos 8 server rebooting...

Can someone provide some guidance with my server, I have a fairly new centos 8 server, pretty much just a KVM host but I have noticed that its dumping and rebooting at various times. Journalctl does not go back past the reboot so I am unable to catch what may be causing it, it appears to be KVM

[CentOS] Bug 1671147 - RHEL 8 Cockpit - "Launch Remote Viewer" in Virtual Machines section does not work remotely

Can someone that has RHEL developer access look up the details of this bug, bug 1671147 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671147 was closed as duplicate to this bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558219 however when you try to access the details it states: "You are not

[CentOS] CentOS 8 virt-manager

I am thinking about building a new host and trying to decide if virt-manager is working on CentOS 8. I thought I saw previously on the mail list that there were some issues but cannot find the thread right now. If anyone has migrated some workloads from 7 and seen any issues let me know. Thanks

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7.5 on Vmware

worked really well but I haven't put any effort in to expanding the configuration to share storage via SRPt or iSCSI Targets even though these options are possible. Having made the jump from VMware to KVM/Qemu on CentOS 7, I wouldn't look back. Tom signature.asc Descr

Re: [CentOS] OT: hardware: sanitizing a dead SSD?

On Tue, May 8, 2018, 2:35 PM wrote: > Anyone have any clues about how to sanitize a dead SSD? We haven't had it > yet, but we're sure it's coming. Esp. since I'm a federal contractor, a > dead disk gets deGaussed, but what the hell do you do with a SSD? > >

Re: [CentOS] Down C6 ALL without torrent ?

On 19/04/2018 02:58, Always Learning wrote: > > I sought: CentOS-6.9-x86_64-bin-DVD1to2.iso The torrent contains two ISOs - DVD1 and DVD2, so you would still need to merge them. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] XScreenSaver

On 09/04/2018 07:47, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > I didn't know a screensaver was that critical. It's critical in that XScreenSaver deals with locking the screen/dealing with passwords. I believe the fancy animation bits are separate. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

On 26/03/2018 16:18, Leon Fauster wrote: > Time synchronization for all nodes is crucial for kerberos ... In my case, somehow Bind lost the required kerberos tokens to be able to talk to the LDAP server on the same host, so DNS didn't work, so it couldn't attempt to refresh the token. Never

Re: [CentOS] How insecure is NIS ? Possible alternatives ?

On 26/03/2018 15:14, Gordon Messmer wrote: > FreeIPA takes all of one command to install, and one to set up. It > provides a web UI for both administrative and end-user management of > users, passwords, login and sudo policy, etc. Anything you find overly > complex can simply be unused. FreeIPA

Re: [CentOS] How Can I ...

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 5:50 PM Eugene Poole wrote: > I've got a WD My Passport Ultra 1TB (USB) plugged into my router and I > have 4 Windows machines, all running Windows 7, and all 4 machines can > see the device as drive 'Y'. I use this device several ways, i.e. all my >

Re: [CentOS] Restarting docker daemon fixes network problem inside containers

On 30/01/2018 09:54, Andrew Holway wrote: > Does anyone have a clue what the root cause of this might be? I've had trouble before when settings in /etc/sysctl.d were disabling ip_forwarding, which will break Docker's networking in some configurations. You may also want to check firewall rules if

Re: [CentOS] Mirroring centos.org

On 29/01/2018 16:21, Felipe Westfields wrote: > Does that delete switch delete those files after download, or does it stop > it from downloading at all? It means "remove files that aren't on the source". This would generally be older versions of packages that have been replaced.

[CentOS] kernel: blk_cloned_rq_check_limits: over max segments limit., Device Mapper Multipath, iBFT, iSCSI COMSTAR

on boot. The inconsistencies in max_hw_sectors_kb for each path before and after starting multipathd (both in initramfs and during/after boot) still baffle me. All comments welcome. Any clues appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merri

Re: [CentOS] KeePassX replacement

in any other standard repository, only through an unofficial repository at https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bugzy/keepassxc/, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Tom Longfield e: tomlongfi

[CentOS] CentOS 7 on PPC64le booting from a MD RAID volume

system? Tom Leach le...@coas.oregonstate.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] RDP for Centos 7

On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Tom Bishop <bisho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Remmina is the one I use but I have not looked to see if Centos is > supported but I use it daily and heavily. > > > On Jun 21, 2017 10:22 AM, <m...@tdiehl.org> wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: [CentOS] RDP for Centos 7

rk. On the plus side, I like the way Remote desktop viewer displays the desktops in tabs. Suggestions? Regards, -- Tom m...@tdiehl.org Spamtrap address me...@tdiehl.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5 End of Life

On 03/03/17 11:59, Johnny Hughes wrote: Thanks for the advice. I'll try and set up a mirror asap, but I'd still like to know when the mirrors will be removed if anyone has that information. Before we remove it from mirror, it will all be moved here: http://vault.centos.org/5.11/ It will

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5 End of Life

On 02/03/17 19:50, James Hogarth wrote: On 2 Mar 2017 03:49, "John R Pierce" <pie...@hogranch.com> wrote: On 3/1/2017 7:28 PM, Tom Munro Glass wrote: Can you say exactly when in early April the tree will be moved? I have a number of installations that need to continue running

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-5 End of Life

Thanks Tom Munro Glass ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network Attached Storage

On Jan 4, 2017 6:31 PM, "TE Dukes" wrote: > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R > Pierce > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 1:50 PM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] [OT] Network Attached

Re: [CentOS] Airprint to old printer using Centos server

On 31/10/2016 10:43, Gary Stainburn wrote: Hi folks, I've found a number of articles on setting up a Linux / CUPS / Avahi server to allow airprinting, but they all seem to be quite old. Two questions: 1) Does anyone have a link for a more recent article, hopefully specifically for Centos7.

Re: [CentOS] Mirror sync strategy or problem?

On 03/08/2016 09:09, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: What are typical delays in mirrors' sync? Or is there any problem in mirrors updates? Does http://mirror-status.centos.org/ show any issue with the mirrors you're being given by fastestmirror ? ___ CentOS

Re: [CentOS] TLSv1.2 support for lftp on CentOS 6.x

On 02/08/2016 12:11, Olivier BONHOMME wrote: So my question is : Can lftp provided by CentOS (of course last version in the 6.x branch), do TLSv1.2 connection ? It may not be related, but in the past I have needed to rebuild libNSS and Curl in CentOS 6 due to an upstream patch the explicitly

Re: [CentOS] KVM HA

Hi Digimer, Thanks for your reply. On 22/06/16 15:20, Digimer wrote: > On 22/06/16 01:01 AM, Tom Robinson wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High >> Availability servers, >> automatically migrating guest

[CentOS] KVM HA

a guest, I can all too easily start it up on both hosts! There must be some way to fence these off but I'm just not sure how to do this. Any help is appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria

Re: [CentOS] OT: Linksys router misbehaviour

On May 11, 2016 11:27 AM, "Gordon Messmer" wrote: > > On 05/11/2016 03:05 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> >> does anyone with such a router know of a way >> to wake the router up in such a case through the computer? > > > > Enable ssh? > > ssh root@dd-wrt reboot > > > >

Re: [CentOS-docs] rpmforge references in the wiki

Burn the references with fire. If there are any references to litko then they should be treated equally. Both are dead. On Wednesday, April 13, 2016, Christoph Galuschka wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Am 13.04.2016 um 16:20 schrieb John R. Dennison: > >> Someone made mention

Re: [CentOS] Just need to vent

Can this thread just end, it's been hashed and rehashed. If there is a moderator out there can we just kill the topic? Lets move along. :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 7 magically rebooted!

local timezone at the end of the boot cycle. Is that normal and can it be configured otherwise? Any help is appreciated. Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria Australia T: +61 3 9761 5050 F:

Re: [CentOS] (OT) Computer seems to have died

+1 or bad capacitors, look on the board and make sure none are leaking or puffed out. On Jan 4, 2016 6:08 PM, "David Both" wrote: > Power supply > > On 01/04/2016 07:03 PM, tdu...@palmettoshopper.com wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I have an old IBM Netvista. Lately, it

[CentOS] amanda-client does not recognise 'dump'

://archives.zmanda.com/amanda-archives/viewtopic.php?t=7390 for more details Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria Australia T: +61 3 9761 5050 F: +61 3 9761 5051 E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au

[CentOS] bind chroot, bind mounts and selinux

, would I bother with chrooting at all if selinux can secure the environment for me? My own opinions aside what do others think and has anyone had experience with this? Kind regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136

Re: [CentOS] bind chroot, bind mounts and selinux

. Anyone else care to comment? > > On 09/09/2015 09:09 PM, Tom Robinson wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm migrating a CentOS 6 bind instance (chrooted) to a CentOS 7 box and am >> curious of people's >> opinions on chrooting vs selinux as a way of securing bind. >> &

[CentOS] Define mandatory desktop profile for a use on CentOS 7

that is only applied to the dynamically created home directory for xguest. Tom ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Fedora change that will probably affect RHEL

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote: Security is *always* opposed to convenience. False. OS X by default

Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux

On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on

Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux

, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? I would strongly recommend a product that supports VSS. Bacula does, and Veeam does as far as I can tell (mentioned by Tom). BackupPC does not. Without snapshots (VSS), you may back up

Re: [CentOS] Using a CentOS 6 Machine as a gateway/router/home server

I get good results with IPCop on an older box. I happened to already have my WAP set up, similar to David, with ethernet cable into my Netgear gigabit switch. But IPCop has a zone now for wifi and I could hook it into my IPCop and and get all it's benefits. I haven't bothered because I'm in

Re: [CentOS] Folding At Home OT

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 6:24 PM, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote: On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:51:31PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 04/22/15 21:05, Mark LaPierre wrote: Can someone recommend a good video card to use with CentOS 6.6 that has a GPU, or two, or more, that

Re: [CentOS] HBA enumeration and multipath configuration

Sorry, I'm posting this question again as my original post go abducted by a different thread due to stupid way I replied to that thread and changed the subject as a new post. My apologies if there's any confusion. On 14/04/15 10:05, Tom Robinson wrote: # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux

[CentOS] HBA enumeration and multipath configuration

regards, Tom -- Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria Australia T: +61 3 9761 5050 F: +61 3 9761 5051 E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[CentOS] HBA enumeration and multipath configuration

regards, Tom Tom Robinson IT Manager/System Administrator MoTeC Pty Ltd 121 Merrindale Drive Croydon South 3136 Victoria Australia T: +61 3 9761 5050 F: +61 3 9761 5051 E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [CentOS] Centos 7 and itk

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Silvere Vautey - FCNET vau...@fcnet.fr wrote: Hello I use mod-itk on several servers on CentOS 6 or CentOS 5 I have a new server with CentOS 7 and I would like to use itk. Installing it works fine using yum but it cannot be started, giving a lot of errors.

Re: [CentOS] Kickstart with multiple eth devices

I have a Dell server that has two built-in ethernet devices. When I kickstart the machine, they are correctly identified as eth0 and eth1 (correctly meaning they correspond to the physical device ports 1 and 2). I need a third one and want that to come up as eth2. After adding the hardware,

Re: [CentOS] Using ipset under CentOS7

and firewalld. I think Don Quixote wrote firewalld. It takes everything that was wrong about iptables and amplifies them, meanwhile only fixing problems that don't exist. Tom -- Email: t...@whatexit.orgWork: tlimonce...@stackoverflow.com Skype: YesThatTom Blog: http://EverythingSysadmin.com

[CentOS] Using ipset under CentOS7

or directory. # systemctl start ipset.service Failed to issue method call: Unit ipset.service failed to load: No such file or directory. # find /etc -name ipset.service # What is the recommended procedure for loading the ipset configuration? Thanks, Tom -- Email: t...@whatexit.orgWork: tlimonce

Re: [CentOS-docs] Where is the official doc for CentOS 7

I bugged Jim about this daily on IRC for a bit, and he had gotten some tractIon from legal, but that was several months ago. Again, a link to http://docs.redhat.com would be nice if nothing else. On Saturday, February 14, 2015, Fabian Arrotin arr...@centos.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [CentOS] anthem details OT

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Chris Wensink cwens...@five-star-plastics.com wrote: Hello Everyone, Does anyone have any more detail about what kind of system Anthem / Blue Cross was running and what kind of attack broke into their system? It's terrible that it happened, but I think it

Re: [CentOS] Kickstarting several *different* setups

On 20/01/2015 16:29, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote: So my question is, is there some way do determine via kickstart, what to install on that machine based on some criteria, possibly the IP that's being assigned to it, or MAC address, or something ... If you just want to use kickstart, it would be

Re: [CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories

follow most or all of the best practices, most don't, and may even stray into the bad practice realm at times. But they haven't garnered a reputation for being either direction yet -- either due to not enough time or users or both. Tom (Zathrus) On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 7:34 PM, Karanbir Singh

Re: [CentOS-docs] Pull Request wiki.c.o/AdditionalResources/Repositories

Patrick, looks fine to me. Thanks for the work -- when I did a major revision I tried to remove some of the rot and got tired of trying, along with refactoring the page in general. Your dedication is appreciated. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM, PatrickD Garvey patrickdgarv...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [CentOS-docs] Fwd: CentOS forum search link in http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories under Atomic Repo

I did the last major rewrite of the AdditionalRepos page, in large part because of issues we see repeatedly on the IRC channels. The repos placed in the known problem section are there for a good reason -- they replace base packages by default, or they're poorly maintained, leading to security

Re: [CentOS] HOWTO Stratum 1 NTP server under CentOS 7

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: The right thing to do next is to ask for this change upstream, so people can get regular updates and stay secure. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro +1 agree 100%

[CentOS] Please remove mirrors.skyshe.cn from mirror list,Thanks!

, but download very slow. I am really happy to see that skyshe.cn is willing to provide this service. However, I don't think their bandwidth is enough to handle this service. Tom ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [CentOS] Remote Desktop Recommendations (2)

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:06 AM, david da...@daku.org wrote: Thanks, Les, for that detail. I knew that x2go had a known bug, but didn't know the name of the missing package. I explicitly installed it, but I still

Re: [CentOS] Off topic - was: Re: Problem with WRT54GL router

As another suggestion, you could try installing the Tomato firmware rather than dd-wrt. I used to run dd-wrt (on a v1.2 WRT-54GS) and had similar stability issues; I've personally found Tomato (http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato) to be more stable. - -- Nels Lindquist nli...@maei.ca +1

Re: [CentOS] Off topic - was: Re: Problem with WRT54GL router

Do note that I thought I read that tomato was no longer under development. the original tomato is not, but it works very well. The original tomato only runs on old school broadcom based WRT54's, not anything newer. there are a few forks, notably Shibby and Toastman that are under active

Re: [CentOS] firefox: annoyance

I'm in the same fix... But. When I will find open source, acceptable browser which I can predict will last and will have the same great attitude late netscape or mozilla had, I will start installing it simultaneously with firefox, yet will make it default browser, which users can switch to

Re: [CentOS] firefox: annoyance

Maybe we can get it into extras? I mentioned something from his repo to my manager, who understandably balked at a Russian server (this is a US gov't agency (non-DoD) that we work at mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Critical update for bash released today.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 09/24/2014 10:26 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: You should 'yum update' as soon as possible to resolve this issue. Here's why you should care:

Re: [CentOS] firefox: annoyance

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:41 PM, mark m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I just updated firefox, here at home... and when I fired it back up, *all* of my tabs were gone. Every one (all couple dozen...) mark, CentOS 6.5 ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] pxebooting

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:10 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Sorry 'bout breaking threading. Paul, you write: The gPXE bootloader can fetch files from an arbitrary network host using TFTP, NFS, HTTP, etc, but the standard syslinux PXE bootloader cannot. On CentOS 6, the syslinux-nonlinux

Re: [CentOS] repos...

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:02 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: is rpmforge now considered 'friendly' with EPEL? I normally only use EPEL as an addition repo, but one package I want to install on this one system is

[CentOS] centos 5.10 has 2 DVDs?

Does the install of Centos5.10 prompt to insert disc2? What's on the second disc? Tom ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] *very* ugly mdadm issue [Solved, badly]

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:30 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Ok, folks, Here's the answer: making a software RAID on a bare drive with no GPT works fine. If it has a GPT, and no partition, it fails on reboot, even with an /etc/mdadm.conf. I've proved this: first, I created the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >