You can use the yum download-only plugin, or you can enable a keep cache
variable in your /etc/yum.repos.d/yourfile.repo. Don't remember the syntax
off the top of my head. However a quick google search should turn them both
up.
Other option if you want to sync a repo you can check out an
Oh but keep in mind if you enable keep cache in your repo file it will
still install them, just it will keep a copy as well. Keep that in mind.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:42 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
You can use the yum download-only plugin, or you can enable a keep cache
Which is why you should use cobbler because it does all that for you.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ryan Wagoner rswago...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Alan McKay alan.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
Is there any way to fake a yum update just to get yum to
:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:02 PM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is why you should use cobbler because it does all that for you.
I actually just installed cobbler a few weeks ago and will look into it for
this to see if it has a way to grab a repository without rsync
I would highly advise against trying to time a CTRL-C in a specific amount
of time. Not sure why you would even try and do that when, that's the exact
purpose of the yum-download only which is easier to install and run then
wait for a whole update to complete and try and manually kill the job.
Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for
security sake.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
l.wandreb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to
configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0
forwarding rules that you
have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain.
You're trying to come in from an outside net to your FW and be forwarded to
what you have NAT'd behind it right?
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
l.wandreb...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:44:11 -0500
cliff
sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to
read. also try this to troubleshoot
watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
it will show you
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
instead of being in the PREROUTING.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry that's watch -n 1
.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:05 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works
http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
On Tue, 13
Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works
http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
My best
@John, yea good catch thanks =)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.ukwrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote:
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually
there
is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300
You should check the perms on the dirs, ssh will not allow it use the keys
if they are too permissive. So I would check starting at /home
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, John Kennedy skeb...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I have 3 servers. All 3 are CentOS 5.5. All 3 have identical
I do believe the perms need to be at 700 for the ./ssh dir and 640 for the
actual key files contained.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010, cliff here wrote:
You should check the perms on the dirs, ssh will not allow it use
the keys
Yep, same answer here, I had RHEL4.8 on a 2.6 TB MSA, and you just leave it
going over the weekend.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:14:23AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
I have a large (1.5TB) partition with millions of files on
Im getting errors like JBD: failed to read block at offset 4360 on a raid 5
parition , have run several fcsk on it are these Journal errors
recoverable? I've done a physical scan of the hard disks with HP insight
manager as well
--
Well if you want the kernel to route IPV4 traffic, then yes it has to be 1
On 7/6/10, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
cliff here wrote:
net.ipv4.conf.ip_forward = 0 ??
change to = 1 ??
yea that needs to be a 1
That cannot be mandatory,
as I have a 0 there and do not have
yea that needs to be a 1
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Thomas Dukes tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
[mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Cliff
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 8:05 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re:
Subject line explains most of it
I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM
(Fedora 13) box.
Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media, but
on the next step after that it says it can't find CD media.
still stumped.
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:51 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
Subject line explains most of it
I'm trying to install Centos from a dvd iso, that has been verified on KVM
(Fedora 13) box.
Virtual machine boots, and will launch anaconda and will test the media
20 matches
Mail list logo
