[CentOS] Test
Test. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test
On Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 09:37:36AM +0100, Lucian (n...@li.nux.ro) wrote: > Just testing, sorry for the noise. Sorry for highjacking this. I do not receive any of my emails sent to the list although I have ticked "receive you won posts" in the mailman interface. I am trying to trace this problem with this reply. -- Jobst Schmalenbach ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test
Just testing, sorry for the noise. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Am Dienstag, den 27.06.2017, 11:08 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > The only exception: if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our > > rebuild > > that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it. That > > is > > just what CentOS Linux is. > > I obviously meant if we introduced the issue, and it is NOT an issue > in > RHEL, we WILL fix it :) > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanx for clear that up to me. I will follow "your" line up. Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
On 06/27/2017 11:06 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The only exception: if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our rebuild > that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it. That is > just what CentOS Linux is. I obviously meant if we introduced the issue, and it is NOT an issue in RHEL, we WILL fix it :) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
On 06/26/2017 02:02 PM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Sorry Hughes, > > got some questions. > > I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post > at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. > > In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 > pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject > .org/thread/NLFYHW3IEJHSFBUOEAVHDHBVTL7TOHYZ/ > > Sometimes I don't know where to push the information. > > on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/CentOS7Python34/ > > I release a ticket because snapper gui do not build on there repo. > Local with mock or without it never fails. No response. > > Since yesterday learned how to use snapper against the dbus api. What > is the better way in my opinion. After some rest i will do it first on > centos and it back into fedora "dnf" later on. > > It looks to me as if in a Fedora release little movement. If someone > wants to upgrade something you simply move it there gladly times on the > next release. This generates a high unwilling something at all a > working release to submit an improvement. This is a lot better under > Centos, although Redhat is very slow with its update cycles. > > Too bad the feedback is not as good as under Centos. > > In principal there are to many ways to push errors or improvments on > each (centos, redhat, fedora) distros. > > Or am I doing something wrong. Is there anything I can do better? > > It is hopefully not that I care 3 various Linux (This time > Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, Centos). It helps to get ideas. > Well .. CentOS Linux (The os/, cr/ , fasttrack/ , and updates/ repos) are exact rebuilds of upstream RHEL source code with only branding changes. We do no technical changes to this sorce code at all. We build it .. end of story. If something does not work in CentOS Linux and it also does not work in RHEL .. then great. We want CentOS Linux to work exactly that way .. so we will NOT make technical changes to get it to work in CentOS Linux. The only exception: if the CentOS team introduced a bug in our rebuild that is not present in RHEL source code, we will not fix it. That is just what CentOS Linux is. If you want to get something fixed in CentOS that is also broken in RHEL, you must submit the changes to Red Hat via either the Fedora or RHEL bug processes. Once those changes are in released into RHEL (and therefore into the public RHEL source code) they will rolled into CentOS Linux. For other CentOS repositories where we actually manage the content and DO make technical changes (extras/ , centosplus/ any of the SIG repos, etc), you can submit changes to CentOS to get things fixed. Hopefully this clears up what CentOS Linux is defined as and why we don't make technical changes. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Sorry Hughes, got some questions. I have the feeling that I do a lot wrong. Today I sent a mailing post at fedora where it is also about btrfs under fedora. In time when i write the mail i forward it my patch for fedora 25 pretransaction & snapper.yp, with the hope of feedback. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject .org/thread/NLFYHW3IEJHSFBUOEAVHDHBVTL7TOHYZ/ Sometimes I don't know where to push the information. on https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/CentOS7Python34/ I release a ticket because snapper gui do not build on there repo. Local with mock or without it never fails. No response. Since yesterday learned how to use snapper against the dbus api. What is the better way in my opinion. After some rest i will do it first on centos and it back into fedora "dnf" later on. It looks to me as if in a Fedora release little movement. If someone wants to upgrade something you simply move it there gladly times on the next release. This generates a high unwilling something at all a working release to submit an improvement. This is a lot better under Centos, although Redhat is very slow with its update cycles. Too bad the feedback is not as good as under Centos. In principal there are to many ways to push errors or improvments on each (centos, redhat, fedora) distros. Or am I doing something wrong. Is there anything I can do better? It is hopefully not that I care 3 various Linux (This time Arch/Manjaro, Fedora, Centos). It helps to get ideas. Thanks for advice. Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Hello Hughes, Had experimental my gst-test installed ~ gstreamer 1.6.4 and there seems to be a hardware video playback function. By the wild gstreamer mix of course not stable. Have only proven that the compilate for intel ok on my laptop. Sincerely Andy Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. > > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with > > new kernel. > > > > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch > > > > If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in > the centos namespace, we have this: > > > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/ > > There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there. > > Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora > linux-firmware mentioned above. > > This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
On 06/10/2017 08:47 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hallo Hughes, > > thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. > > Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not > served in the opensource. > That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. > > My laptop has done the linux-firmware update well, it is nevertheless one of > the newest. > > The kernel and appropriate firmware is unfortunately only the one side of a > driver when it comes to graphics cards. > > The hardware decoding works only sometimes. On CentOS in the moment not > (Radeon / Intel), > but that is not synonymous the focus of a server system. This happens to me > also with the > original packages. > > I give my homework free in the thought that it might help somebody out there. > No problem at all, and thanks for posting. It might indeed help others. If you take a look at the git repo for the linux-firmware, you can see the actions that make that installable on both CentOS-7 and also for CentOS-6 in the xen kernel tree (a couple of obsoletes and some other minor changes). https://git.centos.org/summary/sig-altarch!linux-firmware.git Keep up the good work. > Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: >> On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: >>> Hello Everyone, >>> >>> >>> Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. >>> Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with >>> new kernel. >>> >>> linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch >>> >> >> If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in >> the centos namespace, we have this: >> >> >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/ >> >> There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there. >> >> Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora >> linux-firmware mentioned above. >> >> This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG. >> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Hallo Hughes, thanks to let me know. It is good that you have a focus on LTS 4.9. Unfortunately it is so that the new graphics cards from amd to today are not served in the opensource. That's why I'm experimenting with the latest stable versions and what is so. My laptop has done the linux-firmware update well, it is nevertheless one of the newest. The kernel and appropriate firmware is unfortunately only the one side of a driver when it comes to graphics cards. The hardware decoding works only sometimes. On CentOS in the moment not (Radeon / Intel), but that is not synonymous the focus of a server system. This happens to me also with the original packages. I give my homework free in the thought that it might help somebody out there. Sincerely Andy Am Samstag, den 10.06.2017, 05:52 -0500 schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. > > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with > > new kernel. > > > > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch > > > > If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in > the centos namespace, we have this: > > > http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/ > > There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there. > > Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora > linux-firmware mentioned above. > > This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
On 06/10/2017 05:17 AM, Andreas Benzler wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > > Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. > Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with > new kernel. > > linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch > If people want an experimental kernel and linux-firmware that lives in the centos namespace, we have this: http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/experimental/ There are i386 and x86_64 kernels there. Currently we are tracking the 4.9 LTS kernel branch and the fedora linux-firmware mentioned above. This is also the kernel that we use in the armhfp (32 bit Arm) SIG. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (kernel)
Hello Everyone, Because my tests on AMD and Intel, I had to update the linux firmware. Update comes from the upstream fedora packet and also works on centos with new kernel. linux-firmware-20170605-74.git37857004.el7.centos.noarch Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (mesa, kernel)
Hello Guys, I really wanted to just update mesa. But the Linux kernel was also done quickly. - Mesa 17.1.2 (remove sanitizy check, otherwise fail to built) - Kernel 4.11.4 can be found at: http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ Unfortunately still no time found to care about winehq. OK. My daughter plays under the same driver stack in manjaro linux World of Warcraft for hours and my Fedora in the business also runs stable over several days without failures. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/ Good night. Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)
Today I confirm all drivers working propertly on HP Laptop skylake i5-7200U CPU, HD Graphics 620 (Kaby Lake GT2) Kernel 4.11.3, libdrm 2.4.81, xorg x11 2.99.917-21.20170418, libva 1.8.2, Mesa3D 17.1.1 (llvm 3.9.1) Tested World of warcraft with my old winehq. Totem Hardware decoded video Cheers ... Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)
Forgotten so say I tested the opensource against the one from AMD. Both drivers works for me. The AMD Version can be used without my repo. I look forward to rework wine 2.8 on centos from the spec file of fedora 25. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server updates (drivers, mesa, kernel)
Hello Guys, while im testing a AMD Radeon RX 480 i was up on my centos 7. To get the card realy work, I upgrade my repros: Drivers: [cms4all-drivers] name=cms4all-drivers baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/drivers/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 libdrm -> 2.4.81 libav -> 1.8.2 libav-utils -> 1.8.2 xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-21.20170418 xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1.0.15-1 xorg-x11-drv-ati-7.9.0 xorg-x11-drv-amdgpu-1.3.0 ATI and AMDGPU works here, intel stays out here for test. Mesa: [cms4all-mesa] name=cms4all-mesa baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/mesa/ #baseurl=file:///srv/repo/centos/7/mesa gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 Mesa3D, needs drivers because of libdrm 2.4.81 Mesa 17.1.1 Add downgrade patch zlib 2.8 -> 2.7 Add mesa-vaapi as separate package, still problmes with video out on centos, remove gstreamer1-vaapi to get my videos working. No problem on other distro (not Fedora). There is a hughe difference gstreamer 1.8 Gnome 3.24. Kernel: [cms4all-kernel] name=cms4all-kernel baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/kernel/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 kernel 4.11.3 Same as elrpo, but add functions to amdgpu and radeon. Sincerely Andy PS: Still unsigned private builds, take the source if your unshure. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server (drivers, kernel, media, mesa, winehq, java)
Hello Guys, from christmas till now I updated follow packages in my privated builds: http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/7/ Drivers: libdrm 2.4.75 (update) vulkan 1.0.3 Kernel: 4.9.1 & firmware (update) Media: Kodi 17.0 + pvr addons & vlc 2.2.4 (update) Mesa: 13.0.4 (update) WineHQ: wine 2.0.1 & wine-stage 2.0.1 (update), winetricks http://centos.cms4all.org/repo/java/ Oracle Java 1.8.0 121 Netbeans 8.2.1 Sincerely Andy PS: This are no signed packages, but the source is there - as always. Work daily with my packages since 03/2016. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test
On 18/01/17 19:33, TE Dukes wrote: > > > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test > > No. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> > wrote: > >> Is it working? >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > > Been getting these since last night > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently: > >* centos@centos.org > > Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with > [Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA > p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the > destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>: > Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not > authorized. Please see > http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2 > 52.106;r=centos@centos.org > . Yes, it seems you had a SPF in place for your domain, but that is now removed ? dig -t txt +short +noshort palmettoshopper.com => empty And the fact that your mails reach again the list is a proof that it now works -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test
The SPF record for your email provider did not match the sending systems for your domain. Possibly the IP address or DNS record changed recently at your ISP? On 01/18/2017 01:33 PM, TE Dukes wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda > Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test > > No. > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> > wrote: > >> Is it working? >> >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > Been getting these since last night > > This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. > > Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently: > >* centos@centos.org > > Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with > [Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA > p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the > destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>: > Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not > authorized. Please see > http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2 > 52.106;r=centos@centos.org > . > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test
-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Hal Wigoda Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 1:18 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Test No. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukes <tdu...@palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > Is it working? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Been getting these since last night This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed permanently: * centos@centos.org Reason: There was an error while attempting to deliver your message with [Subject: "Test"] to centos@centos.org. MTA p3plsmtpa11-05.prod.phx3.secureserver.net received this response from the destination host IP - 208.100.23.70 - 550 , 550 5.7.1 <centos@centos.org>: Recipient address rejected: Message rejected due to: SPF fail - not authorized. Please see http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=tdu...@palmettoshopper.com;ip=68.178.2 52.106;r=centos@centos.org . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test
No. On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:11 PM, TE Dukeswrote: > Is it working? > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- - Hal Wigoda Chicago ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test
Is it working? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server upates
Hello Guys, update my repo with - linux kernel 3.8.14 - Mesa 13.0.2 with LLVM 3.9.0 + radeon si fix - Fix depends on AMDGPU driver (X11) - drivers section. Sincerely Andy Example here R9 280x [andy@localhost ~]$ glxinfo | grep ^OpenGL OpenGL vendor string: X.Org OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD TAHITI (DRM 2.46.0 / 4.8.14-1.el7.centos.x86_64, LLVM 3.9.0) OpenGL core profile version string: 4.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 13.0.2 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.30 OpenGL core profile context flags: (none) OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile OpenGL core profile extensions: OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 13.0.2 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL context flags: (none) OpenGL extensions: OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.1 Mesa 13.0.2 OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.10 OpenGL ES profile extensions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on private server against 1611
Hello Guys, I only wanna you know that my private server builds works against centos version 1611. The messa private llmv on centos was never as mine. That’s all I also removed my old 12.04 mesa stuff, because of this behavior. Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test please ignore
test please ignore ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test builds on mesa
Correct my self: libdrm version is 2.6.8 mesa 11.2 needs libdrm < 2.6.6, can be compile with the centos private-llvm 3.6.1 mesa 11.1 libdrm < 2.6.1 mesa 10.6.9 can build without external upgrades. Rebuild mesa, only needs cms4all-drivers. If you are use wine, you need it twice x86_64 and i686 Sincerely Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test builds on mesa
Hello Guys... I wanne let you know that i recently tested my mesa builds 11.2.2 with libdrm 2.4.8 tested on intel (mesa) and radeon (d3dadapter) http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/mesa/ mesa is build with llvm-3.8.0 (skylake patch) Fixes all my serious problems by use kernel 4.6.RC7, private only here.. wine - easy build to 1.9.9 all in once 64 + 32 http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/wine/ Sincerely Andy PS: mesa rebuild needs --enblerepo cms4all-drivers,cms4all-llvm (libdrm 2.6.8 /cmake) http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/llvm/ [cms4all-llvm] name=cms4all-llvm baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/llvm/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 [cms4all-drivers] name=cms4all-drivers baseurl=http://centos.cms4all.org/centos/7/drivers/ gpgcheck=0 enabled=0 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test - please ignore
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test. Do Not Respond
On my mail list servers this is good enough reason for banning from any subscriptions... On Wed, April 22, 2015 10:35 pm, Chris Weisiger wrote: ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test. Do Not Respond
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test, and H/W
Hi, folks, This is a test post; to make it of interest, here's an issue you might want to be aware of, those with not brand new hardware. We've got a few Dell PE R415s. A 2TB b/u drive on one was getting full, so I went to replace it with a 3TB drive (a WD Red, not that it matters.) We got the system in '11. I built the drive - a GPT, 1 3TB partition, on an R320, from '12. smartctl understood it perfectly well. Anything else, not so much. parted *crashed* When I managed to force it to see it without crashing - I think I had to create a new GPT, it only saw 2199G. Put the drive back on the other box, parted complained that the backup block wasn't at the end of the disk. I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote, ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r. It likely worked fine in the R320 due to the age difference and the raid controller installed in it, I don't believe firmware updates will make the drive usable or extra space visible to the controller. snip IMPORTANT NOTE! Only the Dell H700 and H800 currently support the 3TB drives (H200 will add support later this year) - NO earlier controllers, such as the PERC4/5/6, SAS5/6 (or ANY other Dell controller not mentioned) have this support and in some cases, even though you may be able to see the drive, this has NOT been tested or validated, so possible data loss could be experienced. ONLY use the Dell H700 and H800 with the proper firmware to ensure a tested and validated 2TB solution! For non-Dell controllers, contact the controller vendor for their support statement on 2TB drives. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W
John R Pierce wrote: On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote, ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r. the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068 stuff was long ago replaced by 2008, 2308, and now 30xx stuff). The SAS 6/iR Dell article I'm looking at is from May 2008. There were no 3TB drives 7 years ago. True. However, vendors will try to sell what systems they have in stock, until they either run out of them, or someone decides they're too old. Plus, I'm 100% sure that a lot of folks here are still running older hardware, just as we are. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test, and H/W
On 2/12/2015 12:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I finally talked to Dell, and was told, and I quote, ... three terabyte drives aren't supported the raid controller installed in this server, the SAS 6 i/r. the SAS 6/iR is a LSI SAS 1068E chip, kind of an old chip (the 1068 stuff was long ago replaced by 2008, 2308, and now 30xx stuff). The SAS 6/iR Dell article I'm looking at is from May 2008. There were no 3TB drives 7 years ago. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CentOS Test Day, Friday Nov 9th 2012
Reminder Date: Friday November 9th, 2012 Time: From 5:00 UTC to 23:00 UTC We would like to invite everyone to come join us in #centos-devel on irc.freenode.net this Friday Nov 9th, 2012 for a CentOS test day. The aim of the exercise is to get more people looking at the tests we already have, running them on their infrastructure and ultimately joining the effort as contributors. You will need a machine instance ( either physical machine, or a VPS or a Cloud Instance or a VM on your machine ); need a VM image ? you can download one from here as prep : http://dev.centos.org/centos/test-images/ - being able to connect to the internet from that machine instance is essential, and as there are quite a few packages installed / uninstalled / cleaned out - a local CentOS mirror would be handy if you are on a slow link to the internet. The tests are mostly written in bash, but you can use any language you like - just grab yourself a gitorious.org account in advance. Knowledge of git helps, but isn't necessary. The test day will run from 05:00 UTC till 23:00 UTC, and there will be a couple of the CentOS QA guys and people who have contributed to the tests already, to help you get started and join the effort. We will have brief, clear instructions on : - Getting a copy of the most current tests - Set them up on your machine instance - Run the tests - Feedback results and recommendations - Templates to write new tests with - Submission process to contribute new tests - Instructions on howto run the tests regularly in the future The Test Day landing page is being setup here : http://wiki.centos.org/QaWiki/TestDay and will be ready by Wednesday Nov 7th, 2012. These tests are important : we run then every time there is a new iso, new image, new updates etc ready to be released by the project. Getting good and widespread coverage of these tests means that we all end up getting more trustworthy updates. See you then! -- Karanbir Singh, The CentOS Project +44-207-0999389 | http://www.centos.org/ | twitter.com/CentOS GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] test
test -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:22:44 + Nux! wrote: test Pieces of Nine! Pieces of Nine! (Parroty Error) -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test
test ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test
mattias jonsson wrote: Failed, please study harder. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test
I'm sorry for the test should not be repeted -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] För Larry Brower Skickat: den 7 juli 2010 02:22 Till: CentOS mailing list Ämne: Re: [CentOS] test mattias jonsson wrote: Failed, please study harder. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test
testing mail delivery ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test
Janez Kosmrlj wrote: testing mail delivery deliver failure: 550 Administrative Prohibition ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test - please ignore
Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore
Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Regards, Vandaman. --- Your average reporting time for spam is: 5 hours; Great! noob detector - 3 noobs top posting. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore
On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was OK. Sorry to have bothered you all. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore
Anne Wilson a écrit : On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was OK. Sorry to have bothered you all. but that was a lazy test, wasn't it? instead of Test - please ignore, you could have said Happy ymas (or the like) and nobody would have known that you were testing :) best wishes and all that stuff... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Test - please ignore
On Friday 02 January 2009 22:28:50 mouss wrote: Anne Wilson a écrit : On Friday 02 January 2009 13:04:45 Vandaman wrote: Anne Wilson wrote: blank Hi, Welcome to CentOS. What can we do you for? Hi, Vandaman. I had just made changes to my procmail system and needed a test. CentOS is the last filter, so if that worked correctly I knew I was OK. Sorry to have bothered you all. but that was a lazy test, wasn't it? instead of Test - please ignore, you could have said Happy ymas (or the like) and nobody would have known that you were testing :) best wishes and all that stuff... :-) Yup - all that stuff to you too :-) Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Test - you don't need to read it
-- -- Open Kairos http://www.openkairos.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com Sergio Belkin - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test
hello everyone, i just signed up onto the mailing list, testing. nice to meet you all! JC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] test
J C wrote: hello everyone, i just signed up onto the mailing list, testing. nice to meet you all! JC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos got it :) -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers CEO, SoftDux Web: http://www.SoftDux.com Check out my technical blog, http://blog.softdux.com for Linux or other technical stuff, or visit http://www.WebHostingTalk.co.za for Web Hosting stugg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] test
Please excuse me. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos