On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 02:09 +0100, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
the question. RHEL 4 updates must be
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:11 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is
...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise
operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers.
RHEL is, of course, the better alternative when you require the upstream
vendor's certified platform, certified and tested integrated solutions,
industry-leading support,
On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise
operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers.
Wow, what a great post.
Thanks Carl, very cool.
Hope you aren't retiring any time soon, I see too many barnies in
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Apr 12, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Cal Webster wrote:
...based on my experience, for use in all non-certified enterprise
operations (large and small) on general-purpose computers.
Wow, what a great post.
Thanks Carl, very cool.
Cal Webster wrote:
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 14:08 -0700, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for letting me know someone read it Aurf. If I've helped
encourage even one I'm happy.
I also read it, and even it's 01h after too long day, now I found it
interesting to read and fine praise for CentOS
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
the question. RHEL 4 updates must be painstakingly retrieved manually,
one at a time, on the Internet
On Apr 12, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Christopher J. Buckley wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 21:43, Cal Webster cwebs...@ec.rr.com wrote:
Also, the upstream vendor provides no economical
way to mirror RHEL updates on isolated networks - Satellite is out of
the question. RHEL 4 updates must be
9 matches
Mail list logo
