-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: den 11 maj 2015 07:49
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
Main Config:
Schedule:
FullPeriod: 27.9
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 11 maj 2015 08:19
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
How did you get away
On 5/10/2015 11:57 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
expletive. Why can't everybody follow the standards and use a comma when
writing decimals.
our standard is a .
comma is a 1000s seperator.
thats the best part about standards, there are so many to choose from!!
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 11 maj 2015 09:25
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
On 5/10/2015 11:57 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
expletive. Why can't
On 5/10/2015 11:03 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
How did you get away with using 27,9 on Fullperiod?8-)
I'm seeing Error: No save due to errors and Error: FullPeriod must be a
real-valued number, unless I change the value to e.g. 27.
This is on BPC v3.2.1.
27.9 not 27,9 (point, not comma).
--
On 7/5/2015 5:01 μμ, Robert Nichols wrote:
I use rdiff-backup, but I hesitate to recommend a tool that has been
unsupported for over 6 years and does have quite a few bugs.
I have had good experience with mondrescue (mondoarchive, mondorestore)
for years. It's a free, active project.
See:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 8 maj 2015 17:12
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
On 5/7/2015 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
May I ask what your
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 7 maj 2015 19:09
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has been more
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Timothy Murphy
Sent: den 7 maj 2015 23:21
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backup PC or other solution
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable
On 5/7/2015 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
May I ask what your settings are to achieve that retention rate?
there's a lot of settings... but these are probably applicable...
Main Config:
Schedule:
FullPeriod: 27.9
FullKeepCnt: 24
FullKeepCntMin: 8
FullAgeMax: 360
On May 8, 2015, at 10:24 AM, James B. Byrne byrn...@harte-lyne.ca wrote:
If a project is backed/picked up by a corporation, say Redhat or
Oracle, or a foundation, say Apache or LibreOffice, then it may have a
future more or less independent of any single individual or group.
Commercial
On Fri, May 8, 2015 07:59, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Yeah, well, but it's free.
I'm not sure you can complain too much in that case. 8-)
I find this comment, often made, completely unacceptable.
The implication is that inferior code is OK
if the developer is not being paid.
On 5/8/2015 10:40 AM, Warren Young wrote:
- Adobe’s killed off dozens of products over the years. FrameMaker ...
Frame isn't dead, my wife is a technical writer in the EDA (electronic
design automation) business, and thats about all they use.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa
On May 8, 2015, at 12:02 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 5/8/2015 10:40 AM, Warren Young wrote:
- Adobe’s killed off dozens of products over the years. FrameMaker ...
Frame isn't dead
When I think of FrameMaker, I think of the program that started out on Solaris,
then
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:59:12PM +0200, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable to read 4 bytes, which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync protocol message,
Sorin Srbu wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable to read 4 bytes, which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync protocol message, and yeah, debugging
connection/authentication issues is a bit ugly.
On 5/8/2015 12:47 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On May 8, 2015, at 12:02 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 5/8/2015 10:40 AM, Warren Young wrote:
- Adobe’s killed off dozens of products over the years. FrameMaker ...
Frame isn't dead
When I think of FrameMaker, I think of the
Am 07.05.2015 um 08:35 schrieb Michael Schumacher michael.schumac...@pamas.de:
Everybody has its favorite backup program, but why rely on only one system?
I have to backup 8 servers and use three backup systems in parallel.
-- BackupPC. Easy to use, nice user interface with graphical
Il 07/05/2015 11:24, Marcin Trendota ha scritto:
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 21:21, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
What do you mean about Backup PC?
Any experiences?
What solution do you use?
BackupPC is good, howewer it's a pity you can't search for a file in
GUI. But it works well, i'm backing up 32
I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines
browsable directories with multiple versions - the version data is
stored in a separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
One downside is that rdiff-backup causes a lot of network traffic. For
that reason I
Il 07/05/2015 00:47, John R Pierce ha scritto:
On 5/6/2015 1:34 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
My assistant liked backuppc. It is OK and will do decent job for really
small number of machines (thinking 3-4 IMHO). I run bacula which has
close
to a hundred of clients; all is stored in files on RAID
Hello Alessandro,
Wednesday, May 6, 2015, 9:21:10 PM, you wrote:
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
work.
Everybody has its favorite backup program, but why rely on only one system?
I have to backup 8 servers and use three backup systems in parallel.
W dniu 06.05.2015 o 21:21, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
What do you mean about Backup PC?
Any experiences?
What solution do you use?
BackupPC is good, howewer it's a pity you can't search for a file in
GUI. But it works well, i'm backing up 32 hosts (servers, desktops).
Can somebody tell me why
W dniu 07.05.2015 o 11:46, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
I don't know why and don't know if in previous CentOS releases was
included.
It is in EPEL.
BackupPC is available for C7 from nux repo, but this is an external repo.
Good enough, thanks for info.
--
Over And Out
MoonWolf
On 5/7/2015 2:21 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable to read 4 bytes, which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync
On May 7, 2015 6:05 AM, Jussi Hirvi greens...@greenspot.fi wrote:
I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines browsable
directories with multiple versions - the version data is stored in a
separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
One downside is that
On 05/07/2015 05:04 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
I wonder why nobody has yet mentioned rdiff-backup. It combines
browsable directories with multiple versions - the version data is
stored in a separate rdiff-backup-data subdirectory (one per backup task).
I use rdiff-backup, but I hesitate to
John R Pierce wrote:
On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable to read 4 bytes, which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync protocol message, and yeah, debugging
On 7.5.2015 14.24, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
I admit one think it does miss is having a convenient way to look for
a file, specially if you physically rotate drives. If rdiff-backup
will tell when was the last time a file has been backed up/touched
even if drive with said file is not mounted, I
--On Thursday, May 07, 2015 06:41:03 PM +0300 Jussi Hirvi
greens...@greenspot.fi wrote:
But why rotate drives? Big drives are not very expensive nowadays.
1. Redundant copies.
2. Sometimes your filesystems are larger than the largest drives.
For example, I'm currently seting up backups
On 2015-05-06, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
This sounds like Apple borrowed your idea for their time machine (I bet
you are doing it for much-much linger than Apple time machine exists)!
rsnapshot has been using rsync with hard links for ages.
http://rsnapshot.org/
--keith
Il 07/05/2015 11:55, Marcin Trendota ha scritto:
W dniu 07.05.2015 o 11:46, Alessandro Baggi pisze:
I don't know why and don't know if in previous CentOS releases was
included.
It is in EPEL.
BackupPC is available for C7 from nux repo, but this is an external repo.
Good enough, thanks
On 5/7/2015 4:56 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
The worst thing about BackupPC is the insane error message
Unable to read 4 bytes, which comes up if anything is wrong.
Possibly the worst error message anywhere?
thats an rsync protocol message, and yeah, debugging
connection/authentication issues
On 5/6/2015 11:23 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
when disk is filled, on bacula we can recycle disk volumes. What's for
BackupPC? There is automatic backup deletion over retention time?
my year of monthlies and month of dailies of 25 servers has been more or
less constant size for a year or two
Geenhuizen wrote:
I’ve been using BackupPC for several years for my 10 hosts, and works
extremely well, however it can take a lot of disk space, so I’d recommend
a dedicated drive for the backups.
I've been running BackupPC on two home servers (in different places)
running CentOS for many
On 5/6/2015 1:34 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
My assistant liked backuppc. It is OK and will do decent job for really
small number of machines (thinking 3-4 IMHO). I run bacula which has close
to a hundred of clients; all is stored in files on RAID units, no tapes.
Once you configure it it is nice.
On 6 May 2015 at 22:49, J Martin Rushton martinrushto...@btinternet.com wrote:
Don't dismiss Amanda it works well in a disk based setup. I don't
bother with the spooling disk though. I back up to virtual tape slots
on an external disk and rotate three external disks; two are in the
firesafe
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are
too tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more
complex.
I need a
On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:27 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they
are
too tape oriented. Another is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Don't dismiss Amanda it works well in a disk based setup. I don't
bother with the spooling disk though. I back up to virtual tape slots
on an external disk and rotate three external disks; two are in the
firesafe at work, one is on top of my PC.
On
On May 6, 2015, at 9:46 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull
On Wed, May 6, 2015 2:46 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
this
work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are
too
tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more complex. I
need a solution for small office for
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 3:27 pm, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish
this work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they
are too tape
I list,
I'm new with backup ops and I'm searching a good system to accomplish this
work. I know that on centos there are bacula and amanda but they are too
tape oriented. Another is that they are very powerfull but more complex. I
need a solution for small office for disk storage and I found
45 matches
Mail list logo
