Re: [CentOS] Bonding two network cards
On Jan 30, 2008 3:35 AM, Joseph L. Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Try the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces Is it ok to leave the hwaddress in the eth(n) files to make sure they are used explicitely as intended in the event other cards are added? In my experience it is ok. Regards, Tim -- Tim Verhoeven - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 0479 / 88 11 83 Hoping the problem magically goes away by ignoring it is the microsoft approach to programming and should never be allowed. (Linus Torvalds) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bonding two network cards
Joseph L. Casale wrote: I am searching the net for instructions on how to do this in CentOS 5.1 but am not 100% sure I am finding a reliable doc. I am doing this remotely and don't have much room for error:) Can anyone point me along here? Thanks! jlc Try the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces -- Jay Leafey - Memphis, TN [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Bonding two network cards
Try the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces Sorry guys, changed my Google search and went straight to it! It's fairly elaborate, exactly what I was looking for! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Bonding two network cards
Try the wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/BondingInterfaces Is it ok to leave the hwaddress in the eth(n) files to make sure they are used explicitely as intended in the event other cards are added? Thanks! jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
