Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Robert
On 05/29/2010 04:36 PM, Robert informed us: On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us: Robert wrote: Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread MHR
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies.  Mail, preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested.  And email address

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
MHR wrote: On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Robertkerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: O.K., errands finished, the rebuilt rpm installed using yum --nogpgcheck localupdate /path/to/rpm with no problems, no dependencies. Mail, preferences, plugins and helpers work as far as I've tested. And email

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-30 Thread Robert
dependencies, they'll get pulled in from trusted repos. I'll admit that that is probably unlikely with an updated CentOS 5 and Seamonkey, but having been burned really bad, trying to cram CUPS into RedHat 7.2, I try to avoid tarballs unless they're part of a well-documented procedure

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-29 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Robert wrote: Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I rebuilt it for x86_64. The SRPM initially came from a link on the seamonkey web

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-29 Thread Robert
On 05/29/2010 03:35 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg informed us: Robert wrote: Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I

[CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Robert
Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm, downloaded and got

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread MHR
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)?  I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I found  seamonkey-2.0.4

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Ramon Nieto
Pointers, clues, URLs and remarks about my sanity are equally welcome at this point. This link can be helpful: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2010-April/006998.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread Robert
On 05/28/2010 01:35 PM, MHR informed us: On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Robertkerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5 and seamonkey

2010-05-28 Thread MHR
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Robert kerp...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Yeah, I've been to mozilla.org a couple times today, but I have tried to avoid installing from a tarball.  I'm paranoid enough about installing from 3rd party RPM repos. Well, okay, but if you trust their product and you