Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha
scritto:
Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905
Regards,
Dennis
Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905:
Brian Foster 2013-01-08 10:28:08 EST
The current consensus for this bug is
On 01/18/2013 11:28 AM, thus Dario Lesca spake:
Il giorno gio, 17/01/2013 alle 13.09 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn ha
scritto:
Looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883905
Regards, Dennis
Ok, Then solution, after read this from bug 883905:
Brian Foster 2013-01-08
Il giorno ven, 18/01/2013 alle 11.33 +0100, Timo Schoeler ha scritto:
Ignoring it, because it doesn't hurt?
Ignoring the load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00 because is only a errata
display of load average and the real average is 0,03, 0,03, 0,00?
--
Dario Lesca - sip:da...@solinos.it
(Inviato dal
Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load
average value:
w command:
[root@s-doc ~]# w
11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU WHAT
root pts/2dodo:S.0 11:15
On 01/17/2013 12:17 PM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Hi, on my c6.3 server (guest of a vmware host) I have a strange load
average value:
w command:
[root@s-doc ~]# w
11:19:23 up 41 days, 23:15, 1 user, load average: 4,03, 4,03, 4,00
USER TTY FROM LOGIN@ IDLE JCPU PCPU
5 matches
Mail list logo