On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I
am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA.
But, I personally work try to move to EL7 for machines
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am
On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I
am not giving up hope, just working with legal issues is quite a PITA.
But, I
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I
am not giving up hope, just working with legal
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny,
Should we give up hope on this issue?
After 7.1 is released, I will try again to get permission to do this. I
am not giving up hope, just working with legal
-
From: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Monday, 16 March, 2015 15:19:29
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/16/2015 09:38 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
Johnny
Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Phelps, Matthew mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu
:
Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Phelps, Matthew mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu
:
Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community
would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is
Johnny,
Any new information here?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:10 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:26 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Phelps, Matthew mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu:
Any new information here?
maybe some cooperation with the fedora community
would help to share the effort.
Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:51 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium
On 21/01/15 21:12, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 22 januari 2015 18:20
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6
its been withdrawn upstream.
given the level of interest
On Wed, January 21, 2015 3:12 pm, Connie Sieh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23
On 20 January 2015 at 03:44, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:01:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12,
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:01:02PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Johnny,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Johnny,
Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95
cheers
bump
___
CentOS mailing list
Thanks for the status report Johnny.
Is there anyone we can pester (besides you :) )?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On
On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
Johnny,
Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95
cheers
bump
If I could build it, I would. At
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
Johnny,
Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95
cheers
bump
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Johnny,
Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95
cheers
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for
number
On Nov 17, 2014 12:13 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 11/17/2014 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote:
On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
Is it because Adobe said no, or
Am 17.11.2014 um 08:54 schrieb Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I noticed that before chromium-browser-38 (e.g. chromium-31), the browser
was able to find the external flash plugin
On 15 November 2014 16:55, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for
number
keys.
This is a known issue, I will have another
On 11/17/2014 03:41 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 17.11.2014 um 08:54 schrieb Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I noticed that before chromium-browser-38 (e.g. chromium-31), the browser
was able to find the
On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
Is it because Adobe said no, or that you never actually asked?
Because I was OK'd to distribute FlashPlayer (both the ActiveX and
'other browser' Plugin versions) just by filling out a
On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote:
On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
Is it because Adobe said no, or that you never actually asked?
Because I was OK'd to distribute FlashPlayer (both the ActiveX and
'other browser'
On 11/17/2014 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/17/2014 10:05 AM, Darr247 wrote:
On 17 November 2014 @15:19 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
I (we, the CentOS Project) can not distribute flash
Is it because Adobe said no, or that you never actually asked?
Because I was OK'd to distribute
Am 15.11.2014 um 17:55 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
This is a known issue, I will have another version
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I noticed that before chromium-browser-38 (e.g. chromium-31), the browser
was able to find the external flash plugin (/usr/lib64/flash-plugin/...).
I didn't have followed the development but I presume that such
On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
This is a known issue, I will have another version soon (hopefully by
Monday).
There is now a new Chromium pushed:
On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
This is a known issue, I will have another version soon (hopefully by
Monday).
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
snip
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number
keys.
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Cian Mc Govern c...@cianmcgovern.com
wrote:
On 8 November 2014 13:52, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 11/07/2014 01:20
On 8 November 2014 13:52, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu,
On 11/08/2014 01:48 PM, Steve Brooks wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Steve Brooks wrote:
I installed from the repo given here a month ago and it works fine. I
something wrong with this google repo? Should I remove and reinstall
from the new one given here on this list?
Correction this is the
On 08 November 2014 @19:48 zulu, Steve Brooks wrote:
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Steve Brooks wrote:
I installed from the repo given here a month ago and it works fine. I
something wrong with this google repo? Should I remove and reinstall
from the new one given here on this list?
Correction this
On 11/10/2014 03:43 AM, Darr247 wrote:
The only way that would work for C6 is if the script from Richard Lloyd,
or similar, is used to segregate newer libraries from f15 and f17 into
e.g. /opt/google/chrome/lib so versions of Chrome newer than v27 will
install and run on C6, but other programs
On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu,
Am 08.11.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
OK new version posted.
This uses the centos-6 testing key and is available here:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
The repo file is here:
http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/chromium-el6.repo
This
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Is there some way we might utilize social media to help them
understand the demand?
I installed from the repo
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Steve Brooks wrote:
I installed from the repo given here a month ago and it works fine. I
something wrong with this google repo? Should I remove and reinstall from the
new one given here on this list?
Correction this is the repo file
[google-chrome]
name=google-chrome
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster
leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
BTW:
On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Is there some way we might utilize social media to help them
understand the demand?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
On Fri, November 7, 2014 2:44 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Is there some way we might utilize social media to help them
understand the demand?
This is a
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
On Fri, November 7, 2014 2:44 pm, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am sorry, but Google is not interested in supporting CentOS.
Is there some way we
I know you've been busy, but is there any update on this?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I found this bug fix report
http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
I thought we were not able to get Chromium
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Phelps, Matthew mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu
wrote:
I know you've been busy, but is there any update on this?
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I found this bug fix report
Am 14.10.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I found this bug fix report
http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks like
the work has been already done.
Is it
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 14.10.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I found this bug fix report
http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
I thought we were not able to
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official
supplementary ones from RH?
In other words, were they
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are there any differences between how these rpms
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
BTW:
http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/
Are
Am 06.11.2014 um 23:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I found this bug fix report
http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks like
the work has been already done.
Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would be a
wonderful addition to CentOS 6. Please and thank
On 10/14/2014 01:29 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
I found this bug fix report
http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/
I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks like
the work has been already done.
Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would
62 matches
Mail list logo
