> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter
>
> Anyways, the vendor is also free to support
> whatever OS they want, and you're free to choose not to use their
> software.
Except when you're not. Because for whatever reason, the choice of software you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/13/2015 09:17 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> In my experience software compiled for RHEL "just work" with Centos
> and I don't remember any case where it didn't. I have however heard
> whisperings on a grapevine that RH may want to try and make futur
In my experience software compiled for RHEL "just work" with Centos and I
don't remember any case where it didn't. I have however heard whisperings
on a grapevine that RH may want to try and make future versions of Centos
slightly incompatible with RHEL but these are probably just whisperings.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/11/15 15:17, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
>> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
>> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Devin Reade
>>
>> The above answer is right-on. From a technical perspective, you
>> can probably expect the
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Devin Reade
>
> The above answer is right-on. From a technical perspective, you can
> probably expect the 3rd party software to work exactly the same on
> RHEL and CentOS (barring some implausible edge cases), how
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
Thanks for the explanation. Of course what I want to do is evaluate centos
fitness for our purposes, without the effort of evaluating all the changelogs,
and I think this answer is the best possible
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Peter
>
> You can see better details of what has been changed by looking at the
> changelog for a particular package. CentOS changes will be at the top
> of the changelog, so again using httpd as an example:
> $rp
--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:53:20 PM -0800 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
That depends on what you mean by "support."
It's almost certainly possible to run the binaries on CentOS, but if you
need any technical support from the vendor of that application, they
might not provide it. Your first s
On 11/10/2015 02:03 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
> At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS,
> but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL,
> in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of
On 11/10/2015 12:03 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS,
but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL,
in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of
RH
On 11/11/2015 09:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote:
> At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a
> supported OS, but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference
> between Centos and RHEL, in order to claim (or not) that we can
> support our users on Centos instead of
At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS,
but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL,
in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of
RHEL.
I see the release notes, that say "Packages modified by
12 matches
Mail list logo