On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:11:35PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
This is one the major issues with the Linux process these days, as you move
from kernel to kernel there is almost zero assurance of driver abi/api
stability - and that in turn creates a situation like this wherein one
kernel
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:06:03PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/693896
http://pastebin.ca/693905
As you have already pointed out in this email, yes - the installtime kernel
does see the drives fine.
Thanks for your help, I appreciate it!
-chuck
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 08:10:32PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
If you want to keep the driver in-place even when the kernel updates, you
might want to investigate the weak-updates process and how you might get
a driver included into that. Pretty much everything you
Chuck Campbell wrote:
how exactly where you planning on managing out-of-tree kernel drivers
otherwise ?
I've no idea... I've never had to deal with this before, so I didn't
even understand this could be an issue.
This is one the major issues with the Linux process these days, as you move
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:37:05PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
Bothe kernels see the card though (looking in /var/log/messages after boot.
Can you post the output from 'dmesg; lsmod; lspci -n' booting the
installtime kernel at http://pastebin.ca/ and post the url to
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:19:07PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
If you want to keep the driver in-place even when the kernel updates, you
might want to investigate the weak-updates process and how you might get a
driver included into that. Pretty much everything you need to make it
happen
Chuck Campbell wrote:
http://pastebin.ca/693896
http://pastebin.ca/693905
As you have already pointed out in this email, yes - the installtime kernel does
see the drives fine.
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Chuck Campbell wrote:
If you want to keep the driver in-place even when the kernel updates, you
might want to investigate the weak-updates process and how you might get a
driver included into that. Pretty much everything you need to make it
happen would be on the system already.
Where do I
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 01:07:50PM -0700, mark pryor wrote:
This is what you said in the OP
quote
The intent is to install the OS onto the 2-320GB drives on the motherboard
controller (preferrably in a raid 1 configuration). The other disks are for
our data requirements.
/quote
Chuck Campbell wrote:
Unfortunately I can't see my 3ware raid arrays now... I'm getting a bit
frustrated.
Are you using a 3ware-96xx card that you need a driver disk ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing
Chuck Campbell wrote:
The system now boots, so I ran a yum update, which updated 156 packages.
The kernel was updated too, so I set it up to boot the new xen kernel.
Depending on the way your Driverdisk is setup - it would have only installed the
drivers for the kernel you installed
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:19:07PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
The system now boots, so I ran a yum update, which updated 156 packages.
The kernel was updated too, so I set it up to boot the new xen kernel.
Depending on the way your Driverdisk is setup - it would have
Chuck Campbell wrote:
Bothe kernels see the card though (looking in /var/log/messages after boot.
Can you post the output from 'dmesg; lsmod; lspci -n' booting the installtime
kernel at http://pastebin.ca/ and post the url to that here..
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:32:55PM -0700, mark pryor wrote:
Chuck Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a new machine I'm trying to
install Centos 5.0 on and I'm not getting
very far.
Chuck,
I'm suprised that the raid array wasn't named as
/dev/mapper/isw_xxxyyyxxx
raid arrays
Chuck Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:32:55PM
-0700, mark pryor wrote:
Chuck Campbell wrote: I have a new machine I'm trying to install Centos 5.0
on and I'm not getting
very far.
Chuck,
I'm suprised that the raid array wasn't named as
I have a new machine I'm trying to install Centos 5.0 on and I'm not getting
very far.
The system is 2 dual core xeons (5160, 3.0 GHZ) w/ 8GB ram. It has two
320 GB disks on the motherboard controller (Supermicro X7DAE+), and 8 750
GB disks on a 3ware 9650SE-8ml, pcie (x4) controller card. The
Chuck Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a new machine I'm trying to
install Centos 5.0 on and I'm not getting
very far.
The system is 2 dual core xeons (5160, 3.0 GHZ) w/ 8GB ram. It has two
320 GB disks on the motherboard controller (Supermicro X7DAE+), and 8 750
GB disks on a 3ware
17 matches
Mail list logo
