Hi,
> I guess you'll find I lot of old-schoolers among those still using CentOS
> 7.
> I've realised I'm one of them, and I'm proud of it :-) Getting to know how
> and
> / or why is how we keep learning instead of just doing. I'm still hoping
> for
> it to become trendy :-D
>
> Have you tried to
I guess you'll find I lot of old-schoolers among those still using CentOS 7.
I've realised I'm one of them, and I'm proud of it :-) Getting to know how and
/ or why is how we keep learning instead of just doing. I'm still hoping for
it to become trendy :-D
Have you tried to see if your
On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
Attached is the console output of when running Firefox.
BTW, for big logs and similar data, I recommend using a pastebin.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
> I did a quick search to see if there were any SQlite related changes to
> 115.6.0; I could find anything. If I understand you correctly, you
> frequently
> generate places.sqlite and push it to the users. Could there be any change
> in
> file format? Some version conflict between the tool you
I did a quick search to see if there were any SQlite related changes to
115.6.0; I could find anything. If I understand you correctly, you frequently
generate places.sqlite and push it to the users. Could there be any change in
file format? Some version conflict between the tool you use to
> The message
> "ATTENTION: default value of option mesa_glthread overridden by
> environment."
> is most likely caused by firefox overriding the env var to _avoid_ a
> crash:
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1744389
> It's an old but unclosed bug, focusing on getting rid of the
The message
"ATTENTION: default value of option mesa_glthread overridden by environment."
is most likely caused by firefox overriding the env var to _avoid_ a crash:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1744389
It's an old but unclosed bug, focusing on getting rid of the warning, so
> The first lines ("... No marshaller ...") I see on my terminal too, with a
> working firefox. I has been that way for I don't know how long (_many_
> releases).
> In addition I get repeated output of this line:
> "firefox:): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: HH:MM:SS.NNN: g_object_ref:
> assertion
The first lines ("... No marshaller ...") I see on my terminal too, with a
working firefox. I has been that way for I don't know how long (_many_
releases).
In addition I get repeated output of this line:
"firefox:): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: HH:MM:SS.NNN: g_object_ref:
assertion
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 06:47:54PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
> ..
>> Yes I do see the same issue after upgrading to
>> firefox-115.6.0-1.el7.centos.
>>
>> It's just unusable now, don't understand how this got released :(
>
> It is working fine for us
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 06:47:54PM +0100, Simon Matter wrote:
..
> Yes I do see the same issue after upgrading to firefox-115.6.0-1.el7.centos.
>
> It's just unusable now, don't understand how this got released :(
It is working fine for us (firefox-115.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64).
Maybe you
The list seems to strip even text files. Here it is:
$ firefox
[Parent 3932877, Main Thread] WARNING: No marshaller for signature of signal
'PropertiesChanged': 'glib warning', file
/builddir/build/BUILD/firefox-115.6.0/toolkit/xre/nsSigHandlers.cpp:167
** (firefox:3932877): WARNING **:
My console output has never been that quiet :-)
Maybe you forgot the attachment, Simon?
Regards, Christer
On Thursday 18 January 2024 19:06:10 Simon Matter wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
> >> was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to
> Hi,
>
>> I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
>> was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to downgrade to the previous
>> version because the latest version keeps crashing. Anyone else
>> experience this?
>>
>
> Yes I do see the same issue after upgrading to
>
Hi,
> I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
> was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to downgrade to the previous
> version because the latest version keeps crashing. Anyone else
> experience this?
>
Yes I do see the same issue after upgrading to
Correction: The upgrade version that crashes is 115.6.0-1.el7
>The version I downgraded to is 102.15.0.
>The upgrade that crashes I believe is 115.15.0.
>This is on an x_86-64 machine.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
m wrote:
> -From: "wwp"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday January 15 2024 9:19:02AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Latest firefox upgrade crashes
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:16:02 + jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
> > I'm still u
-From: "wwp"
To: centos@centos.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday January 15 2024 9:19:02AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Latest firefox upgrade crashes
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:16:02 + jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
> I'm still using Cent
-From: "Richard"
*
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Cc:
Sent: Monday January 15 2024 8:04:25AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Latest firefox upgrade crashes
> Date: Monday, January 15, 2024 15:16:02 +
> From: jefflp.
Hi Jeff,
On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:16:02 + jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
> I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
> was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to downgrade to the previous
> version because the latest version keeps crashing. Anyone else
> experience this?
> Date: Monday, January 15, 2024 15:16:02 +
> From: jefflp...@twc.com
>
> I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
> was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to downgrade to the previous
> version because the latest version keeps crashing. Anyone else
> experience
I'm still using CentOS 7 (because the stream sucks). Recently there
was a yum upgrade for firefox. I had to downgrade to the previous
version because the latest version keeps crashing. Anyone else
experience this?
___
CentOS mailing list
22 matches
Mail list logo
