This now mysteriously resolved after both servers have rebooted.
The long delay is due to the importance of high availability over the nfs links.
Mike Yates
Hawkgrove Ltd - Software Systems Design
2, The Business Courtyard, Marl Pits Lane, Trudoxhill, Frome, Somerset, BA11
5DL, UK
+44 (0)1373
Hi James
Please reply to me as well as the list as I only get the digest.
You wrote
What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ?
at present:-
#/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash)
/data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none)
/backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash)
What happens if
Mike Yates wrote:
What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ?
at present:-
#/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash)
/data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none)
/backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash)
Can 'hs8' resolve 'hs6' to 172.26.0.6 ??
In your previous post you
+
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?
Mike Yates wrote:
What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ?
at present:-
#/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash)
/data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none)
/backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash)
Can
Hi
I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares.
I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos version
upgrade.
I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs
I have:-
[r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v
mount: no type was given - I'll
Mike Yates wrote:
Hi
I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares.
I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos
version upgrade.
I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs
I have:-
[r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v
mount:
6 matches
Mail list logo