Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-12-07 Thread Mike Yates
This now mysteriously resolved after both servers have rebooted. The long delay is due to the importance of high availability over the nfs links. Mike Yates Hawkgrove Ltd - Software Systems Design 2, The Business Courtyard, Marl Pits Lane, Trudoxhill, Frome, Somerset, BA11 5DL, UK +44 (0)1373

Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-12-01 Thread Mike Yates
Hi James Please reply to me as well as the list as I only get the digest. You wrote What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ? at present:- #/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash) /data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none) /backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash) What happens if

Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-12-01 Thread James Pearson
Mike Yates wrote: What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ? at present:- #/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash) /data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none) /backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash) Can 'hs8' resolve 'hs6' to 172.26.0.6 ?? In your previous post you

Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-12-01 Thread Mike Yates
+ Subject: Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements? Mike Yates wrote: What is the contents of /etc/exports on 'hs8' ? at present:- #/data 172.26.0.6(rw,no_root_squash) /data hs6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash,sec=none) /backup 172.26.0.6(rw,sync,mp,no_root_squash) Can

[CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-11-30 Thread Mike Yates
Hi I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares. I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos version upgrade. I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs I have:- [r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v mount: no type was given - I'll

Re: [CentOS] NFS new security requirements?

2009-11-30 Thread James Pearson
Mike Yates wrote: Hi I've suddenly lost access to some permanent cross-server shares. I think this was following the Nov 5 new kernel, rather than the Centos version upgrade. I don't see any difference to man mount.nfs I have:- [r...@hs6 ~]# mount hs8:/data /sysback/hs8-data -v mount: