[CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Fajar Priyanto
Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
Hi, ext3 is very reliable, i never had such issues (fsck after a power failure, yes... but no data loss). so i whould say its a hardware issue. Greetings On 08/12/2010 10:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Eero Volotinen
2010/8/12 Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread John Doe
From: Fajar Priyanto fajar...@arinet.org Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That thing happened for years and it was fine

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:55:29 +0800 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite debate or something, just want to share experience and a little curiosity. Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Lamar Owen
On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:55:29 am Fajar Priyanto wrote: Back long time ago, we have an old file MS W2K (NTFS) server where due no admin was available to manage it, the server would get power off when the office closed, and auto power on again in the morning. That thing happened for

Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue?

2010-08-12 Thread Keith Roberts
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Benjamin Franz wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: Benjamin Franz jfr...@freerun.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] NTFS is more resilient than ext3? Or is it hardware issue? On 08/12/2010 01:55 AM, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Hi guys, I don't mean to incite