Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-24 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article 50117.213.157.4.156.1314117697.squir...@nimrod.dscd.de, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: I removed sendmail - but it also removed

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On 22 August 2011 19:45, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Anne alternatives --config mta Switch to Postfix. Validate by alternatives --display mta then remove Sendmail if you do not use it. Thanks - that's what I was looking for. alternatives --display mta mta - status is

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On 23 August 2011 07:47, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 August 2011 19:45, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Anne alternatives --config mta Switch to Postfix. Validate by alternatives --display mta then remove Sendmail if you do not use it. Thanks -

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Fajar Priyanto
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: Aug 22 14:02:11 borg postfix/qmgr[1499]: B4693A377C: from=a...@borg.xxx.lan, size=7487, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=a...@xxx.org,

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway. I removed

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum install postfix

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On 23/08/2011 11:46, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: One of the first things I do after the

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On 23 August 2011 10:46, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote: In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de wrote: One of the first

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Scott Robbins
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: On 23/08/2011 11:46, Tony Mountifield wrote: Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/23/11 3:51 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, xxx.lan, xxx.org This morning I restored the old main.cf, which uses the old network settings of xxx.net. Now mail is being received, but sending mail is being refused by my server. I have

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Anne Wilson
On Tuesday 23 Aug 2011 Les Mikesell wrote: On 8/23/11 3:51 AM, Anne Wilson wrote: mydestination = $myhostname, localhost.$mydomain, $mydomain, xxx.lan, xxx.org This morning I restored the old main.cf, which uses the old network settings of xxx.net. Now mail is being received, but

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Rob Kampen
Anne Wilson wrote: On 23 August 2011 10:46, Tony Mountifield t...@softins.co.uk wrote: In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: On 22 August 2011 20:50, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn denni...@conversis.de

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/23/2011 4:46 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I aborted. Advice? milters are specific to sendmail. clamav-milter is a linkage between ClamAV and

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Alexander Dalloz
In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried to re-install clamav-milter it would have pulled sendmail back in so I aborted. Advice?

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-23 Thread Craig White
On Aug 23, 2011, at 9:41 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: In article cajfu-f7ncz+iamxzg5rq0vzaelctbcncnfysyykaapxw5ce...@mail.gmail.com, Anne Wilson cannewil...@googlemail.com wrote: I removed sendmail - but it also removed clamav-milter. When I tried to re-install clamav-milter it would have

[CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Anne Wilson
Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases, I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP is rejecting the mail because it is seeing an envelope carrying

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 12:49:21 Anne Wilson wrote: Although I have the alias defined in /etc/aliases and /etc/postfix/aliases, I'm not receiving root mail. Following the previous thread about unreceived logwatch mail, I tested with a manual run of logwatch, and found that my ISP is rejecting

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Barry Brimer
a...@.org: host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification failed for a...@xxx.lan 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender: Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command) It looks like your outgoing mail from your local user(s) needs to be masqueraded or

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: a...@.org: host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification failed for a...@xxx.lan 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender: Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command) Once your email is out on

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Brian Mathis
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote: a...@.org: host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification    failed for a...@xxx.lan 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender:    Domain must resolve in DNS! (in reply to RCPT TO command) It looks like

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Scott Robbins
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: a...@.org: host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: 550-Verification failed for a...@xxx.lan 550-Unrouteable address 550 Envelope Sender: Domain must

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote: Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an Internet email address. Exactly - and my problem is knowing where it is getting this from.

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Marc Deop i Argemí
On 22/08/2011 15:29, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 22 Aug 2011 13:12:54 Always Learning wrote: Once your email is out on the Internet is needs a genuine Internet email address. xxx.lan is known only to your internal system and it is not an Internet email address. Exactly - and my problem is

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Philippe Naudin
Le lun 22 aoû 2011 14:29:29 CEST, Anne Wilson a écrit: ... Aug 22 14:02:12 borg postfix/smtp[2071]: B4693A377C: to=a...@xxx.org, relay=mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98]:25, delay=0.43, delays=0.09/0.02/0.15/0.18, dsn=5.0.0, status=bounced (host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said:

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Actually, the main suspect is the program or person that is sending out mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just user. Change it to a qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN). Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Les Mikesell
On 8/22/2011 9:26 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Actually, the main suspect is the program or person that is sending out mail with an unqualified sender, e.g. just user. Change it to a qualified sender (e.g. with a resolvable FQDN). With sendmail you can set 'MASQUERADE_AS' in sendmail.mc to the

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Anne Wilson
On 22/08/2011, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 01:12:54PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 13:07 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: a...@.org: host mailhost.zen.co.uk[212.23.3.98] said: If you're running postfix, you might want to also edit

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Alexander Dalloz
It is obvious you run both Sendmail and Postfix, ending in trouble. The sendmail binary (which is a symlink) still points to Sendmail, though you seem to have configured Postfix as you system's MTA. I have been careful to re-map transports and restart postfix after any changes to the config

Re: [CentOS] Not receiving root mail

2011-08-22 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
One of the first things I do after the installation of a system is a yum install postfix followed by a yum remove sendmail. No need to deal with alternatives if you don't intend to deal with sendmail anyway. Regards. Dennis On 08/22/2011 08:45 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote: It is obvious you