Re: [CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

2009-04-16 Thread Dianne Yumul
Dan Mensom wrote: Does anyone know what these accesses are? snip Also, on a related note, is it normally best practices to 'setenforce 0' during a 5.x upgrade? I also got these type of messages. I just did a yum update from 5.2. Output from audit2allow are as follows: allow useradd_t

[CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

2009-04-13 Thread Dan Mensom
Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly trying to access the rpm database? Here's the audit messages (I tend to look at my selinux messages using audit2allow /var/log/audit.log as I find it

Re: [CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

2009-04-13 Thread D Tucny
2009/4/14 Dan Mensom mensom...@yahoo.com Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly trying to access the rpm database? Here's the audit messages (I tend to look at my selinux messages using

Re: [CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

2009-04-13 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 12:06 +0800, D Tucny wrote: 2009/4/14 Dan Mensom mensom...@yahoo.com Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly

Re: [CentOS] Odd SELinux messages during+after 5.3 upgrade (system_mail_t and postfix_postdrop_t access rpm_var_lib_t)

2009-04-13 Thread D Tucny
2009/4/14 D Tucny d...@tucny.com 2009/4/14 Dan Mensom mensom...@yahoo.com Hey guys, I've been getting some strange selinux messages after the 5.3 upgrade. It appears as though my mail system (postfix) is constantly trying to access the rpm database? Here's the audit messages (I tend to