John Thompson wrote:
On 2007-11-12, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub came up on reboot, suggesting that it did indeed overwrite the lilo
boot record in the MBR, but grub was unable to load completely and
required a
On Nov 13, 2007 5:15 AM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-11-12, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub came up on reboot, suggesting that it did indeed overwrite the lilo
boot record in the MBR, but grub
Johnny Hughes wrote:
John Thompson wrote:
On 2007-11-12, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub came up on reboot, suggesting that it did indeed overwrite the lilo
boot record in the MBR, but grub was unable to load
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-11-09, Garrick Staples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your problem could happen if you installed the boot loader into the
active partition and there is a stale boot loader in the mbr.
I told anaconda to write the
On 2007-11-12, Alain Spineux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 9, 2007 10:55 PM, John Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Grub came up on reboot, suggesting that it did indeed overwrite the lilo
boot record in the MBR, but grub was unable to load completely and
required a hard reset to recover.
John Thompson wrote:
On 2007-11-09, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know...he did say that he restored lilo to get his FC1
installation working again. grub should not have problems picking up its
second stage unless it rests beyond the 1024 cylinder and there is no
LBA
On 2007-11-09, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know...he did say that he restored lilo to get his FC1
installation working again. grub should not have problems picking up its
second stage unless it rests beyond the 1024 cylinder and there is no
LBA support. That leads to
On 2007-11-09, Garrick Staples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think your problem could happen if you installed the boot loader into the
active partition and there is a stale boot loader in the mbr.
I told anaconda to write the boot record onto /dev/hda assuming that
woul put it in the MBR of the
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and lilo
users like me are subscribers. Don't complain about grub. grub
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged:
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list where grub and
Garrick Staples wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:12:33PM -0600, John Thompson alleged:
On 2007-11-07, Christopher Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any clues what I did wrong?
Yes. You placed the kernel on an LVM (grub does not support LVM...at
least not LVM2 IIRC) and then come to this list
That leads to the question, where is the partition for the
/boot for the Centos5 kernels located and is there LBA support in the BIOS?
should have been: where is the partition for the /boot filesystem that
holds the centos5 kernels located...
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
