Greetings,
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
It's going to have an accident, pretty soon, pretty
soon.
Steve
aah!... does anybody smell a BOFH here ;)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/odds/bofh/
Regards,
On 03/31/2010 09:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
...
Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to build up
the new rpms from the deltarpms compared to just downloading the new rpms
as full packages :)
I've noticed that too on my eee 901 with a slow flash disk.
yum remove
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I
I'm not surprised at the delay for RHEL 6. Consider 2.x is still
supported this means they are supporting 4 different RHEL versions right
now. I would actually wait until at least 2.x dies..if not maybe 3.x
before spitting out another version.
On 4/1/2010 7:16 AM, Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On
Am 31.03.2010 18:47, schrieb MHR:
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I didn't see anything jump
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
I guess that they are well informed, so this supports the idea that
Fedora 12 will be the basis for RHEL 6.
[1]
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for
Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was too
conservative, given the somewhat
They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
get into contract liability if they did).
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
RHEL5 will go out of
On 4/1/2010 10:14 AM, R-Elists wrote:
They won't change the cycle for existing releases (they would
get into contract liability if they did).
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May 31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb
On 4/1/2010 9:11 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
Mathieu Baudier a écrit :
Afaik it's based on Fedora 12.
Recent activity on the EPEL repo mailing list [1] seems to indicate
that they plan to branch EPEL-6 packages from Fedora 12.
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was
Niki Kovacs wrote:
Recently a friend of mine complained his Debian stable system was too
conservative, given the somewhat outdated software. I told him not to
mind, since Debian is bleeding edge compared to my OS of choice.
Maybe your friend needs another distro, of course everyone knows
it's
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
How many people got trampled in the rush?
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
on 4-1-2010 6:42 AM Benjamin Franz spake the following:
Mogens Kjaer wrote:
On 03/31/2010 11:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
...
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years,
RHEL2 is already out of support (it was end-of-lifed on May
31, 2009).
RHEL3 will go out of support Oct 31, 2010.
RHEL4 will go out of support Feb 29, 2012
Since the world will end in 2012, your version 5 installs
will be just fine!!!
LOL
Scott,
hehehe, do you mean
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing between releases, skipping a version
On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing
MHR wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:25 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
I *just* finished upgrading to CentOS 5.4 6 days ago.
How many people got trampled in the rush?
You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and
At Thu, 01 Apr 2010 12:29:26 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
On 4/1/2010 12:08 PM, R-Elists wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of
On 4/1/2010 1:35 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
I thought 4 was too buggy compared to 3 and held off
upgrading most machines until 5 was out. In retrospect that
still seems like it was a good move even if most of the
problems in 4 were eventually fixed in updates. But with
many years elapsing
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:44 AM, nate cen...@linuxpowered.net wrote:
You might be surprised how many outages it takes to co-ordinate
such an upgrade in a medium-large environment(and nobody including
me likes to take *everything* down at once though we did have
such an outage a few weeks ago
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Robert Heller hel...@deepsoft.com wrote:
CentOSPlus has the firewire drivers...
I asked about this a little while back, and I'm pretty sure the
firewire drivers are ok in the non-plus CentOS.
Or did I get that one wrong?
mhr
MHR wrote:
but I just don't like to do it. 30 systems? Yoik!
Out of ~300 ..
As for moving from 4 to 5, that's not a trivial thing at all - and
it's not an upgrade per se unless you have LOTS of faith in the
process. I always reinstall across releases, and that's a royal pain
(though
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I didn't see anything jump out at me on the Red Hat site, so -
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
Timo
-BEGIN PGP
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
I didn't think they had, hence no CentOS6.
I have actually just been
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Paul Stuffins
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Release 6?
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope
On 3/31/2010 12:48 PM, Paul Stuffins wrote:
thus Paul Stuffins spake:
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Nope. But it's all over town that Red Hat might conduct one or more
public (!) beta tests of RHEL within the next several weeks (mind Red
Hat Summit in June).
I didn't think they had,
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
At Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:22:05 +0100 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
*I* gave up on Fedora Core after FC2: I installed it on a dual Pentium
Pro 200 box
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
_
I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very well (definite
Paul Stuffins a écrit :
Has RedHat even released RHEL6?
Here's some fresh info:
http://www.serverwatch.com/news/article.php/3873916/Red-Hat-Enterprise-Linux-55-Released-RHEL-6-Coming-Soon.htm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 02:43:38PM -0400, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
_
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
I use F12 on my laptop. I have to say it runs very well (definite
On 3/31/2010 1:58 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and laptop's.
I use F12 on my
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers and Linux
Mint on my desk and
On 3/31/2010 2:19 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:58:25AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Tait Clarridge wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 19:22 +0100, Paul Stuffins wrote:
Has it become usable again?
Not sure, I don't use Fedora, I use CentOS on my servers
A lot of the work after Fedora 6 seemed to revolve around making
single-user desktop type access more convenient at the expense of more
general purpose server concepts - and making it boot quickly which isn't
a big priority on boxes that run all the time. And some things even
when not
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I vaguely recollect that RH mentioned pushing out the (total)
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
We use F12 headless, so I can't comment on desktop issues, but I
really like the deltarpm stuff. It really cuts down on bandwidth
requirements on a frequently updated distro like Fedora.
Yeah.. and with a fast internet connection it takes LONGER to
Spiro Harvey wrote:
Since 5.5 is now out from Red Hat and most likely our amazing CentOS
team has already jumped on that, is there any word on Release 6? IIRC
it's already a year out of date (base was supposed to be Fedora 10),
so I have to wonder.
I vaguely recollect that RH
On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:14 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
It's about time someone did that. I completely gave up on Fedora
after version 6 and unsubscribed from the mail list because they were
only interested in changing things and adding features, not making
anything work. Has it become
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the latest version that
will run on it. And
Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than a
year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse is that
it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this is the
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Milos Blazevic wrote:
I mean, can you imagine anyone who used RHEL 2.1 up until less than
a year ago?
Actually, I still have an RHEL 2.1 system in production. My excuse
is that it is an Itanium I box (an HP I2000), and this
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Milos Blazevic milos.blaze...@sbb.rs wrote:
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for
On 3/31/2010 4:43 PM, Milos Blazevic wrote:
Current RHEL life cycle is in fact 7 years.
Interesting, I remember hearing just the opposite - that they're about
to reduce the life cycle from 7 to 5 years, since allegedly no one uses
the same EL major release for more than 5 years. I mean, can
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:18:17PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
When something works right there's not much need to change it. I still
have an RH 7.3 box running that's had a couple of 4-year uptime spans
I hope there's very little internet exposure on that box; even ssh has had
remote
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
setting up Fedora as servers at work.
Well, I love to make people laugh so I'll chime in here.
I do use Fedora for some hosting, and
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Joseph L. Casale jcas...@activenetwerx.com
wrote:
Well all valid, I always laugh when I see posts in Fedora list about people
setting up Fedora as servers at work.
I can't imagine such a practice. I use at home only on my desktop for the
bleeding
edge
I run Fedora on servers at home without any issues.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote:
If the accident accidentally involves a circular saw, a YouTube link
would be really cool! :-)
You know you use Reddit too much when you look for an upvote button.
;)
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos
53 matches
Mail list logo
