Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-25 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Sorin Srbu wrote: I don't get it... Is the petition CentOS-related?? Ermm, no? Ralph pgpwroDWd2lVZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-25 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Scott Silva Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 5:20 PM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes Lemmings, all of em I don't get it... Is the petition CentOS

[CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-24 Thread Mark Weaver
SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES It does not matter if you personally like or dislike Obama. You need to sign this petition and flood his e-mail box with e-mails that tell him that, even if the House passes this bill, he needs to veto it. It is already impossible to live on Social

Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-24 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Mark Weaver wrote: SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES One strike and yer out. Ralph pgpl5HP4xxTLb.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-24 Thread Scott Silva
on 2-24-2009 6:13 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: Mark Weaver wrote: SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES One strike and yer out. Ralph Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is valid anyway? Nevermind... They can be that stupid! -- MailScanner is like

Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-24 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is valid anyway? How many names were on that list again? It's not scientifically accurate by any stretch, but for the purposes of this demonstration, it'll do

Re: [CentOS] Social Security Changes

2009-02-24 Thread Ross Walker
On Feb 24, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Jim Perrin jper...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: Good! How stupid can people be that think something like this is valid anyway? How many names were on that list again? It's not scientifically