Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: > > > > I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1. > > Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ? > > Both naming schemes are correct, depending

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On Feb 15, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Mike - st257 wrote: > > I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1. > Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ? Both naming schemes are correct, depending on the *type* of USB to serial converter. The difference comes down to a

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On 16/02/16 01:32, Robert Heller wrote: OK, I just tested it: sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce permissive sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo minicom Device /dev/ttyACM0 access failed: No such file or directory. sauron.deepsoft.com% sudo /usr/sbin/setenforce enforcing Nope, that did not

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

I have not yet found a USB-to-serial adapter detected as /dev/ttyACM1. Try /dev/ttyUSB0 ? - Mike On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Robert Heller wrote: > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

At Sun, 14 Feb 2016 19:20:48 -0500 Robert Heller wrote: > > At Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:41:32 +1100 CentOS mailing list > wrote: > > > > > On 14/02/16 02:14, Robert Heller wrote: > > > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On 14/02/16 02:14, Robert Heller wrote: I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. If you suspect SELinux is to blame, have you tried putting SELinux into permissive mode to see that resolves the

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The SELINUX settings for both machines are *exactly* the same (the stock defaults for a standard CentOS 6 install). The *only* difference is that the desktop

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The SELINUX > settings for both machines are *exactly* the same (the stock

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

At Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:14:30 -0500 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > I sent this out about a week or so ago, but I have heard nothing. I am > *thinking* it is a SELINUX problem, but I cannot figure out what. The SELINUX > settings for both machines are *exactly* the same (the

Re: [CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

> OK, I tried rebooting without the '8250.nr_uarts=8' option and that had no > effect. > > I wonder if I should file a bug report? I don't know if I should file it with > the Red Hat bugzilla or the CentOS bugzilla. Should be with the Red Hat, I guess.

[CentOS] USB Serial ports (ttyACMn) CentOS 6.7 (64-bit) vs. CentOS 6.7 (64-bit)

I have two computers: both running CentOS 6.7, 64-bit, with kernel 2.6.32-573.12.1.el6.x86_64. One is a laptop with an 2 core Intel processor and the other is a desktop machine with a 4 core AMD processor. Both with selinux enabled. I have a USB serial port device (a RR-CirKits LCC-Buffer