On Apr 5, 2011, at 4:19 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
But ...
I've been reading about some of the issues with ZFS performance and have
discovered that it needs a *lot* of RAM to support decent caching ...
the recommendation is for a GByte of RAM per TByte of storage just for
the
On Sat, Apr 02, 2011 at 02:13:01PM -0700, John R Pierce spake thusly:
ZFS isn't GPL, therefore can't be integrated into the kernel where a
file system belongs, therefore is pretty much relegated to user space
It can be patched in by the end user. So if someone were to distribute a patch
which
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
You might be asking why I didn't choose to make a ~19 TB RAID-5 volume
for the native 3ware RAID test
That is really a no-brainer.
In the time it takes to re-build such a RAID, another disk might just
fail and the R in RAID goes down the
On 04/05/2011 09:00 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
That is really a no-brainer.
In the time it takes to re-build such a RAID, another disk might just
fail and the R in RAID goes down the toilet. Your 19-disk RAID5 just
got turned into 25kg of scrap-metal.
As for ZFS - we're using it
But ...
I've been reading about some of the issues with ZFS performance and have
discovered that it needs a *lot* of RAM to support decent caching ...
the recommendation is for a GByte of RAM per TByte of storage just for
the metadata, which can add up. Maybe cache memory starvation is one
On Apr 2, 2011, at 5:28 PM, Dawid Horacy Golebiewski
dawid.golebiew...@tu-harburg.de wrote:
I pondered Solaris for some time, but as I do not intend to build the OS
from scratch and nexenta was to GUIed for me I started researching SME.
What puzzled me is the theory and the practice: RAIDz
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
I do want to
use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse
implementation and unclear hints that there is another way.
Here are some benchmark numbers I came up with just a week or two ago.
(View with fixed-width
On 04/04/11 8:09 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
I do want to
use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse
implementation and unclear hints that there is another way.
Here are some benchmark numbers I came up with just a
On 4/4/2011 9:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
try iozone
Maybe on the next server. This one can't be reformatted yet again.
bonnie++
That's what I used. I just reformatted its results for readability.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I have trouble finding definitive information about this. I am considering
the use of SME 7.5.1 (centOS based) for my server needs, but I do want to
use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse
implementation and unclear hints that there is another way. Phoronix
reported
Can so. tell me if fuse-ZFS is more trouble than it's worth?
I've tried both fuse-ZFS, and also zfs installed from rpm's on
zfsonlinux.org. Both on centos 5.5.
fuse-ZFS is more polished, but cut write speeds in half on my raid 5.
I ended up going ext4.
SME Server is great by the way - been
On 04/02/11 1:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
I have trouble finding definitive information about this. I am considering
the use of SME 7.5.1 (centOS based) for my server needs, but I do want to
use ZFS and I thus far I have only found information about the ZFS-Fuse
implementation and
I pondered Solaris for some time, but as I do not intend to build the OS
from scratch and nexenta was to GUIed for me I started researching SME.
What puzzled me is the theory and the practice: RAIDz is the best
solution from a theoretical standpoint (maximum features available) but
still raid
On 04/02/11 2:28 PM, Dawid Horacy Golebiewski wrote:
Opensolaris supposedly stopped last February.
opensolaris has been superceded by openindiana (full distribution) and
illumos (a community developed/supported kernel derived from opensolaris).
14 matches
Mail list logo
