On 02/14/2012 12:59 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
and updates dir for that arch, with the newer
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/14/2012 5:54 PM:
yes it should be udpated.
I was just pointing out that the i386 version you have installed must
have come from extras, since your x86_64 system cannot see the i386
versions available in the base+updates i386 repos that you
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/14/2012 5:59 PM:
BTW: why do you need 32bit perl? Since the package exists and you have
it installed, I guess there must be use-cases... but perl being
interpreted, I'm curious as to what they could be.
I did not install it intentionally. I
Johnny Hughes wrote the following on 2/15/2012 4:39 AM:
I am adding the i386 version of perl to x86_64 extras for c5 now ...
it will go out to the mirrors soon.
I appreciate the help Johnny.
Thanks,
--Blake
___
CentOS mailing list
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
and updates dir for that arch, with the newer version in updates. Same
if you have an
Blake Hudson wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
and updates dir for that arch, with the newer version in updates. Same
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
Blake Hudson wrote:
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
and updates dir for that arch, with the
On 02/14/12 3:59 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
BTW: why do you need 32bit perl? Since the package exists and you have
it installed, I guess there must be use-cases... but perl being
interpreted, I'm curious as to what they could be.
usually in my experience, the requirement for 32 bit perl
I seem to running into the following bug when attempting to perform a
yum update: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5322
I have been skipping perl to move on. However, I am unable to update
perl to the latest i386 release due to what appears to be a mistake in
the centOS repo.
The CentOS
Blake Hudson wrote:
I seem to running into the following bug when attempting to perform a
yum update: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5322
I have been skipping perl to move on. However, I am unable to update
perl to the latest i386 release due to what appears to be a mistake in
the
10 matches
Mail list logo
