Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-23 Thread vychytraly .
n.s...@orgfarm.uu.se> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken > > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14 > > To: centos@centos.org > > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update > &

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-22 Thread Sorin Srbu
> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14 > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update > > On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-22 Thread m . roth
ken wrote: > On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: >> Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies >> there... :) > > Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!  > I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-22 Thread ken
On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote: Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies there... :) Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!  I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about it, I still don't

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread wwp
Hello Peter, On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:39:41 +1300 Peter wrote: > On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote: > Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single > binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't > use that text

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread Peter
On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote: Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer libstdc++). Please

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread wwp
Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:22:19 -0600 Robert Nichols wrote: > On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > > On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> > >> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote: > >> > >>> On

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread Robert Nichols
On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote: On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: There's the unstable version that installs and works: https://www.skype.com/en/insider/

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread Mark LaPierre
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote: > Hello, > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote: > >> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: >>> There's the unstable version that installs and works: >>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ >> >> Thanks for pointing this

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread Peter
On 21/11/17 02:21, milos.blazevic wrote: > Judging by the comments in the original announcement: > https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_linux-skype_startms-skype_installms/the-new-skype-for-desktop-is-here/dba5e41b-126a-4221-9e28-e1266d235689?auth=1 > I'd say yes. > > Sadly, no

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread milos.blazevic
Quoting Peter : On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: There's the unstable version that installs and works: https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-20 Thread wwp
Hello, On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote: > On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: > > There's the unstable version that installs and works: > > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ > > Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer >

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-19 Thread Peter
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote: > There's the unstable version that installs and works: > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/ Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand? Peter

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-19 Thread milos.blazevic
Quoting ken : For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux: Packages skipped because of dependency problems:     skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for package:

Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-19 Thread vychytraly .
Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies there... :) On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:02 PM, ken wrote: > For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux: > > Packages skipped because of dependency problems: >

[CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update

2017-11-18 Thread ken
For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux: Packages skipped because of dependency problems:     skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for package: skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 Is there any