n.s...@orgfarm.uu.se>
wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken
> > Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of ken
> Sent: den 22 november 2017 20:14
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] skypeforlinux lacks dependencies, won't update
>
> On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:
ken wrote:
> On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:
>> Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
>> there... :)
>
> Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!
> I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about
On 11/19/2017 12:53 PM, vychytraly . wrote:
Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
there... :)
Thanks, I didn't know about flatpak... even tho it's in the base repo!
I have to admit though, after reading through the flatpak website about
it, I still don't
Hello Peter,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:39:41 +1300 Peter wrote:
> On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote:
> Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single
> binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't
> use that text
On 21/11/17 19:55, wwp wrote:
Maybe. Unpacking the rpm works, anyway, I never encountered a single
binary issue since I use it like that (ordinary use, I probably don't
use that text encoding or whatever submodule which depends on a newer
libstdc++).
Please
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 19:22:19 -0600 Robert Nichols
wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
> >>
> >>> On
On 11/20/2017 07:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
There's the unstable version that installs and works:
https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
On 11/20/17 03:44, wwp wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
>
>> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
>>> There's the unstable version that installs and works:
>>> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
>>
>> Thanks for pointing this
On 21/11/17 02:21, milos.blazevic wrote:
> Judging by the comments in the original announcement:
> https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/skype/forum/skype_linux-skype_startms-skype_installms/the-new-skype-for-desktop-is-here/dba5e41b-126a-4221-9e28-e1266d235689?auth=1
> I'd say yes.
>
> Sadly, no
Quoting Peter :
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
There's the unstable version that installs and works:
https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly
Hello,
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 12:58:21 +1300 Peter wrote:
> On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> > There's the unstable version that installs and works:
> > https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
>
> Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
>
On 20/11/17 11:30, milos.blazevic wrote:
> There's the unstable version that installs and works:
> https://www.skype.com/en/insider/
Thanks for pointing this out, it looks like they removed the newer
GLIBCXX requirement that was added for 8.10, possibly due to popular demand?
Peter
Quoting ken :
For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable
Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for
package:
Maybe try flatpak version? there should be no problems with dependencies
there... :)
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 7:02 PM, ken wrote:
> For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
>
> Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
>
For about a week now yum has tried and failed to update skypeforlinux:
Packages skipped because of dependency problems:
skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64 from skype-stable
Processing Dependency: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.20)(64bit) for
package: skypeforlinux-8.10.0.4-1.x86_64
Is there any
16 matches
Mail list logo