On 16.04.2015 04:15, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:00 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 4/15/2015 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mostly I'm interested in avoiding surprises and having code that isn't
married to the weirdness of any particular version of any
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
No, systemd actually remaps /tmp from apache - and apparently most
other daemons - to private directories below /tmp with configs as
shipped. The command line tool wrote the file to /tmp as expected.
The
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:44:21AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
The issue here really isn't systemd or the PrivateTmp feature but the
fact that some applications don't properly distinguish between temporary
files and
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 07:44:21AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
The issue here really isn't systemd or the PrivateTmp feature but the
fact that some applications don't properly distinguish between temporary
files and data files.
Maybe, but if an application wants a private directory for
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:52:16PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mostly I'm interested in avoiding surprises and having code that isn't
married to the weirdness of any particular version of any particular
distribution. And I found this to be pretty surprising, given that I
That's always
Is there a generic way that processes written to share files with
(say) apache in /tmp can figure out that they are running on an OS
with systemd and in that case, where the daemon in question thinks
/tmp is?
For example, twiki has a backup/restore add-in where the backup part
is normally done
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:31:52PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Thanks - I can see how those would work once you understand what is
broken on the target system and why, but is there a way that programs
'should' be written to run with/without systemd? That just happened
to be the first thing
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:15:23PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Why does this directory have to be /tmp rather than a specific
directory belonging to twiki?
Twiki is a perl web application run under apache. It doesn't
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 04:15:23PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Why does this directory have to be /tmp rather than a specific
directory belonging to twiki?
Twiki is a perl web application run under apache. It doesn't have its
own uid. It doesn't 'have' to be anywhere in particular but that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:00 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 4/15/2015 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mostly I'm interested in avoiding surprises and having code that isn't
married to the weirdness of any particular version of any particular
distribution. And I found this to be
On 4/15/2015 6:52 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mostly I'm interested in avoiding surprises and having code that isn't
married to the weirdness of any particular version of any particular
distribution. And I found this to be pretty surprising, given that I
could see the file in /tmp and could read
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:31:52PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Thanks - I can see how those would work once you understand what is
broken on the target system and why, but is there a way that programs
'should' be written
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:55:34PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there a generic way that processes written to share files with
(say) apache in /tmp can figure out that they are running on an OS
with systemd and in that case, where the daemon in question thinks
/tmp is?
For example, twiki
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:55:34PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Is there a generic way that processes written to share files with
(say) apache in /tmp can figure out that they are running on an OS
with systemd and in that
14 matches
Mail list logo
