We utilize Spacewalk and the errata from https://cefs.steve-meier.de/ to
provide this function for CentOS.
Andrea
-Original Message-
From: CentOS On Behalf Of Jon Pruente
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2020 7:08 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: {EXTERNAL} Re: [CentOS] yum update
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:02 PM Eric Chennells
wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I
> believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating
> around google that suggests it does.
>
> Well it's just that many enterprises
On Nov 13, 2020, at 19:01, Eric Chennells wrote:
>
> Frank,
>
> Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I
> believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating
> around google that suggests it does.
>
> Well it's just that many enterprises
Frank,
Interesting thank you I didn't realize that. It used to be supported I
believe, and there is a lot of out of date 3rd party documentation floating
around google that suggests it does.
Well it's just that many enterprises have policies which state that only
security updates should be
On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:52:08 -0800
Eric Chennells wrote:
> Does anyone know what's going on here?
That is unsupported by Centos. So the short answer is, you can't do that.
Any particular reason you can't just update your system fully?
--
Can we uninstall 2020 and install it again? This one
Hello,
I'm trying to do a yum update and only apply the security patches.
I'm aware of yum update --security , however when I do that it fails to
install any updates. I've tried this on a fresh 7.8.2003 (core) system, as
well as the Centos 7 AMI on AWS, specifically ami-04a25c39dc7a8aebb and I
On 25/1/20 11:56 am, Anthony K wrote:
[0]: https://anindya.me/2011/09/17/grub-fallback-after-kernel-panic/
I've just discovered that the article I posted is a rather old post so
went hunting.
If you have a RHEL subscription (I'm using the free developer
subscription) you can see the
On 23/1/20 12:44 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
...
As I will probably only have one chance to fix this (without having to get the
ISP's help again) I was wondering if there are any clear instructions on how to
remove a failed kernel RPM update, returning the server to the state it was in
prior to
On Thursday 23 January 2020 15:22:32 Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
> >
> > Before you try the update again, you'll have to fix the reason for the
> > failure - add memory, or at least add a swap file.
> >
> > You could check with
> > rpm -qa --last | head -20
> > which the latest packages are
> On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns
>> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the
>> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover
>> from this would be greatly
On 1/22/20 3:57 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out
> it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and
> things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be
> greatly
> I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns
> out it was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the
> middle and things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from
> this would be greatly appreciated
I may sound old school but my
I have managed to find out what happened in the yum update and it turns out it
was a mess. It looks like the server ran out of memory in the middle and
things then started to fail. Any advice on how to recover from this would be
greatly appreciated
The log below shows:
[root@vps2 ~]# yum
I have a VPS running C7. I ran a 'yum update' which included a kernel update.
The yum update wasn't a total success because mariadb updates failed. However
everything else appeared to work.
However, when I rebooted the server it did not restart. I have managed to get
the ISP's support desk to
I'm doing
yum update
in CentOS 7 since some 10 hours.
Last terminal message is:
Updating : gitlab-ci-multi-runner-9.5.1-1.x86_64
ps aux:
root 15296 0.3 2.5 1554608 204988 pts/0 S+ 06:23 2:01
/usr/bin/python /bin/yum update
to kill yum is not a good idea. Alternative?
for what
Thanks for the explanation.
Yes, I see both of these lines, including systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.4.x86_64, but as quoted it also
has the label "removed" - that had me confused.
'yum info systemd-sysv' shows that systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.1 is installed - as expected. And if I
run the actual
On 11/06/2017 01:01 PM, Thomas Roth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> when I check for updates with yum, it gives me a list of packages, with
> some additional info, e.g.
>
> --> systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.1.x86_64 from @updates removed (updateinfo)
> --> systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.4.x86_64 from updates
Hi all,
when I check for updates with yum, it gives me a list of packages, with some
additional info, e.g.
--> systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.1.x86_64 from @updates removed (updateinfo)
--> systemd-sysv-219-42.el7_4.4.x86_64 from updates removed (updateinfo)
yum info will tell me that I have
While you may have them disabled _now_ at some point they were enabled and so a
conflicting package was installed and is now causing the issue.
- On 26 Sep, 2017, at 05:23, Gary Stainburn g...@ringways.co.uk wrote:
| On Tuesday 26 September 2017 11:56:06 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
|> The error
On Tuesday 26 September 2017 15:32:50 Leon Fauster wrote:
> Sorry to be pedantic, the symptom is fixed not the problem.
>
> To check which packages are from atrpms try this one:
>
> # rpm -qa --qf '%{NAME}-%{VENDOR}\n' | grep -v CentOS
>
> It will list package name along with the corresponding
> Am 26.09.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Gary Stainburn :
>
> On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote:
>> On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>> You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You
>>> need to remove that package and/or
On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:27:43 Mark Haney wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You
> > need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past
> > the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is
On 09/26/2017 09:23 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You
need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past
the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this
situation nor will any other set of yum
On Tuesday 26 September 2017 14:23:46 James B. Byrne wrote:
> You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You
> need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past
> the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this
> situation nor will any
You have a conflicting package installed from repository @atrpms. You
need to remove that package and/or disable that repository to get past
the dependency issue. 'Skip broken' is not going to handle this
situation nor will any other set of yum options.
On Tue, September 26, 2017 05:32, Gary
On Tuesday 26 September 2017 11:56:06 Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> The error is actually pretty straight forward. You are using a repo
> (atrpms) that has not been updated in years, it's not surprise that it
> finally has lost compatibility with the platform.
>
> Find a modern and up to date
-Original Message-
From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Stainburn
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 3:32 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] yum update problem - dependancy problem
> For a while I've been updating using the command
>
> yum
I'm sure this is a FAQ, and a simple answer is available, but I've not managed
it yet. I've tried all of the RPM database tidy routines. I've tried
uninstalling the libblueray1 library but the ever growning dependency tree
was too big.
For a while I've been updating using the command
yum
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Peter Kjellström wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:16:06 -0500 (EST)
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr
updates applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a
bunch of deps.
...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:16:06 -0500 (EST)
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr
> updates applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a
> bunch of deps.
...
> ==
>
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:30 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response.
No problem
> Hummm, According to the changelog your version of lvm2 is over a year old.
>
Yes, it was a test vm server not recently updated.
>
> So I guess what I am trying to figure out is
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed response.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:16 PM, wrote:
Hi,
I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr updates
applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a bunch of deps.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:16 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr updates
> applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a bunch of deps.
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
>
Hi,
I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr updates
applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a bunch of deps.
Dependencies Resolved
==
Package Arch Version
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> Right. And I do want to point out, this list is really not the place to
> discuss the positives and negatives of systemd vs. upstart vs. SysV.
> The goal of CentOS is to build RHEL source code with the absolute
> minimum changes required for branding. So, we get the init
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>>> is
>>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them
>>>
On Fri, May 6, 2016 8:46 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 08:38 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere.
This
On 05/06/2016 08:38 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>>> is
>>> not intended to start the new one, but to help
On Fri, May 6, 2016 3:13 am, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This
>> is
>> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them
>> to
>> define their statute.
>>
On Fri, May 6, 2016 04:36, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2016, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
>> What I didn't expect, and what really threw me was that this has
>> been implemented via a simply 'yum update' of an existing system,
>> not at a major release level.
>
>
> Something like RHEL is stuck
On 05/06/2016 05:45 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/06/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>> Me again,
>>
>> Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
>> showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
>>
>> [root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt
On 05/06/2016 03:30 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> Me again,
>
> Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
> showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
>
> [root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt localp...@example.com
> 2016-05-06 09:27:04 WARNING:
On Fri, 6 May 2016, Gary Stainburn wrote:
What I didn't expect, and what really threw me was that this has been
implemented via a simply 'yum update' of an existing system, not at a major
release level.
journald has been there since you installed C7.
You appear to have seen a change in
Me again,
Another problem I've found since doing my yum update is that EXIM is now
showing the following error, on startup, and repeatedly in main.log
[root@ollie2 ~]# exim -bt localp...@example.com
2016-05-06 09:27:04 WARNING: purging the environment.
Suggested action: use keep_environment
On Thursday 05 May 2016 17:16:17 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> There were several heated discussions on this list, and elsewhere. This is
> not intended to start the new one, but to help someone who missed them to
> define their statute.
>
> People split into two groups:
>
> Opponents of systemd (,
On Thu, 5 May 2016, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Another change to my Centos 7.2 system since my 'yum update' yesterday is
that /var/log/dovecot is no longer written to.
If I do 'systemctl status dovecot' I can see log entries. How can I now do
the equiv or 'tail -f '
Also, why has this changed, and
Me again,
Another change to my Centos 7.2 system since my 'yum update' yesterday is
that /var/log/dovecot is no longer written to.
If I do 'systemctl status dovecot' I can see log entries. How can I now do the
equiv or 'tail -f '
Also, why has this changed, and where is it documented?
I have just run a 'yum update' on a Centos 7.2 server which updated several
hundred RPMs.
The update worked fine with no errors or warnings
I then rebooted the server and now my EXIM is rejecting emails because the
clamd service isn't running.
So I tried:
[root@ollie2 ~]# systemctl restart
On 03/16/2016 12:31 AM, John Cenile wrote:
Hello all,
When running yum update on a few of our servers, we get the following
errors:
[snip]
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/yum/rpmtrans.py", line 470, in
callback
self._scriptStop(bytes,
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 18:31:59 +1100
John Cenile wrote:
> When running yum update on a few of our servers, we get the following
> errors:
It appears that you're not running Centos, but rather Cloudlinux. Have you
checked with their technical support?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital
Hello all,
When running yum update on a few of our servers, we get the following
errors:
Running Transaction
Updating : openssl-1.0.1e-42.el6_7.4.x86_64
1/327
Updating : postgresql-libs-8.4.20-5.el6_7.cloudlinux.x86_64
2/327
Updating :
Hola,
Ya supe cual fue el problema, revise con un ps uax y vi que el proceso
de yum update estaba dormido (S+) lo que me parecio muy extraño, volvi a
correr ps pero ahora con tree y me arrojo lo siguiente:
4129 pts/0S+ 0:00 \_ /bin/sh
/sbin/service httpd
Hola a todos,
Quisiera hacer una pregunta, recien estoy actualizando mi Centos 6.6 con
yum pero se ha quedado en el proceso de Cleanup, no avanza, ya esta en
el ultimo paquete pero esto me ha detenido el apache y algunos otros
servicios, es recomendable detenerlo con Ctrl-c o tendre que
Hi anyone else having this problem?
Error: Package: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.021-136.el6.x86_64 (@base)
Requires: perl = 4:5.10.1-136.el6
Removing: 4:perl-5.10.1-136.el6.x86_64 (@base)
perl = 4:5.10.1-136.el6
Updated By:
On 12/02/2014 10:55 AM, Rob Kampen wrote:
Hi anyone else having this problem?
Error: Package: perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.021-136.el6.x86_64 (@base)
Requires: perl = 4:5.10.1-136.el6
Removing: 4:perl-5.10.1-136.el6.x86_64 (@base)
perl = 4:5.10.1-136.el6
On Tue, September 30, 2014 10:07, ken wrote:
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos
5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4.
Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on
the second machine include: gcc, httpd,
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos
5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4.
Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on
the second machine include: gcc, httpd, kernel-2.6.18-398.el5, and
probably a couple
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, ken wrote:
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos 5.10, one
of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4. Packages which
were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on the second machine
include: gcc, httpd,
On Tue, September 30, 2014 9:07 am, ken wrote:
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos
5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4.
Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get updated on
the second machine include: gcc,
On 09/30/2014 12:00 PM Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Tue, September 30, 2014 9:07 am, ken wrote:
Just doing yum update on two machines (and only two), both centos
5.10, one of them updated something like 22 packages, the other just 4.
Packages which were updated on the first, but didn't get
Hi folks,
on CentOS 6.5 I run tripwire software which verifies data integrity. My
system is automatically updated by yum (as far as I understand the
/etc/cron.daily/0yum.cron is responsible for the regular system
updates). After a system update I'm then notified by tripwire about the
changes
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Meikel wrote:
By browsing those tripwire reports I found that there are files which
did not change at all (i.e. the MD5 hash is the same as before) but the
inode changed. I do not understand what yum did to the file that
resulted in an inode change,
Meikel,
Aside from the stupid way:
create a file org_name
copy it to new_name
rm org_name
mv new_name org_name
I don't know of a way to change inode
and keep md5 the same.
Does anyone know of a way?
This would be the perfect question for this forum.
GKH
Hi folks,
on CentOS 6.5 I run
On 2014-08-22, GKH x...@darksmile.net wrote:
Aside from the stupid way:
create a file org_name
copy it to new_name
rm org_name
mv new_name org_name
I don't know of a way to change inode
and keep md5 the same.
If the bug that Matthew cited is involved, then that's likely very much
what
On 6.5, I've got openswan installed, but yum update is wanting to install
libreswan.
If libreswan is intended to replace openswan, wouldn't the appropriate yum
transactions have been created to remove opnswan first?
I'm stumped. Advice appreciated.
Fred
--
On 2014-02-05, Fred Smith fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us wrote:
On 6.5, I've got openswan installed, but yum update is wanting to install
libreswan.
If libreswan is intended to replace openswan, wouldn't the appropriate yum
transactions have been created to remove opnswan first?
I'm stumped.
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 20:32 -0800, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: December 4, 2013 15:09
From: Frank Cox Sent: December 4, 2013 15:04
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800 Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
That
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.com wrote:
That happened yesterday and I can not recall specifically what it said.
I am currently in the process of backing up the hard drive before
proceeding any further. I will see if I can get the error a little
later today.
From: Louis Lagendijk Sent: December 5, 2013 13:37
Try package-cleanup --problems and see what it returns
package-cleanup --cleandupes may helps with removal of duplicates
I jut finished cleaning it all up. It took a while and I ended up with
having to manually identify and delete a bout 40
Hi All:
I am having problems with a CentOS 6.4 box that I was in the process
of doing a yum update to 6.5. Unfortunately the system hung during
the update and I was forced to reboot it and it is now a bit of a mess.
Can someone point me in the direction of any documentation that would
assist in
On 12/04/2013 11:34 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Hi All:
I am having problems with a CentOS 6.4 box that I was in the process
of doing a yum update to 6.5. Unfortunately the system hung during
the update and I was forced to reboot it and it is now a bit of a mess.
Can someone point me in
FromJitse Klomp Sent: December 4, 2013 14:47
On 12/04/2013 11:34 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
I am having problems with a CentOS 6.4 box that I was in the process
of doing a yum update to 6.5. Unfortunately the system hung during
the update and I was forced to reboot it and it is now a
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800
Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
From: Frank Cox Sent: December 4, 2013 15:04
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800 Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
That happened yesterday and I can not recall specifically what it said.
I am currently in the process of backing up the hard drive before
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: December 4, 2013 15:09
From: Frank Cox Sent: December 4, 2013 15:04
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 14:55:03 -0800 Hugh E Cruickshank wrote:
Tried that but it failed.
Describe failed.
That happened yesterday and I can not recall specifically what it
said. I am
Though I've used it countless times in the past, yum update
--skip-broken doesn't work anymore... it doesn't skip over updates
which have dependency problems. Is this a known issue? Is there a
work-around for it? Has anyone else experienced this?
tnx.
Keep in mind that --skip-broken lets you bypass a problem, but the problem
still exists. If you miss enough updates, you will get breakage.
If you have conflicting repositories enabled that cause --skip-broken to be
needed and you use it regularly, you're asking for problems.
On Mon, Nov 4,
ken wrote:
Though I've used it countless times in the past, yum update
--skip-broken doesn't work anymore... it doesn't skip over updates
which have dependency problems. Is this a known issue? Is there a
work-around for it? Has anyone else experienced this?
One thing that provokes that, in
Hi All.
I've updated my system from 6.3 to 6.4. In my /etc/yum.repos.depel.repo I
have:
[epel]
name=Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux - $basearch
#baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/6/$basearch
mirrorlist=
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-6arch=$basearch
If you change this you will have to do a `yum clean all`
From: Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.com
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 4:52 AM
Subject: [CentOS] yum update after update from 6.3 to 6.4 - problems
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is
picking up the the 6.4 base repo
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 09:30:40PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't recall ever seeing the base repo change; it is almost like it is
picking up the the 6.4 base repo instead.
That's exactly what it's doing. The /6 base and update repository
always point to the latest version. 6.4 was
On 03/10/2013 09:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.03.2013 02:30, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
I am being hit on a number of my systems with yum update reporting 270+
rpms to update, and MOST are coming from the base repo. I checked a few
out, and yes, they are of a higher release.
I don't
I usually use a Desktop option when installing a new machine. This
gives me all I need for an X session and then I add other packages or
grouplists on an as-needed basis.
I'm putting together a couple of machines that will not have network
connectivity until all packages are installed. Is
I'm thinking I found the answer in the Centos-Media repo.
sorry, I overlooked that originally.
steve campbell
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Steve Campbell campb...@cnpapers.comwrote:
I usually use a Desktop option when installing a new machine. This
gives me all I need for an X session and then I add other packages or
grouplists on an as-needed basis.
I'm putting together a couple of machines
Hi folks
bit of an odd one
over the last few days i have been getting
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server error
Could not retrieve mirrorlist
http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=5arch=i386repo=updates error
was
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error
(though not just with
Hello,
we have several physical servers (CentOS 5.*) with rather critical applications
where (because of stability)
we don't do regularly 'yum update'. In virtualized environemnts (under Vmware)
we do a snapshot, then 'yum update', reboot and if something is wrong we
rollback the snapshot.
On
On 06/22/2012 09:42 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
Hello,
we have several physical servers (CentOS 5.*) with rather critical
applications where (because of stability)
we don't do regularly 'yum update'. In virtualized environemnts (under Vmware)
we do a snapshot, then 'yum update', reboot
On 22/6/2012 2:06 μμ, Theo Band wrote:
What is your best practise regarding rollbacking 'yum update' on
physical servers ?
Assuming that you have problems due to a particular newly-installed
package, you can downgrade:
rpm -Uvh --oldpackage package-2.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
or:
yum downgrade
On 06/22/2012 01:58 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
I am interested on other solutions too, so your thread is interesting!
dump
Assuming some form of ext[n] filesystem is being used. It has the
advantage that is also works with incremental backups. You can dump the
root file system and perhaps also
On 10/02/12 10:50, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
Running Transaction
Updating : selinux-policy
1/6
Updating : kmod-r8168
2/6
Working. This may take some time ...
An hour later, still working...
Wow. These kmods can take quite some time to update/install in yum,
On 10/02/12 10:50, John Doe wrote:
Hi,
Running Transaction
Updating : selinux-policy
1/6
Updating : kmod-r8168
2/6
Working. This may take some time ...
An hour later, still
Hi,
Running Transaction
Updating : selinux-policy 1/6
Updating : kmod-r8168 2/6
Working. This may take some time ...
An hour later, still working...
S+ 10:51 0:08 | \_
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
Should I wait or can I just ctrl-c, reset the usb_storage module to clean up
and
retry yum update?
Never mind, it did end after a while...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
I have had very little problems with yum and it's updates, but this one
has me stumped (CentOS 5.4):
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: mirrors.loosefoot.com
* extras: yum.singlehop.com
* rpmforge: apt.sw.be
* updates:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank M. Ramaekers said the following on 21/12/11 21:54:
Error: Missing Dependency: perl(Compress::Raw::Zlib) = 2.024 is needed by
package perl-IO-Compress-2.024-1.el5.rf.noarch (installed)
You could try using --skip-broken to work around the
Thanks! That did the trick.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Luigi Rosa
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:58 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Yum update woes (perl
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of action? Logical would be to
downgrade perl to the one from ISO
On 12/20/2011 03:55 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I finally started yum upgrade for CentOS 6.0+CR x86_64.
yum reports that I have already installed
perl-5.10.1-119.el6_1.1,
but perl-CGI requests for
perl-5.10.1-119.el6 from ISO/base repo.
Can someone advise on the best course of
1 - 100 of 452 matches
Mail list logo