On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:09 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First thing that comes to mind is DNS;
Has your DNS servers changed and you have them hardcoded
in /etc/resolv.conf or similar ?
Nope - no such file.
Are the seamonkey/firefox browsers going through a proxy ?
Nope - direct
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:09 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First thing that comes to mind is DNS;
Has your DNS servers changed and you have them hardcoded
in /etc/resolv.conf or similar ?
Nope - no such file.
Are the seamonkey/firefox browsers going through a proxy
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 11:54 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
3 possible scenarios:
1) DNS not properly configured
Make sure your resolv.conf is properly configured, if you are doing
DHCP look into having your resolv.conf set through it, if you are
using PPPOE you can have the ppp daemon
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 11:54 -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
3 possible scenarios:
1) DNS not properly configured
Make sure your resolv.conf is properly configured, if you are doing
DHCP look into having your resolv.conf set through it, if you are
using PPPOE you
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:48:19 -0800
James A. Peltier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope - no such file.
Are the seamonkey/firefox browsers going through a proxy ?
Nope - direct connect.
Have you disabled ipv6 in Firefox? It's a well know behaviour of
Firefox.
about:config
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007 12:06 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no /etc/resolv.conf means no DNS name resolution. are you SURE of
this? its `resolv` without an e.
Yeah - I need new glasses
Thanks.
If you are doing pppoe (which I think you
On Nov 12, 2007 9:58 PM, Mark Hull-Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I go back to my CentOS SeaMonkey and clear the cache and the history.
I'm not sure what else to do, though, because that didn't solve the problem,
and Firefox is as slow as my SeaMonkey.
Any suggestions? Are there
Mark Hull-Richter wrote:
I have ATT (formerly SBC) DSL for my primary internet
connection here, and tonight it has been exceptionally,
extraordinarily S - L - O - W Pages that normally load
in, at most, seconds, are taking several minutes to locate,
even common, frequent access
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:44:48 -0800
Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
selectively deleting
cnn.com cookies (in order of my guess at their usefulness from least
toward most) eventually revived it.
Why not delete them all? cnn.com seems to work fine without being allowed to
set cookies on
--- Frank Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:44:48 -0800
Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
selectively deleting
cnn.com cookies (in order of my guess at their
usefulness from least
toward most) eventually revived it.
Why not delete them all? cnn.com seems to
On Nov 13, 2007 11:46 AM, Steven Vishoot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the problem is between keyboard and chair. :-D
Yeah, my blasted watch is keeping too accurate time these days
;^)
No, wait! I have GOT to stop handling those bits manually!
;^)
Thanks for the good thoughts!
mhr
- Original Message -
From: Mark Hull-Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 3:58:01 PM (GMT+1000) Australia/Brisbane
Subject: [CentOS] OT: Slow browsers or slow connections?
I have ATT (formerly SBC) DSL for my primary
12 matches
Mail list logo
