On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:11 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
The only reason for me to keep maintaining the dkms packages, would be
for those people not running supported kernels
JohnS wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:11 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
The only reason for me to keep maintaining the dkms packages, would be
for those people not running supported kernels
Ned Slider wrote on 09/16/2009 06:12 AM:
...
That tends to change as the drivers move forward over time, older cards
become legacy and are no longer supported by the latest driver.
For a list of cards supported by the latest driver, the user is better
off referring to nvidia's
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
Ned Slider wrote on 09/16/2009 06:12 AM:
...
That tends to change as the drivers move forward over time, older cards
become legacy and are no longer supported by the latest driver.
For a list of cards supported by the latest
lostson wrote on 09/16/2009 08:23 AM:
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
...
In the doc we have been toying with the finding the correct driver is
in there.
Yes, I see it in the draft - just suggesting ideas to beef it up.
Phil
P.S. [soapbox]Trimming quotes to the
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:39:23AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
Could those that are trying out the kmod driver please report what
video card model you have. Would be nice to have a good list of the
Legacy and Newer Cards.
For what it is worth, I'll take the lazy man's way out and just send it
here.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
b...@silverbullet.dk wrote:
Hi
username: MartinBoel
Please grant me access.
Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
and don't just add the one line from your first mail (which will
break, when the box is
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
b...@silverbullet.dk wrote:
Hi
username: MartinBoel
Please grant me access.
Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
and don't
Christoph Maser wrote:
Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
totally outdated and covers way to much info how to configure nagios
itself. In my opinion this should be simply replaced by links to the
official documentation since it is out of place and
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Maser c...@financial.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
b...@silverbullet.dk wrote:
Hi
username: MartinBoel
Please grant me access.
Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial and
it receives several hundred hits each month. Its also the second result
in Google if you search for install nagios
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial
and it receives several hundred hits each month. Its also the second
result in
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Christoph Maser c...@financial.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial
On 09/16/2009 06:44 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
I've not read your guide, but perhaps both could be united to make one
that's current and suitable for everyone's needs. Just a thought too. :)
How about splitting it up into 'Install Guide' and a 'Recommended first
steps'.
Having used Nagios ( or
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 20:05 +0200 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
On 09/16/2009 06:44 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
I've not read your guide, but perhaps both could be united to make one
that's current and suitable for everyone's needs. Just a thought too. :)
How about splitting it up into 'Install
Karanbir Singh wrote:
How about splitting it up into 'Install Guide' and a 'Recommended first
steps'.
Having used Nagios ( or does Nagios use us ? ) I know there are a
million different ways to set things up. And only a few people really
need to get down and understand eveyrthing about
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:50:41PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
and don't just add the one line from your first mail (which will
break, when the box is relabeled).
Ralph
Btw. i really consider the current nagios
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:27:42PM -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
Christoph Maser wrote:
Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
totally outdated and covers way to much info how to configure nagios
itself. In my opinion this should be simply replaced by links to
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
This one?
http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on_CentOS_5
This is what i really think it should like!
You're serious? That's
Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
This one?
http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on_CentOS_5
This is what i really think it should
20 matches
Mail list logo
