Dear Russ.
Why not granting Edit rights (and I mean full Edit Group Access) to
anyone who has already contributed good stuff.
Then there should be something like a Wiki Admin group which will
track changes and correct them || start discussion on the MLs if
necessary.
because creating a
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Brian Mathis
brian.mathis+centosd...@gmail.com wrote:
What you currently have is the lock model, and with few admins the
idea of opening up the system seems like a bad one because those
admins will need to deal with all those errors, but this is not the
case.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Marcus Moeller m...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
the right to fix errors in articles
There are around 80 people who have that right *right now*.
Ralph
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Will Fitch w...@phpfever.com wrote:
Dear Russ.
It's not about creating problems but finding solutions. If no one has
the right to fix errors in articles and if every minor change has to
be discussed over and over again on the ML, it's the dead of a vital
wiki.
+1
-20
This continuing drama is beginning to remind me of the Miller Great taste,
less filling commercials of old (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_Lite)...
It's the same damn beer/CentOS people! ;) [?]
347.png___
CentOS-docs mailing list
From: Ralph Angenendt, Friday, October 02, 2009 6:11 AM
We already have 70 people who would be able to do so (no idea how
many of these accounts are still in use). Do I see those going over
pages? Rarely, it's nearly always the same persons.
I'm OK with helping to update/maintain the wiki.
