be
possible to just use git workflow on html files to modify/update/remove
content as needed (interim solution)
Kind Regards,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | @arrfab[@fosstodon.org]
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
at during the migration process, the wiki instance will
not be available.
Thanks for your comprehending and patience.
on behalf of the Infra team,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
the theme you can see on the staging
instance.
Kind Regards,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
C
changes to a branch to your fork
- open a PR (Pull Request) against master artwork repository
Then someone with direct right from sig-artwork can merge your request
in the main artwork git repo
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
.centos.org to a new
platform, so people with accounts on our side would then be able to use
the usual PR git worflow to contribute.
Does that answer your question ?
PS : not following the -docs list closely, so I only saw your mail ..
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.
esign level ?
What about the common banner we use almost everywhere, including wiki ?
Just my two cents, but (also just my opinion) some of the new ones
aren't really looking good (including for the centos logo on top not
being displayed correctly as with some kind of "white on white")
Coordinator: Fabian Arrotin
Coordinator email: arr...@centos.org
Secondary contact: Karanbir Singh
Secondary email: kbsi...@centos.org
Description:
The CentOS Project is a community-driven free software effort focused
around the goal of providing a rich base platform for open source
communities to build
ould then meet the "content management via automation" requirement. Or
do we have to also investigate directly another solution (like
mediawiki) and so migration ?
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
On 22/01/18 10:20, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 18/01/18 16:10, Charlie Drage wrote:
>> I had a bit of trouble git cloning the website since the repository URL
>> portion isn't filled in,
>> see: https://git.centos.org/summary/?r=websites/centos.org.git
>>
>>
etc ..
Let me see why it was decided to have it public but not "clonable" with
the involved folks and I'll keep the list informed
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | https://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/12/17 17:25, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:00 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arr...@centos.org
> <mailto:arr...@centos.org>> wrote:
>
> it's all in the title : what's next for wiki.centos.org
> <http://wiki.centos.org> ?
>
> As a
ance using ACO works fine. (but that's a different thread)
We should divide all parts into specific areas. Benefits of using .md
means being able to switch to something else even later and not be tied
to $yet_another_tool to generate the web part. (just my idea)
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS
(even if mkdocs.org , simple solution with
Markdown, combined with git would be perfect for me) but just wanted to
start a dedicated thread so that we can think about the future of
wiki.centos.org
Opinions ? Proposals ? anything else ? Fee free to comment :-)
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project
a huge amount of
notifications, but at least some people on the list will get
notification when a git commit was done.
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ch kind of discussion for a
SIG (that hasn't been approved yet - still in proposal status - ) would
better fit on the centos-devel list, as centos-docs if for the wiki
itself, or other docs.
Kind Regards,
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @ar
uot;
> -n, --new-certGenerate a new CentOS Certificate". It would be
> nice if someone fix that typo or provide me edit permission to do so.
>
> https://wiki.centos.org/kumarpraveen
>
Thanks, instead of fixing the page, the centos-cert tool should be fixed ...
pinging
it appears that he
copied/paste content from original page into the SIGGuide one
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-d
team) if possible
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman
? Where to send a pull request, for example? Where can I add
> content to the main page and other sectors, links?
It's a long debate/discussion. You can read the last attempt around this
in the following thread :
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2016-March/005908.html
Cheers,
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of CentOS-docs digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>1. Re: discussions around upstream documentation (Jim Perrin)
>2. Re: Request to contribute to wiki page (CentOS) (Fabi
On 12/05/16 10:00, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 12/05/16 06:12, Partners wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We have received the subscription notification.
>> Following is the information required to contribute to the wiki page:
>>
>> Username: PacktPublishing
>> Subje
are
those books under CC-by-SA license and so fully/freely available somewhere ?
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-docs ma
eople can submit PR to)
While personally I don't mind switching to something using git in the
workflow, I'm wondering if such tool shouldn't be used instead to target
"official" docs under centos.org/docs and not the wiki. (both can be
complement
On 22/03/16 10:21, François Cami wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Manuel Wolfshant
> <wo...@nobugconsulting.ro> wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 09:30 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was having a look at that page, and
uptream documentation
( - except for subscription manager - ) can be applied to CentOS and so
having link from that section to https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/
Ideas, thoughts, comments ?
--
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
a lot for your contribution to the wiki :-)
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlZNv+wACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6siQCeMEhJBAMRcqqk8NyNxt2wVBac
N28An1fTgXZfAd/LK5a8I
the $lang page itself. That "issue" itself has to
be considered, but also the fact that the navi_bar can't be extended
to infinity either (moin suggests no more than 6 items in that
navi_bar, for readability purposes)
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key
the FAS solution coming soon (I really hope so, as everything is
now ready for a "deploy to prod" soon [TM]), it would make sense to
see if moin can use it as authentication source too.
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
--
(on git.centos.org)
Is that possible to have an overview of the infra and goals (aka the
architecture) of this GSoC doc project ? that would help
understanding, as I agree that I'm currently lost, and I'm probably
not the only one, also the reason for that thread :-)
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project
be in favor of either finding a solution (involving
lawyers) or just getting rid of that /docs (as it doesn't look nice in
the current state)
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU
directly ?
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlTZpY4ACgkQnVkHo1a+xU51RACglawiL2fuaRPKX+CzH8dszwM1
/HUAnjKTkNL/HPDj6c30+rbAO6ps+cue
=BvY2
-END PGP
have two choices :
* delete the link in the master page (easier/faster)
* try to resurrect that Newsletter (harder)
I'd vote myself for #1
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22
it ? redireting to
http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup (as now most of the things
outside of Core happens through SIGs)
Searching for opinions ..
- --
Fabian Arrotin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22
) :-)
- --
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlQrj9YACgkQnVkHo1a+xU6wUwCfXVKK3kX2DKe0b7CPcdQWhXz9
eoIAn00PwNTJXnGQfTy+SyypLfpf+y5E
=kRHz
-END PGP SIGNATURE
using a strange DNS resolver overriding our TTL (we had that
issue for the lists.centos.org move) will be aware of the migration.
And, as quoted from a saying, if you have something to say, say it
now or never ! :-)
Cheers,
- --
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
-BEGIN PGP
PS : we've just added a basic auth to block some search engines from
crawling/indexing that wiki instance, and have duplicate pages indexed.
Happy testing !
--
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS
On 03/09/14 11:10, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
snip
http://wikitesting.centos.org
PS : we've just added a basic auth to block some search engines from
crawling/indexing that wiki instance, and have duplicate pages indexed.
And replying to myself, in case people would not see it in the auth box
On 03/09/14 13:33, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Hi nice people interested in CentOS Docs and wiki !
Can I ask all of you to do some intensive tests around that test
instance please ?
So far it seems to work (editing page, login, reset
On 03/09/14 14:19, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 03/09/14 13:33, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Hi nice people interested in CentOS Docs and wiki !
Can I ask all of you to do some intensive tests around that test
instance please ?
So far
On 03/09/14 14:27, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 02:19:09PM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
On 03/09/14 13:33, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
Hi nice people interested in CentOS Docs and wiki !
The data on that testing
.
My wiki ID is: patrickmslatteryvt
Thanks, Patrick M. Slattery
I've normally added you on the ACL so can you check please ?
--
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http
page (there is a typo).
My username is JulienPivotto
Thank you.
Hi Julien,
Can you verify it's working now ?
Cheers,
--
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http
,
The Newsletter initiative is actually dead (from a content perpective)
: do you plan to resurrect it ? :-)
As the page says , you have to be added to the Newslettergroup, and I'm
not able to add you in that group, so we have to wait for a wiki admin
to do that.
Cheers,
--
Fabian Arrotin
gpg key
Hi documentation team,
As CentOS 6 is now being released to the mirrors, it would be a good
time to think about putting the accurate documentation on
http://www.centos.org/docs
Red Hat changed their documentation license in the past and they are now
using the CC-by-SA license.
My own
mail so .. ;-)
If i follow your conclusions on planet.centos.org , my blog feed needs
also to be removed (because i'm a contributor and not a 'developer') ..
--
--
Fabian Arrotin
idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain`
test -z $idea echo sorry, init 6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh
it installs my key, the
one from fabian and the one from dries
Akemi
Hmm, which is not exact : my key appearead only in
rpmforge-release-0.4.0-1 (still tagged as Test and so not available on
the rpmforge mirror) Something to be fixed ! ;-)
--
--
Fabian Arrotin
idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain
/Extras/Moin/ ` ?
--
--
Fabian Arrotin
idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain`
test -z $idea echo sorry, init 6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
kind of draft maybe) and then Ralph (aka the Wiki Master) can change the
ACLs on the newly created page for your topic ..
Welcome :D
--
--
Fabian Arrotin
idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain` ; test -z $idea echo sorry, init
6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh
it. However I think it looks
fine, even when the screenshot could be improved. (Although we should not
make the screenshot too complex)
--
-
Fabian Arrotin fabian.arro...@arrfab.net
Internet network currently down, TCP/IP packets delivered now by
UPS/Fedex
/design is protected or not ?
--
Fabian Arrotin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solution ?
echo '16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlbxq' | dc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs
50 matches
Mail list logo
